US How Estrangement Has Become an Epidemic in America - The hyper-partisan politics in the shadow of the 2024 election is breaking the bonds of families to a greater extent than ever before.

1.png
Getty Images

He’s a father of a 28-year-old son and he’s hurting. A retired police officer, he proudly voted for Donald Trump every time he ran and never hid his political beliefs from his family. “My son and his wife say that since I’m a fan of Trump they’re no fan of mine and cut me off,” he said. “Now I can’t see my only grandchild who I was so close to. It’s crazy and it’s tragic.”

It’s also increasingly common. The 2024 election spatchcocked the nation, widening a rift that was exposed in 2016 and put in an even sharper gulf four years later. Now, the hyper-partisan politics in the shadow of the 2024 election is breaking the bonds of families to a greater extent than ever before.

Social psychologists have long understood that merely identifying with a group in competitive contexts can lead people to view those outside the group less favorably. Historically, those dividing lines were differences like religion, race and ethnicity, age, and gender. Today, political affiliation is the most significant determinant of this us-them division, research shows. Furthermore, affective polarization makes “belongers” feel justified in treating those in the opposing party with disdain, contempt, and even hostility.

As a psychologist who specializes in family estrangement (Coleman) and is a national public opinion researcher (Johnson), we wanted to more closely investigate the divisive effect of politics on family. To do so, we collaborated on a national survey of representative adults shortly after Election Day. We asked them if politics has altered their relationships with family and friends and, if so, whether they have limited or even severed all contact as a result. We also asked them what might reunite them. In addition, we reached out to clients who have experienced estrangement to share their stories, without invading family privacy by naming them.

We found that estrangement is becoming an epidemic. 

According to our research, today, 1 in 2 adults is estranged from a close relative. While the primary cause of these rifts is often tied to something a relative said or did, 1 in 5 directly cite political differences as the reason. Among those estranged over politics, nearly half report that the break occurred within the past year, with 1 in 7 stating it happened as recently as the month leading into the election. These disconnections often involve severing all communication, including through intermediaries, and blocking the relative on social media.

Even within intact families, the divisive influence of politics is keenly felt. One-third of American adults report feeling uncomfortable at a family gathering in the past year because of a relative's political views. Similarly, a third express concern that political disagreements could cast a shadow over future family events. 

There's little difference in frequency of estrangement by political beliefs or party affiliation, though it is much more common among adults under 35. They’re also the most likely to say that a relative has disturbed or upset them with their political beliefs at a recent family get-together. This divergence gap likely reflects a tendency of younger generations to prioritize relationships aligned with their own identities above ancestral links and to put their own mental wellbeing and personal growth ahead of family obligations.

We’ve seen families shatter publicly. Two days after Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger called for removing Trump from the presidency over his role in the 2021 storming of the Capitol, 11 members of his family released a letter they had mailed him in which they accused him of siding with “the devil’s army” and embarrassing the family name.

More often, the agony is experienced privately. A self-described “gay son of a Southern Baptist preacher” told us why he has shunned his father. Though he disagreed with his father’s viewpoints when he was young, he said he could respect his father’s “noble pursuit of moral purity” that underpinned them, only to see him back Trump. “If we can't agree that Donald Trump is uniquely unfit, I don't see how we could ever agree on anything meaningful. In short, I now no longer feel I can trust or respect my parents.”  

“Chosen families,” or close friends not directly related, can be shattered, too. A former teacher said she ended a 40-year friendship after her friend began pushing conspiracy theories about school shootings and railing against government assistance in the early months of the pandemic only to accept a loan herself. “The hypocrisy is just too much to deal with at this point in life, so I’m done with that,” she said. 

Based on our polling, most Americans would condemn the behavior of those who are cutting off family, whether they were triggered or not. Two-thirds of survey respondents agree that ending contact with a family member because of political beliefs is not justified and that most family fights over politics could be easily resolved. 

But is it that easy? Just over half of those who are estranged because of politics want to reconcile to some degree, and an apology from the relative or demonstrable change in their behavior may increase that potential. But most say reconnecting is unlikely, with 1 in 5 saying they never want to make up. Our survey shows that even a death in the family or an intervention by a relative isn’t enough to get most to resume contact.  

Family relationships may be more fraught today because they exist in what sociologist Zygmunt Bauman called “liquid culture,” a period characterized by rapidly changing norms and values. The traditional bonds and shared values that once unified individuals and families have eroded, leaving relationships more fragile and increasingly susceptible to the strains of political and cultural polarization. 

This suggests we may need to put in extra effort to take responsibility for our role in conflicts, show greater empathy for others’ values and perspectives, and steer clear of the futile pursuit of proving someone else wrong. 

We may also have to work harder to stay calm. Marital researcher John Gottman has found that when our heart rate exceeds 100 beats per minute, effective communication becomes nearly impossible. This physiological state, known as "flooding," triggers the body's fight-or-flight response, impairing the ability to process information. If you’re starting to feel agitated in a conversation, change the subject or take a break. And avoid trying to get even.

While this once applied only to those working in government and politics, increasingly family members feel compelled to declare their loyalties, too. Four more years of branding one another the enemy is likely to lead to even more estrangements.

But rather than to fall for the temptations and identities of division, we should do everything we can to work together. Not only for the sake of the American family, but for the survival as a nation.

Article Link

Archive
 
God I hate this shit and I hate how it's infecting my country now.
What the fuck is wrong with everyone these days?

Even back in my cringe uWu shitlib early 20s, I worked with Yugoslavs that thought Milošević didn't go far enough.
Never even crossed my mind to whine or complain about it to HR or management.
I was like "That's an interesting point Stanislava. I have never considered that all Bosnians should be slaughtered like the pigs they are" and kept working.
I'm there to work, not give a fuck about anyone's opinion on things.

Either don't talk politics or just find common ground.
A cousin of mine is hardcore opposite to me and instead of fighting at family functions, we drink and bond over our hatred of immigrants and trannies instead.

Imagine fighting your own blood over which group of wealthy parasites is better at sucking your bank account dry and fucking over your countryman.

Gulag worthy behaviour.
 
Looks like it's going exactly as planned.

Breaking the family is necessary to establish secular authoritarian control. Look at George Orwell's 1984, for example. They turned sex and procreation into "Our duty to the party," and took all the love and joy out of it. They turned recreational sex into a horror story, where their only option was to hire a proletariat prostitute. They encouraged children to rat out their families with the children's clubs, like the Junior Anti-Sex League. They completely turned families against one another.

In Aldous Huxley's Brave New World, they used technology to banish the family entirely. Once they could raise babies in bottles, they turned "Mother" and "Father" into a scatological joke, and encouraged promiscuity to prevent permanent romantic ties. They reinforced these changes with conditioning. Different technique, same outcome.

I'm not really surprised that things have turned out this way, I'm only saddened that it worked so quickly and so well.
 
Remember the Civil War? Where brothers were literally slinging lead at brothers over whether or not states could secede from the Union? When it gets to that point, then we can worry about political estrangement.
Can we worry about it earlier? Or can we just visit all the universities and Hollywood studios and sling redacted at those instead?
 
Marital researcher John Gottman has found that when our heart rate exceeds 100 beats per minute, effective communication becomes nearly impossible. This physiological state, known as "flooding," triggers the body's fight-or-flight response, impairing the ability to process information. If you’re starting to feel agitated in a conversation, change the subject or take a break. And avoid trying to get even.
If you experience what's tantamount to an anxiety attack when presented with political opinions you don't agree with you are, in fact, a dedicated lolcow.
 
Last edited:
This estrangement only happens because people are so soft and fragile that they cannot handle any form of disagreement.

It is less about punishing others with ceasing contact than it is about protecting immature emotional control and identity.
It is and it isn't. You can end up with somebody who is just so fundementally objectionable that cutting them off is the better thing for everybody. I had an great-uncle who was into conspiracy theories and would sermonise about really weird, paranoid shit and he was eventually barred from my grandmother's funeral, because he simply couldn't be trusted to not make it about himself.

The difference now is the Left and Right are in two different information ecosystems, the viewpoints of each other are sealed because that's really what people choose, and both end up thinking the other is in a completely different reality before they start making the worst of assumptions about the other. This is how 'deporting illegal immigrants is racist' becomes 'great white replacement' in translation.

Everything people are saying in this thread, Biden voters were saying 4 years ago about Trump voters, and are saying now in less charitable language. It remains inconceivable to many that a sane rational person looking at the world properly would look at what is actually a media cultivated caricature of an already very flawed man and vote for him.

The democrats are a cult.
Weren't some A&H users hiding in private chatrooms to escape being trolled by Hollywood Hulk Hogan?

Right wingers are perfectly capable of being snowflakes too.
 
Right wingers are perfectly capable of being snowflakes too.
This is not how snowflake is used by right wingers. Snowflake came from mocking tumbleristas who thought themselves special and unique like a snowflake by having twenty different identities.
The difference now is the Left and Right are in two different information ecosystems, the viewpoints of each other are sealed because that's really what people choose, and both end up thinking the other is in a completely different reality....
Muh both sides. You can easily look up that conservatives do not mind having liberal friends and family members while many liberals will actively shun and avoid conservatives. Conservatives tend to be very familiar with liberal positions. This has been borne out in several surveys on college campuses.
It is and it isn't. You can end up with somebody who is just so fundementally objectionable that cutting them off is the better thing for everybody. I had an great-uncle who was into conspiracy theories and would sermonise about really weird, paranoid shit and he was eventually barred from my grandmother's funeral, because he simply couldn't be trusted to not make it about himself.
This is not what most people are referring to and even in your case it was seemingly your whole family ostracizing your uncle for being a boorish asshole, not a child cutting of contact with their parents for voting wrong.
 
Estrangement is not strictly a political issue and these articles are overblown rage-bait.

Yeah, people block family members over politics all of the time, but rarely is it a decision made on a whim. Some relatives are awful people and you're not gonna ever find peace unless you cut them off.

Those who were blessed to have good and functional families have a hard time understanding this.
 
Last edited:
God I hate this shit and I hate how it's infecting my country now.
What the fuck is wrong with everyone these days?

Even back in my cringe uWu shitlib early 20s, I worked with Yugoslavs that thought Milošević didn't go far enough.
Never even crossed my mind to whine or complain about it to HR or management.
I was like "That's an interesting point Stanislava. I have never considered that all Bosnians should be slaughtered like the pigs they are" and kept working.
I'm there to work, not give a fuck about anyone's opinion on things.

Either don't talk politics or just find common ground.
A cousin of mine is hardcore opposite to me and instead of fighting at family functions, we drink and bond over our hatred of immigrants and trannies instead.

Imagine fighting your own blood over which group of wealthy parasites is better at sucking your bank account dry and fucking over your countryman.

Gulag worthy behaviour.
The tragic thing is it's this attitude that leads to another Yugoslavia crisis. My concern is one day Americans will kill each other in large number similar to the Yugoslav wars of the 90s and we will wake up Going from the mess worse and broken wondering why the fuck did we let this shit happen.

Right wingers are perfectly capable of being snowflakes too.
No one disagrees with that. But muh both sides look minus some crazy Christan schizo most Trump supporters and Republicans didn't go I'm not seeing you Xmas or Thanksgiving because you voted Biden or blue.
Democrats have that problem because maybe believing Trump is literally Hitler mussolini and satan in one all the time and running he will turn us into nazi Germany tends to turn off normies from trusting mainstream media.
Meanwhile those who trust msnbc, CNN, and etc.. as if they're still gospel are going into I need to cut off my neighbor everyone is a neo-nazi hysteria. So much so that we might lose our civil liberties if we're not careful.
Last I checked the ball is in the progressive left wings court culturally still not the rights.
 
If assholes kids in the article acted like that to me... I say "go ahead and regret your actions".

Then fucking cut them not only out of my will as well as begin the process of getting a "No Contact" and/or Restraining Order.

AND then get fucking mean. The cult of Contact. The cult of Ignorance. The Cult of Greed is part of our society and I want no part of it.

Why? Because I know that if my kids are acting that way, they are only there waiting for me to die.

I've seen too many times in my life where kids leech off/destroy/murder their parents for the... money... Wait to they grow feeble. Get control of their fiances and toss them into the care home for them to quickly die.

Naa. Not Happening here.
 
Back