UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk
https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs

7
10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019

See spread happiness's other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton
https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary


42
10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019

See pg often's other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.

 

[Mound Dweller]

@Mound Dweller

You know they review the CCTV footage over anyone they find suspect when they close the store right? Is ending up with a criminal record (even if its for shoplifting) worth it?

The only thing I've ever stolen is one of those pens from Argos and felt bad about it afterwards too, people I know who don't mind though totally fair game.
That said you know petty theft is 100% decriminalized and has been for years? Assuming you're not running out the door with a bag full of vodka/being an actual nuisance menace the staff don't give a shit, sad for the social fabric but such are the consequences of insufficient beatings.

Beaks and all?

Just the edible carcass skip the giblets, you may knock turkey but it's cheap and better than chicken for putting on bread it definitely has flavour the trick is to not overcook and dehydrate it like everyone does.

 

[Bloom Worm Cross Field]

Question for the genetically learned amongst you, maybe @Otterly, on the subject of inbreeding -- As I understand it, the genetic case against inbreeding is like this:

When genetic mutations happen, those that occur in dominant genes are immediately expressed and result in a disabled/mutated offspring, so natural selection happens at the point of mutation and the gene is not passed on. However, if the mutation is recessive, it gets hidden away and becomes part of the population's "mutational load" - the set of recessive genes that only get expressed and cause problems when both parents pass on the faulty recessive gene. The problem then with inbreeding is that successive iterations of it causes a person to have the same gene in more and more pairs (homozygosity?) which means that eventually, all recessive mutations will end up becoming expressed.

Does this mean that if you took two *unrelated*, extremely Habsburg-tier inbred people and bred those, since they each only pass one of each pair of genes, and each is genetically unrelated to the other, would this result in a completely normal, non-inbred offspring in a single generation?

 

[teriyakiburns]

Just to reassure everyone I'm not the only lunatic in your geographic area; is fidgeting a hate crime?
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8ewl757d2ko/https://archive.is/4UXOk

I'm trying to work out what angle they're pushing for this this. Is it introducing the idea of mentally unstable people inflicting a psychological toll on those around them, so we should stop catering so much to them? Or is it reinforcing the idea that we should enable the anxieties of others?

turkey but it's cheap and better than chicken for putting on bread it definitely has flavour the trick is to not overcook and dehydrate it like everyone does.

This is actually correct. Well done.

Stop stealing your mam's eggs.

 

[Otterly]

those that occur in dominant genes are immediately expressed and result in a disabled/mutated offspring, so natural selection happens at the point of mutation and the gene is not passed on.

Yes if it’s a deleterious mutation - you’re less likely to breed and pass it on. (Multiple caveats, a ‘bad’ mutation can be selected for in some situations, e.g sickle cell or founder effects simply because of a small population.)

Does this mean that if you took two *unrelated*, extremely Habsburg-tier inbred people and bred those, since they each only pass one of each pair of genes, and each is genetically unrelated to the other, would this result in a completely normal, non-inbred offspring in a single generation?

It’d depend on which recessives they carried. If it was twenty completely different ones yes, and if there was overlap then no. And of course all those masked recessives go to the next generation so they can pop up later, and not all ‘silent’ recessives are actually silent. You very often hear that CF carriers have a history of respiratory issues, and things like the haemophilia b mentioned earlier - at least one of the princesses nearly bled to death after a minor op.

Just to reassure everyone I'm not the only lunatic in your geographic area; is fidgeting a hate crime?

I used to work with someone who said she had misophonia or whatever it’s called. She was EXTREMELY loud and extroverted, and her own noise magically never bothered her, but she policed every noise anyone else made. It was basically a way of bullying other staff. She was insane.
Yeah turkey isn’t so bad. Roasting it at Christmas I’m done with though, it’s hard to get it juicy and the birds are massive. I think I’ll do beef or lamb this year

 

[Wonderland foster child]

To add to the crap cuisine sperging and bring us full circle to the reason this thread exists, I've developed an addiction to the vegan festive bakes at Greggs. I'll be going into withdrawal after Hogmanay. Thank you for your understanding.

 

[LaVieKL]

Absolute fucking traitor.
Hope you can view this too.

 

[-Jack-]

To add to the crap cuisine sperging and bring us full circle to the reason this thread exists, I've developed an addiction to the vegan festive bakes at Greggs. I'll be going into withdrawal after Hogmanay. Thank you for your understanding.

I'm over Greggs at the moment, we have a Wenzel's which is similar to Greggs but they do really nice "fresh" sandwiches which are decent.

 

[John Badman]

Got kicked out of Greggs once

 

[teriyakiburns]

Got kicked out of Greggs once

Why'd you get kicked out of greggs?

 

[John Badman]

Why'd you get kicked out of greggs?

They said I was being racist.

 

[teriyakiburns]

They said I was being racist.

Why'd they say that?

 

[John Badman]

Why'd they say that?

I was being racist.

 

[teriyakiburns]

I was being racist.

In greggs?

 

[John Badman]

In greggs?

Yeah. Can’t eat there no more cuz it’s racist.

 

[Chaos Theorist]

Absolute fucking traitor.
Hope you can view this too.
View attachment 6757685

Context?

 

[AnOminous]

I always found Huel so fucking weird. It seems made for people that dislike being happy.

Holy shit it's like Bri'ish Soylent.

Toad In The Hole is great as well. Great some premium butcher sausages to roast with the batter and it's awesome.

Fun fact, in burgerclapistan what we call Toad in the Hole is what you call Eggy in a Basket.

 

[FedPostalService]

Context?

She was objecting to racists in Greggs.

 

[teriyakiburns]

Context?

She's creating more "combined regional authorities" and transferring more power from local councils to those combined authorities. The end goal is presumably "devolved" regional governments based on the ITL2 administrative regions of the UK, as illustrated in this convenient map:



These regions were originally drawn out for Blair's "devolution" plans, and were designed to slot into an EU-wide re-organisation of governance into regional authorities that were divorced from previous national and local systems of government. They would have had a partially elected unicameral governing body, headed by a governing council, and would take on all of the responsibilities currently handled by local government, as well as - at the time - having a direct descent of authority from the EU's central government, bypassing Westminster. Blair (who was then mapping out his campaign to be appointed as EU president) sold it as "power to the people", with the claim that it was bringing control over government closer to the electorate. The measures were soundly rejected by everyone at the time, much to his chagrin.

They've never gone away, though. The regions still have the unelected advisory councils lurking over them, which shape regional policy to a great extent, and the statistical regions are in general use by the government for most policy-making anyway. The combined authorities established in the last 15 years mostly fit inside the borders of these larger regions.

 

[Geoff Capes Vapes Apes]

Ange (who sounds like an absolute mong when speaking) can take those plans, roll them up and shove them up her ginger growler.

My part of Norfshire has absolutely fuck all to do with Manchester or Liverpool and I'll be damned if we're going to be run by them. Just an excuse to ship migrants out to/build shitty plasterboard new builds in places that have been spared them to date by the local council.

 

[FedPostalService]

She's creating more "combined regional authorities" and transferring more power from local councils to those combined authorities. The end goal is presumably "devolved" regional governments based on the ITL2 administrative regions of the UK, as illustrated in this convenient map:

View attachment 6758002

These regions were originally drawn out for Blair's "devolution" plans, and were designed to slot into an EU-wide re-organisation of governance into regional authorities that were divorced from previous national and local systems of government. They would have had a partially elected unicameral governing body, headed by a governing council, and would take on all of the responsibilities currently handled by local government, as well as - at the time - having a direct descent of authority from the EU's central government, bypassing Westminster. Blair (who was then mapping out his campaign to be appointed as EU president) sold it as "power to the people", with the claim that it was bringing control over government closer to the electorate. The measures were soundly rejected by everyone at the time, much to his chagrin.

They've never gone away, though. The regions still have the unelected advisory councils lurking over them, which shape regional policy to a great extent, and the statistical regions are in general use by the government for most policy-making anyway. The combined authorities established in the last 15 years mostly fit inside the borders of these larger regions.

They’re doing it as old people in the Norf tend to go out and vote Labour in local elections because they’re zombies.

Gawd bless the NHS, I might be paying too much council tax and they’re moving Somalis next door, but I don’t want people to think I’m a Tory.

It’s why they pushed Scottish devolution. The thought they’d be in power forever and it would be more jobs for their boys only to have it backfire spectacularly when Labour self immolated.

Personally I can’t wait wait to see a bunch of Reform Mega Councils when it backfires this time.

Ange (who sounds like an absolute mong when speaking) can take those plans, roll them up and shove them up her ginger growler.

I wish she’d speak in her real voice. You’re from fucking Cheadle, love. I hate it when Labour women Northern it up. I bet they speak like regular women when they’re talking to a bank manager.

My part of Norfshire has absolutely fuck all to do with Manchester or Liverpool and I'll be damned if we're going to be run by them. Just an excuse to ship migrants out to/build shitty plasterboard new builds in places that have been spared them to date by the local council.

Double post (because fuck it) but they tried to make a massive Merseyside council years ago and absolutely no one wanted it because of what a corrupt bunch of gangsters and communists that practically set money on fire at the corrupt hell hole that is Liverpool City Council.