Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[FamicomGorby]

Well, today´s the day, Russ better give us some lulz.

Assuming Greer hasn't submitted anything, I don't think we'll hear about it until tomorrow when Hardin files a motion explaining to the court that Greer did nothing and just bitched at Hardin to just give in and settle and let him live his life of creeping on whores.

Hope we get that since any time Greer bitches at Hardin to settle I'm just reminded of this classic persuasion technique.

 

[The Stranger]

Well, today´s the day, Russ better give us some lulz.

Filings, if any, will come at the 17th. Russ has until the end of tommorow to disclose his witnesses to Mr. Hardin, but that won't be a filing. The soonest filing will be on the 17th if Russ doesn't comply, or does so poorly.

 

[StinkySnack]

I don't think we'll hear about it until tomorrow when Hardin files a motion explaining to the court that Greer did nothing and just bitched at Hardin to just give in and settle and let him live his life of creeping on

What a novel idea.

Filings, if any, will come at the 17th. Russ has until the end of tommorow to disclose his witnesses to Mr. Hardin, but that won't be a filing. The soonest filing will be on the 17th if Russ doesn't comply, or does so poorly.

 

[mindlessobserver]

I'm still holding out hope for post deadline explanations for his failure but I have a feeling he will submit a bunch of nonsense and expect Hardin to do the lawyer work of making it comprehensible on Nulls dime.

 

[Bill Evans 45]

I expect nothing and am rarely disappointed.

 

[Debbie Macomber]

I didn't listen to the scheduling conference, did Russell amend his discovery requests to anything useful?

Last I heard, he asked for:
-How many Greer copyrights are on the site (Answer, none, there are only links and direct posts have been removed)
-How many people downloaded his copyrights (doesn't exist because the site doesn't keep data on how many link clicks and even that wouldn't say how many computers downloaded)
-How many times Null viewed the Greer threads (doesn't exist because why would the site keep that information? At most he could say how many posts Null made, but that wouldn't be relevant at all)

Russell told Hardin he had no evidence to hand over because all his screenshots of trolls are irrelevant to the surviving copyright case. I think Russ believes Hardin will hand him all the evidence for that, and he'll be in for a rude awakening when all the answers are "None, doesn't exist, doesn't exist"

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I didn't listen to the scheduling conference, did Russell amend his discovery requests to anything useful

As the name implies, Scheduling conference dealt with schedules, which you can see here:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.177.0.pdf

 

[Debbie Macomber]

If Hardin says nothing today or tomorrow, should we take that as meaning Russ sent him SOMETHING? Or should we not expect Hardin to file anything until January 15th as per his holiday extension?

 

[DavidS877]

If Hardin says nothing today or tomorrow, should we take that as meaning Russ sent him SOMETHING? Or should we not expect Hardin to file anything until January 15th as per his holiday extension?

Greer still has to respond next week to "Why the court shouldn't sanction you." so Hardin will almost certainly send something in ASAP if Greer misses this week's deadline.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

Wouldn't the "proper" thing to to be to interpret whatever Greer sent in the most favorable light, and file that - so some variation of "Greer has no witnesses, no evidance, and no case."

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Wouldn't the "proper" thing to to be to interpret whatever Greer sent in the most favorable light, and file that - so some variation of "Greer has no witnesses, no evidance, and no case."

Hardin already field something like that. The proper response would be a tactful 'I told you so, judge', but I am a spiteful wretch.

 

[Accept Only Substitutes]

Hardin already field something like that. The proper response would be a tactful 'I told you so, judge', but I am a spiteful wretch.

I believe the professional phrase for that is "as per my previous filings X and Y."

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

What a novel idea.

You act like Hardin @Useful_Mistake can't just tell us exactly if/what Russell emailed him today

 

[Harvey Danger]

And so begins another day of hitting F5 waiting for filings to drop on the Farms.

 

[Bill Evans 45]

And so begins another day of hitting F5 waiting for filings to drop on the Farms.

Looks to me like that might cause crippling RSI, IIED and associated plights. There must be someone you can sue for that.

 

[Magnificent Penis]

Hardin has shown himself to be a professional guy. It is 100% guaranteed that he at least has been emailing Greer going "hey dummy, the judge said you have to do this by the 16th. Please do it, don't blow this off" but in nicer words. He wants to show the court that "your honor, I tried my best, he just doesn't want to cooperate". We can only hope that Greer was actually retarded enough to ignore the deadline in spite of Hardin trying to get to him, but because of the Nothing Ever Happens rule I assume he probably did something, anything, that he will be able to cry to the court that it totally counts even though it was bullshit, and the judge will go easy on him.

 

[Doctor Socrates]

Shit happened or not @null

 

[DHugo]

View attachment 6761278

Shit happened or not @null

Filings, if any, will come at the 17th. Russ has until the end of tommorow to disclose his witnesses to Mr. Hardin, but that won't be a filing. The soonest filing will be on the 17th if Russ doesn't comply, or does so poorly.

 

[Doctor Socrates]

I'm asking if Russ disclosed his witnesses

 

[DHugo]

I'm asking if Russ disclosed his witnesses

Got you fam

Filings, if any, will come at the 17th. Russ has until the end of tommorow to disclose his witnesses to Mr. Hardin, but that won't be a filing. The soonest filing will be on the 17th if Russ doesn't comply, or does so poorly.

Edit:
Now that I think about it, you always ask the most retarded questions in this thread.
Is this Russell's account trying to bait @Useful_Mistake into saying Russell did disclose, since the only way that could be known is if Hardin is @Useful_Mistake?

Also you did say you were a phonefag, so is Russell, and Russell admitted to being on kiwifarms in one of his filings.