Greg "Mae" Dean is upset at someone posting a random address somewhere.
View attachment 6757936
And he's still trying to play coy about what he did.
View attachment 6757937
View attachment 6757938
The argument seems to be that posting a link to zillow isn't doxing, in the same way posting a link to a google drive isn't hosting copyrighted material: the dox/infringement is happening off site. Either the offsite activity doesn't violate ToS, and the link should be allowed, or the offsite activity does violate ToS, and Jesse should be banned for his offsite activity.
What's interesting about this take is that the logic breaks basically everything they're screaming about.
First of all, it's just wrong. The Zillow link breaks ToS because it's "doxing," and Zillow isn't doxing anyone because there's no name associated with the address on Zillow. In order for it to be a dox, you have to tie a name to the address. When a tranny who is angry about Jesse posts a link to Zillow to skirt doxing rules, there's an implication that the address belongs to Jesse, linking his name to the address. The link between name and address happens on BlueSky, not Zillow, and so the doxing is committed by the user on BlueSky, not by Zillow.
It's the same problem with Jesse revealing trans kid's medical info: the medical info doesn't matter if there's no name attached to it. The replies are saying that it should be allowed to post the Zillow link because there's technically not a name attached, but if that's the case then Jesse is definitely in the clear as well.
Now, they could have linked to whatever public records that were initially used to find his address, and then the doxing would actually be happening off site. Of course, that would require admitting that the doxing is actually being done by the public records they used to get the address in the first place, and that "doxing" is just reiterating already public information, which in turn is admitting that the farms aren't actually doing anything more than discussing public information.