Why introducing kids to sex concepts too young is a bad idea?

1733501193411.png
Why are all your "deep thoughts" just you trying to justify telling kids about your weird sex fetishes? Are you some kind of retard?
 
View attachment 6722156
Why are all your "deep thoughts" just you trying to justify telling kids about your weird sex fetishes? Are you some kind of retard?
Except that neither topic is about wanting to explain kinks to kids. And actually most of my Deep Thoughts topics have nothing to do with sex or children.

Here's an idea, try reading more than just topic titles before jumping to conclusions and hitting the reply button and making yourself look like a reddit-tier moron.
 
I wouldn't be surprised, honestly. One of Jackson's recollections (and I can't recall where I read this) was recalling as a young kid, he was taken to a strip show with a huge audience, where a woman took off her clothes on-stage... except, plot twist, the "woman" was actually a man. And apparently the crowd loved it. IIRC Jackson recalled being confused and horrified.

If someone else knows what the fuck I'm talking about, please link to it.
From a young age, Jackson was exposed to sex. He received mixed messages on the subject from his parents. His mother Katherine was a devout Jehovah's Witness and conveyed her thoughts clearly; lust in thought or deed was sinful outside of marriage, and physical intimacy should be saved for marriage. In contrast to his wife, father Joseph, a steel mill worker, shunned the religion and would have the Jackson 5 perform at strip clubs and seedy bars in the earliest days of their career. He allowed nine-year-old Michael to watch from the wings of the stage as male audience members whistled at women who stripped until nude.
During other residencies, the siblings would perform the Joe Tex song "Skinny Legs and All". Joseph would instruct a young Michael to make his way into the audience, crawl under tables, lift up ladies' skirts and peek at their panties as part of the performance. Though embarrassed by the task, Jackson feigned enjoyment as he knew the audience loved the routine.
As members of the increasingly successful Jackson 5, Michael's brothers Jermaine and Jackie found fame advantageous. As they toured the country, they had sex with many female fans. The two brothers would bring girls back to a hotel room, where younger siblings Michael and Marlon were instructed to "play sleep".
One girl, who had sexual relations with Jermaine, recalled such an experience:
"I jumped into bed with him and he climbed on top of me. As he climaxed, he shuddered so loudly I was afraid he would wake up Michael and Marlon, who were sleeping three feet away in the next bed. Or at least I thought they were sleeping. As I was slipping out of the room, I heard Michael say to Jermaine, 'Nice job. Now, can we please get some sleep?'"
...holy shit. Between this, and the fact that his dad allegedly put him on puberty blockers, no wonder he was fucked in the head. Poor dude.
 
bro thinks of romeo and juliet
Romeo and Juliet?

Imagine a view of grown, adult man wearing spandex and dog masks on leash in bright day light when kids just hitting puberty are exposed to this kind of freaks.
Imagine the Pulse nightclub hero.

you can't force teens to not like sex. this year we had 2 huge dramas about mr beast's Delaware guy who fucked a 11 year old when he was 16 and james bear fucking his sister when he was 13 and she was 9, and courtney peet decided to strike back at jerry peet for fucking her when she was a child and he is only like a bit over year and a half older than her.
All of those things were tragic, but real.
A healthy sexual outlet (with their unrelated peers) would've fixed those problems.
You can't force anybody to not do anything, there will always be incidents of whatever behavior you discourage, but that doesn't mean you can't minimize it, and you certainly don't need to encourage "sexual outlets".

Instead just restore a culture of virtue, teach marriage is good and worth saving one's self for into adulthood.
 
law in most european shitholes including mine where a sex with underage within 2-3 age gap is not jailable but ends up with certain problems in order to avert jailbait situations
Isn't the average AoC in Europe 14 or something like that? I don't think they would need that
 
In my experience young teens aren't as sex crazed as they are stereotyped to be until someone puts that thought into their head. I don't think its normal for -13 to 15 year olds to be having sex. I knew about sex and didn't particularly care to have it until it was like all of society was pushing for me to have it. Then I felt like a loser for not having sex, when before I was apathetic. And I recall my peers feeling similarly. Black children are having sex with other children at abysmally young ages and they are extremely fucked up from it, ignoring the multitude of other issues.
 
In my experience young teens aren't as sex crazed as they are stereotyped to be until someone puts that thought into their head. I don't think its normal for -13 to 15 year olds to be having sex. I knew about sex and didn't particularly care to have it until it was like all of society was pushing for me to have it. Then I felt like a loser for not having sex, when before I was apathetic. And I recall my peers feeling similarly.
I was "sex crazed" at that age but too embarrassed and shy to pursue relations, and even passing opportunities for it. Maybe bashfulness might be nature's way of counterbalancing it.

Black children are having sex with other children at abysmally young ages and they are extremely fucked up from it, ignoring the multitude of other issues.
Animals breed young lmao
 
the minute sex enters your life, it basically dominates everything and you're never able to go back to that period of fun and innocence ever again.
This is some puritan shit, you either grew up super sheltered or you forgot your childhood and how much you were exposed to sex (I'm young so I still remember A BIT of it), and how you didnt give it a second thought. Even victims of mild CSA (I mean, like, forced exposure or fondling and stuff) often dont realize that something bad happened before they grow up and remember this, so it clearly doesn't "dominate their lives".
The answer to the OP's question is "this isn't inherently a bad idea", a bad idea would be letting children view pornhub to "explore their sexuality" or letting some grown ass faggot talk to them about "sex ed" in school, but kids getting THE TALK a little bit earlier than usual or knowing what the word "fuck" actually means, will not fuck them up, literally a part of human nature.
I have gotten involved with violent, unstable, dangerous men because of my inability to kick this early childhood sexual desire to be killed/maimed/eaten/etc
This isn't a paraphilia, you're just a woman.
 
Even victims of mild CSA (I mean, like, forced exposure or fondling and stuff) often dont realize that something bad happened before they grow up and remember this, so it clearly doesn't "dominate their lives".
I think you're downplaying it a little.

This isn't a paraphilia, you're just a woman.
This is the funniest response I've read in a while :story:
 
It depends on what you mean, really. If it's parents talking about it in an age-appropriate manner or even teachers having a little lesson on things related to CSA and consent, then it's perfectly fine. The other things, at least in urban/rural parts of the U.S., don't typically happen. Of course, with the exception of what children may see online.
And with the whole innocence thing, it really does depend on the situation and how old the child is. If it's too vague, it can lead to more harm. For example, COCSA still exists and happens, so we need to make sure that victims of it know it isn't their fault and make sure both get therapy. Often with the abuser in these relationships, it may be a child who has been a victim of sexual abuse or trauma in some way. Plus there's the risk of children trying to find the information through other means, and this can lead to grooming and/or sexual abuse.
On the other hand, you don't want to give too much information, for reasons I hope is obvious to everyone.
 
Animals breed young lmao
Its so fucked, but you can’t say anything because you can't dare insinuate that black culture isnt perfect and any flaws isn't whiteys fault. Children losing their virginity at 9, to other children, preteen girls dating grown men, those same girls also often prostitute, and the parental figures know and do nothing.
I guess thats the extreme example of exposing children to sex before they are ready, they've been exposed since birth.
 
It depends on what you mean, really. If it's parents talking about it in an age-appropriate manner or even teachers having a little lesson on things related to CSA and consent, then it's perfectly fine. The other things, at least in urban/rural parts of the U.S., don't typically happen. Of course, with the exception of what children may see online.
And with the whole innocence thing, it really does depend on the situation and how old the child is. If it's too vague, it can lead to more harm. For example, COCSA still exists and happens, so we need to make sure that victims of it know it isn't their fault and make sure both get therapy. Often with the abuser in these relationships, it may be a child who has been a victim of sexual abuse or trauma in some way. Plus there's the risk of children trying to find the information through other means, and this can lead to grooming and/or sexual abuse.
On the other hand, you don't want to give too much information, for reasons I hope is obvious to everyone.
This is exactly my thoughts, and actually good, instead of just straight up teaching kids sex crap.
In kindergarten, my class and I were taught about "good and bad" touches. And to tell an adult if someone touched us inappropriately. At the time, I thought it was weird and gross, but looking back on it, I'm grateful we had that, even when we lived in a rural area. When I went to school in a more populated area, I was surprised and quite upset they didn't do the same.
 
This is exactly my thoughts, and actually good, instead of just straight up teaching kids sex crap.
In kindergarten, my class and I were taught about "good and bad" touches. And to tell an adult if someone touched us inappropriately. At the time, I thought it was weird and gross, but looking back on it, I'm grateful we had that, even when we lived in a rural area. When I went to school in a more populated area, I was surprised and quite upset they didn't do the same.
I actually have a similar experience. I honestly find it interesting that it only happened once for you.
Where I live, it's mandatory for children to get these types of talks every year up to their last year of school. Mostly it's refreshing what they previously learned in order to make sure they actually know it and for what information is relevant to their age group about sexual abuse. For context, I love in an area that is technically an exurb, though I don't really call it that. Children can be excused from these due to special circumstances, but that usually starts happening around middle school.
 
Last edited:
teachers having a little lesson on things related to CSA and consent, then it's perfectly fine.
Teachers have a tendency to teach them first-hand, so no. And I'm pretty sure that was originally the excuse to put sex ed in schools, now we slippery sloped as expected to students being groomed by the LGBT.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
Because they don't have the vocabulary or experience to process sex in a way that a teenager or adult can.

People don't like to admit how complicated sex is. It's not a huge thing but everything that surrounds it (physically, socially) is.

I understand that I don't live in a perfect world where kids are taught about sex in terms of a loving relationship where your vulnerability is protected by your partner, but there has to be a better way than some mechanical relationships of parts.

We're not educating kids about sex right but introducing it to malleable kids to whom you can feed all sorts of ideas surrounding it is a bad way of going about it.
 
When I was like 8 years old, an older girl was raeped and murdered, and the family is very well-known in the area so I will not mention it as it is too powerlevely but I remember my mom having to tell me how sex even worked because I'd read the newspaper story and was like WTF. Even then I didn't really understand it and was confused enough that I imagined the perpetrator had a voyeuristic piss fetish or something. But then again I am a fucking autist so it's impossible to say if this wrekt me.
 
Back