I don't understand the Mass Effect hype, never did.
Ah, Śmigus-dyngus where girls get soaked with water and slapped with pussy willow by dressed up drunkards. A great tradition. Pagan rituals in Old Europe are awesome.
Isn't LI a rather liberal area? I mean sure, your average liberal probably (hopefully) finds her to be a fucking degenerate freak but I get a sick feeling that they wouldn't mind. Sure, they wouldn't love it, but they'd tolerate it as long as it doesn't bother them like how Chris bothered Bob & Barb or Cyraxx bothers his grandma.
I mean she's technically right but that's like doing cocaine when you go to Colombia in order to have a fun time. Not a good look.
Are we talking about Reketia (how the fuck do you spell it ffs) or Fuentes? I mean I'd assume the former but I could also see a case for Fuentes if he wasn't a complete piteog. Nick is one of those "conservatives" who lean so hard into moral purity in spite of or even because of their own degeneracy. So if he was into women I'd expect him to be weirdly attracted to someone like this because it's "dirty" or "wrong" or "degenerate" or whatever. It's the whole Madonna Whore Complex that I think Freud talked about. In my opinion Freud was on to something with that, at least when it came to men like Fuentes.
She's too old for Nick.
Is that illegal to do after filing a lawsuit?
I guess their hope is that Ron Colemann can't get them an evidence preservation letter in time. But I'm also pretty damned sure if Colemann reached out to Elon he'd undelete all that shit, or send them a thumbdrive with her entire data history on it.
I'm getting conflicting comments on the requirement to have received an evidence preservation letter. Apparently if you're the plaintiff in the suit one is assumed?
Whether or not this is the case, the very fact of going around deliberately deleting things that absolutely contradict what you just claimed in a lawsuit you just filed can result in the finder of fact drawing an adverse inference, at the very least.
Not unless opposing council filed something to stop them, but they would have done so as a matter of course. However I do think it's somewhat helpful to the opposing party in this case, they now know exactly what tweets are incriminating and helpful for their case and can ask twitter to supply them to council. Deleted doesn't mean "deleted" when it comes to most social media.
Opposing COUNSEL.
3 posts here and you're praising Alyssa and bashing grummz
No it was planned, in Smash JT's video they point how Sweet Baby Inc and other DEI companies have also deleted their tweets the same day when Alyssa deleted hers.
And here I was trying to give her the benefit of the doubt. God they're dumb.
What?! You mean The Cabal of internet bullies whose entire career is being perpetual victims, and their identity politics whilst often sharing the same unpopular opinions and views that seem to go off of sucking eachother's cocks are deeply connected to eachother?
