- Joined
- Jun 11, 2024
Lennart will need to pry my # root prompt from my cold, dead fingers.It sets your prompt to include colors and a fucking unicode character when operating as root.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lennart will need to pry my # root prompt from my cold, dead fingers.It sets your prompt to include colors and a fucking unicode character when operating as root.
At least it's notLennart will need to pry my # root prompt from my cold, dead fingers.
yeah. I just ended up removing lxqt today. I really really hated pcmanfm-qt. didn't like all the mixed up theming stuff. Things just felt, not ready. and janky.with both lxqt's wayland session (via labwc) and kde's wayland session, I had issues with firefox crashing a lot and games would get stuck (only visually, the game still played in the background to the point I could pause and un pause it but it would just show the stuck frame no matter what even when alt-tabbing in and out). I ended up going to LXQT's X11 session and everything works better but I really had to install xfce's Thunar file manager and also xarchiver.
Really? LXQt is actually my favorite DE, and PCManFM is a very reasonable Windows Explorer-alike if you ask me.I just ended up removing lxqt today. I really really hated pcmanfm-qt. didn't like all the mixed up theming stuff.
I tried it on a netbook and found it really annoying, it didn't want to let me make shortcuts to open applications, either on the toolbar or the desktop. Plus when searching using the little bottom-left button it would remember searches which was annoying and made me constantly have to backspace out the old thing I typed whenever I needed to open something new. Also couldn't figure out how to assign icons to any shortcuts whereas in cinnamon for instance thats entirely automated.LXQt is actually my favorite DE
That might just mean you update too oftenSorry, breaks too often.
Pfft, honestly the file managers in linux all look kinda the same. I looked at some images and it looks more or less the same to my thunar setup, so tbh it doesn't really matter. I mean, honestly, it's a goddamn file manager, i don't feel necessery to argue over which file manager is the best since they all kinda do the same thing. The windows 10 file manager hovewer is actually decently designed. Infact indows 10 is the last good microsoft OS. Like, if you need windows 10 for some reason just pirate the LTSC version.PCManFM is a very reasonable Windows Explorer-alike if you ask me.
It could have been because of me trying the Wayland session and that being the reason I installed it. Well that added some extra things that were bad for sure.Really? LXQt is actually my favorite DE, and PCManFM is a very reasonable Windows Explorer-alike if you ask me.
But yes, theming/coloring is a huge pain. Not sure how much of that is just inherent to Linux and its multiple competing graphics toolkits, and how much is on LXQt specifically.
I've actually been playing around with running only the WM from KDE (KWin), and then LXQt as the actual DE.
I haven't tried the Wayland version so I can't speak to that.
I actually moved to thunar. Because it's super easy to minimize what is shown and tie it to key binds. Also I like the way searching works more in Nemo, and thunar.Pfft, honestly the file managers in linux all look kinda the same. I looked at some images and it looks more or less the same to my thunar setup, so tbh it doesn't really matter. I mean, honestly, it's a goddamn file manager, i don't feel necessery to argue over which file manager is the best since they all kinda do the same thing. The windows 10 file manager hovewer is actually decently designed. Infact indows 10 is the last good microsoft OS. Like, if you need windows 10 for some reason just pirate the LTSC version.
Because the first 3 things you mentioned are mutlitrillion global companies with enough money to give entire developed countries a very, very good run for their money. No, seriously, the market valuations of those companies are in the trillions. So, on one side youv'e got trillion dollar companis putting their full resources on one clearly defined goal, with strict organisation and pretty efficent management.... On the other side hovewer.... you have a couple hundred autistic nerds who all seem to disagree and hate on eachother. So, you can see where i'm at. That, and the fact that the kernel is so open it kinda gets in the way of having a "One thing does all" solution that works for anyone.With all this X11 vs Wayland stuff, I have to wonder. How does Microsoft Window's display server/compositor work? Is it like X11 in that it also fails to implement GUI isolation to prevent keylogging? Or is it like Wayland, which supposedly makes this more difficult? Similarly, how does MacOS do it? How does Google Android do it? How does ChromeOS do it?
With wayland being in development for 16 years and still not being ready, the project seems like a failure. Microsoft can figure out how to display applications. Apple can figure out how to display applications. Google can figure out how to display applications. Why is GNU/Linux unable to figure out how to display applications?
Have you read the open source software thread? It's all made by retardsWhy is GNU/Linux unable to figure out how to display applications?
I had been bouncing between Thunar and some other random GUI file manager on one install. Then I started logging in to the PC in question both locally, and via XRDP.Pfft, honestly the file managers in linux all look kinda the same. I looked at some images and it looks more or less the same to my thunar setup, so tbh it doesn't really matter.
No GUI isolation between programs running in the same session, unless it's one of the Microsoft Store apps.How does Microsoft Window's display server/compositor work? Is it like X11 in that it also fails to implement GUI isolation to prevent keylogging? Or is it like Wayland, which supposedly makes this more difficult?
We did, it's called X.Why is GNU/Linux unable to figure out how to display applications?
I was really pissed off when they changed the default from konq to dolphin, but I have to admit it's grown on me since. It helps that they made it not suck in the meantime. What I like about it most is that it stays out of the way and just shows me what I want, instead of being a constant reminder of how things could be better. Unlike Nautilus.The best file manager is Dolphin.
sudo is not systemd.
The systemd retards have tried to make an improved version "run0".
It sets your prompt to include colors and a fucking unicode character when operating as root.
View attachment 6737566
Kill systemd, behead systemd etc etc.
In a continuing effort to minimize and eventually eliminate suid-root binaries, sudo, su, and pkexec have all been removed from the images. As noted at the end of this section of the postinstall readme, polkit prompts and manual polkit invokations via run0 can be used to accomplish the same functionality without suid-root, notably even for non-wheel users (by prompting for the wheel user's password). In addition, suid-root has been removed from numerous other binaries that don't require it.
I'm pretty sure the people that actually say this are trolling.With wayland being in development for 16 years and still not being ready, the project seems like a failure.
Classic Konqueror from the KDE 2/3 releases was amazing. The supposed 'complexity' was completely rational stuff like 'having the option to add a panel at the bottom of the screen of the directory you're in with a terminal UI directly reused from Konsole because the KDE developers were then aping the very cool concepts that Apple tried to develop with their competitor to OLE.I was really pissed off when they changed the default from konq to dolphin, but I have to admit it's grown on me since. It helps that they made it not suck in the meantime. What I like about it most is that it stays out of the way and just shows me what I want, instead of being a constant reminder of how things could be better. Unlike Nautilus.
X Windows was a usable prototype, functionally equivalent to modern day Wayland, thirty years ago. A couple years later they'd gone from that Wayland-tier system to the highly evolved X Windows 6.0 system. X11 was achieved by 1987. Now we have fancy extensions so you can plug your phone into a USB-C screen and dynamically extend your X Windows clients onto that, if for some reason just 'using a computer' is too hard. Every problem with Wayland has been discussed countless times over decades, and- in X- resolved. The perpetrators of Wayland didn't just create a shittier new system for no reason, they deliberately ignored the hard earned wisdom of actually competent non-Desi real human beings who came before.I'm pretty sure the people that actually say this are trolling.
That or overly emotionally invested in xorg some reason.