Inactive Shmorky / David Kelly / Daisy Kay / Sandypants / Peaches the Puppy & Ex-Fiance Amanda "Mandy" Mullen - Something Awful throwaway, pedophile sexual predator, abusive tranny schizo chaser; batshit crazy ex-fiancée

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
nrWiGPp.png


uhm excuse me goon sire but I don't believe SASS are the "piss babies" in this scenario

Ever notice how lame and ridiculous the insults you're left with are once you get rid of all the actually funny ones as problematic?
 
Can you guys believe there are members of our generation who think they are actually the moon and that misgendering someone is worse than being a pedophile.

Thank god most people have the common sense outside of the internet to ridicule them and keep them in their place.

The "misgendering" complaints are little more than an excuse to deflect the hate away from the poor oppressed transperson and redirect it to a more narrative-suiting target like Kiwi Farms or Lowtax.

This is pretty evident by the fact that not a single one of them seems to give a damn that Shmorky himself misgendered Carefully throughout the entirety of the log.

Shmorky's whole defense squad as of late boils down to "Yeah, Shmorky's bad, but LOOK WHAT ____ DID!!!!".
 
The fact he was deleting his messages this time around seems to scream "I know what I'm doing is wrong but I'm not gonna consider stopping." Like. ???
I think it's just paranoia and trying to find a new young girl who is more receptive to his fetishes. Also since this person didn't make a point of it I'm guessing they weren't underage as well? We have a few examples of him going after younger people, so it's possible that the person doesn't want to out themselves by hinting at age.

I still think a lot of him focusing on people in this age group has to do with them being easier to manipulate. Obviously he wanted not only someone to do diaper shit for him in real life but also to financially support him and worship him as well. The second he realized @Mandarys_Milan wasn't doing all of that he probably started shopping again. I'm sure it's been written before but I'm guessing @Mandarys_Milan was quite a bit younger than him.

I think he's a piece of shit and did go after some 14 and 15 year olds(no logs yet), though I feel like a lot of the shit with skype was just him feeding his fetish and hoping he'd get someone to put up with his shit. My main thing is he obviously didn't set off alarm bells(or well not enough) around @Lowtax and he didn't ever go after jobs that gave him access to kids(working in children's cartoons is a pretty esoteric route to that). Who knows what would have happened if he actually wanted to have normal sex though?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bowow and minmin
The "misgendering" complaints are little more than an excuse to deflect the hate away from the poor oppressed transperson and redirect it to a more narrative-suiting target like Kiwi Farms or Lowtax.

This is pretty evident by the fact that not a single one of them seems to give a damn that Shmorky himself misgendered Carefully throughout the entirety of the log.

Shmorky's whole defense squad as of late boils down to "Yeah, Shmorky's bad, but LOOK WHAT ____ DID!!!!".

It's sad that most of them won't even do their research and see what went down. And those that do, blame Carefully or call the 90+ page chatlog a hoax.
They are so very against victim blaming until it involves their idol, then they're suddenly convinced that poor Carefully doctored the chat logs and the victim is actually the perpetrator.
 
It's funny to me that so many individuals are deemed pedophiles for fucking 16 year olds, even though the majority of you would jump at the opportunity to do so too.
The age gap is something important to consider. Your profile says you're 19, so it'd be a little weird for you to fuck a 16 year old, but it'd be much more unjustifiable for the then 34 year old Shmorky. If you can really try and say there's no problem with going after people who are half your age then you're pretty fucking weird man.
 
@InLivingTuna Well she was 18, according to her. Though I think engaging in sexual relationships with people who are immature and easy to manipulate is the problem, rather than some obscure thing about half age. 20 and 40 is probably fine 15 and 25 isn't suddenly not a problem. Also it's worth noting that most normal people actually engage in normal fucking human relationships before having sex, rather than someone saying they love your art and you trying to get them to change your pissy diapers.

the victim is actually the perpetrator.
That's the worst thing these guys have shit fits over messages on tindr being about sex but some guy basically guilting/forcing fans into diaper roleplay is fine. I can understand someone saying "16/17 who gives a shit?" but disregarding the abuse and victimization of people with mental illness is incredibly callous.
 
i finished the song

http://www.colorfinger.net/shmorky/theShmorkySong-Full.mp3

lyrics:

The Shmorky Song

I'm not the one that's a rapist
And I'm not the one that's an abuser

Stop screaming
And pretending
Look, I don't want to put you in an institution, OK?

Now I don't know what to do
I've never seen you act like this before

The truth is that you
Are now facing consequences of harrassing people
Get help, OK?
Jewish question.
...OK

I do not own a house
I do not own people
I do not want harrassment, OK? Uh uh
You're the one doing this

I'm not pretendiiaaaaAAAAAAAAAAA

The damage is already done
Stop the Kyankas
You uh definitely shouldn't threaten lives
No no no, no, no.

They have that information
On Twitter
On WhatsApp
You know, I have to tell you this
I'm really sorry

You understand?
I had to leave
That's what's happening!

And now you're pulling hair?
OK.
That's what's happening!

Everything else
Is true

You win the internet for today.
 
It's sad that most of them won't even do their research and see what went down. And those that do, blame Carefully or call the 90+ page chatlog a hoax.
They are so very against victim blaming until it involves their idol, then they're suddenly convinced that poor Carefully doctored the chat logs and the victim is actually the perpetrator.

Most of 'em seem to be past the denial phase. Nobody seems to be denying Shmork's guilt at this point, other than that Taiolu guy from a few pages back.

The majority's current tactic is to just bring up someone else in conjunction with Shmorky. It's either the misgendering, as mentioned before, or the newer method of throwing Lowtax under the bus and accusing him of "exploiting his kid" and thus being just as bad (in other words, what Voidburger and PsychedelicEyeball tried).
 
Most of 'em seem to be past the denial phase. Nobody seems to be denying Shmork's guilt at this point, other than that Taiolu guy from a few pages back.

The majority's current tactic is to just bring up someone else in conjunction with Shmorky. It's either the misgendering, as mentioned before, or the newer method of throwing Lowtax under the bus and accusing him of "exploiting his kid" and thus being just as bad (in other words, what Voidburger and PsychedelicEyeball tried) .

Wow, it's like people in these circles don't want to believe they're wrong, because if they were they would be immediately ~problematic~
 
Drew this listening to that song Colorfinger posted. ye.

View attachment 174011
Man there are some really talented artists on this forum, why have none of you gone into drawing blob comics about crying, then used the cred from that to groom teens? The guy from last page really seemed to think everyone wants to groom teens.
 
Back