Inactive Shmorky / David Kelly / Daisy Kay / Sandypants / Peaches the Puppy & Ex-Fiance Amanda "Mandy" Mullen - Something Awful throwaway, pedophile sexual predator, abusive tranny schizo chaser; batshit crazy ex-fiancée

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
people in circles that are "oppressed" will tend to stick to the idea that anyone out of that circle is just attacking them for that certain thing they feel they're oppressed for. i literally saw people reblogging a post about how CWC was autistic and trans so making fun of sonichu is problematic. Without doing any research on the actual person behind those labels.

so, yeah, labels are all just about power in their own ways. i hate how people like Shmorky use them to get away with fucked up shit. But people like this will always take things and turn them into something that benefits them.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: WalterPresson96, bowow, Mr. Awesome Man and 7 others
So... I got behind, cuz this thread jumps like 20 pages a day, and I am sick right now and got confused reading the OP. :(

1. Is Shmorky still in the hospital?
2. Any more evidence for or against that he's sandy pants and peaches? I know there was some serious doubting at around page 180 or something, even after soliliqueef confirmed they were the voice of peaches and showed emails.
3. Any other new developments?
 
creamyfanta said:
So... I got behind, cuz this thread jumps like 20 pages a day, and I am sick right now and got confused reading the OP. :(

1. Is Shmorky still in the hospital?
2. Any more evidence for or against that he's sandy pants and peaches? I know there was some serious doubting at around page 180 or something, even after soliliqueef confirmed they were the voice of peaches and showed emails.
3. Any other new developments?
Click to expand...
1) to our knowledge yes
2)things got proven to be correct and other oekaki users confirmed as well iirc
3) some new people have come out with proof of shmorky grooming them and everybodys drawing fantastic fan art
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: bowow, Fazang, Mr. Awesome Man and 9 others
Long time kookologist here, been following this for awhile, the thing I don't get though is that there doesn't seem to be a horde of diaper art coming from Shmorky. Normally if an artist has a "thing" for a particular fetish there's always a great big horde of unending and overly obvious fetish art. Even the ones who try and hide it at every opportunity (like Astolpho for example) for the sake of appearances... they've always got tons of fetish art hidden below the surface.

But Shmorky doesn't, at least not with the diaper fetish aspect. That leads me to believe that either the logs are potentially fake (well, likely real but with the names swapped around) or (more likely) he's of the Alan Panda type, basically a pedophile who uses the adult baby fetish as a convenient medium to try and get at kids/teens.

It's not unusual at all for pedophiles to use fetish communities as a vehicle for targeting kids. Most often because fetishes are ingrained since birth, they're not really something you just "pick up" later in life for the most part. As such young and impressionable kids/teens with fetishes often go online seeking support, guidance and community... which is where the pedophiles in fetish/SJW clothing come in, who then groom the kids/teens and use them for their own sordid sexual interests.

That hypothesis is also supported by the fact that, of the small selection of "diaper art" that Shmorky has done, it's all wrong. That is, the diapers are all flat. The only time you see "flat diapers" from a diaper fetish artist is when they're a complete amateur and just don't know how to draw them more realistically. That community in particular is an absolute stickler for "puffy diapers". They've got tutorials and shit all over the place on "how to draw the perfect diaper" and shit like that. So it's pretty strange that such a seasoned/gifted artist like Shmorky would be drawing his own supposed fetish in such a half ass way. Unless he doesn't have a diaper fetish and only used it as a means of targeting kids/teens.

Anyway, just a theory. I think that's also why the diaper fetish community isn't siding at all with Shmorky, I think they know he isn't one of them and see him as a "snake in the cradle" so to speak. That community in general has always been recklessly hateful and vindictive when it comes to any semblance of pedophilia in their ranks. To the point where at one point there was even a "war" of sorts between the "teen babies" and the "adult babies" because the later thought the TBs made them look like pedos, so they started actively excluding them from the community and even outright attacking them.

In fact I'm 99% sure that, despite what any of them say, both Shmorky's ex and that "carefully" are diaper fetishists, whether they want to admit to it or not, those logs don't lie... those logs are filled with every last sordid little adult baby trope imaginable... and they're not just coming from Shmorky. The wording, the style, the cultural apropos... Shmorky may be a sick screwjob and potentially a pedophile, but whoever the hell he's chatting with in those logs isn't much higher up on the fetid fetish food chain.
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Disagree
Reactions: Smurfchu, Varis, Voivode and 59 others
Still looking through chanboards and finding Shmorky threads, link is NSFW:
https://lulz.net/furi/res/3425911.html
Archive.is

TLbXUA.png

Someone who knew Dave since the 2000s
a81lG4.png

enDw37.png

Waccoon comments
 
  • Informative
  • Horrifying
Reactions: some racist username, bowow, Fazang and 16 others
Invidious said:
Long time kookologist here, been following this for awhile, the thing I don't get though is that there doesn't seem to be a horde of diaper art coming from Shmorky. Normally if an artist has a "thing" for a particular fetish there's always a great big horde of unending and overly obvious fetish art. Even the ones who try and hide it at every opportunity (like Astolpho for example) for the sake of appearances... they've always got tons of fetish art hidden below the surface.

But Shmorky doesn't, at least not with the diaper fetish aspect. That leads me to believe that either the logs are potentially fake (well, likely real but with the names swapped around) or (more likely) he's of the Alan Panda type, basically a pedophile who uses the adult baby fetish as a convenient medium to try and get at kids/teens.

It's not unusual at all for pedophiles to use fetish communities as a vehicle for targeting kids. Most often because fetishes are ingrained since birth, they're not really something you just "pick up" later in life for the most part. As such young and impressionable kids/teens with fetishes often go online seeking support, guidance and community... which is where the pedophiles in fetish/SJW clothing come in, who then groom the kids/teens and use them for their own sordid sexual interests.

That hypothesis is also supported by the fact that, of the small selection of "diaper art" that Shmorky has done, it's all wrong. That is, the diapers are all flat. The only time you see "flat diapers" from a diaper fetish artist is when they're a complete amateur and just don't know how to draw them more realistically. That community in particular is an absolute stickler for "puffy diapers". They've got tutorials and shit all over the place on "how to draw the perfect diaper" and shit like that. So it's pretty strange that such a seasoned/gifted artist like Shmorky would be drawing his own supposed fetish in such a half ass way. Unless he doesn't have a diaper fetish and only used it as a means of targeting kids/teens.

Anyway, just a theory. I think that's also why the diaper fetish community isn't siding at all with Shmorky, I think they know he isn't one of them and see him as a "snake in the cradle" so to speak. That community in general has always been recklessly hateful and vindictive when it comes to any semblance of pedophilia in their ranks. To the point where at one point there was even a "war" of sorts between the "teen babies" and the "adult babies" because the later thought the TBs made them look like pedos, so they started actively excluding them from the community and even outright attacking them.

In fact I'm 99% sure that, despite what any of them say, both Shmorky's ex and that "carefully" are diaper fetishists, whether they want to admit to it or not, those logs don't lie... those logs are filled with every last sordid little adult baby trope imaginable... and they're not just coming from Shmorky. The wording, the style, the cultural apropos... Shmorky may be a sick screwjob and potentially a pedophile, but whoever the hell he's chatting with in those logs isn't much higher up on the fetid fetish food chain.
Click to expand...
This thread has brought forward proof of multiple pseudonyms Shmorky used as a platform for his diaperfur fetish art, I don't think you can cite the fact that "he doesn't draw diapers right" as proof to the contrary.

Sure it could be a ruse, but realistically I think it's too well documented for that to be the case.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: NarutoYaoi, bowow, Mr. Awesome Man and 12 others
Invidious said:
That hypothesis is also supported by the fact that, of the small selection of "diaper art" that Shmorky has done, it's all wrong. That is, the diapers are all flat. The only time you see "flat diapers" from a diaper fetish artist is when they're a complete amateur and just don't know how to draw them more realistically. That community in particular is an absolute stickler for "puffy diapers". They've got tutorials and shit all over the place on "how to draw the perfect diaper" and shit like that. So it's pretty strange that such a seasoned/gifted artist like Shmorky would be drawing his own supposed fetish in such a half ass way. Unless he doesn't have a diaper fetish and only used it as a means of targeting kids/teens.
Click to expand...

Tell me more about your encyclopedic knowledge of diaper porn.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: NarutoYaoi, bowow, Smurfchu and 43 others
Aleks said:
This thread has brought forward proof of multiple pseudonyms Shmorky used as a platform for his diaperfur fetish art, I don't think you can cite the fact that "he doesn't draw diapers right" as proof to the contrary.

Sure it could be a ruse, but realistically I think it's too well documented for that to be the case.
Click to expand...

No, it hasn't actually. It has produced a lot of random accusations, most of which are outright hilarious if you're at all familiar with that community. At this point many of you are just randomly pointing at every other diaper fetish artist you can find along with PizzaGate level, triangle "fact" finding. The most hilarious of which is probably SandyPants.
 
  • Autistic
  • Dumb
  • Deviant
Reactions: bowow, TheJoe, Mr. Awesome Man and 28 others
Invidious said:
No, it hasn't actually. It has produced a lot of random accusations, most of which are outright hilarious if you're at all familiar with that community. At this point many of you are just randomly pointing at every other diaper fetish artist you can find along with PizzaGate level, triangle "fact" finding. The most hilarious of which is probably SandyPants.
Click to expand...
Except that part where there's a video of him saying "hey Dave Bunny here aka Sandyp- aka Shmorky".
 
  • Dumb
  • Disagree
Reactions: Mr. Awesome Man, Oekaki Hellion, Flareon and 1 other person
Invidious said:
Long time kookologist here, been following this for awhile, the thing I don't get though is that there doesn't seem to be a horde of diaper art coming from Shmorky. Normally if an artist has a "thing" for a particular fetish there's always a great big horde of unending and overly obvious fetish art. Even the ones who try and hide it at every opportunity (like Astolpho for example) for the sake of appearances... they've always got tons of fetish art hidden below the surface.

But Shmorky doesn't, at least not with the diaper fetish aspect. That leads me to believe that either the logs are potentially fake (well, likely real but with the names swapped around) or (more likely) he's of the Alan Panda type, basically a pedophile who uses the adult baby fetish as a convenient medium to try and get at kids/teens.

It's not unusual at all for pedophiles to use fetish communities as a vehicle for targeting kids. Most often because fetishes are ingrained since birth, they're not really something you just "pick up" later in life for the most part. As such young and impressionable kids/teens with fetishes often go online seeking support, guidance and community... which is where the pedophiles in fetish/SJW clothing come in, who then groom the kids/teens and use them for their own sordid sexual interests.

That hypothesis is also supported by the fact that, of the small selection of "diaper art" that Shmorky has done, it's all wrong. That is, the diapers are all flat. The only time you see "flat diapers" from a diaper fetish artist is when they're a complete amateur and just don't know how to draw them more realistically. That community in particular is an absolute stickler for "puffy diapers". They've got tutorials and shit all over the place on "how to draw the perfect diaper" and shit like that. So it's pretty strange that such a seasoned/gifted artist like Shmorky would be drawing his own supposed fetish in such a half ass way. Unless he doesn't have a diaper fetish and only used it as a means of targeting kids/teens.

Anyway, just a theory. I think that's also why the diaper fetish community isn't siding at all with Shmorky, I think they know he isn't one of them and see him as a "snake in the cradle" so to speak. That community in general has always been recklessly hateful and vindictive when it comes to any semblance of pedophilia in their ranks. To the point where at one point there was even a "war" of sorts between the "teen babies" and the "adult babies" because the later thought the TBs made them look like pedos, so they started actively excluding them from the community and even outright attacking them.

In fact I'm 99% sure that, despite what any of them say, both Shmorky's ex and that "carefully" are diaper fetishists, whether they want to admit to it or not, those logs don't lie... those logs are filled with every last sordid little adult baby trope imaginable... and they're not just coming from Shmorky. The wording, the style, the cultural apropos... Shmorky may be a sick screwjob and potentially a pedophile, but whoever the hell he's chatting with in those logs isn't much higher up on the fetid fetish food chain.
Click to expand...

"he's diapering wrong"

What a great first post. Welcome to the forums, I'm sure your diaper fetish expertise will be a great asset to this thread and the community as a whole.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: some racist username, WalterPresson96, bowow and 38 others
Invidious said:
Even the ones who try and hide it at every opportunity (like Astolpho for example) for the sake of appearances... they've always got tons of fetish art hidden below the surface.
Click to expand...
To be fair, @Mandarys_Milan is the only person who would have had access to his room/personal belongings that we're aware of (though he didn't let her), and the one time she did, she did find a bunch of Klurfs pissing and shitting.

I don't think diapers, specifically, are Shmorky's fetish. I think it's more the logical conclusion of his piss/scat fetishes (which he DEFINITELY has) combined with his infantilism/pedophilia fantasies. Not the diapers themselves. As far as I can tell, true diaperfags are into the literal diaper aspect.

But his first known 'big' alias was Davebunny, who was 100% diaperfur, so who fucking knows. Who cares. Shmorky is gross in every aspect of his psyche.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: bowow, Mr. Awesome Man, Scratch This Nut and 3 others
Invidious said:
No, it hasn't actually. It has produced a lot of random accusations, most of which are outright hilarious if you're at all familiar with that community. At this point many of you are just randomly pointing at every other diaper fetish artist you can find along with PizzaGate level, triangle "fact" finding. The most hilarious of which is probably SandyPants.
Click to expand...

Either you haven't read the whole thread from the beginning, or you're trolling. Either way, stop boring up the place.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: WalterPresson96, bowow, DadaistVizor and 11 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back