Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.5%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.8%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 155 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 112 24.2%

  • Total voters
    463
Hopefully this rubs the judge the wrong way or am I being 🌈 maybe the judge will agree no actual harm was done and leave it be
I think the telling thing will be Greer's response due next week to the "Why shouldn't we sanction you?" question. If he's retarded there I put it about 0.3% that the judge will do something. Which is a significant increase from the 0.0% up till now.
 
So he filed a low effort simple and incomplete "list" of 2 people in a documents that looks like it took him a max of 3 minutes to put together. Yet somehow it was 2 hours late on the middle of the night

Meanwhile he was putting actual effort going back and forth and back and forth sperging about his money.

Hardin said it was deficient and I'm sure the retard will say he didn't know but the judge literally gave him info on what to do after their conference.

Hopefully this rubs the judge the wrong way or am I being 🌈 maybe the judge will agree no actual harm was done and leave it be 🤔
Since the Judge told Greer to put up or shut up in his order I can't imagine he'll be pleased with Greer not providing all of the information that he was supposed to with his witness list and doing it in an email riddled with more spelling errors than usual. But who knows, maybe he'll just tell Greer to amend it and try again.
 
Honestly, does anyone think Russell's Parkinson's riddled father in the ICU is going to have a medical copter fly him to Utah, and have nurses and doctors roll his gurney, IV bag, and vitals monitor and any other machines he may need into the court room just so his dad can say "My son showed me something on the computer called a kifiworms and said they were taking his music and sending him pictures of Hitler"
 
Aaaand the majority wins the poll!!

Russ really should just drop this by now, it's beyond clear he ain't got shit but it's in his petty little mind to make this as pyrrhic a victory for Null as possible and make the court do it so he can scream he lost due to 'bias and money' and not by being a gimpy faced retard with less knowlege of legal procedures then most laymen despite his paralegal degree.

It wasn't hard to predict given Russ's fuck-up nature and every judge acting like his advocate and doing his work for him.

He was already on the backfoot with the sanctions having to submit an argument as to why he SHOULDNT be sanctioned, I'm sure the judge was assuming he'd meet his actual deadline and provide his disclosures in that event. So now he's fucked up what he was already sanctioned on AGAIN and still has yet to provide a reason he shouldn't be sanctioned in the first place.

I am prepared for Russ to argue that he should not be sanctioned until the END of the trial, so then the court can address all his violoation once. Why make him deal with the same thing OVER AND OVER? Besides, he can pay the fines out of the huge settlement he is going to win. He should be allowed to do what he wants until then because of his trauma lumps.

Russell debuting his new legal strategy:

"I'm seven years old and what is this"

He's trans-agist. Jesu Mon harassed a minor! Double death penalty now!
 
Reminder:
Screenshot 2024-12-17 192641.png
Here's to hoping.
 
Reminder:
View attachment 6762147
Here's to hoping.
For those who may be unaware, this is Rule 26(a)(1):

Rule 26. Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery
(a) Required Disclosures.

(1) Initial Disclosure.
(A) In General. Except as exempted by Rule 26(a)(1)(B) or as otherwise stipulated or ordered by the court, a party must, without awaiting a discovery request, provide to the other parties:
(i) the name and, if known, the address and telephone number of each individual likely to have discoverable information—along with the subjects of that information—that the disclosing party may use to support its claims or defenses, unless the use would be solely for impeachment;
(ii) a copy—or a description by category and location—of all documents, electronically stored information, and tangible things that the disclosing party has in its possession, custody, or control and may use to support its claims or defenses, unless the use would be solely for impeachment;
(iii) a computation of each category of damages claimed by the disclosing party—who must also make available for inspection and copying as under Rule 34 the documents or other evidentiary material, unless privileged or protected from disclosure, on which each computation is based, including materials bearing on the nature and extent of injuries suffered; and
(iv) for inspection and copying as under Rule 34, any insurance agreement under which an insurance business may be liable to satisfy all or part of a possible judgment in the action or to indemnify or reimburse for payments made to satisfy the judgment.
Edit: I bolded the stuff Greer was required but failed to provide.
 
Last edited:
Russ's witnesses are both family members who are presumably just going to tell the courts about his plights, none of which is actually relevant to the action at hand. So nothing surprising, there.

But I'd love to hear Russ's thought process on why he waited to send the witnesses until after the deadline. Did he think Hardin would just forget? Did he set the wrong time on his alarm clock? Or is he habitually incapable of ever doing anything that isn't the worst option? He could have just sent them (maybe following the rules to try and keep them confidential) on time. Or he could have not sent them at all if he wanted to keep trying to obstruct (wouldn't have worked but it would have kept the names out of Hardin's hands if that's what he's worried about). Instead, he fails to meet the deadline and yet sends them over anyway in such a manner that allows them into the record.

I can only stand in awe, once again, of the greatest (para)legal mind of our generation.
 
Yeah, that's true. We all got fixated on the witness list because it was something that Russ could potentially do, but there is a lot of other Rule 26 stuff he didn't even make an effort on. I think in a way this is what the judge was hoping for, something that is just a bright line violation that he can throw Russ out on and not have the appeals court over turn.
 
Honestly, does anyone think Russell's Parkinson's riddled father in the ICU is going to have a medical copter fly him to Utah, and have nurses and doctors roll his gurney, IV bag, and vitals monitor and any other machines he may need into the court room just so his dad can say "My son showed me something on the computer called a kifiworms and said they were taking his music and sending him pictures of Hitler"
I'm pretty sure if dad was a legitimate witness that Hardin would approve deposition by Zoom or travel to his location. Contrary to Greer's filings, Hardin is probably not a monster.
 
But I'd love to hear Russ's thought process on why he waited to send the witnesses until after the deadline. Did he think Hardin would just forget? Did he set the wrong time on his alarm clock? Or is he habitually incapable of ever doing anything that isn't the worst option? He could have just sent them (maybe following the rules to try and keep them confidential) on time. Or he could have not sent them at all if he wanted to keep trying to obstruct (wouldn't have worked but it would have kept the names out of Hardin's hands if that's what he's worried about). Instead, he fails to meet the deadline and yet sends them over anyway in such a manner that allows them into the record.
he probably thinks because he made it this far there will be no consequences. Hope he's finally wrong but rainbows on that.
 
We can bet on the latter, the judge has almost always found a way to keep Ratmouth's case alive despite the retards best efforts to screw it up.
True, but the Judge has clearly been opening up to dismissal over the past few months. Now we have direct, dare I say, RECALCITRANT, behavior spitting in not just Null and Harden and the Farm's eye, but the Court's as well.
 
Back