Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.5%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.8%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 155 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 112 24.2%

  • Total voters
    463
Honey!!! You and your boyfriend get in here, they got 'em! THEY FINALLY GOT GREER!!!
1734475948442.png
 
Am I the only one slightly horrified that he would seek to involve his family in this and subject them to deposition? Where they will be asked about his creepy antics under oath? I can't see that as going the way Russel planned?
I'm sure they're now delighted to be involved, and won't do anything they can to get out of his brothel delusions as soon as Hardin has to reach out, if it goes that far.
They are the key to proving his case, after all.
 
When this case ends eventually how does all the cost payment work. If Greer has to pay Hardins fees but has no money, is Hardin just shit out of luck, or is he paid by Null now and Hardin simply refunds Null as payments come in? Greer has nothing right now I don't see him holding a shit job long enough to make any substantial money. Does this legal cost just hang over him for the rest of his short life?
 
Honey!!! You and your boyfriend get in here, they got 'em! THEY FINALLY GOT GREER!!!
View attachment 6763053
Ah! Well, nevertheless
When this case ends eventually how does all the cost payment work. If Greer has to pay Hardins fees but has no money, is Hardin just shit out of luck, or is he paid by Null now and Hardin simply refunds Null as payments come in? Greer has nothing right now I don't see him holding a shit job long enough to make any substantial money. Does this legal cost just hang over him for the rest of his short life?
They can garnish his wages if he has any (and isn't working for cash under the table), or attach the judgment to any assets Greer has. Federal money judgment liens are valid for 20 years, and can be renewed for an additional 20; if it uses state law for some reason, it's 8 years +8 renewal in Utah.

Null could purchase Russ' copyrights in exchange for satisfaction of the judgment, then market them to recoup his costs.
 
This is some secret code:
"6"
"L"
"I'm 7"

What does it mean?
I ran it through my Little Orphan Annie Decoder Ring and got this:

D R I N K D R O O L M O R E O V A L T I N E

I do so hope we get to see Christmas Consequences for this fucking faggot though. Far beyond time he gets treated like an adult.
 
When this case ends eventually how does all the cost payment work. If Greer has to pay Hardins fees but has no money, is Hardin just shit out of luck, or is he paid by Null now and Hardin simply refunds Null as payments come in? Greer has nothing right now I don't see him holding a shit job long enough to make any substantial money. Does this legal cost just hang over him for the rest of his short life?
Null could demand Greer hand over his copyrights too him in lieu of monetary compensation :unholy:
 
He'll call them good boys he was unable to retain due to circumstances beyond his control (The Plights) and the real injustice was the court let the defense have a lawyer when he wasn't allowed to.
On the other hand, it could end up as a Dennis Hof type situation, where he either loves and appreciates them or hates and blames them based on the needs of the moment.
Excellent witness list. I'm sure they'll be happy to get involved and help Russ blow the case wide open.
Imagine being personally tied to Russell Greer. It's like some sort of curse from the Bible, where God takes vengeance on the second and third generations for a transgression. Hopefully the posters here have the good taste not to contribute to these poor people's suffering by bothering them.
 
Null could demand Greer hand over his copyrights too him in lieu of monetary compensation :unholy:
I'm not sure how serious he was but Null mentioned how entertaining it could be to try and collect worldly possessions and record the process. That seems less likely now that Greer presumably had to already get rid of most of his stuff. His copyrights are generally worthless but maybe people would buy the Swift book for fun if the money doesn't go to Russ... and maybe there's some "if I did it" changes like when OJ had to hand over his copyright
On the other hand, it could end up as a Dennis Hof type situation, where he either loves and appreciates them or hates and blames them based on the needs of the moment.

Imagine being personally tied to Russell Greer. It's like some sort of curse from the Bible, where God takes vengeance on the second and third generations for a transgression. Hopefully the posters here have the good taste not to contribute to these poor people's suffering by bothering them.
and they adopted him! Not for the first time, it's proven that no good deed goes unpunished.
 
His copyrights are generally worthless
It might not be about the money so much as it is about sending a message.
maybe people would buy the Swift book for fun if the money doesn't go to Russ
Future KF fundraiser idea? I know I'd buy a hard copy of "Why I Sued Taylor Swift: and How I Became Falsely Known as Frivolous, Litigious and Crazy" with a foreword by Null.
 
If Greer has to pay Hardins fees but has no money, is Hardin just shit out of luck, or is he paid by Null now and Hardin simply refunds Null as payments come in?
It’s the latter and technically the money goes to Null to use for compensation against costs.

However, many other deals can be negotiated (upfront as has been done before) and those we wouldn’t know.
 
His copyrights are generally worthless but maybe people would buy the Swift book for fun if the money doesn't go to Russ... and maybe there's some "if I did it" changes like when OJ had to hand over his copyright
If the book is signed by Null and Mr. Hardin, and has the cover be something different (image of the judgement, KF logo, Null giving the middle finger, etc), I'd buy it. I'd probably be overpaying it, but it'd be a novelty item, so I don't mind.
 
I guess I don't even understand the proposed witnesses. What could they possibly testify about in this case, even theoretically?

They have no personal knowledge of alleged infringing occurring. So they are no help proving his case. Let's say the court finds contributory copyright infringement. The plaintiff ideally needs a damages expert to assess the potential lost revenue caused by the naughty poasters (something he seemingly has waived with his latest disclosure). Hurt feelings or psychological distress from copyright infringement can't be compensated- its not a IIED case (which I think was in the original complaint).

So even if get past the fact the Rule 26 disclosure is late and completely inadequate- shouldn't the witnesses be excluded for total lack of relevance?
 
Back