UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson fatally shot outside Hilton hotel in Midtown in targeted attack: cops - Just Part and Parcel of visiting a Big City

roflcorn69420 said:
NY governor Kathy Hochul holding personal therapy sessions with executives
Click to expand...
Bunny Wigglesworth said:
Anyone confused by the hatred Americans have for these Mammonites is either a demon or a retard.
Click to expand...

I did not know, there was an industry that made the MIC look like saints.

The modern American aristocrats really do suck donkey balls.

These people tolerate their own spawn marrying niggers or cutting their cocks off.

There is up much lasting value or legacy for the modern CEO and CFO and stockholders.

And the MBA schools have abandoned merit and excellence for nigger homosexual worshipping.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Qonas, Zemblan Physics, Nebulon X5 and 14 others
Accidental Racism said:
They're already shitting their pants, you should see the post earlier in this thread (?) where a governor basically posts paranoid shit on twitter thinking there are drones above his house. They were stars.
Click to expand...
Sidenote, do you think all the reports of "drones" over New Jersey is an attempt to dilute the news (and our attention) amid reclarified hatred for our reptilian overlords?
 
  • Winner
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Milk Float, Billy Bob Dick, Bunny Wigglesworth and 3 others
The Morning Visitor said:
Sidenote, do you think all the reports of "drones" over New Jersey is an attempt to dilute the news (and our attention) amid reclarified hatred for our reptilian overlords?
Click to expand...
I think it’s a false flag to justify more of our tax dollars going to hand chosen defense contractors. When Elon Musk comes out as the only voice who magically can fix our drone problem, you’ll know I’m right.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Memento Malum, Milk Float, Billy Bob Dick and 5 others
Why are they risking potentially fucking up their case with questionable terrorism charges when a first degree murder charge would already be slam dunk conviction with life in prison?
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Milk Float and I'm a Silly
Helvetia said:
because the CEOs whispering in their ear want to make an example of him.
Click to expand...
Yea but what would be convicted of additional terrorism charges mean for Luigi? New York doesn't have the death penalty so either way he'd get life in prison max.

Potentially fucking up a case for purely optics reasons doesn't sound very smart but I guess our elites often aren't very bright so that tracks.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Fatsuit Shinji, SIMIΔN, Nebulon X5 and 5 others
Jace on ice said:
Yea but what would be convicted of additional terrorism charges mean for Luigi? New York doesn't have the death penalty so either way he'd get life in prison max.

Potentially fucking up a case for purely optics reasons doesn't sound very smart but I guess our elites often aren't very bright so that tracks.
Click to expand...
It moves the Overton Window for the jury’s deliberation further towards a guilty verdict. A terrorism charge being ridiculous makes a first degree murder charge seem more plausible in comparison.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: Coo Coo Bird, Aunt Carol, SIMIΔN and 8 others
Jace on ice said:
Yea but what would be convicted of additional terrorism charges mean for Luigi? New York doesn't have the death penalty so either way he'd get life in prison max.

Potentially fucking up a case for purely optics reasons doesn't sound very smart but I guess our elites often aren't very bright so that tracks.
Click to expand...
I suppose a successful terrorism charge would allow them to more harshly proscribe people who support Luigi - anyone who "solicits, raises funds for or provides other material support or resources to those who commit or encourage the commission of horrific and cowardly acts of terrorism" or "making a terroristic threat (with) no defense to a prosecution pursuant to this section that the defendant did not have the intent or capability of committing the specified offense or that the threat was not made to a person who was a subject thereof" has committed a Class D Felony in New York state. So if they establish he's a terrorist then maybe people donating to his legal fund or saying "deny, defend, depose" to insurance agents could get targeted more firmly.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Coo Coo Bird, Tragon Dirtle, World Star and 13 others
honestly i'd be surprised if he gets convicted, the most time he'll serve is time served probably for the minor cases, i know Bernie Goetz was 40 years ago but this is literally Bernie Goetz on shrooms, no way in hell will people side against him. with how Penny got off i would not be surprised if the justice department isn't going to try every dirty trick in the book. I'm honestly shocked they aren't demanding the internet companies hand over stuff

Beyond that i'm even more shocked Mr. Musk doesn't hand over stuff. we all know twitter keeps records whenever someone deletes their tweets, those could easily sour a jury. Musk better be using those as a bargining chip, same with the rest of the internet companies, make the justice department sweeten the deal for them and drop some cases to get that stuff.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Fatsuit Shinji, Aunt Carol, I'm a Silly and 3 others
AssignedEva said:
I suppose a successful terrorism charge would allow them to more harshly proscribe people who support Luigi - anyone who "solicits, raises funds for or provides other material support or resources to those who commit or encourage the commission of horrific and cowardly acts of terrorism" or "making a terroristic threat (with) no defense to a prosecution pursuant to this section that the defendant did not have the intent or capability of committing the specified offense or that the threat was not made to a person who was a subject thereof" has committed a Class D Felony in New York state. So if they establish he's a terrorist then maybe people donating to his legal fund or saying "deny, defend, depose" to insurance agents could get targeted more firmly.
Click to expand...
also they can accuse literally anyone who's praised luigi and/or his act of being a terrorist supporter.

it also means letters he writes can be seized by the FBI, like Timothy McVeigh's were.
I was uncertain what to do with the letter. Several months later, during jury selection for McVeigh's federal trial in Denver, I wrote a short article about it.

The story caused a minor stir, and it prompted an FBI agent to come to the Gazette offices and consiscate the letter. The agent used a rubber glove to retrieve it and gingerly place it in a plastic evidence bag.
Click to expand...
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Fatsuit Shinji, Coo Coo Bird, Tragon Dirtle and 6 others
Fanatical Pragmatist said:
This 100%.

I'm not shedding a tear for the CEO who's crowning achievement was getting an AI to deny more claims, and I 100% understand why people are rooting for the killer here (and it really shows how the US healthcare/insurance system needs to change) - but I'm gonna call bullshit on any "class consciousness" faggotry because the same people cheering for a premeditated shot-in-the-back killing are the same people wanting Rittenhouse raped and Penny hung for acting in blatant self-defense.
Like I might be sympathetic, but I'm not gonna endorse your desire to shoot people in the back of the head until you endorse my right to fend off someone charging right at me.

Something something no bad tactics only bad targets or w/e
Click to expand...

I think there can be nuance here?

Penny was justified, dumb nigger being a menace just died because someone was trying their best to make sure he wasn't a danger to other people. If you're being a danger to other people, sometimes you just die.

Rittenhouse went armed to a protest he should've had zero involvement with, to do what exactly? Protect some stranger's property with lethal force? We have enough of those retards already, they're called police. And even their small bit of training kept them from going solo and killing multiple people "in self defense". It was as much about self defense as killing Harambe was self defense. Some dumb nigger put themselves in a dumb situation where lethal force could be conceivable justified for self preservation. But he's the one that went into that Gorilla cage with a gun in the first place. Fuck Rittenhouse and his murder boner.
 
  • Disagree
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Fatsuit Shinji, Netizennameless, Coo Coo Bird and 19 others
  • Winner
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Fatsuit Shinji, The Taxman, Tragon Dirtle and 6 others
beautiful person said:
What about (wuttaboutism, lmao) the people who appreciate what Mangione did, but also recognize that Rittenhouse and Penny blatantly acted in self-defense? Like, are you talking about other users on this site, or retard communists on bootleg Xitter Bluesky?
Click to expand...
People I know IRL, mostly with FB & Insta accounts, but I wouldn't be surprised if they had Bluesky.

Most people in this thread seem to have level heads.
Ironically the corners of the internet where you can still drop slurs happen to be the parts of internet where honest discourse can happen.
roflcorn69420 said:
The true Gigachad legal defense would be to compare the case to that of Gary Plauche/Jeffrey Doucet https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Plauché
Click to expand...
This.
Plauche was literally a case of "and then the jury was okay with it"
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Fatsuit Shinji, SIMIΔN, I'm a Silly and 7 others
Unique User Name said:
I think there can be nuance here?

Penny was justified, dumb nigger being a menace just died because someone was trying their best to make sure he wasn't a danger to other people. If you're being a danger to other people, sometimes you just die.

Rittenhouse went armed to a protest he should've had zero involvement with, to do what exactly? Protect some stranger's property with lethal force? We have enough of those retards already, they're called police. And even their small bit of training kept them from going solo and killing multiple people "in self defense". It was as much about self defense as killing Harambe was self defense. Some dumb nigger put themselves in a dumb situation where lethal force could be conceivable justified for self preservation. But he's the one that went into that Gorilla cage with a gun in the first place. Fuck Rittenhouse and his murder boner.
Click to expand...
There absolutely can be nuance. I don't know if the CEO shooter was "justified" in a legal sense, but one look at UHC's business practices will make any Tom, Dick or Jane say "he had it comin'". As @roflcorn69420 said earlier, it's comparable to Gary Plauche extrajudicially killing the monster that raped his son.

Daniel Penny is a hero. The left is shooting themselves in the foot by trying to turn it into a "don't strangle retarded niggers" issue when the retarded nigger in question was brandishing a knife and threatening to stab random passengers. I don't care about his mental state or skin complexion, the man was a danger to innocent people and needed to be disarmed, with lethal force if necessary.

Rittenhouse is an idiot larper that put himself in a bad situation, but Rosenbaum threw an unidentified item at him and charged him to gain control of his gun, which any gun owner knows is a threat on their own life (and potentially the lives of bystanders). Everything after that (Huber and Grosskreutz) was a case of a stupid mob operating on heresay and chasing an "active shooter" while he was on his way to the police line to attempt to turn himself in. So while Rittenhouse was a retard that shouldn't have been there in the first place, a voluntary manslaughter charge (for death as a result of reckless behavior) would have stuck much easier than any kind of murder charge. The prosecution was somehow dumber than the lobster that dropped itself in the boiling pot and overplayed their hand.

But I also believe in someone defending their own property with deadly force. I equate personal theft with slavery (you are taking the value of the hours someone worked for that property), so that's probably why I'm not too offended by self-deputized larpers. It's simply morally gray to me when it's a third party's property, as is the case of Rittenhouse.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Coo Coo Bird, Scarface1, Bunny Wigglesworth and 9 others
Unique User Name said:
I think there can be nuance here?

Penny was justified, dumb nigger being a menace just died because someone was trying their best to make sure he wasn't a danger to other people. If you're being a danger to other people, sometimes you just die.

Rittenhouse went armed to a protest he should've had zero involvement with, to do what exactly? Protect some stranger's property with lethal force? We have enough of those retards already, they're called police. And even their small bit of training kept them from going solo and killing multiple people "in self defense". It was as much about self defense as killing Harambe was self defense. Some dumb nigger put themselves in a dumb situation where lethal force could be conceivable justified for self preservation. But he's the one that went into that Gorilla cage with a gun in the first place. Fuck Rittenhouse and his murder boner.
Click to expand...
Rittenhouse was self defense, Americans are allowed to have guns
 
  • Agree
  • Dumb
  • Like
Reactions: Fatsuit Shinji, Coo Coo Bird, Qonas and 13 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back