State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

Will Nicholas Rekieta take the plea deal offered to him?


  • Total voters
    1,268
  • Poll closed .
Ha haaa can you imagine the seething as he reads this:

IMG_9477.jpeg
 
I know it's a long shot but I wonder if April can - at this stage - flip on the Rekietas to get her charges dismissed. Would there be any advantage for the State to do so?
Much like Aaron, she's an eyewitness and, unlike Aaron, a personal participant in every aspect of the case, even the part after Aaron committed his one act of prudence and got the fuck out of Dodge.

She saw it all. And she can play the weak, brainwashed woman card about how Balldo FORCED her into sexual degeneracy and TRICKED her into all this stuff. Turn on the waterworks and maybe even play the retroactive consent revocation card, and Nick actually totally MEGA RAPED her.
 
I need a 'yes, but he'll insist we don't understand the facts and logic of how he totally wasn't owned by the State'.

Once he pleads guilty I assume Kayla will get a similar plea deal as well, though not sure if April will to scorched earth if she gets the chance.

It will be worse. within hours of pleading guilty he'll say: "What's funny and weird is I don't even remember what the state made me plead guilty to. Sometime a father has to make sacrifices to make sure their children are taken care of. You have no idea what I'd plead guilty to see my kids everyday."


Oh, and tomorrow is Friday before Christmas week. I am thinking this is when SJW will drop a DENIED on Kayla. Merry Christmas.
 
Last edited:
Who has taken BBN’s (@Crackieta) place as the de facto top news outlet for everything Rekieta on Xitter?
 

Attachments

Kayla's motions are thrice DENIED
Wasn´t this paragraph:

The Court does acknowledge that using social media video as support for a warrant is somewhat unusual and caution must be used to ensure an altered video, parody, etc. are not used 9 as support for a warrant. In this case, there is no indication that Deputy Pomplun did not watch Nicholas Rekieta’s May 21, 2024, video nor is there any evidence that the video is altered or a parody or otherwise inaccurate.
exactly the same


Exactly the same from Nick´s motion?

Also, signing off SJW is pretty funny;
 
Exactly the same from Nick´s motion?
The arguments were actually different. Nick was trying to have the video thrown out in its entirety, leaving the state without probable cause.

He didn't even try to argue that there wasn't probable cause at all, just that it was based on a fake video.
Anyone know if/when they'll lump Kayla and Nick into the same Settlement Conference? I think Sean or Kurt predicted that would likely occur.
I think it depends on how hardball they want to go. If they did want to go hard on Nick specifically, they'd do them separately to try to get Kayla to turn on Nick or Nick to cave in for an easier deal for Kayla. I don't Balldo is the kind of man to go for the latter because he is weak.

The settlement conference is sort of a formality. It could be to negotiate, and it could just be to put ink on the paper of something that's already been agreed upon. The prosecution and defense don't actually need a formal settlement conference to cut a deal and can reach one at any time prior to the end of the case.

It's not even uncommon for the sides to cut a deal in the hallway outside the courtroom right before the trial is scheduled.
 
Back