Megathread SRS and GRS surgeons and associated horrors - the medical community of experimental surgeons, the secret community of home butchers

[sperginity]

Dumb people are insanely monetizable, and the latest trans craze is a push to see how much they can exploit retards

A lot of these people are not dumb, they're just insanely dishonest. Being smart and dishonest makes for some really egregious levels of self-deception. A stupid person cannot come up with as many ways to lie to themselves and will not really try to justify everything they do anyway.

Due an update on Fistulissa ?

The TL is clogged with a lot of shit about canadian politics and gaza, the trans-adjacent xeets are split evenly between complaining about minors being deprived of puberty blockers and how his SRS has ruined his life. "it is so hurtful to see other friends on here whose SRS improved their quality of life". He sees no contradiction here. I guess he has convinced himself that its just exceptionally poor luck to end up with a bad SRS result. It takes a long time to come to term with such a terrible mistake, but most people do not learn from their worst mistakes at all.

There was an additional tweet about disability paperwork being lost in the mail. So he is going to permanently cost a lot of money to tax payers on top of the money paid for SRS/ostomy/etc. What a waste. If he was born 100 years ago he probably would have built houses or done some other useful thing before growing old

https://archive.is/hOD7N

 

[Cuckoman]

i just saw some girl posting on Twitter about her tits getting cut off and i just can't comprehend it
i don't get how this is allowed by any doctor
its tragic when a female gets breast cancer and has to have one of her breasts removed but praised when a mentally ill and brainrotted autistic person willingly gets them removed
its fuckin horrendous
how did we even get here as a society when you are meant to feel euphoric about having part of your body removed
what happened to the Hippocratic oath?

The only thing upsetting is how inconsistent it is.
If you are a mentall ill troon then it is celebrated when you multilate your body and amputate body parts.
But if you are a different type of mentally ill and identify as a cripple then it is suddenly unethical to amputate your (functioning) legs or severe your spinal cord.

If one is allowed and celebrated then the other should too. Or both should be banned.

The issue imho is that troons live under special rules to the rest of society and what is considered an affront anywhere else is celebrated as stunning and brave when it is about troons.


The only real solution is to permanently remove troons from society. Their value systems are incompatible with normal people's and if they are let to exist in society their depravity will eventually corrupt all of society.

 

[Stan]

The irony would be if a) those are goosebumps and b) that actually meant the surgeon did a good job and the healing went well, hooking up to good circulation.

I can just imagine the follow-up appointment conversation.

"Doc, my dick gets goosebumps, can we do something about that?"
"Really? That means it's healing really well! Congratulations!"
*surgeons high five each other, the pooner dies a bit more inside as she holds up the most defeated limp hand up for a high-five*

I’m familiar with breast reduction which would be the simplest of surgeries and that has to be treated meticulously and properly for the best results.

I’m not a doctor; my knowledge of the complex anatomy and physiology of the sex organs is pretty superficial but I understand it’s damned complicated. That being said, I really have to wonder how it is that people undergoing such surgeries don’t seem to grasp that there is no way in hell they’re going to get even decent cosmetic results, never mind functional ones.

One bit of info I’m curious to try and find, is… if you say, have your pecker pulled and a ‘neovagina’ installed, will that ‘vag’ last for life? I didn’t know about several times a day dilation; how long do patients have to do that because it strikes me that dilation that often suggests you’re dealing with a permanently open wound.

I'm in a physicianly mood so I can speculate. The short answer is, more data is needed. The long answer is, more data is desperately needed. If Jesse Singal has demonstrated anything with his troon investigative reporting, it's that followup data on these patients is woefully inadequate. When troons say that there's less than x% regret rate, they are making those calculations off the medical equivalent of yelp reviews. Surgeons who do SRS procedures follow their patients through 30 days post op and that is the end of their liability for mortality. Any further followup is voluntary and apparently, many surgeons don't go out of their way to get in touch with patients down the line. Or, the patients aren't willing to write them back, which is their prerogative. Or, the patients 41%'d and they're unable to write back. Gender medicine specialists, who follow the patient longitudinally over the whole transition experience would have more authority to get data about these people, but HIPAA is verrry conservative in what you may share. If the urologists and gender surgical subspecialists don't actively seek out data to tell us how many years an amhole or a rotdog lasts, we have none. And so far, they seem uninterested in proving all but the most basic of survivability measures for those who get these surgeries done.

 

[Cuckoman]

If the urologists and gender surgical subspecialists don't actively seek out data to tell us how many years an amhole or a rotdog lasts, we have none. And so far, they seem uninterested in proving all but the most basic of survivability measures for those who get these surgeries done.

The reason for lack of data is likely, at least partially, due to:
1, the urologist that perform these procedures has no interest in collecting this data
2, the urologist that does not perform this procedure does not want to get involved

 

[Stan]

The reason for lack of data is likely, at least partially, due to:
1, the urologist that perform these procedures has no interest in collecting this data
2, the urologist that does not perform this procedure does not want to get involved

yea that's my point, a surgeon with a business in SRS is usually too busy to want to collect this data anyway, so you get the outliers in both directions... the people who are so satisfied they post pics of their own accord, and those so dissatisfied they do the same. We may not have the full picture of the business, because Kiwi-posting mostly is a result of Reddit, Twitter and social media scraping.

Also I meant to say earlier: It seems to me that the FTM top surgeries could be done to a much more believable spec. MTF top surgeries look more plausible, why are the FTMs cursed with dog-ear outie scars? It's really bad cosmesis. The surgeons who leave women who chose this elective should be ashamed imo.

 

[Pronoun Party]

These surgeries don't need to be banned. Insurance just needs to stop covering them. Do that, and they'll go away on their own, aside from the antics of a few rare ultra-rich degens. Most of these people are useless failures who can barely afford rent, and mommy and daddy are much less likely to play along with their teen's whiny antics if they're going to cost $70,000 out-of-pocket.

 

[Elderly beef taco]

These surgeries don't need to be banned. Insurance just needs to stop covering them. Do that, and they'll go away on their own, aside from the antics of a few rare ultra-rich degens. Most of these people are useless failures who can barely afford rent, and mommy and daddy are much less likely to play along with their teen's whiny antics if they're going to cost $70,000 out-of-pocket.

Instead of pushing srs as a "life saving surgery" they should instead have it be what it is: unnecessary physical alteration for cosmetic reasons. That's it.
Maybe encourage people who think they're trans to get proper mental health support instead of immediately going to hormone therapy would probably help a lot too.
Hopefully things get better regarding that. I'm mad that actual life changing surgeries in Canada can be written off as cosmetic while trans shit is allowed (ex. I know of someone whose father had a heart attack, he had to get a blood vein rerouted to fix it. Insurance dubbed this cosmetic.)

 

[Sinner's Sandwich]

Hopefully things get better regarding that.

I have good and bad news for you.

Good news: It will get getter. The turning of the tide has already begun.

Bad news: It's most likely going to take another decade or 2 or 3.

It's not the first time in history where horrible surgeries where seen as positive and necessary, Lobotomy lasted for 40 years. This thread is going to have stuff to talk about for decades.

 

[Woggie's child bride]

Were I a dicktator, step 1 would be to ban troonism; this would classify troon surgeries with other cosmetic mutilations (udders, buttocks, bottocks, nose reassignment, etc). Step 2 is to have those banned, too, for general moral reasons, and because they compromise the medical profession (which should be about making the patient better, not giving the customer what (s)he wants).

Cosmetics can constitute an improvement, appearance has noticeable effects on how people are treated and think of you and no amount of societal indoctrination will be able to change that, we've had decades long campaigns designed to forced tolerance of ugliness and it's only worker superficially, kind words will be said but never acted upon. I think if it impacts the ability to reproduce then that alone is cause for it being seen as a medical issue. Tranny surgeries are in a different category entirely because not only do they leave the patient unfuckable they also are sterilizing which is something that should never be allowed for the healthy and non-criminal.

Instead of pushing srs as a "life saving surgery" they should instead have it be what it is: unnecessary physical alteration for cosmetic reasons. That's it.
Maybe encourage people who think they're trans to get proper mental health support instead of immediately going to hormone therapy would probably help a lot too.

Your description is too generous, it's a purposeful destruction of function for fetishistic reasons, these aren't people trying to look more attractive to improve their lives and the lives of those around them they're instead seeing to sterilize themselves(betraying their ancestors) and turn themselves into disgusting abominations(a nuisance to everyone who isn't directly profiting off them). Honestly the "proper mental health support" most of them need is just someone to fuck/get fucked by rather than an overpaid psychologist. Male virginity and female aversion to men are both real problems that need to be dealt with on a government level, therapy can't solve societal issues.

 

[Paper Machete]

Not all trannies are kissless virgins or were so fugly as to be unfuckable before trooning. People are averse to them post trooning because they're a troon not because they have an ugly mug. And ugly people have sex all the time. Every day. There is probably an ugly person getting it on RIGHT THIS SECOND!

Makeup is also not necessary. It won't help fix you if you're truly uggo and guys do not give a shit. You can still get them to pay attention to you just fine and they don't care if you don't wear it ime, as long as you have healthy skin that isn't very obviously uneven or pock marked with acne, you do not day to day get benefits from wearing makeup the way people claim. It's just an industry they've bought into. People will be prompted to compliment you because you've made it obvious you put effort into being groomed and well dressed, not just because the presence of makeup.

 

[Safir]

Not sure you should be in charge of anything, fren. You seem about as dumb as trannies.

Banning shit once it's already entrenched in society never works.

We banned spousal rape almost 102 years ago as of this writing, and now most of the world has caught up.
Or, do you still rape your wife?

More banned shit:
child labor
animal (and human) sacrifice
corporal punishment (should've kept this one for criminals)

 

[whotfsaidthat]

We banned spousal rape almost 102 years ago as of this writing, and now most of the world has caught up.
Or, do you still rape your wife?

More banned shit:
child labor
animal (and human) sacrifice
corporal punishment (should've kept this one for criminals)

 

[Hubelublub]

More banned shit:
child labor
animal (and human) sacrifice
corporal punishment

Not sure you're firing on all cylinders, fren.

 

[LongDayAgain]

So do you think Ritchie left for any reason related to his rot hole?

 

[Peaches Demure]

So do you think Ritchie left for any reason related to his rot hole?

Huh?

 

[Stupid Sexy Flanders]

Huh?

I assume they're talking about Ritchie "TullipR" Herron, a somewhat noteable male detransitioner.

He appears to have deactivated his Twatter account. It seems like he's focusing on his lawsuit related to his transition and doesn't want social media distracting him.

 

[whotfsaidthat]

So do you think Ritchie left for any reason related to his rot hole?

didnt he post his rot-hole once? does anyone have an image or link? i heard he posted it but i never saw it. im curious, as he said it looks like a shark-bite.

 

[expectant asshole]

Marital rape was only outlawed in the UK in 1991 and in the USA in 1993. It’s still legal in many countries.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marital_rape_laws_by_country

Now back to your regularly scheduled eldritch horrors.

 

[Peaches Demure]

A pooner with a horrific-looking abdominal phallo has posted a 7 week update:

The thing is literally bursting at the seams and seems to have developed some kind of mixture of a keloid scar and a blood blister on top.

Spoiler: This thing is legitimately horrifying

https://www.reddit.com/r/phallo/comments/1hhj6dh/7_week_abdominal_phallo_update/

"It gets better". Uh huh. Sure will. You can count on that.

 

[Procrastinhater]

These surgeries don't need to be banned. Insurance just needs to stop covering them. Do that, and they'll go away on their own, aside from the antics of a few rare ultra-rich degens. Most of these people are useless failures who can barely afford rent, and mommy and daddy are much less likely to play along with their teen's whiny antics if they're going to cost $70,000 out-of-pocket.

Thats the key. This shit should not be funded by taxpayers or insurance payments.
If these freaks want to mutilate themselves it needs to be 100% out of pocket.
I don't want my taxes and my insurance payments going towards this fucking immoral shit, funding genital mutilation for fetishist perverts.
If they had to pay for it themselves hardly any of them could afford it.

A pooner with a horrific-looking abdominal phallo has posted a 7 week update:

View attachment 6770072

The thing is literally bursting at the seams and seems to have developed some kind of mixture of a keloid scar and a blood blister on top.

Spoiler: This thing is legitimately horrifying

View attachment 6770081View attachment 6770077

https://www.reddit.com/r/phallo/comments/1hhj6dh/7_week_abdominal_phallo_update/

View attachment 6770092

"It gets better". Uh huh. Sure will. You can count on that.

I'm sure typical Pooner hygeine had nothing to do with the appalling condition of her 'dog.
They're so fucking stupid looking.
That one is coming apart at the seams and covered in self harm scars and the Pooner its (barely) attached to looks like she bathes once every few months at most.