Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 15.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 5 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 97 24.7%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 69 17.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 159 40.6%

  • Total voters
    392
Most is spot on but I disagree with the wrangling Nick bit. He's an adult (supposedly) and can wrangle himself. Active parenting has an expiration date unless your kid is disabled.
I'd argue a drug addicted alcoholic falls under an incapable person, especially because he's in total denial, but that's a matter of opinion really. I'm mostly angry that they let the farce go on with regards to the harming of their own grandchildren, though if I were to guess, I would think they themselves are narcissistic boomers who actually don't give a shit.
They don’t have to do any of that, Nick is a 40 year old man, why would his parents take responsibility, people turn out to be pieces of shit all the time even with amazing parents and we don’t really have any proof they were too permissive or shitty, that’s. kiwi farms headcanon
He's still on the family dole, and that dole likely continues despite his public drug addiction and neglect of his children. If they cut him off and left him to die in a gutter, that would be fine, as he's an adult. I'm more concerned about the kids, who deserve that money infinitely more than Nick.
 
Ralph unironically loves his kids more than Nick
meh. I'm not certain about that. I don't think "love" fits into either of their feelings for their children.
Vanity projects more like.
Someone needs to be at this plea hearing who can draw.
Surely there must be at least one MN. ArtistFarmer to give us courtroom illustrations? Perhaps a quick character sketch to be completed after the proceedings?
The mask slipped precisely because he gave himself serious brain damage. If his body visibly decayed in just a year during 2023, imagine how bad it must be on the inside?
I knew someone who took one bad trip on acid and was never right again. Mental institute-type not right. No doubt there were probably mental disorders before, though unapparent at the time since they were only 17 at the time. The Machine Elves can fuck up your clockworks permanently.
If your current husband is presented a choice between A) you and your five children, and B) his side piece, and it's an actual difficult decision to pick A (where it seems like Nick wants to be a selfish piece of shit), and not the most obvious and simple decision for anyone who isn't a fucking retard, you need to get him the fuck out. Your relationship will not get better, it's going to get substantially fucking worse. You cut the rot off at the source.
You Scandinavian Prude! You just don't understand the Rekieta Plan! Communal living!
it's for people so selfish and self-absorbed that they that they get to choose what and when to be part of the family. Nick can be a bread winner by choosing to joke and drink all night so he can't be available during the day. Kayla can choose to be the baby-making machine and artsy fartsy space-cadet music teacher. She only does infant care however. When the babies turn into small humans, they are too demanding. Then comes April. She can choose to be the nanny, which no one really knows what the fuck she can really do besides keep porn-sick Nick sucked off so he will quit pestering Kayla for sex. He doesn't want her anyway, her body is ruined and Kayla doesn't want him because broken and tired. That leaves Aaron as a cook. Someone find him a can opener...

What do your children get to choose?
Your children will look for other people to give them what you do not provide for them.
Do you trust them to make wise decisions? After all, they don't even know what drugs are!
What exactly did you teach your children? I fear the answer to that question.
They would have been safer had they been raised by 3 wolves.
 
The only interesting thing about it is that it's another data point showing that Celeste is incapable of smiling without looking like a lunatic.
What I wanna know is why is she bothering some high school kids? I bet they're practicing for the school tennis team, and they're all like "Oh look, it's that crazy lady again, the one with the "hot shot" lawyer son. Let's just humor her until she goes away."

And rictus grin aside, what's wrong with her faaaccceee? It's more blistered and weathered than Ape's snot pocket after an all night balldo sesh!
 
we don’t really have any proof they were too permissive

These instances from the past year come to mind (Nick's questionable financial history aside):

Nick's father saw the state of the home while the Qover was still together and even looked after the kids for a week so Nick and co. could do whatever degenerate shenanigans they wanted (Aaron paid for dinner as thanks). Nick's father had also seen the state of the home at that time. The only reported criticism Robert had was yelling at Nick to do his taxes while visiting the filthy home. Also, Nick's father also testified at a hearing that he had never seen Nick drunk (lol).

You can decide for yourself how strong/weak the evidence is for Nick's parent's permissiveness (and how to feel about it), but it seems silly to pretend the evidence doesn't exist at all to avoid blaming them in any way.
 
It's unenforceable and ridiculous as a practical matter. We all know that your average serious drug dealer is probably hanging out with other felons despite what any plea agreement says. It simply gives the State leverage if the person commits any future crimes.
It's not ridiculous. There is a practical reason for having a clause like that.

How enforceable it is I think comes down to how competent and attentive the probation department is.

Sure, you can argue it's dumb because Nick could just sneak off to a hotel with April when nobody is looking, but you could also say Nick might be able to break any other condition of his probation when nobody is looking.

(And BTW, he absolutely will. He's not gonna stop drinking).

The 'come back to me Vic' thing - There was that weird whiny drunken emotional rant about how Vic wasn't being enough of a special friend to Nick. From what I remember, it was all kinda gay.
He was assmad Vic wouldn't come on his show. Vic eventually did, but later.

He damn well knew was a bad idea at that point in time, for legal reasons, but Nick wanted that Vic fangirl $$$. Which naturally, he would keep all for himself.
 
the Sletta/Woltjers are the people most involved in the Rekieta kids' lives vs Bob & Celeste
Speaking of, does anyone else ever wonder if Kayla’s extended family read the thread & hate watch/ monitor Nick?

On another note, Kayla (& the kids) would be better off without Nick. I can’t imagine their marriage working out after Nick was forced to choose between Kayla & their children, or April. How humiliating that must be. The resentment in that relationship between both parties is guaranteed to be out of this world. It would be better for everyone, especially the kids, if they divorced. There is no going back once you’ve jumped off the edge.

The only thing Nick consistently provides for his family is the monthly trust payments. Kayla can get alimony & child support in the event of divorce, especially as she’s been married to Nick for 20+ years. If he isn’t much of an active participant in her life, nor the children’s, she’d be in a fairly similar position to just drawing a few checks each month, without all his whining & emotional blackmail. Similarly (& to be fair,) Nick would be free to be the faggot he is & could do whatever shit he wants, so it would be a win/ win.

He’s made it clear what he really wants, to pretend they can fix this is simply wasting time. Maybe if they were a strong couple, they’d have a chance to mend things, but I doubt they could fix all the issues as they are now. By strong, I mean honest, emotionally or mentally strong, & willing & able to do everything it takes. I don’t think that describes Nick, & Kayla is probably not at her best right now either, though her state is unknown. Cut losses, move forward. I doubt forgiveness will be feasible anytime soon. Especially with how petty, distractible, & immature Nick is known to be.
 
Doxxing am bad.
24.12.20 Rekieta - Doxing am bad.png
Xeet | Archive

24.12.20 Rekieta - sorry to disappoint.png
Xeet | Archive

I'll see you in hell bish!
24.12.20 Rekieta - Ill see you in hell bish.png
Xeet | Archive
 
These instances from the past year come to mind (Nick's questionable financial history aside):

Nick's father saw the state of the home while the Qover was still together and even looked after the kids for a week so Nick and co. could do whatever degenerate shenanigans they wanted (Aaron paid for dinner as thanks). Nick's father had also seen the state of the home at that time. The only reported criticism Robert had was yelling at Nick to do his taxes while visiting the filthy home. Also, Nick's father also testified at a hearing that he had never seen Nick drunk (lol).

You can decide for yourself how strong/weak the evidence is for Nick's parent's permissiveness (and how to feel about it), but it seems silly to pretend the evidence doesn't exist at all to avoid blaming them in any way.
To me, the fact that they apparently haven't insisted April be gone is one of the biggest tells they are extremely permissive of Nick's fucked up lifestyle choices.

They are grandparents who think it's cool for the kids to have two mommies. That's massively fucked up. I feel like they're 1960s "peace, love, dope, let's all live in a commune together," hippies or some shit. Like they heard Kayla's "Quover" idea and thought it was the neatest idea ever.

Goddamned hippies.

unnamed.jpg

Doxxing am bad.
Nick wanted everybody in KV doxed and openly encouraged KF to do it.

Then again, he also wanted fully open courts until he was in the dock.

Nick's positions vary based upon when benefits him the most.
 
Nick wanted everybody in KV doxed and openly encouraged KF to do it.

Then again, he also wanted fully open courts until he was in the dock.

Nick's positions vary based upon when benefits him the most.
He also published his ex-boyfriend's (Aaron) Google history after supposedly invading his account without permission.

So, truly, Rekieta is the best person to talk about the ethics of doxing.

Rekieta lawgic 2.png
 
Speaking of, does anyone else ever wonder if Kayla’s extended family read the thread & hate watch/ monitor Nick?

On another note, Kayla (& the kids) would be better off without Nick. I can’t imagine their marriage working out after Nick was forced to choose between Kayla & their children, or April. How humiliating that must be. The resentment in that relationship between both parties is guaranteed to be out of this world. It would be better for everyone, especially the kids, if they divorced. There is no going back once you’ve jumped off the edge.

The only thing Nick consistently provides for his family is the monthly trust payments. Kayla can get alimony & child support in the event of divorce, especially as she’s been married to Nick for 20+ years. If he isn’t much of an active participant in her life, nor the children’s, she’d be in a fairly similar position to just drawing a few checks each month, without all his whining & emotional blackmail. Similarly (& to be fair,) Nick would be free to be the faggot he is & could do whatever shit he wants, so it would be a win/ win.

He’s made it clear what he really wants, to pretend they can fix this is simply wasting time. Maybe if they were a strong couple, they’d have a chance to mend things, but I doubt they could fix all the issues as they are now. By strong, I mean honest, emotionally or mentally strong, & willing & able to do everything it takes. I don’t think that describes Nick, & Kayla is probably not at her best right now either, though her state is unknown. Cut losses, move forward. I doubt forgiveness will be feasible anytime soon. Especially with how petty, distractible, & immature Nick is known to be.
There is no way Nick and Kayla's marriage survives. Can you imagine being the kids, especially the youngest ones, in the middle of all of this? Just how psychologicalky fucked up that entire household has got to be. Kids normally feel like pawns in a divorse. They feel responsible as their world crumbles around them. But this? This is a level of fucked up that no child should need to endure.
 
1734721594314.png

Isn't this the same bitch nigga who openly doxed all the Keffals fans who sent an ethics complaint about him, and then tried a year ago to bait Eric July's fans into doing the same thing so he could dox them as well?

Doxing is very much a simple issue. You're putting information out there which makes it trivial to target someone (often alongside opinions or information which stirs righteous indignation to enable others to feel justified in targeting them), but because the U.S. government is ran by avaricious leeches, they keep it legal so that data brokers can enrich themselves by buying and selling P.I.I. for pennies apiece. Until it personally affects enough politicians in a way that forces them to address it, they will allow this to continue. There's not a damn thing complicated about it.
 
It's unenforceable and ridiculous as a practical matter. We all know that your average serious drug dealer is probably hanging out with other felons despite what any plea agreement says. It simply gives the State leverage if the person commits any future crimes.
It's not ridiculous. We threaten people with terms like this to make sure they comply. The purpose of probation many times is to buckbreak people and force them to act like civilized adults.

It's easily enforceable. With someone like Nick, he'll be easy to catch violating probation.
 
Until it personally affects enough politicians in a way that forces them to address it, they will allow this to continue. There's not a damn thing complicated about it.
Until the Supreme Court is entirely comprised of cucks who decide the First Amendment doesn't exist, there's not a damn thing they can do about it. Short of very specific kinds of information, like SSNs and credit card numbers, and specific individuals like protected witnesses, and behavior above and beyond the doxing, it's entirely legal to do.

If you want an example of the sort of thing that can actually be punished, think Hal Turner doxing a federal judge while calling for his murder. That's the kind of thing you can't do (especially if you are a now useless federal asset like Hal was).
 
Back