- Joined
- Nov 14, 2022
My boy Danisch is writing again on the situation, translated by me; original [A]
The things we now know about the culprit open up a can of worms that I have already written about years ago.
After what is now known about the culprit - and I was able to see his tweets on his Twitter/X account in time - he was not a jihad-fighting Islamist, but the opposite, namely a non-Muslim or former Muslim who defended against Islam and felt threatened and persecuted, and who insinuates that the police is driving the Islamization of Germany and failing its victims.
Years ago, I already mentioned the problem that Germany surrenders its ability to be an asylum country if it takes in everybody, so if the people who cause others to flee also come here, and the people in here feel just as threatened - or even genuinely are - like in the country that they fled from, so the refuge in Germany is just going from a rock to a hard place. So that we in Germany don't offer asylum in the sense of the word, but only Islam++, that is Islam with Bürgergeld [unemployment money].
We need to have a discussion on whether asylum by itself isn't already being hollowed out and rendered impossible simply by granting too much of it. Because, actually, asylum is supposed to offer protection from political persecution. But that no longer works if you let all the persecutors into the country too - and there is nothing left for the persecuted to flee to.
They're now going to talk a lot about the culprit, and that he's an islamophile, and so on and so forth.
But the central question, which is going to be avoided, is: If the man - rightly or wrongly - felt persecuted by Islam, and especially so in Germany and the islamized German police - then where could he have even fled to?
I believe this is a very important question.
The right to asylum is constantly being held up - especially by leftists and people like Nancy Faeser. Other than the fact that this right to asylum, as they claim, does not exist, the question would be if asylum rights come with the duty to maintain asylum-capability.
And this begs the question of whether we are even capable of granting asylum if people in Germany feel this threatened and persecuted by Islam.
Magdeburg and Islam++
The things we now know about the culprit open up a can of worms that I have already written about years ago.
After what is now known about the culprit - and I was able to see his tweets on his Twitter/X account in time - he was not a jihad-fighting Islamist, but the opposite, namely a non-Muslim or former Muslim who defended against Islam and felt threatened and persecuted, and who insinuates that the police is driving the Islamization of Germany and failing its victims.
Years ago, I already mentioned the problem that Germany surrenders its ability to be an asylum country if it takes in everybody, so if the people who cause others to flee also come here, and the people in here feel just as threatened - or even genuinely are - like in the country that they fled from, so the refuge in Germany is just going from a rock to a hard place. So that we in Germany don't offer asylum in the sense of the word, but only Islam++, that is Islam with Bürgergeld [unemployment money].
We need to have a discussion on whether asylum by itself isn't already being hollowed out and rendered impossible simply by granting too much of it. Because, actually, asylum is supposed to offer protection from political persecution. But that no longer works if you let all the persecutors into the country too - and there is nothing left for the persecuted to flee to.
They're now going to talk a lot about the culprit, and that he's an islamophile, and so on and so forth.
But the central question, which is going to be avoided, is: If the man - rightly or wrongly - felt persecuted by Islam, and especially so in Germany and the islamized German police - then where could he have even fled to?
I believe this is a very important question.
The right to asylum is constantly being held up - especially by leftists and people like Nancy Faeser. Other than the fact that this right to asylum, as they claim, does not exist, the question would be if asylum rights come with the duty to maintain asylum-capability.
And this begs the question of whether we are even capable of granting asylum if people in Germany feel this threatened and persecuted by Islam.
