- Joined
- May 29, 2023
nobody will care but I'll share anyways.
I'm still using a veracrypt container stored on a zfs raidz2, (I've had to replace the drives in my array recently since one of them was about to commit rm -rf / irl soon) but interestingly, the container's performance changed.
sometimes it would do its old behavior, where file listings wouldn't load on some devices sometimes, but now it has a chance of it working perfectly fine without issue apart from the file listing taking a sec.
the previous drives were wd blues and I've got wd red plus's in it now. the blues weren't meant for NAS usage and i suspect that the red's faster response time and suitability to the task has helped.
i know zfs can do encrypted containers but i haven't found a good way to decrypt it in a way that isn't storing the password on the server in some way.
i might just buy a ssd and shove the container onto it at this point if the performance starts getting shitty again. but i found this interesting so i thought I'd share.
I'm still using a veracrypt container stored on a zfs raidz2, (I've had to replace the drives in my array recently since one of them was about to commit rm -rf / irl soon) but interestingly, the container's performance changed.
sometimes it would do its old behavior, where file listings wouldn't load on some devices sometimes, but now it has a chance of it working perfectly fine without issue apart from the file listing taking a sec.
the previous drives were wd blues and I've got wd red plus's in it now. the blues weren't meant for NAS usage and i suspect that the red's faster response time and suitability to the task has helped.
i know zfs can do encrypted containers but i haven't found a good way to decrypt it in a way that isn't storing the password on the server in some way.
i might just buy a ssd and shove the container onto it at this point if the performance starts getting shitty again. but i found this interesting so i thought I'd share.