What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

Anyone like a sports conspiracy?

In 1993, at the Chinese Games in Beijing, multiple Chinese women obliterated several track world records. The elite group included several runners who were barely heard of again and the performances included record breaking times within the overall times. In other words, they were dropping 1500m records inside 3000m races. I believe the 10k record recently fell to some doped Ethiopian but the 3k still stands out of sight.

No one doubts the girls were doped but most elite runners are doped out their domes. How did they do it? Well, the track was destroyed shortly after the event. I do believe the track was purposely laid 10 meters short. Only short clips of the last few seconds of each race exist, which is for one obvious reason; to stop video analysists measuring the track.
 
I know the conversation has moved on from this but when the possibility of nuke hoaxes was discussed here i tried to find the name of a book i remembered but goodreads wasn't showing any results, apparently they have now decided it breaks site rules. Noticed some other books were delisted too.
Zrzut ekranu 2024-12-13 164732.png
Zrzut ekranu 2024-12-13 180953.pngZrzut ekranu 2024-12-13 181128.pngZrzut ekranu 2024-12-13 181542.png
they're making the site useless, used to be you could get away with saying pretty much anything in comments/reviews too
 
they're making the site useless
Same thing happened with Zweites Buch and Testament of a Russian Fascist as well; they don't even appear when searching for them. Goodreads is owned by Amazon, so this doesn't surprise me since right wing banned books (aka actually banned books) have been pulled from Amazon before. They're clearly trying to memory hole them on Goodreads.
 
It is a religion. The cult of SJW. Or the cult of Woke
They killed god, but people needed something to replace it.
What if the "New Atheism" movement and the following atheism-versus-religion internet drama was all "astroturfed" to remove religion: to clear the way for "social justice"?
 
this guy has a theory about Isaac Kappy (https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Isaac_Kappy):


I believe that towards the end of his life, Isaac was involved in some extremely deep and dangerous political games. I know for a fact that he was approached by some extremely shady characters. I believe Isaac was being run in circles by 1st, and 2nd tier intelligence operatives while being fed both information and disinformation. I believe that if Isaac wasn’t approached before he came out publically about Seth and Clair that he was telling the truth as he knew it and the Hollywood Deepstate machine circled the wagons and eventually took Isaac out.

He ties it in with Better Call Saul:

bandicam-2021-07-27-16-28-20-985-768x496.jpgbandicam-2021-07-29-08-27-59-907-768x574.jpgbandicam-2021-08-05-15-26-18-781-672x372.jpg
 

In July 2018, Kappy posted a video online which accused Seth Green of being a pedophile.
He experienced censorship on Twitter so he switched to 8chan."
Ironic.
 
What if the "New Atheism" movement and the following atheism-versus-religion internet drama was all "astroturfed" to remove religion: to clear the way for "social justice"?
It was almost structured that way. Before 2008, a lot of the culture was in the control of the "religious right". They acted like the SJW and leftists of today. Banned and censored things they did not like. Conducted massive letter writing campaigns to pressure political issues.
Had a lot of swing with influential people. If a pastor said that Pokemon was the devil. They had mass burning of Pokemon stuff(and ironically Harry Potter was also a victim of this).
Then around 2008, the four horseman rose to prominence. Publicly debating retarded creationists and easy mark religious people. Like how people dunk on flat earthers today.
Then you had the online push and sharing the early Internet viral clips of them doing this. r/Atheism and the debate bros of the time, were heavily pushed and promoted. Unless you started talking shit about Islam or Judaism. That was going to far.
It decimated Christianity. And too this day you have these guys to thank for having people dunk on Christians and protecting the feelings of sand niggers.
You could say it was engineered to sweep up the Bush administration supporters as well. If you want to read deep in to the wider context of it. As they were one of the main factions supporting Bush and the Republicans back then. The Obama years is what this all took place in. So it can make you think it was engineered by someone on their side. He had 2 uninterrupted terms after all.
 
They acted like the SJW and leftists of today.
At least the older influences of that "religious right" were nowhere near as pervasive and endless as that of the Cult of Progress. And it's still arguably better to follow conservative religious values than "woke" values. At least conservative religious values do not demonize white people, heterosexuality (to an extent), nor healthy families.
 
At least the older influences of that "religious right" were nowhere near as pervasive and endless as that of the Cult of Progress. And it's still arguably better to follow conservative religious values than "woke" values. At least conservative religious values do not demonize white people, heterosexuality (to an extent), nor healthy families.
It is more that they use the same sort of tactics. Not morals. A SJW/woke/leftist does not have any morals. They will use anything and everything against you. Even things they do themselves.
They just found away to keep structure of tactics the same. I said in the other thread that they have structured it like a religion. I do not think that is coincidence.
Also i forgot to mention, the Occupy Wall Street Protests. That was their first big break using the religions teachings in practice. You had fat black Shaniq'uas screeching about the marginalised voices and shit to break that protest up.
 
What if the "New Atheism" movement and the following atheism-versus-religion internet drama was all "astroturfed" to remove religion: to clear the way for "social justice"?

It was almost structured that way. Before 2008, a lot of the culture was in the control of the "religious right". They acted like the SJW and leftists of today. Banned and censored things they did not like. Conducted massive letter writing campaigns to pressure political issues.
Had a lot of swing with influential people. If a pastor said that Pokemon was the devil. They had mass burning of Pokemon stuff(and ironically Harry Potter was also a victim of this).
Then around 2008, the four horseman rose to prominence. Publicly debating retarded creationists and easy mark religious people. Like how people dunk on flat earthers today.
Then you had the online push and sharing the early Internet viral clips of them doing this. r/Atheism and the debate bros of the time, were heavily pushed and promoted. Unless you started talking shit about Islam or Judaism. That was going to far.
It decimated Christianity. And too this day you have these guys to thank for having people dunk on Christians and protecting the feelings of sand niggers.
You could say it was engineered to sweep up the Bush administration supporters as well. If you want to read deep in to the wider context of it. As they were one of the main factions supporting Bush and the Republicans back then. The Obama years is what this all took place in. So it can make you think it was engineered by someone on their side. He had 2 uninterrupted terms after all.

At least the older influences of that "religious right" were nowhere near as pervasive and endless as that of the Cult of Progress. And it's still arguably better to follow conservative religious values than "woke" values. At least conservative religious values do not demonize white people, heterosexuality (to an extent), nor healthy families.

It is more that they use the same sort of tactics. Not morals. A SJW/woke/leftist does not have any morals. They will use anything and everything against you. Even things they do themselves.
They just found away to keep structure of tactics the same. I said in the other thread that they have structured it like a religion. I do not think that is coincidence.
Also i forgot to mention, the Occupy Wall Street Protests. That was their first big break using the religions teachings in practice. You had fat black Shaniq'uas screeching about the marginalised voices and shit to break that protest up.
preservetube
 
"Science" is the atheist's religion. It's a god they believe in without question and try and indoctrinate other people into it. People are naturally drawn to a creator figure who can explain their existences and the origin that they can't usually comprehend.
The most scientifically plausible explanation for the origins of life on Earth is divine intervention, followed by aliens put us here.
Science explains the what and sometimes the how, but misses on the who and the why most often.
 
What if the "New Atheism" movement and the following atheism-versus-religion internet drama was all "astroturfed" to remove religion: to clear the way for "social justice"?

I think it was pushed to help drum up support for the "War on Terror" post 9/11. The Republicans of the time were all yee-haw and ready to go but the Liberals needed convincing that we had to save the Muslims from their own backwards God-fearing ways. At the very least, it probably helped to quell Liberal sympathy for the Muslims a bit. Hitchens was a massive chickenhawk too and he was an atheist deity,

I don't think New Atheism was pushed with the purpose of clearing the way for social justice per se but the establishment have long understood that religion is one of the stumbling blocks to reducing us to bugmen.
 
Science explains the what and sometimes the how, but misses on the who and the why most often.
If instead of SOYence™, Reddit Atheists© followed the actual scientific method, they wouldn't be able to point so many fingers, since it's never supposed to be the definitive answer/SOYlution to a question, but one step amongst many to figuring out how the world works.

1734867281888.png

Instead, we have to contend with garbage papers that are used to bash people over the head with bullshit (endless tranny papers, terrible climate predictions that are considered the end of the fucking world, rushed vaccines that are Definitely Safe) while being so full of procedural holes, if you were to show them to an actual scientist from the 1800's, they'd probably kill you in a duel just to ensure you don't infect anybody else with your idiocy.

A good example are almost all of the phrama-funded papers on Statins:
- They have a run-in period that is often multiple times the length of the trial itself, which lets them eliminate anybody with major negative reactions without reporting it
- Because of this, they actively hide side effects, including higher risk of diabetes, muscle pain, increased risk of stroke, ALS, liver damage... (See attached)
- The trial itself is extremely short, often mere months for a medication that is supposed to be taken for life, and often, the study is "stopped early".
- The results are shown in relative terms, as otherwise, they would be ridiculously inconsequential (Out of 17802 people, 50% relative reduction of risk, but the absolute reduction? "142 first major cardiovascular events had occurred in the rosuvastatin group, as compared with 251 in the placebo group")
- Every single umbrella review you can find on statins that's not backed by big pharma end up finding, at best, minor benefits (as in, 3-4 days of life gained as a median. Archive)
- That's without mentioning the amount of studies that use LDL as a proxy for heart disease, despite multiple studies showing that LDL is a terrible proxy for heart disease.

Unfortunately, science has been hijacked by these dick-chopping retards. I can't wait for Academia's downfall.
 

Attachments

Not really a conspiracy theory but I'll put it here...

If you plot on a map the four stores that were targeted in the 1982 Tylenol poisoning case and then draw a cross, Ted Kaczynski's mother's home is very close to the centre of the cross.

Contrary to what some might believe, Ted wasn't shacked up in the cabin for 30 straight years. He did visit his mother and is known to have visited in 1980 and "in the years after that" (David Kaczynski).

Also somewhat contrary to popular belief, Ted,wasn't an eco-warrior. According to his own writings, he was on a revenge mission and he had a special hatred of tech and pharmaceutical companies. Killing people also gave him a thrill.

The coordinates surrounding his mother's home become more salient when you consider that this was a man with a PhD in the boundary functions of circles (drawing intersecting lines) and an obsession with codes, riddles and cat and mouse games. In fact, you can find some interesting patterns by plotting the sites of his Ted's unabomber crimes. "Finding patterns where there are none", I here you say. Not with Uncle Ted. His whole unabomber canon is a web of high culture allusions, puzzles and misdirection.
 
I remember someone on /tv/ insinuated that bald and bankrupt guy from youtube was a glowie. Then I get a suggested video of him in syria less than a week out from a 'regime change'. Made me do a big thunk.
4chan definitely has a partnership with YouTube because when I was on 4chan five or more years ago I'd get suggested videos that were mentioned on 4chan all the time. Bald and Bankrupt is also a kike so it's safe to assume he's up to something.
 
Back