Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Lol men are pathetic and quite literally never shut the fuck up about all the feelings they claim not to have. They are the victim in all scenarios.
IMG_2114.jpeg
 
Lol men are pathetic and quite literally never shut the fuck up about all the feelings they claim not to have. They are the victim in all scenarios.
View attachment 6779066
I love when they say "Men suffer in silence" lol, WHERE? Men constantly take it out on everyone around them when they are upset. You will always know a man is upset because he will have a short fuse, yell, stomp, slam doors etc. with no regard of how it affects people around him. It's women who suffer in silence and we suffer because of moids.
 
Last edited:
Link a few, I'd be fascinated to watch.

They definitely exist and they have mostly female audiences who are begging in the comments for the algorithm to drop these videos in men's feeds.

Zach Mental Load Guy (recovering manchild series)
Jimmy Knowles aka Jimmy on Relationships
The Evolved Man

Not vouching for any of them, just the few that I stumbled upon in my day to say browsing.

There's a few others I've seen, but don't remember the names of. They're out there, but only women follow them.
 
Lol men are pathetic and quite literally never shut the fuck up about all the feelings they claim not to have. They are the victim in all scenarios.
View attachment 6779066
More often than not, its moids telling other Moids to “man up”. A phenomenon they want to blame on women, even though its moids who enforce that nonsense.
 
The average 40-60 year old man in my country looks like a human-sized teratoma or a physical embodiment of several sins. I would care less if it was only young internet poisoned scrotes saying this, since they look at male celebs all day and never actually see people outside, but this is a thing for all age groups. How the fuck does a person look in the mirror, see a giant bloated zit of a man, and think to himself 'wow salt and pepper, bro'? Arguably Eastern or Central Europe isn't known for attractive men, but I've been to many countries and the only one where men took some decent bare minimum (staying in shape, haircut, not dressed like a dirty slob) care of themselves was France.
Yeah how come when I hear that men age like fine wine, it's always some meat-golem?
I am no winefag, but to go with the wine analogy, most of wines even if they are fine in the year 1 or 2, turn vinegary after a longer time, and those collectible and carefully selected ones have to be well preserved and stored to pass as ''drinkable'' after decades and their taste is usually described with euphemisms.
Where I live, asocial and/or ugly people (in the history also financially unsecured ones) who aren't likely to ever marry, are called something like ''good for vinegar''.

Edit, and processed aged milk, that's called cheese. Also remember the millenia old archaeological finds of bog butter.
 
Last edited:
The whole narrative around male sexual abuse victims is very irritating. Men hijack conversations, making them quickly fizzle out because they had to do a WHATABOUTism, to bring up some supposed unfairness they suffer. It’s usually disingenuous and inaccurate, making false comparisons and turning it into a pity party for themselves, adding nothing of value and always hinting that women have some great privilege.

So I got to thinking deeper on it. People want to pay extra attention to males becuase it’s hard for them to come forward (yes? same for everyone), they are often not taken seriously (same), they are seen as less of a man (by moids, and women face extreme stigma along with blame.)

Let us not even get into the fact that by age 16, 97-99% of men are stronger than adult women, so the natural unlikelihood of abuse being from the direction of women has a physical limitation from the start. So, yes, there will be a question as to how. Even though people automatically believe men because they are so desperate to amplify crimes women allegedly commit as if that makes them look better. It’s near unrealistic, and that lets people laugh at it, just like seeing heads explode in a movie is fine because no one will see that IRL.

What benefit do women have? People certainly do not care more. The questioning and abuse they face in court is worse, because if she cries it’s manipulation if she doesn’t cry she’s lying bitch. They are not taken more seriously. Conviction rates remain almost at zero. Most don’t come forward. They also carry that with them, are judged differently for their entire lives if people know. Never-mind STI’s that impact women worse and pregnancy.

So, what? People can make jokes about male abuse and that’s not fair because if the roles were reversed faggotry starts. Okay, but that’s usually jokes made by other men, and usually nonsense because there are easy comparisons to be found where no one gives a fuck about the abuse against women treated as a joke, or even sexualised, in media. It’s just complete fucking nonsense that serves to silence women. Virtue signalling to the max.
 
Last edited:
I'm getting pissed off at the posts and discussions I see online that insist women should be wives, housekeepers and mommy-milker breed cows for FAGGOTS and TRANNIES. AND, if I, as a woman, write in a response that expecting women to put up with such an arrangement is unrealistic and obscene, I am the one who gets banned for "hate speech"! Fags and trannies use "muh gender identity discrimination" TOS on every single platform to BAN and CONTROL all discussions surrounding women, let alone "Lavender Marriage".
I've seen some women, of whom I assume are PAID psy ops or controlled opposition to PROMOTE women being married to FAGGOTS AND TRANNIES. It's beyond enraging!
Women who get trapped in marriages with FAGGOTS AND TRANNIES often become suicidal, their lives are destroyed, their youth is LOST, they sometimes end up with AIDS... yet social media fame whores are PROMOTING THIS????
I saw some fake ass (probably a bot post, I hope) of some woman who was "proud" she "dated this guy who was bisexual and had AIDS, but since I'm not a homophobe, I married him!" And all these other posters were up-dooting her like "RAH RAH SISTAH!"
Fuck me with a fucking hot poker and a flame thrower. I'd rather die than ride an e-coli cock.
This is the worst combination: red pilled right wing FAGGOTS AND TRANNIES. The left ones pretend to care about "muh consent", although they still demand obedience from females. The right wing FAG-TRONS demand little girl slaves, they advocate brain chipping lobotomies and gene editing "to make women obedient". They literally want to enslave and skin walk little girls, then exterminate us all for robots and artificial wombs.
Expect to see more and more content online with FAGGOTS AND TRANNIES insisting that women must be their mommy milker breed cows and house slaves... they literally want teen girls to clean up after their gay chemsexx parties with their faggot boyfriends. Many rich men in tech and politics are FAGGOTS and/or closeted FAGGOTS, too, so expect to see this PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE campaign to be waged against women on ALL FRONTS.
 
- despite the much-touted male loneliness epidemic and all the data saying women are healthier and happier single, it is actually women who are the unhappiest when not married with kids and men are fleeing marriage because it's just not appealing to them
- women can't be lonely

You pointed out other contradictory "canon" beliefs, but this one cracks me up. "Women don't have to be lonely bc they "get" to have magically built-in support sisters and have no individual existence, whereas men are stark individuals*...except for any woman over 30 not married, bc they are sad, bitter, lonely, drunk cat ladies."

*"men are completely living out destiny as independent warriors...but are entitled - no, forced - to cry daily about how women, modern life, feminism, DEI, wokism, unrealistic expectations by women & society, corporations, the government, immigration, women having rights, Chad, Tyron, Stacy, Backy, fat chicks, working women, women who don't work, vain women, women who let themselves go, and everything else but themselves has caused them to be crippled by loneliness."

Make it make sense.
 
The government dumps all the refugees where I am because housing and cost of living is cheaper, but that’s because we’re all poor as fuck here, and it all just compounds the issue. There are straight up ghettos of these cunts and I don’t mean to be a weird chud when I say that there are straight up areas where you will not hear English and groups of them hang out in their nighties perving on women. The Lidl (I’m sorry to say LidlDrip) next to the mosque is straight up like walking through a fucking market stall in bumfuck Pakistan, they treat the place like shit and have no manners. In our flat building they stand and smoke in the hallways and stare and catcall you.
There's an entire Sainsbury's in Oxford of all places notorious for having an all Male jeet staff that basically catcalls anyone that walks in.
It makes me grateful that undocumented spics in the US atleast keep to themselves and do manual labor. I know I'm an outsider but I seriously don't get why the UK needs so many brown men working retail or Deliveroo.
Also why do they never shave? Istg someone needs to tell them their scraggly beards don't look good because they all must assume it does. Don't tell them though because knowing how to shave's one of the main differentiators to me between rich and poor (Sunak is a good example)

Tangentical maybe but I really don't get how the UK fails to understand regional economic inequality this badly. Is it because everyone who knows about geography is too busy in London to give a shit? We have something similar in the US to some extent but it's not nearly as unequal compared to just how much London has compared to the rest.
Anyway, apparently it's "woke" to try and prevent women from dying in car accidents.

Screenshot_20241222-033307.png
They're ganging up on her because she looks funny and like one of their SJW kringe!!! videos
 
Last edited:
I pity his pajeet beard.
View attachment 6780013
Just teenage hijinks! Until you combine it with all the vile, misogynistic shit he says about women or the fact that he and Thiel are so cozy.
Vance will be the first troon president, I can feel it. After Trump if Vance gets elected next he will make trooning out his first act as president.

Since we are now on the topic, have a complilation of stories from women that will make you say: "Actually, yes wine and cats are better than getting married".

GdDGkQvagAEwXsI.jpg
GekUCmZXoAEYHmy.jpgGeNe-KfbMAAtHYu(1).jpgGd7ULD2a0AEFtPP.jpgGc1njWeasAAdqA3.jpgGcivKapaMAMRMcj.jpgGcdNmIObIAANjKw.jpgGbwX4_baEAAp2Q5.jpgGalKJGBa8AAwq6J.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
“Why doesn’t anyone take boys being abused nearly as seriously as girls??”

Because Moids don’t fucking take it seriously, and they’d rather project their own porn sickness onto 12 year olds that get molested by their teachers:
IMG_7767.jpeg
IMG_7768.jpeg
IMG_7769.jpeg
They get a little too eager to hear the details as to how the boys got molested. They’re pretty much pedophiles, and just know better than to outright admit it.

But somehow, it’s women’s fault that no one takes male victims seriously.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7771.jpeg
    IMG_7771.jpeg
    254.7 KB · Views: 47
  • IMG_7770.jpeg
    IMG_7770.jpeg
    171.2 KB · Views: 42
I'm getting pissed off at the posts and discussions I see online that insist women should be wives, housekeepers and mommy-milker breed cows for FAGGOTS and TRANNIES. AND, if I, as a woman, write in a response that expecting women to put up with such an arrangement is unrealistic and obscene, I am the one who gets banned for "hate speech"! Fags and trannies use "muh gender identity discrimination" TOS on every single platform to BAN and CONTROL all discussions surrounding women, let alone "Lavender Marriage".
I'm so glad you mentioned the concept of Lavender Marriage. Personally, while I do find the idea of it good on paper and could see why young people, especially women nowadays are interested in it, it also rubs me the wrong way due to the fact that most lavender marriages are women being beards for gay men and not only these goids get to be status boosted by the society, but also they still have the same access to women's emotional labor through this marriage the same way a straggot moid would have through his own marriage.

Even if you look at the history of it, it's always a woman marrying a goid to protect him from being ostracized and rarely the other way around. The reality that most likely if lavender marriages do rise, we're gonna see more of the "goid and his beard" dynamic than the 2 female platonic friends marrying for sake of marital benefits.

Peter Thiel, Dave Rubin and "allegedly" JD Vance comes to mind.
Your le based pro-life men btw
1734899520102.png

The knowledge that divorces are always a rift in your child's life that hurts them, compared to your parents growing up and learning to get along. The purpose and vow-greement that you're in this for keeps. IMO if you divorce you're transferring relationship stress and its politics onto your kids to relieve your own issues.
If your partner is punching walls and having anger management issues while you sit there and do nothing, that's not overcoming things or learning to get along, that's enabling and you hoping that he doesn't turn his fist towards you. Yes, divorce affect children but people also absolutely overlook the consequences of children growing up in a household where they seen their parents hate each other but pretend everything is okay for the sake of marriage. Children that grow up in this type of environment tend to pick up unhealthy relationship habits and patterns that they thought were completely normal because they've seen their parents do it, they tend to ignore and think it's okay when they get mistreated whether it's by their future boyfriend/girlfriend or somebody else.
 
It makes me grateful that undocumented spics in the US atleast keep to themselves and do manual labor
They don't lol
Even if you look at the history of it, it's always a woman marrying a goid to protect him from being ostracized and rarely the other way around.
That would be far, far too dangerous to work because scrotes
 
The same can be said for people who stay together who are not in love, in relationships that are abusive, or disordered. You are in a disordered relationship. You cling to him out of some sense of obligation, some belief that otherwise you're child will become traumatized or broken. Perhaps, and it seems to me, it's also out of sheer consumerist need for monetary security. A child sees this too, and the stress will still transfer. A child, a girl, growing up witnessing deadbeat daddy who can't even be assed to tend to her for five minutes, making this money you claim he has. What will that show her? Her view of men is already disordered from jump.
Slight PL on my part but this can't be stressed enough ... this behavior is honestly confusing for someone who is supposedly so worried about their child. I have firsthand experience with should-have-been-divorced-parents who "stuck it through" because "twoo wub", AKA the scam that was invented to chain women to men for centuries. I also happen to have a friend whose parents are divorced. I promise you that she is much happier than I am, and she's even on good terms with both her parents now that they are living separately.

Even if you look at the history of it, it's always a woman marrying a goid to protect him from being ostracized and rarely the other way around. The reality that most likely if lavender marriages do rise, we're gonna see more of the "goid and his beard" dynamic than the 2 female platonic friends marrying for sake of marital benefits.

This reminds me of all the posts that used to wash up on r/AITAH about how one spouse "realized" that they were gay 3 kids and 30 years of marriage later. Actually, I noticed that it was always the women who "realized" they were gay and the men who knew they were gay all along and married the women to cover their own asses. Naturally, the comments were always much more sympathetic toward the male beards than the female ones. They acted as if it was a gay man's right to have a woman to hide behind.

Platonic marriage becoming a real trend among younger women seems unlikely. Women tend to see situations like that as being second-tier to having a man. They would see it as an insult and a "step down".
 
Back