Business False rape allegations like the Duke scandal aren’t common enough to justify withholding support from victims, advocates say

[Article]
[Archive]
Screenshot 2024-12-23 184023.png
When Katie Koestner was a college freshman, a boy she liked took her out to dinner. They went on a few more dates, she says, until one night, after going back to her college campus dorm, he ignored her pleas and raped her.
Up until that point, Koestner was a quiet girl, who rarely spoke out to defend herself when she was mocked or taken advantage of. But this time, she found her voice.
The dean of her university, The College of William & Mary in Virginia, steered her away from filing a police report, she says. The man she accused of assaulting her was found guilty in a university investigation but was allowed to stay on campus. For years, Koestner says, she faced backlash for going public with her story.
Koestner and other sexual assault victim advocates are now issuing reminders of the dangers of dismissing and discrediting rape allegations in light of the latest development in the 2006 Duke scandal.
More than 18 years after accusing three now-former Duke University lacrosse players of raping her, an account she shared in graphic detail, Crystal Mangum admitted in an interview published Wednesday that she lied about the encounter.
Mangum apologized to the men for fabricating a story in which she said she was trapped inside a bathroom, sexually assaulted and raped by three players at a team party where she was performing as an exotic dancer. The men were arrested following her allegations.
“This was a really damaging instance that hurt those boys’ lives and impacted them for decades, so I don’t want to downplay how tragic it is from that perspective, but I do hope that people put it into context of this is far from the norm,” says Scott Berkowitz, president of non-profit anti-sexual violence organization Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN).
“For every false report, there is a far greater number of reports both that are truthful and people who experienced rape who never reported. That’s a much bigger national problem.”
A study published by the journal Violence Against Women in 2010 found that false allegations of sexual assault range from between 2% to 10% of assaults reported. A majority of sexual assaults, an estimated 63%, are never reported to the police, according to the National Sexual Violence Resource Center.
“Crystal’s case was a high-profile case so many people might hear just about her case and a few others, and then misperceive the amount of false reports to be much higher than it really is,” Koestner, who is now the founder of anti-sexual violence nonprofit Take Back The Night, told CNN.
“We should take each case as one situation and not make assumptions about those involved. The Duke case is one of millions. I hear about 10 stories from victims each day I speak at a school — no matter whether it is Princeton or a public high school in Texas.”
Rare cases like the Duke scandal, victims’ advocates like Koestner say, might discourage victims from reporting sexual assault and cause people to wrongly doubt them.
“False reports hurt not only the people falsely accused, they hurt every rape victim,” Jennifer Simmons Kaleba, vice president of communications for RAINN, told CNN. “There are already too many victims who do not report the crime for fear of not being believed. After a false report in such a high-profile case, even more survivors may be reluctant to come forward out of fear that law enforcement will not believe them.”

The consequences of silencing victims​

Survivors of sexual assault and rape often grapple with a range of fears when considering whether to report the crime. Many worry they won’t be believed, that law enforcement won’t take their case seriously, or that their personal history will be used against them. Others are concerned about professional repercussions, having their motives questioned, seeing their reputations tarnished, and losing their privacy.
“False reports like this case really exacerbate that problem,” Berkowitz told CNN.
Experts say it is crucial for the mental health and recovery of rape victims to feel comfortable reporting their assault and getting help. Victims who have supportive friends and family will have a much better, quicker road to healing, Berkowitz says.
The safety of both communities and society as a whole is also dependent on victims reporting their assaults, ensuring that perpetrators are held accountable and prosecuted.
“From a justice standpoint, a really significant percentage of rapists are serial criminals, and so when someone reports it and there’s a prosecution, it will statistically better prevent rapes in the future and protect others from being sexually assaulted,” Berkowitz said.
Many victims keep the trauma to themselves and don’t even tell those closest to them what happened, which can have a significant long-term impact on their health.
Many survivors often struggle with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for years after the assault, Berkowitz said.
Rape victims are also significantly more likely to later have drug- and alcohol-related problems and experience mental health issues like depression and anxiety. Rape victims are 13 times more likely than non-crime victims to attempt suicide, according to a study by the National Violence Against Women Prevention Research Center.
“Rape is very similar to other types of trauma and the effects that it has on someone,” Berkowitz said. “It’s not something that anyone ever forgets or completely moves past, but we want to see victims heal to a point where they can continue living their lives and continue to devote the time to family and to work as they as they should be.”
Victims can receive mental health support from resources including the National Sexual Assault hotline or from professional therapists. Those who have friends and family who believe them and are there for them as they navigate through the recovery process also have better chances at recovery, Berkowitz said.
Koestner was 18 when she was on the cover of Time magazine in 1991 as one of the first women to publicly speak out about being a victim of date rape – sexual assaults in which there was a form of romantic relationship between the victim and assailant.
“My assaulter was found guilty in my campus hearing and told not to go in my dorm for a semester as his punishment. It was the lack of accountability that caused me to speak out,” Koestner said. “That led to more interviews and helped me let others know that rape can happen to anyone.”
Thousands of students signed a petition alleging she lied. Her car was covered with honey and baby powder, she was voted “the most dangerous man on campus,” and derogatory words were written about her on the walls of some women’s bathrooms on campus – but still, she was not silenced.
“Speaking out about what happened helped me turn the trauma into a purpose: raising awareness of any problem is the first step toward prevention,” Koestner said.
The College of William & Mary later changed its policy to require school officials to suspend students found guilty of sexual assault.
There are more than 433,000 cases of sexual assault or rape annually in the US among people aged 12 and older, according to 2015 data from RAINN. Every 68 seconds, another American is sexually assaulted, RAINN data from 2020 shows.
Kaleba said she encourages people to consider the victims of rape or sexual assault in the US who may now face renewed disbelief and question the value of reporting sexual violence.
“Don’t allow infrequent, false reporting to stand in the way of standing with survivors,” Kaleba said.

Editor’s note: Anyone affected by sexual violence can reach out to the National Sexual Assault Hotline at 800-656-HOPE (4673) or visit online.rainn.org to receive support via confidential online chat.
 
I love how the cycle is always so predictable.
>Thing does not happen
>Thing happens but it is too rare to worry about
>Thing happens more than we admitted but really you should disregard the negative effects
<---We are here
>Thing happens all the time but it is actually good that it happens


It is applicable to so much it really is wild.
 
It blows my mind that colleges are the ones dealing with these allegations. An accusation of gang rape is a serious criminal allegation, it cannot be dealt with by college administrators. It needs to be with the police.
Is that what happens? Pardon me if I’m wrong but it seems like the college is dealing with the whole thing? How can that possibly be? If someone was accused of this in the uk it would be a police matter. The university I’m sure would conduct an investigation into things like ‘were we at fault at any point or negligent/do we need better lighting here’ all that kind of thing but the ‘is he guilty?’ Shit is the courts
 
People will always take rape charges seriously. Only a really jaded person, or an actual misogynist that hates women, wouldn’t believe one.
It's not that I wouldn't believe an accusation of rape. It's just that I hear enough women online whinging out there about all the reasons they didn't report their rape and produce a police report. If you're a little kid, you probably don't know better. If you're a grown-ass adult enough to know what rape is and you cry about being "re-traumatized by the police", and making a big stink about it all over social media, that's a problem you need to get over.

It's not your fault that you're raped, and you don't deserve it, regardless of whether or not you report it. That said, what happened to you isn't your fault. What happens after is your responsibility, and if you refuse to put on your big-girl overalls and report it, you're going to be met with skepticism.

To the subject of this thread: I am 100% behind punishing people who lie about rape. It is well-known the social consequences of being branded a rapist (people still beat the Brock Turner dead horse like it's anything more than virtual signaling), and it's difficult enough to beat that rap. I contend it's the same as "you can't hit me because I'm a girl".
 
Here is a point I’ve never seen addressed: does anyone else find it interesting that the left believes those accused of rape should be heavily scrutinized when they’re the same party that does everything in their power to keep other violent criminals from facing accountability? How many times has some libshit legal group bailed someone out or got them acquitted on a technicality who would later go on to commit another crime.
Makes complete sense once you start to understand the world through the prism of progressive politics. Rape, 99% of the times, is an oppressor vs oppressed (man vs woman) act. Many crimes are committed by dindus and other minorities, often against the wealthy. So it would be an oppressed group fighting back against white supremacy or something.
An accusation of gang rape is a serious criminal allegation, it cannot be dealt with by college administrators. It needs to be with the police.
Same with pedophilia.
Been making this point like a hundred times.
You accuse somebody of a very serious crime. CALL THE FUCKING COPS. No I don't care about your online posturing. Get the guilty party in jail already and off the streets.
 
To the subject of this thread: I am 100% behind punishing people who lie about rape. It is well-known the social consequences of being branded a rapist (people still beat the Brock Turner dead horse like it's anything more than virtual signaling), and it's difficult enough to beat that rap. I contend it's the same as "you can't hit me because I'm a girl".
If someone is raped, they need to go to the police ASAP. Get the guilty party put in jail before they can harm someone else. Don't go on Tumblr or Reddit and talk about it, they're not going to do anything. I find rape claims on Reddit and Tumblr suspicious anyway because if you're willing to talk about it that flippantly the day after, then why not report the attacker? If you have something like that happen to you, what are you going to do? Are you going to go on Reddit and tell everyone about it? Or are you going to go to the POLICE??
 
Just like if a patient in a hospital bed who keeps pushing the emergency button, a nurse will always rush over.
This is known to be false.


Alarm fatigue or alert fatigue describes how busy workers (in the case of health care, clinicians) become desensitized to safety alerts, and as a result ignore or fail to respond appropriately to such warnings.[1] Alarm fatigue occurs in many fields, including construction[2] and mining[3] (where vehicle back-up alarms sound so frequently that they often become senseless background noise), healthcare[4] (where electronic monitors tracking clinical information such as vital signs and blood glucose sound alarms so frequently, and often for such minor reasons, that they lose the urgency and attention-grabbing power which they are intended to have), and the nuclear power field. Like crying wolf, such false alarms rob the critical alarms of the importance they deserve. Alarm management and policy are critical to prevent alarm fatigue.

The US Food and Drug Administration cataloged 566 deaths from ignored alarms in the period 2005 to 2008.[5] The United States-based Joint Commission's sentinel event reports 80 alarm-related deaths and 13 alarm-related serious injuries over the course of a few years.

It's simply the nature of the nervous system- if the alarm is observed too frequently, the brain will become desensitized to it. That is why appropriate management of these things is so vital.
 
We've gone from there are never any false accusations to there are almost no false accusations to they're rare to them not being quite common enough to stop the crusade.
Even if false accusations happen as infrequently as they claim, that's still often enough that it's always a real possibility that needs to be investigated. We can believe rape victims while also critically examining the situation.
 
We can believe rape victims while also critically examining the situation.
You actually cannot.
Critically examining is a skeptical position, not one of belief. Belief means that no investigation would be required, as you simply believe the statements of the victim.
Law enforcement always has to be skeptical of any claims, and always has to rely on proper proof. Belief is out of question.
 
It's not that I wouldn't believe an accusation of rape. It's just that I hear enough women online whinging out there about all the reasons they didn't report their rape and produce a police report. If you're a little kid, you probably don't know better. If you're a grown-ass adult enough to know what rape is and you cry about being "re-traumatized by the police", and making a big stink about it all over social media, that's a problem you need to get over.

It's not your fault that you're raped, and you don't deserve it, regardless of whether or not you report it. That said, what happened to you isn't your fault. What happens after is your responsibility, and if you refuse to put on your big-girl overalls and report it, you're going to be met with skepticism.
You forgot saying the N word.
It's simply the nature of the nervous system- if the alarm is observed too frequently, the brain will become desensitized to it. That is why appropriate management of these things is so vital.

IMG_6746.jpeg
IMG_3558.jpeg
 
What happens after is your responsibility, and if you refuse to put on your big-girl overalls and report it, you're going to be met with skepticism.
Oh it’s far worse than just being met with skepticism. The article rightly points out that most rapists are serial rapists. Meaning if you got attacked, chances are high someone else will be raped as well. Knowing that, and not reporting the rape? It’s as good as saying you don’t care if that creep hurts another woman. Crimes MUST be reported.
 
“This was a really damaging instance that hurt those boys’ lives and impacted them for decades, so I don’t want to downplay how tragic it is from that perspective, but I do hope that people put it into context of this is far from the norm,” says Scott Berkowitz,
“We should take each case as one situation and not make assumptions about those involved"
Hilariously dishonest of Berkowitz, considering it was his ilk that blew up the Duke Hoax as representative of gorillions of black strippers being raped by evil Huwite males. It had dozens of articles and hundreds of hours of media coverage, with activists shrieking "privilege" and other blood libel at their favorite punching bag demographic. But when it turns out to be utter falsity, nevermind, it's just one tiny insignificant case?

It blows my mind that colleges are the ones dealing with these allegations. An accusation of gang rape is a serious criminal allegation, it cannot be dealt with by college administrators. It needs to be with the police. Is that what happens? Pardon me if I’m wrong but it seems like the college is dealing with the whole thing?
There's an entire branch of Civil Rights Act law that encourages Universities to devote entire departments to the lie that women are being raped constantly there (and minorities having heckin' racisms done to them). They often have their own campus police forces, but even when they don't, they basically run parallel legal systems with investigative staff and pseudo-trials, and as you can imagine the staff in those departments are activists who go into such investigations knowing what they want to find.

Obama turbocharged it by having his DoJ "suggest" that Universities invert the usual "innocent until proven guilty" standard with things like "affirmative consent", where the victim is presumed correct and the accused expected to prove otherwise. There are also federally mandated crime reports specifically targeting sexual violence, which contradict their entire narrative by showing how much safer campuses are than most other places.
 
Here is a point I’ve never seen addressed: does anyone else find it interesting that the left believes those accused of rape should be heavily scrutinized when they’re the same party that does everything in their power to keep other violent criminals from facing accountability? How many times has some libshit legal group bailed someone out or got them acquitted on a technicality who would later go on to commit another crime.
cognitive dissonance is a bitch
It doesn't necessarily need to be cognitive dissonance but it often is in practice with this crowd because this crowd isn't actually interested in civil rights or justice or anything like that, for their own sake. They're interested in identity politics first and foremost because they're not capable of understanding anything more complicated than that. Like intellectually, they're incapable of digesting anything more nuanced than "welp black guy white guy gay guy, privilege points idk".

Like it's totally possible to believe sexual assault is a heinous crime that needs to be taken seriously, and in fact, investigated with additional resources because of its inherently complicated "he said / she said" nature. But! You still believe in the essential importance of restrictions on governmental powers and believe that, unfortunately, sometimes an evil perpetrator needs to go free because the justice system was abusing its powers.

It's totally possible to hold both those two beliefs in your head at once without it being a contradiction.

It just happens to be that the mongoloids who get really into this style of politics just don't have the brainpower to parse a nuanced discussion any more elaborate than, again, black vs white, man vs woman, cis vs trans.

I think that's why they were so jazzed about the term "interactionality". It represented a new concept that totally blew their minds, even though it's the most common sense, basic bitch concept that someone can be hindered by multiple aspects of their identity.
It blows my mind that colleges are the ones dealing with these allegations. An accusation of gang rape is a serious criminal allegation, it cannot be dealt with by college administrators. It needs to be with the police.
Is that what happens? Pardon me if I’m wrong but it seems like the college is dealing with the whole thing? How can that possibly be? If someone was accused of this in the uk it would be a police matter. The university I’m sure would conduct an investigation into things like ‘were we at fault at any point or negligent/do we need better lighting here’ all that kind of thing but the ‘is he guilty?’ Shit is the courts
It is a police matter but various activist groups and as @JohnnyG noted, the Obama DoJ, made the argument that if universities didn't have their own internal disciplinary processes (that run on less than the proper criminal burden of proof of "beyond a reasonable doubt"), they would be running an unequal educational environment which would be a violation of Title IX. To avoid losing the sweet, sweet federal cash, universities had to set up special kangaroo courts.

They could possibly face real prosecution too but often the cases didn't meet the evidentiary standards. So dumbass college lecturers ran shitty internal kangaroo courts. I think there's even been outright hoaxes where the university disciplinary record was never corrected.
 
It's at this time i think it's important (and funny) to point that according to these extremist groups own numbers.. well over 90% of rape claims are false. (Yes, if you can claim almost every allegation is true, then i can claim almost every failed conviction/charge is false)

Google and others have this propaganda piece as top results when looking up this case. Fucking ghouls
 
Back