Need help addressing the claims and myths made by the media - The claim is that KF is a bullying forum and wishes the worst on their lolcows.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Found the open sauce

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Mar 11, 2024
The biggest bombshell is the deaths that are attributed to the farms, such as Julie Terryberry, Chloe Sagal, and Near. A passage from the Wikipedia page says the following:
Harassment campaigns by Kiwi Farms users are known to have contributed to the suicides of at least three individuals.[15] The Kiwi Farms community considers it a goal to drive its targets to suicide, and has celebrated such deaths with a counter on the website.[23]: 55, 61  They have used social media reporting systems to mass-report posts by harassment targets in which they have expressed suicidal thoughts or intentions, with the goal of reducing the possibility their targets receive help.[23]: 91
Citation 23 is Veale, Kevin (2020). "Gaming the Rules". Gaming the Dynamics of Online Harassment.
Even when the celebrations of each death are condemned by the higher-ups, people still joke about them in a way that comes off as the dead lolcows having no redeeming or sympathetic qualities.

It's all despite KF's explicit stance against A-Logging, which is what the media sees all trolling as. The timestamp of this video makes perfectly good points about the media's narrative and what they say goes against KF's stance on the outcome of each lolcow.

If KF's rule is to only passively observe and gather info without engaging with the person, then could the person's downfall that's linked to KF be simply ruled out as people being exposed to all kinds of incriminating stuff that turns people away from the person? It's allegedly an unspoken rule that if you have a thread on KF regardless of the reasons, that you're already dead but just don't know it yet, and that the public will hate you forever.

The claim from the media is also that most of the targets as lolcows are disproportionately vulnerable neurodivergents with crippling aphasia-like symptoms and a childhood of being A-Logged in school and in the family, and are just ultimately looking for help but don't have the capacity to communicate it in an understandable or convincing way.

What also backs up the MSM's narrative is the nature of Encyclopedia Dramatica, meant to be a satirical wiki that exaggerates everything wrong with the internet, but pages on autistic lolcows from 2017 and 2018 came off as un-satirical A-Logging meant to put the lolcows in danger. It's not just the ones from Cokeman43, an example of DuskTheRaccoon being halal. Since 2017, I used to be a raging whiteknight and enemy of the lulz until maybe a year ago, when I started questioning what I've been taught by the headlines and yellow journalism and started wanting real answers.
 
Most people just glance at headlines. Most people google kiwi farms and see the Wikipedia page, or several big name news operations: CBS, CNN, Washington Post, NBC, The Guardian, even the AP. And every single story is 100% negative with no input from anyone here.

Google kiwi farms right now and you’ll know what I mean.

You can say “Lol those sources suck” all you want, it hardly matters. They get the first and last word. That’s what matters for affecting people’s opinions. They suffer absolutely no dissent, and that unity and uniformity is what makes the media as competent as an army.
 
It's allegedly an unspoken rule that if you have a thread on KF regardless of the reasons, that you're already dead but just don't know it yet, and that the public will hate you forever.

These fucking drama queens, I swear to god. Or you could try being a good sport about it, learning to laugh at yourself and ultimately making new friends with the people who seem to be so intrigued by you. If they are wrong about you, show them! If not and you are embarrassed by the things they bring to light, then make a positive change in your life. But no. lolcows never do that. They are so narcissistic that they cannot fathom living in a world where the false view of themselves they have so painstakingly constructed is somehow seen through and not accepted by their peers. In so doing they are causing their own deaths through the sin of Pride and ultimate fragility, with their refusal to respond to an unforgiving world by growing stronger being both the engine of their own destruction and the fuel within it.
 
Only occasionally would there be some a-logging going on here. When that happen, it is all of our duty's to make fun of whoever commits a-logging. That would be a great big evidence that this place doesn't evoke harassment, right? This may be the wrong term, but I doubt anyone here is stupid enough to believe in ye old mantra of "The enemy of my enemy is my friend".
 
These fucking drama queens, I swear to god. Or you could try being a good sport about it, learning to laugh at yourself and ultimately making new friends with the people who seem to be so intrigued by you. If they are wrong about you, show them! If not and you are embarrassed by the things they bring to light, then make a positive change in your life. But no. lolcows never do that. They are so narcissistic that they cannot fathom living in a world where the false view of themselves they have so painstakingly constructed is somehow seen through and not accepted by their peers. In so doing they are causing their own deaths through the sin of Pride and ultimate fragility, with their refusal to respond to an unforgiving world by growing stronger being both the engine of their own destruction and the fuel within it.
No one has ever been destroyed by their thread in the same way no one dies because of the circling vultures. Any one who thinks their thread is their problem is screaming at vultures instead of trying to find food, and shelter.
 
Trying to refute Wikipedia is pointless. The website exists as a legal defamation machine that is deliberately set up so journalists and activists can form a circle jerk of deniability to lie but not be sued for it because Wikipedia exists to provide protection from an actual malice finding.
 
Julie Terryberry - Said she'd kill herself if her boyfriend left, boyfriend left, she killed herself

Chloe Sagal - Pariah of the troon community, lit self on fire because of that

Near/Byuu - Possibly isn't even dead but chances are he is. Offered Null 100k to take down his relatively inactive thread, Null counter offered by offering him a job with no thread being taken down, he then proceeded to threaten to kill himself if it wasn't and then supposedly an hero'd on a phone call with Hector Martian
 
Julie Terryberry - Said she'd kill herself if her boyfriend left, boyfriend left, she killed herself

Chloe Sagal - Pariah of the troon community, lit self on fire because of that

Near/Byuu - Possibly isn't even dead but chances are he is. Offered Null 100k to take down his relatively inactive thread, Null counter offered by offering him a job with no thread being taken down, he then proceeded to threaten to kill himself if it wasn't and then supposedly an hero'd on a phone call with Hector Martian
The closing post by a mod on the Julie thread says that there were pictures of self-harm floating around, but nobody bothered to step in for her. KF not stepping in themselves and allegedly mocking her and just being a bystander is also a red flag if it's true.

Should there be a factual wiki of lolcows, as in the intention being to document why they're a target instead of being to mock or make them pariahs?

In the video that I linked in the OP, what the OP of that video wants is for people to help get the vulnerable and suffering the help that they need, instead of either scorning them or spreading more data with the intent to make their situations worse and enable their vulnerabilities. Ofc, there are tons of people with threads on here who rightfully deserve it, and are designated as horrorcows, people who are either pure evil or don't have enough evidence of being simply broken and vulnerable.
 
The closing post by a mod on the Julie thread says that there were pictures of self-harm floating around, but nobody bothered to step in for her. KF not stepping in themselves and allegedly mocking her and just being a bystander is also a red flag if it's true.
You're retarded if you think it's the responsibility of pseudoanons on an Internet forum to save a retarded woman from a tranny. Her death is probably the most ironic because a bunch of trannies would later parade her corpse around to supposedly show how evil we are despite being abused by her tranny boyfriend that she killed herself over after he left
 
Last edited:
Trying to refute Wikipedia is pointless. The website exists as a legal defamation machine that is deliberately set up so journalists and activists can form a circle jerk of deniability to lie but not be sued for it because Wikipedia exists to provide protection from an actual malice finding.
And wikipedo articles are using same journos as source.
 
Back