Found the open sauce
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2024
The biggest bombshell is the deaths that are attributed to the farms, such as Julie Terryberry, Chloe Sagal, and Near. A passage from the Wikipedia page says the following:
Even when the celebrations of each death are condemned by the higher-ups, people still joke about them in a way that comes off as the dead lolcows having no redeeming or sympathetic qualities.
It's all despite KF's explicit stance against A-Logging, which is what the media sees all trolling as. The timestamp of this video makes perfectly good points about the media's narrative and what they say goes against KF's stance on the outcome of each lolcow.
If KF's rule is to only passively observe and gather info without engaging with the person, then could the person's downfall that's linked to KF be simply ruled out as people being exposed to all kinds of incriminating stuff that turns people away from the person? It's allegedly an unspoken rule that if you have a thread on KF regardless of the reasons, that you're already dead but just don't know it yet, and that the public will hate you forever.
The claim from the media is also that most of the targets as lolcows are disproportionately vulnerable neurodivergents with crippling aphasia-like symptoms and a childhood of being A-Logged in school and in the family, and are just ultimately looking for help but don't have the capacity to communicate it in an understandable or convincing way.
What also backs up the MSM's narrative is the nature of Encyclopedia Dramatica, meant to be a satirical wiki that exaggerates everything wrong with the internet, but pages on autistic lolcows from 2017 and 2018 came off as un-satirical A-Logging meant to put the lolcows in danger. It's not just the ones from Cokeman43, an example of DuskTheRaccoon being halal. Since 2017, I used to be a raging whiteknight and enemy of the lulz until maybe a year ago, when I started questioning what I've been taught by the headlines and yellow journalism and started wanting real answers.
Citation 23 is Veale, Kevin (2020). "Gaming the Rules". Gaming the Dynamics of Online Harassment.
Even when the celebrations of each death are condemned by the higher-ups, people still joke about them in a way that comes off as the dead lolcows having no redeeming or sympathetic qualities.
It's all despite KF's explicit stance against A-Logging, which is what the media sees all trolling as. The timestamp of this video makes perfectly good points about the media's narrative and what they say goes against KF's stance on the outcome of each lolcow.
If KF's rule is to only passively observe and gather info without engaging with the person, then could the person's downfall that's linked to KF be simply ruled out as people being exposed to all kinds of incriminating stuff that turns people away from the person? It's allegedly an unspoken rule that if you have a thread on KF regardless of the reasons, that you're already dead but just don't know it yet, and that the public will hate you forever.
The claim from the media is also that most of the targets as lolcows are disproportionately vulnerable neurodivergents with crippling aphasia-like symptoms and a childhood of being A-Logged in school and in the family, and are just ultimately looking for help but don't have the capacity to communicate it in an understandable or convincing way.
What also backs up the MSM's narrative is the nature of Encyclopedia Dramatica, meant to be a satirical wiki that exaggerates everything wrong with the internet, but pages on autistic lolcows from 2017 and 2018 came off as un-satirical A-Logging meant to put the lolcows in danger. It's not just the ones from Cokeman43, an example of DuskTheRaccoon being halal. Since 2017, I used to be a raging whiteknight and enemy of the lulz until maybe a year ago, when I started questioning what I've been taught by the headlines and yellow journalism and started wanting real answers.
