'Queer' Hasn't Even Earned a Tenth of Its Reported Budget at the Global Box Office Yet - Movies?

Article / Archive

Earlier this year, director Yorgos Lanthimos followed up the biggest hit of his career, Poor Things, with a film that massively under-performed at the box office — Kinds of Kindness. Mere moths later, another European arthouse filmmaker has followed up his biggest hit with what appears to be a box office disappointment. Director Luca Guadagnino experienced mainstream success earlier this year with the sports drama Challengers, and some weeks ago, debuted his latest film, the period film Queer. Starring Daniel Craig, the movie is having a difficult time at the box office, while still playing in limited release.

Distributed domestically by the indie outfit A24, Queer is based on the book by William S. Burroughs and follows an American expatriate’s relationship with a younger man in 1950s Mexico City. The film has grossed $2.8 million domestically and around $300,000 in overseas markets, for a cumulative global haul of $3 million. Queer was produced on a reported budget of $50 million. It’ll be released by the streaming service MUBI in several key regions around the world.

Positioned as something of an awards contender, Queer has divided audiences. The movie holds a 76% “fresh” approval rating on the aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, but the platform’s audience score is languishing at 58%. In his review, Collider’s Ross Bonaime praised Craig’s performance, and described the film as “an audacious adaptation and yet another remarkable film in Guadagnino's increasingly impressive filmography.”

'Queer' Marks a Departure From Franchise Films for Daniel Craig​


It is, however, one of Craig’s lowest-grossing films. By comparison, even the Netflix release Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery earned five times as much in its limited theatrical run. Queer opened in seven domestic locations, and was expanded into 47 theaters in its second week. It received a further expansion into over 450 theaters in week three, but was downgraded to around 380 locations in week four. This isn’t a promising sign. The movie will need significant awards attention to bounce back. Also starring Drew Starkey, Lesley Manville and Jason Schwartzman, Queer premiered at the Venice Film Festival. You can watch the film in theaters, and stay tuned to Collider for more updates.
 
The two men arrive in Quito to the residence of Dr. Cotter and her husband. Initially apprehensive, Cotter warms to the men and brews the yagé found in the forest surrounding her residence, creating ayahuasca for the four of them to drink. Shortly after consumption, Lee and Allerton spend the rest of the day experiencing vivid hallucinations such as the two vomiting out their hearts and communicating telepathically then disappearing in front of each other. The night ends with the men melding their bodies together.
So it is just 2 guys fucking while tripping balls on fantasy LSD.
Isn't that every gay club in the US every weekend?
2 men having sex while high as shit. Riveting film content i am sure. High art that could dethrone IMDBs top 10.
 
That's because it's based on the 1953 Burroughs semi-biographical novel of the same name.
Which they should have renamed or given a new title. 'Queer' as a word has such bad connotations now.

Also Daniel Craig is a good actor, I don't want to see him snogging blokes. I don't know, maybe I'm in the minority.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FedPostalService
Sounds like some sex tourist shit. Did they age up the younger guy in the movie so it's not the historically accurate older gay molests teenage gay like Harvey Milk and Harry Hay and NAMBLA?
How the fuck did this cost $50 million? How did they expect a movie like this to earn back that kind of investment? It's too weird and gay for mainstream audiences and not clearly not gay enough for the horny queer crowd it seems to be trying to court if that article BlewberryNausea linked is to be believed.
Can't imagine it's cheap to get Daniel Craig to be in your movie.
Also, why does Daniel Craig seem to have a thing for playing gay characters lately? Maybe he's so sick of James Bond he's trying to get as far away from that archetype as possible.
All of his Bond movies were gay too. Like Casino Royale has a dude flogging Bond's testicles and one of the villains in Skyfall is a naked gay guy who gets freaky with him. IIRC he said once in an interview that he plays James Bond as a sex-crazed bisexual.
 
"These films are always about gay cowboys eating pudding."
1735017536034.png
 
The film has grossed $2.8 million domestically and around $300,000 in overseas markets
America is almost 10x more gay than the rest of the world combined. Embarrassing for burgers...

an American expatriate’s relationship with a younger man in 1950s Mexico City
Fags aren't pedos, Chud!

Queer. Starring Daniel Craig
Lol Craig's a homo and his Bond's a fag.
Imagine his grandchildren reading that line in school in a few years' time. The bullying will be glorious.
 
I've never read his work, but I have seen David Cronenberg's adaptation of 'Naked Lunch' (again a semi-autobiograffical work by Burroughs that weaves in the story about that time he shot and killed his second wife in Mexico), to call his work 'un-commercial' is an understatement. It's a weird, hypnotic, heroin induced fever dream that I don'tknow I could reccomend.
Cronenberg's Naked Lunch was also a box office bomb, earning $2.6 million on a $16 million budget. I loved the film when I first saw it in my early teens but I don't know about it now.

Burroughs 'avant garde' work has aged horribly, but his pulp novels like Junky and Queer are worth reading.

giphy.webp
 
Last edited:
I once was a kid who liked the Beat movement, so I’m familiar with the work. But the books of the Beat movement are fairly boring once the feeling of transgression wears off. I think Cronenberg’s “The Naked Lunch” is a good film because of Cronenberg and not so much because of Burrough’s neurotic writing.

I’d give this movie a try if my art friends want to see it, even if it goes against my current beliefs. I don’t think it’s that bad and if anything it’s santized, because IIRC Burroughs just showed how disgusting being a faggot is. But yes, it’s an arthouse film appealing a handful of art retards and it’ll never be mainstream, no matter how much LGBTQIACIAFBIAOL it has.
 
buddy, it's a gay romance film literally named "Gay". it's not exactly mass appeal material. films like this usually get attention because they're transgressive, because gay romance is has classically been considered nontraditional. however, nontraditional sexuality has been so monomaniacally centered in modern culture that two dudes fucking is not transgressive, it's not even unusual. pretty much every Netflix show includes gay romance for the femcels at this point. "queer" culture has moved on to the current frontier of transgressiveness, i.e. drag queens dangling their dicks in front of kids and troony genderblobbery. gay sex drama doesn't pass the minimum dose anymore. besides, I'm going to guess that if you had a romance story that stood on its own merits instead of just being about dudes fucking, it wouldn't have such an obnoxiously on-the-nose name like Queer. also, does anybody really give a fuck about Daniel Craig? adjust your expectations.
It's an adaptation of a William S Burroughs novel. It's a "gay romance" in the same way that JG Ballard's Crash is a movie about driving (and the reason why the only previous adaptation of Burroughs' work was by David Cronenburg). I have genuinely no idea not only why this film was greenlit, but why it had a $50 million budget... however the film turned out, it was never going to make much money because the nature of the film is so incredibly niche. I can only assume this was Luca Guadagnino's reward for having made Challengers.
He's obviously a closet faggot. He's done a few commercials where he's literally doing power bottom aerobics for the camera like a fruit. He had to act masculine to the public for Bond but now that's over and he can be himself again.
The kids say that him and Rachel Weisz are "bisexual coded"
daniel-craig-and-rachel-weisz-attend-the-loewe-show-during-v0-zuuwfx1jkfrd1.webp
I actually quite like him as an actor but I do get the impression he's a real luvvie who mostly wants to make artsy films and only took Bond for the paycheck. Someone who enjoys acting for acting's sake and gets set for life can end up choosing to play "challenging" roles that stretch their acting chops. Or that are fun, he clearly enjoys making the Knives Out series.
 
@AssignedEva said:
I can only assume this was Luca Guadagnino's reward for having made Challengers.

Pretty much. Queer has been a passion project for him for years, and he needed a big enough star willing to suck dick onscreen to get it made— enter Craig who flopped being a leading man outside of 007 and did a pivot to arthouse weirdo/gay caricature to save his career.

Having seen it, it’s amazing how boring it is for a movie that has James Bond tripping and fucking. I usually like Guadganino too, but this was a snooze.
 
Back