'Queer' Hasn't Even Earned a Tenth of Its Reported Budget at the Global Box Office Yet - Movies?

Article / Archive

Earlier this year, director Yorgos Lanthimos followed up the biggest hit of his career, Poor Things, with a film that massively under-performed at the box office — Kinds of Kindness. Mere moths later, another European arthouse filmmaker has followed up his biggest hit with what appears to be a box office disappointment. Director Luca Guadagnino experienced mainstream success earlier this year with the sports drama Challengers, and some weeks ago, debuted his latest film, the period film Queer. Starring Daniel Craig, the movie is having a difficult time at the box office, while still playing in limited release.

Distributed domestically by the indie outfit A24, Queer is based on the book by William S. Burroughs and follows an American expatriate’s relationship with a younger man in 1950s Mexico City. The film has grossed $2.8 million domestically and around $300,000 in overseas markets, for a cumulative global haul of $3 million. Queer was produced on a reported budget of $50 million. It’ll be released by the streaming service MUBI in several key regions around the world.

Positioned as something of an awards contender, Queer has divided audiences. The movie holds a 76% “fresh” approval rating on the aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, but the platform’s audience score is languishing at 58%. In his review, Collider’s Ross Bonaime praised Craig’s performance, and described the film as “an audacious adaptation and yet another remarkable film in Guadagnino's increasingly impressive filmography.”

'Queer' Marks a Departure From Franchise Films for Daniel Craig​


It is, however, one of Craig’s lowest-grossing films. By comparison, even the Netflix release Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery earned five times as much in its limited theatrical run. Queer opened in seven domestic locations, and was expanded into 47 theaters in its second week. It received a further expansion into over 450 theaters in week three, but was downgraded to around 380 locations in week four. This isn’t a promising sign. The movie will need significant awards attention to bounce back. Also starring Drew Starkey, Lesley Manville and Jason Schwartzman, Queer premiered at the Venice Film Festival. You can watch the film in theaters, and stay tuned to Collider for more updates.
 
There has been multiple times when I have heard someone say the word queer and I just completely exploded and screamed at them at told them the word queer is a hate crime to say. The name is vulgar and a movie should not have that as a name.
 
Stuff like Heartstopper worked because they realized there is a market for women thinking teen boys having a chaste romance is just the cutest thing evarr! Literally nothing else outside of honest to God gay porn nobody cares about. It's why it never makes any money. It would have made even less if you selected out the people seeing it to signal progressivism.
 
Brokeback Mountain had a budge of $14 million. Simple fact about gay cinema is it has to be low budget because only LGBTQWTF folx will watch it.

Also fuck off with 'Queer'. Trying to strongarm everyone under that vile label.
"Brokeback Mountain" also starred Heath Ledger, who died a few years later. After it came out on DVD, I worked with a woman whose teenage daughter came home with the DVD.

Mom: "Do you know what that movie is about?"

Daughter: "My friends said it was really good."

Mom: "DO YOU KNOW WHAT THAT MOVIE IS ABOUT?"

Daughter: "Heath Ledger's in it!"

So, Mom sat down with her daughter to watch it, and a few minutes in, when the two men started kissing, the daughter went, "Ew! Ew! Ew!" and shut it off.

Most likely, "Queer" just isn't a very good movie. Some Christians were tearing out their hair over the Disney film that featured two women kissing, and another more recent movie called "Dear Santa" that they found blasphemous (if they actually saw it) but by all accounts, both movies flopped because they were terrible.
 
Theaters should sell deluxe tickets where PVP is enabled against faggots who bought actual tickets to this trash. Would easilty recoup costs.
 
At this point I’m just impressed they can still keeping pumping out retarded shit like this despite it losing millions to billions every time. At some point someone has to run out of money????
 
Okay, I was about to call most of you guys idiots but then I looked at the trailer.


This is the most tone-deaf adaptation of William S. Burroughs that you could get. The book is not a love story. Not in the slightest. It is about a guy struggling with drug addiction, his homosexuality, and murdering his wife. It is not a god damn feel good love story. It shows how fucked up it can be to be a part of that culture especially when being a full blown junkie.

There's an infinitely better adaption of Burroughs with Cronenberg's Naked Lunch:




THIS is what an adaptation of Queer would look like. And even though the film is called Naked Lunch it's not a straight adaptation of that book and incorporates elements of Burroughs' life and the novel Exterminator. Burroughs was never about "Yay, it's good to be gay!" No, he felt shame, he felt like the lowest POS junkie you could find, and there was anger and disgust at himself. He was also a pedo, sadly.

Obviously this movie looks like complete shit and Daniel Craig is terribly miscast as Burroughs. HE DOESN'T EVEN TRY TO SOUND LIKE MOTHERFUCKING BURROUGHS! This is what he sounded like:


Trivia: the late voice actor for Dale Gribble in King of the Hill based his voice on Burroughs. The more you know.
 
This is the most tone-deaf adaptation of William S. Burroughs that you could get. The book is not a love story. Not in the slightest. It is about a guy struggling with drug addiction, his homosexuality, and murdering his wife. It is not a god damn feel good love story. It shows how fucked up it can be to be a part of that culture especially when being a full blown junkie.
I’ve seen it. The trailer is misleading- the movie definitely doesn’t present this as a love story. Lee/Burroughs is presented as an infatuated sad sack with the GI being largely indifferent to his affections. The movie is much more about loneliness and obsession and doesn’t shy away from Lee being a degenerate junkie. I just thought it was meandering and boring, even the ayahuasca trip at the end.
 
This is the most tone-deaf adaptation of William S. Burroughs that you could get.
I wouldn't expect anything better, tbh.

As for Cronenberg's, it wasn't a great adaptation, but it was an okay movie in its own right. Burroughs really can't be adapted. But Cronenberg's focus on body horror was actually somewhat sympatico with Burroughs's own deep self-loathing.
Which they should have renamed or given a new title. 'Queer' as a word has such bad connotations now.
It would be absolutely retarded to adapt a novel and then call it something now politically correct.

Actually it was retarded to adapt this novel in current year and expect it to work but that's a different thing. Burroughs's original work was called QUEER, don't fucking change it for politics, that shit SUCKS.
 
I’ve seen it. The trailer is misleading- the movie definitely doesn’t present this as a love story. Lee/Burroughs is presented as an infatuated sad sack with the GI being largely indifferent to his affections. The movie is much more about loneliness and obsession and doesn’t shy away from Lee being a degenerate junkie. I just thought it was meandering and boring, even the ayahuasca trip at the end.
How degen are we talking? I still won't see it simply because Craig doesn't even try to imitate Burroughs.

As for Cronenberg's, it wasn't a great adaptation

Patrick Bateman.gif
 
It's a fucking acid trip with anal from old guy and young dude based on a weird book by an insane man.......so of course.

Drew whatever is yet another bland guy and I don't understand why Rachel Weisz is married to Craig
 
Cronenberg kinda cheats by having Judy Davis play both Bill's wife and the Jane Bowles character, which is fine because it made it easier to get made/market/watch.
My assumption was Cronenberg was trying to show Burroughs' type, that he would have to murder- metaphorically and literally- for the sake of his art. His homosexuality and drug usage being complementary, despite obvious drawbacks, to his writing, while his - relatively- stable heterosexual family life was against what he was writing about. The cycle of murdering his wife was analogous to the beginning of writing a novel, hence the film's ending.

It has been a few years since I have watched it though.
 
So, Mom sat down with her daughter to watch it, and a few minutes in, when the two men started kissing, the daughter went, "Ew! Ew! Ew!" and shut it off.
I forgot a lot of women, despite being natural faghags, are really weirded out by men kissing.

I can watch two hot women kissing for hours. Check mate, liberals.
 
Back