US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Considering the massive debt America has, I have high doubts. Whatever happened to shrinking the debt? :tomgirl:
wartime measures give you an excuse to reset your nation's finances. I wouldn't be surprised if Trump saw the financial calculations showing that America is on the verge of bankruptcy, and determined that the best solution is an acquisition such as a hostile takeover.
 
Denmark has had it coming for centuries. Danish ships were complicit in Caribbean piracy which disrupted American trade in the 1800s. We've never really settled the score there. Plus, Hans Christian Andersen totally dissed America in the 1830s. We don't have to take that from some loser European culture. Plus, legos are way overpriced and it's completely absurd. This is economic warfare already.
 
He’s anti-democracy and pro-Trump: the obscure ‘dark enlightenment’ blogger influencing the next US administration
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/dec/21/curtis-yarvin-trump (archive)

Key figures in the incoming administration follow Curtis Yarvin, who’s pushing for an autocratic takeover of the US

2265.webp
 
Considering the massive debt America has, I have high doubts. Whatever happened to shrinking the debt? :tomgirl:
It's ambitious as fuck, but I can see how it can make us money.
  • Annex Canada: Streamline defence spending as we no longer need to finance Canada's army along with our own as well as lowering costs from needing to man the largest border in the world (also water for the desert states)
  • Annex Greenland: Lots of untapped resources to extract that can fuel American Industries.
  • Annex Panama: Important shipping lane for both US trade and military vessels. We still pay a lot for it and even send engineers down there to do repaires. Might as well cut out the middleman.

Personally I think Trump is just aiming high so he can be negotiated down to what he is actually after.
 
So much for fixing the economy and focusing on immigration; Dementia Don is really proving his haters right with these schizo rants about retaking Greenland and the Panama Canal. :shit-eating:
Why would acquiring extremely resource rich land be bad for the economy?
Why would having a monopoly on Atlantic-Pacific ocean transit in the western hemisphere be bad for the economy?

Trump should buy the Drake Passage from Argentina and put a military base on the Falkland Islands. Then America can maximize rent-seeking for ocean transit.
Argentina - Drake Passage.png
 
I hope that President Trump is smart enough to make sure you retards don't get any Electoral Votes once he annexes you twats.
Truthfully, I hope that once we annex these shithole countries, that we can possibly renegotiate the 13th amendment. I want to own a Mexican.

It's ambitious as fuck, but I can see how it can make us money.
  • Annex Canada: Streamline defence spending as we no longer need to finance Canada's army along with our own as well as lowering costs from needing to man the largest border in the world (also water for the desert states)
  • Annex Greenland: Lots of untapped resources to extract that can fuel American Industries.
  • Annex Panama: Important shipping lane for both US trade and military vessels. We still pay a lot for it and even send engineers down there to do repaires. Might as well cut out the middleman.

Personally I think Trump is just aiming high so he can be negotiated down to what he is actually after.
  • Annex Mexico: Bring back slavery so we can manufacture goods in the US again.
 
I hope that President Trump is smart enough to make sure you retards don't get any Electoral Votes once he annexes you twats.
it's not that hard:
option a: only conquer the mostly unpopulated provinces and territories rich in resources, and ignore BC and everything east of Manitoba. These regions are mostly red leaning and are in low enough numbers to be easily controlled.
option b: make Canada an unincorporated territory that has some self-governing under American oversight but do not have the right to vote in US elections
 
it's not that hard:
option a: only conquer the mostly unpopulated provinces and territories rich in resources, and ignore BC and everything east of Manitoba. These regions are mostly red leaning and are in low enough numbers to be easily controlled.
option b: make Canada an unincorporated territory that has some self-governing under American oversight but do not have the right to vote in US elections
I feel B is the best solution. Conquering as much land as possible is a definite must.
 
it's not that hard:
option a: only conquer the mostly unpopulated provinces and territories rich in resources, and ignore BC and everything east of Manitoba. These regions are mostly red leaning and are in low enough numbers to be easily controlled.
option b: make Canada an unincorporated territory that has some self-governing under American oversight but do not have the right to vote in US elections
option c: day of the rake with no survivors.
 
To those sorts of Europeans, on behalf of everyone in America, take your tiny little cars and cold little apartments, shove 'em up your ass, and remember which continent produced Napoleon and Hitler
The dark night of fascism is forever descending on America, but somehow keeps on landing in Europe.
 
He's not talking about Britbong shitposts on KF dot com. He's talking about the penchant Europeans have for smugly preening about how you're so much less violent, less racist, more environmentally conscious, less sexist, or whatever. Like 90% of your continent is proud that complaining about the latest Diversity Incident painting the street with the blood of children is an imprisonable offense.

To those sorts of Europeans, on behalf of everyone in America, take your tiny little cars and cold little apartments, shove 'em up your ass, and remember which continent produced Napoleon and Hitler. Then thank the God that you no longer believe in, but spent the better part of the 17th century killing each other over, that America pointed enough nukes at those godless commie Russians to buy you the freedom to one day invite a rapist from Saudi Arabia to celebrate Christmas by crashing his car into a crowd of people, and that we don't actually make any of you pay your NATO obligations so that you can afford to give all his co-religionists free health care and housing as the children you never had don't get in the way of the young people destroying priceless works of art in the name of permanently darkening the lights of your civilization.
To be fair, Hitler was the best thing Europe ever produced.
 
Drive out of L.A. county into San Bernadino or Kern and you'd swear you were in Texas. Nobody hates LAfags like the Based Desert Dwellers.

That's cope. It's a faggot version of Texas where you can't own any nice guns or nice anything, you don't get bags when you go shopping and you get paper straws from restaurants, at least 10% of your paycheck goes towards trannies and illegals.
Wow so checking based!
 
That's cope. It's a faggot version of Texas where you can't own any nice guns or nice anything, you don't get bags when you go shopping and you get paper straws from restaurants, at least 10% of your paycheck goes towards trannies and illegals.
Wow so checking based!
Why do you think the desert folk, the valley folk, the forest folk, and the mountain folk hate the fucking urbanite scum?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back