Debate Zorin! Published author and businessman - Thread formerly called "Has anyone else had a existential crisis before?" before it got fun

The only thing I've asked him respectfully at that mind you, is what format his company or corp is. For some reason, this makes me a pedophile.

I understand he's in the middle of his assault of the user base but, I would hope he can at least take enough a breather to explain how his bread winning is laid out.
Most of the users here are cool, it's just a minority of dimwits trolling anyone who mentions Alefantis in a negative light who are the problem.

The fact that they have such a hard-on for the guy in the picture above definitely say... something. If it was anyone other than Alefantis, he'd already have a "lolcow" thread on him, so they're apologizing for him for some reason, either pure partisan hackery or something more... sinister...

lmao look at this dude calling @AnOminous a pedo

And dude, you know that you popped on a thread about existencial crisis and out of fucking nowhere, started to demand that we discuss something completely different, right?
I gave you a proposal since you seemed interested in the FBI investigation into Alefantis as of this week... you declined it... so there's that.

Ominous and a few others were trolling users in another thread who were trying to discuss the allegations and separate the fact from the fiction, so there's a reason why he doesn't want Alefantis to be discussed negatively, and even wants the discussion shut down.
 
Most of the users here are cool, it's just a minority of dimwits trolling anyone who mentions Alefantis in a negative light who are the problem.

The fact that they have such a hard-on for the guy in the picture above definitely say... something. If it was anyone other than Alefantis, he'd already have a "lolcow" thread on him, so they're apologizing for him for some reason, either pure partisan hackery or something more... sinister...
I would agree most are cool, your conduct could quickly put you into the not cool.

Now as I said, I've asked you something very simple and polite that doesn't give any personal info away. You choose to reply to me, and skirt the topic again. Can you see how this is not casting the best light on you or your claims?
 
Most of the users here are cool, it's just a minority of dimwits trolling anyone who mentions Alefantis in a negative light who are the problem.

The fact that they have such a hard-on for the guy in the picture above definitely say... something. If it was anyone other than Alefantis, he'd already have a "lolcow" thread on him, so they're apologizing for him for some reason, either pure partisan hackery or something more... sinister...

This entire forum was paid off by Hillary Clinton and now assassins have been sent out to take you out
 
This entire forum was paid off by Hillary Clinton and now assassins have been sent out to take you out
Not likely, since Alefantis was never linked directly to hillary clinton.

That'd be like saying Jerry Sandusky was linked to the Republican party just by tangental association.

But hey dude, if you're pro-pedophilia, just admit it, by this site's standards you won't even seem that weird anyway. Only reason I can think of twits like you believing you know better than the FBI.
 
Most of the users here are cool, it's just a minority of dimwits trolling anyone who mentions Alefantis in a negative light who are the problem.

The fact that they have such a hard-on for the guy in the picture above definitely say... something. If it was anyone other than Alefantis, he'd already have a "lolcow" thread on him, so they're apologizing for him for some reason, either pure partisan hackery or something more... sinister...


I gave you a proposal since you seemed interested in the FBI investigation into Alefantis as of this week... you declined it... so there's that.

Ominous and a few others were trolling users in another thread who were trying to discuss the allegations and separate the fact from the fiction, so there's a reason why he doesn't want Alefantis to be discussed negatively, and even wants the discussion shut down.

Dude, calm down, its just the internet...
And we don't have the obligaton to act like your personal army of detectives.
 
This is just obviously Brando again.
Just admit you're part of a pedophile community or something Ominus, that's the only reason why you think you know better than the FBI about Alefantis not being worthy of investagtion. They've begun and investigation, so you an other denialists like Pikimon are the only ones who still think it's unworthy.

Or maybe you just don't like possible pedophiles discussed in a negative light... or Democratic pedophiles at least. It'd be interesting to review your posts and see how keen you were about the Epstein allegations prior to the election... hm...

Dude, calm down, its just the internet...
And we don't have the obligaton to act like your personal army of detectives.
Don't really care, but I wanted a discussion between anyone interested in the FBI investigation since guys like Ominus were trolling the thread and trying to shut down those who were seriously discussing it.

So honestly, only reason I can think of is that they're either pedophile apologists, or blind party shills who probably believed the Epstein allegations as soon as they read them on Huffpo, lol. That or they're just morons with nothing better to do with their time than interfere with serious discussions and intentionally lie about them.
 
Don't really care, but I wanted a discussion between anyone interested in the FBI investigation since guys like Ominus were trolling the thread and trying to shut down those who were seriously discussing it.

So honestly, only reason I can think of is that they're either pedophile apologists, or blind party shills who probably believed the Epstein allegations as soon as they read them on Huffpo, lol
You have a strange memory, more so being it's still all posted of what happened.
There was a nice thread. You started flipping out about another topic, instead of making your own thread.
You start insulting members and make a bunch of claims with no backing both in boast and slur.

And you've still for the literally 4th time now, ducked my very simple question.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: yasscat and drain
You start insulting members and make a bunch of claims with no backing
ray%2Bliotta%2Bgoodfellas%2Blaughing.jpg


So, you? You're the only one trying to discuss it. Everyone else wants you to post your """"published works""""
Um no, me and several others were discussing the actual details including the recently opened FBI investigation, you and a few other twits just looking for some idiot "Alex Jones type folks" to troll were murking it up, and Ominus and a few others were trying to intentionally get the thread locked - sorry but you picked the wrong topic to poke fun at, you should find an actual 'conspiracy theory' to do that with, rather than something the FBI is actually investigating right now.
 
Then I ask you, where is your company proof? Where is your publishing proof? Where is pedophile proof?

You laugh but I don't see anyone disagreeing with me. You are the one making claims. And now 5 times ducked on me.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: yasscat
So, you? You're the only one trying to discuss it. Everyone else wants you to post your """"published works""""
Then I ask you, where is your company proof? Where is your publishing proof? Where is pedophile proof?

You laugh but I don't see anyone disagreeing with me. You are the one making claims. And now 5 times ducked on me.
God your reading comprehenison is awful, I think it was explained to you what would have to be done before I'd discuss little ol' me any futher, so you either didn't bother to read coherantly or are just intentionally being obstinate.
 
I was thinking cutco, or some kind of pyramid. Those could generously be interpreted as 'owning a business' by someone who will never be close to owning a business.
Irony being getting an EIN is literally a phone call.

God your reading comprehenison is awful, I think it was explained to you what would have to be done before I'd discuss little ol' me any futher, so you either didn't bother to read coherantly or are just intentionally being obstinate.
Debate doesn't work like that. You don't get to move the goal posts because even if we met your absurd rules, you'd just duck again. Running away from your bold claims is all you've done.

Also for a published author, I counted 4 typos, that's before we get into grammar.
 
Your 'backing' has effectively amounted to pointing at someone and yelling "YOU'RE A PAEDO" at them repeatedly with no proof whatsoever.
Already stated the proof several times silly.

The users in question are aware that an FBI investigation against a person for alleged sex trafficking opened this week. They're aware that even if he isn't diddling kids, that he at least sent emails talking about it and posted riske content on his social media involving children.

They're intentionally flaming anyone discussing Alefantis and the FBI investigation that was just opened, lying about it, and trying to get people threadbanned who say anything negative about the guy.

That right there makes me suspicious that they're pedo-apologists - I've seen the same thing happen elsewhere as well, such as on Youtube regarding a 'pedophile' activist named Jack McClellan.

Until you provide evidence that isn't the demented ravings of an autistic mongoloid, I'll just assuming you're talking shit.
"Austistic mongoloid" is redundant silly.
 
Back