- Joined
- Nov 27, 2023
Browncels: "Omg! How dare women want to sleep with Luigi, a young, handsome, wealthy, intelligent and masculine guy! This makes no sense and wasn't 100% predictable at all!"
UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson fatally shot outside Hilton hotel in Midtown in targeted attack: cops - Just Part and Parcel of visiting a Big City
- Thread starter quaawaa
- Start date
Helvetia
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
obviously he got pussy, i was being superlative. he didn't really have any girlfriends beforehand, had his first kiss at 38 and stayed a virgin his entire life. he dismissed a lot of the letters and such because he (correctly) assumed they were only interested in him because he was a high profile inmate.
-sources-
can't even google the word women without fucking trannies coming up
90 Seconds
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2024
@VargReallyDidNothingWrong there's still hope. if a woman can find teddy's unbrushed hair and misanthropic worldview attractive, there's probably a woman out there who would like you.
to add to Helvetia's point, most women who find a serial killer attractive are separate from the women who find luigi attractive. Hybristophilliac is the name for the minority of women who would go for a Bundy type. these are women attracted to unremorseful killers because of their murders. part of it is the ego boost of "taming" a man so evil and part of it is the knowledge that behind prison bars, he can't actually hurt you, would depend on you for emotional support, and can't cheat on you. Basically if a woman is mentally deficient enough, a serial killer would be attractive to her.
the reasons Mangione is more attractive to the average woman is because his murder did not kill innocent women, children, or otherwise vulnerable people. he killed one man who arguably represents the worst of decadence and wealth at the expense of people's lives. he's attractive, noble, rich, intelligent, and sacrificed his freedom for what he believed was right. there are not many men like that who are plastered all over the news. slight PL I'm not attracted to men, but it's easy to see why luigi is getting so much female attention. it isn't just "muh femcels r crazy" or "women be stupid bitches" lol. he's almost comically well-suited to women's fantasies of a man of action who is noble and wants to protect the innocent.
>antisocial virgin
>murdered innocent people
>genuinely hated women
>"omg he's a tranny just like us"
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2024
I mean, they are right. Most trannies are antisocial misogynistic virgins with murderous/suicidal thoughts who treat women like an image to appropriate and pervert. See the incel to tranny pipeline. Their only idea of women comes from porn and Japanese schoolgirl cartoons. Their promiscuity is a side-effect of their porn addiction and overcompensation for their lack of sex life pre-trooning.
90 Seconds
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2024
it's hilarious how they say the quiet part out loud when they think cissoids aren't looking. they did the same with Marsha P. Johnson (drag queen who called himself a gay man and drowned = trutranny who wuz murdered and sheeet), Kurt Cobain (he wore skirts and killed himself = trutranny!!), and tbh i bet if mangione dies in prison, some troon will try and claim he was ~secretly an egg~ like the vultures they are. #LETLUIGIBECIS
Helvetia
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2024
Quit it with the genderwars. None of you here have the life experience to know wtf you are talking about, it's embarrasing to read. And we have over 9000 other threads to sperg about wahmen bad/men bad.
Falcos_Commisar
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 18, 2020
Enjoy your truck/car/knife/machete/homemade IED of peace Eurotrash
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2023
Agree with Terfmaster to quit the gender posting; if I were Null I would use the Man-Hate/Woman-Hate threads as ban lists lol.
As a final world as to why I like Luigi - he really is like the man from Bonnie Tyler's "Holding out for a Hero" lmao, or the man sung about in "Where Have all the Cowboys Gone". Men of principle and action will always be attractive to women. It's also dumb that the men most ignorant of female sexuality have the most to say on it; Bundy was never popular among women, and if fancying murderers is a female instinct then why did men send love letters to Casey Anthony in prison when she more than likely killed her daughter? Karla Homolka, who raped and killed her own sister, is married to her lawyer's brother. Somehow those facts never get brought up when chuds can make women the bad guys for fancying a traditionally masculine man who's nothing like them and activates their insecurities.
As a final world as to why I like Luigi - he really is like the man from Bonnie Tyler's "Holding out for a Hero" lmao, or the man sung about in "Where Have all the Cowboys Gone". Men of principle and action will always be attractive to women. It's also dumb that the men most ignorant of female sexuality have the most to say on it; Bundy was never popular among women, and if fancying murderers is a female instinct then why did men send love letters to Casey Anthony in prison when she more than likely killed her daughter? Karla Homolka, who raped and killed her own sister, is married to her lawyer's brother. Somehow those facts never get brought up when chuds can make women the bad guys for fancying a traditionally masculine man who's nothing like them and activates their insecurities.
Helvetia
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
lol calm down
New article from the NYT that I thought we'd enjoy:
The Manhattan district attorney has brought a terrorism charge against the man accused of killing a health insurance executive, arguing that he intended to “sow fear.”
Six days after Sept. 11, 2001, as New York City reeled from the worst terrorist attacks on United States soil, lawmakers in Albany passed sweeping antiterrorism laws. Since then, prosecutors have used them infrequently.
But last week, the Manhattan district attorney’s office leveled a terrorism charge against Luigi Mangione, a 26-year-old man accused of killing a health insurance executive, classifying the crime not just as a murder but also as an attack on democracy.
Prosecutors’ decision to characterize the killing of the UnitedHealthcare chief executive, Brian Thompson, as a political act will test the law. And it will have implications beyond the courtroom.
The defendant, who carried a handwritten manifesto decrying the American health care system, has been cast as a martyr by some people sympathetic to his apparent philosophy — and the charges could strengthen that perception. Some have criticized what they see as a judgment by the authorities that the killing of a wealthy executive is more important than the deaths of the anonymous poor. And as a practical matter, terrorism could be a more difficult charge to prove than second-degree murder.
Alvin L. Bragg, the Manhattan district attorney, has argued that the terrorism charge is warranted because the gunman’s action was meant to do more than kill Mr. Thompson — it was meant to send a message to the public. Mr. Mangione, he said at a news conference last week, intended to “sow fear.”
“This type of premeditated, targeted gun violence cannot and will not be tolerated,” Mr. Bragg said.
Zachary W. Carter, who served as the United States attorney in Brooklyn in the 1990s, said that based on what has been made public about Mr. Thompson’s killing, it “fits the definition of terrorism.”
New York’s terrorism laws allow for stiffer sentences for certain offenses and can be applied in a variety of circumstances. For a crime to be considered terrorism, the government must prove that the perpetrator intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population, influence the policy of a unit of government or affect the conduct of a unit of government.
Prosecutors can use criminal charges both as a means to punish people for what they have done and as a way to deter other people from similar acts in the future, said Michael F. Bachner, a defense lawyer and former prosecutor in the Manhattan district attorney’s office.
In the case of Mr. Mangione, he said, prosecutors most likely wanted to send a message to “anyone thinking that they can try and change policy, whether in the government or corporate policy, by killing people.”
But applying terrorism charges to a case in which prosecutors believe the broader target was a specific industry, rather than the government or the public at large, is unusual.
James M. McGuire, a former prosecutor in the Manhattan district attorney’s office who also served as an appellate court judge, noted that the law describes a defendant’s intent to terrorize “a civilian population” or influence the government.
“It’s hard to conclude that the Legislature intended the phrase ‘civilian population’ to encompass persons working for health insurers who make coverage decisions,” Mr. McGuire said.
State prosecutors have applied terrorism charges sparingly over the years.
The first person convicted under the 2001-era laws was Edgar Morales, a member of a street gang who was charged in a 2002 shooting that resulted in the death of a 10-year-old girl. In 2012, the State Court of Appeals overturned the conviction, saying gang activity did not meet the criteria for an act of terror.
More recently, Abdullah el-Faisal, a Jamaican-born cleric, was convicted in Manhattan last year of supporting terrorism after prosecutors portrayed him as a jihadist who had supported ISIS. Earlier this year, a Manhattan woman was convicted of using cryptocurrency to fund terrorism after sending money to several groups operating in Syria. In November, a man who was arrested at Pennsylvania Station in 2022 after making threats online of “shooting up a synagogue” was sentenced to 10 years after pleading guilty to possessing a weapon as a crime of terrorism.
And in Buffalo, Payton Gendron, a white man who killed 10 Black people in a racist massacre at a supermarket in May 2022, became the first person in the state to be convicted of domestic terrorism motivated by hate, a newer addition to the state’s terrorism laws that carries a penalty of life imprisonment without parole.
Complicating the terrorism case against Mr. Mangione is the public’s reaction to the crime he is accused of.
Mr. Mangione faces an 11-count indictment in state court, including three murder charges. He is also facing federal charges, one of which carries the possibility of the death penalty, as well as charges in Pennsylvania.
In a court appearance last week, Mr. Mangione’s lawyer, Karen Friedman Agnifilo, described her client as “overcharged.” He has pleaded not guilty to all the charges.
The case has transfixed Americans from the moment the first details became public on the morning of Dec. 4.
Surveillance footage showed a gunman walking up behind Mr. Thompson that morning as he neared the doors of a Hilton hotel on West 54th Street in Manhattan. The man lifted a handgun fitted with a suppressor and shot Mr. Thompson once in the back and once in the leg before fleeing the scene — heading uptown on an e-bike and then leaving the state, the police said. Almost immediately, the police began a manhunt, canvassing the city and releasing images of the person being sought.
The authorities said they found shell casings and a bullet at the scene with the words “deny,” “depose” and “delay” written on them — likely references to health insurers and how they respond to claims. They have also pointed to the manifesto, which described hostility toward the health insurance industry and its wealthy executives.
In response, many Americans openly voiced support for the gunman, hoping he would evade capture. Social media was awash in anger toward health insurance companies.
A recent Emerson College poll found that while 68 percent of those polled said that the killer’s actions were unacceptable, 41 percent of those between the ages of 18 and 29 said they found them acceptable.
On Monday, as Mr. Mangione was arraigned in a criminal courtroom in Lower Manhattan, a group of protesters gathered outside. Some shared stories of negative experiences with insurers that left them with pain and expensive medical bills.
They chanted, “Free Luigi!”
Ms. Friedman Agnifilo has also expressed concern about her client’s right to a fair trial, in part because his case has become politicized. She described Mr. Mangione’s perp walk after he was extradited to New York last week, during which he was accompanied by Mayor Eric Adams, as “absolutely unnecessary” and “utterly political.”
All of these circumstances could make jury selection especially challenging.
Given the publicity and public discourse around the case, it will be difficult to find people who do not already have “their minds made up about his guilt,” said David E. Patton, who worked as a federal public defender.
Ellen Brickman, a director at DOAR, a New York City trial-consulting firm, said lawyers on both sides will most likely be paying attention to whether potential jurors have extreme views about health insurance companies, whether they think violence is ever an acceptable response and how much they understand about mental health issues.
“I think generally positive or negative feelings about health insurers are not necessarily going to translate into a belief that a health insurance executive should be murdered,” she said.
L / A
Six days after Sept. 11, 2001, as New York City reeled from the worst terrorist attacks on United States soil, lawmakers in Albany passed sweeping antiterrorism laws. Since then, prosecutors have used them infrequently.
But last week, the Manhattan district attorney’s office leveled a terrorism charge against Luigi Mangione, a 26-year-old man accused of killing a health insurance executive, classifying the crime not just as a murder but also as an attack on democracy.
Prosecutors’ decision to characterize the killing of the UnitedHealthcare chief executive, Brian Thompson, as a political act will test the law. And it will have implications beyond the courtroom.
The defendant, who carried a handwritten manifesto decrying the American health care system, has been cast as a martyr by some people sympathetic to his apparent philosophy — and the charges could strengthen that perception. Some have criticized what they see as a judgment by the authorities that the killing of a wealthy executive is more important than the deaths of the anonymous poor. And as a practical matter, terrorism could be a more difficult charge to prove than second-degree murder.
Alvin L. Bragg, the Manhattan district attorney, has argued that the terrorism charge is warranted because the gunman’s action was meant to do more than kill Mr. Thompson — it was meant to send a message to the public. Mr. Mangione, he said at a news conference last week, intended to “sow fear.”
“This type of premeditated, targeted gun violence cannot and will not be tolerated,” Mr. Bragg said.
Zachary W. Carter, who served as the United States attorney in Brooklyn in the 1990s, said that based on what has been made public about Mr. Thompson’s killing, it “fits the definition of terrorism.”
New York’s terrorism laws allow for stiffer sentences for certain offenses and can be applied in a variety of circumstances. For a crime to be considered terrorism, the government must prove that the perpetrator intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population, influence the policy of a unit of government or affect the conduct of a unit of government.
Prosecutors can use criminal charges both as a means to punish people for what they have done and as a way to deter other people from similar acts in the future, said Michael F. Bachner, a defense lawyer and former prosecutor in the Manhattan district attorney’s office.
In the case of Mr. Mangione, he said, prosecutors most likely wanted to send a message to “anyone thinking that they can try and change policy, whether in the government or corporate policy, by killing people.”
But applying terrorism charges to a case in which prosecutors believe the broader target was a specific industry, rather than the government or the public at large, is unusual.
James M. McGuire, a former prosecutor in the Manhattan district attorney’s office who also served as an appellate court judge, noted that the law describes a defendant’s intent to terrorize “a civilian population” or influence the government.
“It’s hard to conclude that the Legislature intended the phrase ‘civilian population’ to encompass persons working for health insurers who make coverage decisions,” Mr. McGuire said.
State prosecutors have applied terrorism charges sparingly over the years.
The first person convicted under the 2001-era laws was Edgar Morales, a member of a street gang who was charged in a 2002 shooting that resulted in the death of a 10-year-old girl. In 2012, the State Court of Appeals overturned the conviction, saying gang activity did not meet the criteria for an act of terror.
More recently, Abdullah el-Faisal, a Jamaican-born cleric, was convicted in Manhattan last year of supporting terrorism after prosecutors portrayed him as a jihadist who had supported ISIS. Earlier this year, a Manhattan woman was convicted of using cryptocurrency to fund terrorism after sending money to several groups operating in Syria. In November, a man who was arrested at Pennsylvania Station in 2022 after making threats online of “shooting up a synagogue” was sentenced to 10 years after pleading guilty to possessing a weapon as a crime of terrorism.
And in Buffalo, Payton Gendron, a white man who killed 10 Black people in a racist massacre at a supermarket in May 2022, became the first person in the state to be convicted of domestic terrorism motivated by hate, a newer addition to the state’s terrorism laws that carries a penalty of life imprisonment without parole.
Complicating the terrorism case against Mr. Mangione is the public’s reaction to the crime he is accused of.
Mr. Mangione faces an 11-count indictment in state court, including three murder charges. He is also facing federal charges, one of which carries the possibility of the death penalty, as well as charges in Pennsylvania.
In a court appearance last week, Mr. Mangione’s lawyer, Karen Friedman Agnifilo, described her client as “overcharged.” He has pleaded not guilty to all the charges.
The case has transfixed Americans from the moment the first details became public on the morning of Dec. 4.
Surveillance footage showed a gunman walking up behind Mr. Thompson that morning as he neared the doors of a Hilton hotel on West 54th Street in Manhattan. The man lifted a handgun fitted with a suppressor and shot Mr. Thompson once in the back and once in the leg before fleeing the scene — heading uptown on an e-bike and then leaving the state, the police said. Almost immediately, the police began a manhunt, canvassing the city and releasing images of the person being sought.
The authorities said they found shell casings and a bullet at the scene with the words “deny,” “depose” and “delay” written on them — likely references to health insurers and how they respond to claims. They have also pointed to the manifesto, which described hostility toward the health insurance industry and its wealthy executives.
In response, many Americans openly voiced support for the gunman, hoping he would evade capture. Social media was awash in anger toward health insurance companies.
A recent Emerson College poll found that while 68 percent of those polled said that the killer’s actions were unacceptable, 41 percent of those between the ages of 18 and 29 said they found them acceptable.
On Monday, as Mr. Mangione was arraigned in a criminal courtroom in Lower Manhattan, a group of protesters gathered outside. Some shared stories of negative experiences with insurers that left them with pain and expensive medical bills.
They chanted, “Free Luigi!”
Ms. Friedman Agnifilo has also expressed concern about her client’s right to a fair trial, in part because his case has become politicized. She described Mr. Mangione’s perp walk after he was extradited to New York last week, during which he was accompanied by Mayor Eric Adams, as “absolutely unnecessary” and “utterly political.”
All of these circumstances could make jury selection especially challenging.
Given the publicity and public discourse around the case, it will be difficult to find people who do not already have “their minds made up about his guilt,” said David E. Patton, who worked as a federal public defender.
Ellen Brickman, a director at DOAR, a New York City trial-consulting firm, said lawyers on both sides will most likely be paying attention to whether potential jurors have extreme views about health insurance companies, whether they think violence is ever an acceptable response and how much they understand about mental health issues.
“I think generally positive or negative feelings about health insurers are not necessarily going to translate into a belief that a health insurance executive should be murdered,” she said.
L / A
Uncle_Teds_Cabin25
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2024
I just wish he'd dug deeper and realized that Larry Fink (CEO of BlackRock ) etc al is part of the problem.
The Rot is Deep.
The Rot is Deep.
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2024
If terrorism is when sow fear, then how come journalists and the media are not being prosecuted for terrorism for sowing fear and terror to make money since the beginning of the 24hour news cycle, hm???? Makes ya think.
Netizennameless
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2021
It's an extremely well-known fact that men will stick their dicks into anything with a pulse. "I can fix her" is a very common phrase around here.
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2019
Goes without saying but it's wayyy too early. This is even earlier then that nic Cage 9 11 movie.
Unless they have a lot of really good interview material of friends and family it's gotta be propaganda or watch bait. Until the trial I doubt we'll know the crucial details of his spine and motive.
Men are the simp gender. If Luigi got released and started an OF or something his main customer would be faggots, not women.
Look at the simping for the Wisconsin femcel shooter who was literally sub 80 iq judging by her writing.
I wonder if the Mangione clan might start shutting down some of the media circus with lawsuits. I imagine some of the less close relatives (like that republican cousin) aren't very happy with the reputational damage from this.
Pampered Degenerate
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2020
FFS, can people give the thirst posting/femcel/gender wars shit a rest? This is actually one of the more interesting happenings in recent years, so kindly fuck off and stop making the thread unreadable with your retarded bullshit.
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2020
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2017
Wypeepo don't season 'dey CEOs (*chirp*)
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2024
Is this one of the actual occupy photos or from a tv show? I don't think I've ever seen them.
We have that in the UK too but we don't get asked about us health insurers obviously, did you get the one on the 17th: What do you really think of the Wealthy?
There's a tiktoker who visited the trial and said that the calmness is just media trying to make him look like a socio dick - apparently he was visibly nervous / angry but didn't say anything unless asked and the smiling / thank yous come from when he directly interacted with court staff. I'll edit a link in if I can find it.
People in the thread arguing that everyone not already sold on his guilt is a moron are bootlicking. It is literally the NY state prosecution's job to convince me he is guilty, not yours, stop doing their job for them. Creating a sense of resignation that he'll get punished in some kind of way because he is guilty when he hasn't even been on trial yet is not helpful. I agree that yeah he's probably looking at best option life in prison even if innocent, but that's not the point. The point is they're trying to force an outcome before anything's even happened legally yet, don't help them.
Like I definitely have questions about shit and I want those answered. Also about the internet history like yes it's rare but even if he's 1 in 10,000 in the US that's still 34000 people. Plus we're all posting on internet hatesite kiwifarms, the fuck are you to talk about sketchy internet histories.
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2023