- Joined
- May 22, 2019
Bruh, you're gonna have to be more specific.
Obviously kidding, but you're right. This debacle, while hilarious, is a waste of time and money that could be directed at other more serious threats to the Farms.
Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
Obviously kidding, but you're right. This debacle, while hilarious, is a waste of time and money that could be directed at other more serious threats to the Farms.
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2020
Pour one out for our poor @DeadpoolI'm well aware of the Melinda Scott saga. I'm just optimistic about this one. It may be the holiday season effect. I deserve all the.
He was really mean to Melly and she did not like him and said YHWH struck him down.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
It was literally the same judge all six times
Permanant injunction, yeah, and you can view it here:
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
I got to ask, at this point, what does Kiwi Farms do to you Greer? Watch and comment? Eat popcorn at your hooker shenanigans?
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2014
His evidence is so numerous that he can't actually provide it. Enjoy sanctions, hardship.
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2020
KF is the clown from your nightmares. The scarecrow from the horror story you were told as a child. The man that looked at you funny while passing you on the street.
It does nothing, and in doing nothing, it terrifies you. It becomes a placeholders for all of your fears. It becomes a receptacle for the blame of all the things you did wrong.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
Actually though. In reality we're the two old men from the Muppets. Seriously Russ, just don't look at the internet and you'll be fine honestly
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2014
The reality is of course that it's a convenient collection of all of Russell's retardation that he cant tilt at. Everything about him is spread over the internet in news articles and videos and legal filings, but here it has all been collated and he thinks the world will be his oyster if the kiwifarms hardship was out of the way.
goblin enby
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2022
Meanwhile in ECF 203 EXHIBIT B filed by Mr Greer...
These two unhinged filings are a Christmas miracle. Most of the "justifications" for his behaviour have already been covered as insufficient, inaccurate and/or lies in Hardin's original motions. It's especially funny how he's relying on claiming there was only one request to meet and confer that he "saw" when, again, Hardin already filed multiple exhibits showing the numerous times he attempted to arrange it without response.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
He is showing Mr. Hardin's exhibit to substantiate his claim.
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2019
I didn't disclose the witnesses that I chose, in the case I filed, because I don't want to drag the witnesses I chose, into the case I filed.
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2022
Man does Russ'tard cling to that 10th circuit ruling.
Russ, they only said that you might possibly have a case and that it would have to be adjudicated. Not that you won, not that your case has merits, not that you've been harassed or anything even close to what your claiming.
The 10th circuit only said that you can present your case for contributory infringement against Josh Moon, that's it.
Russ, they only said that you might possibly have a case and that it would have to be adjudicated. Not that you won, not that your case has merits, not that you've been harassed or anything even close to what your claiming.
The 10th circuit only said that you can present your case for contributory infringement against Josh Moon, that's it.
goblin enby
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2022
Can he not redact the information himself in that situation and simply reference the previous ECF numbers to substantiate that Hardin's versions weren't redacted? It seems strange that someone would have to effectively re-publish the same private information themselves over again if it genuinely was a violation. Obviously I'm not a lawyer but this seems weird to me.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
Kiwifarms is the hardship because if you google this regard’s name it shows up.
That’s it. That’s the sum and totality of it all.
That’s it. That’s the sum and totality of it all.
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2020
Kiwifarms is the Hardinship
I see his new tactic is to try to use his pro se leeway to accuse hardin of knowingly violating the protective order because russel was too retarded to activate it. Lol and lmao.
Maybe he should watch some of the judges litigation for retards videos.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
Can the court itself call and deposition witnesses?
They may have to to ascertain the truths of this filing.
Also this nigger claims to be a paralegal but hasn’t even read the first paragraph of the Wikipedia article for deposition or discovery.
Let alone spent an hour reading a Nolo book.
They may have to to ascertain the truths of this filing.
Also this nigger claims to be a paralegal but hasn’t even read the first paragraph of the Wikipedia article for deposition or discovery.
Let alone spent an hour reading a Nolo book.
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2021
He keeps making this claim (that his non-disclosure was justified) AFTER the judge has explicitly stated that his non-disclosure was NOT justified, and that in fact it was recalcitrant and willful, and that Greer has to show cause for why he should not be sanctioned for his UNjustified non-disclosure.
Judge: "Your non-disclosure is not justified. Why shouldn't I sanction you?"
Greer: "ACKCHUALLY it WAS justified because I said so. Sanction the other guy."
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
I will not opine to great detail on the matter, but yes, he could have chosen better ways to do it
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2021
Indeed, he could have avoided the whole issue in the first place by simply following the (very! simple!) rules laid out in the protective order itself.
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2020
Reading is for lawyers and lurkers. Not Russtard and posters.