Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.5%

  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%

  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.8%

  • Next Year

    Votes: 155 33.5%

  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 112 24.2%
  • Total voters
    463
Third World Aristocrat said:
Well, I'm probably biased, but I don't know about that. I think Russ crossed too many lines. I can't interpret these recent filings and the emails he responded to Mr. Harding without thinking that he is clearly acting in bad faith about the whole process.

I think he may have just crossed too many lines for the judge to simply ignore. And he has no case.
Click to expand...
If the judge just lets this slide what he is saying is "I'm a completely incompetent fraud of a judge" and the judge should put on a tutu and dance around like a fairy.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Windex, Irene and 22 others, jerkstore and 25 others
reptile baht spaniard rid said:
Can the court itself call and deposition witnesses?
Click to expand...
A court can generally do anything sua sponte (that is on its own motion) that it could do in response to a motion by a party. Courts generally do this only rarely, though. In this case, there's absolutely no point to these witnesses who clearly have no pertinent testimony since "plights" isn't a cause of action and they know absolutely nothing of copyright infringement.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Windex, Irene and 22 others, murph and 23 others
IamnottheNSA said:
View attachment 6790684
I accept crypto.
Click to expand...
Outside of the fucking awesomeness of this audio reading - it’s amazing how many words Russ can say, while saying absolutely nothing.

THE HARDSHIP.

Greer.
Greer.
Greer.

KIWI FARMS

Greer. Greer. Greer blah blah blah.

Shut up and show us the evidence, you gimp-faced lunatic.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Winner
Reactions: Irene and 22 others, .iota., murph and 20 others
Useful_Mistake said:
The date is weird, but the docket shows a new entry from Greer (it wasn't visible until now). This new filing is 30 pages long. I guess the clerk couldn't be bothered to upload it on the 20th, and forgot until now. 10 out of 30 pages are the arguments, the rest are exhibits.
View attachment 6790065
Click to expand...
19 pages of exhibits, and not a single picture of Hitler?

This lawsuit sucks.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Irene and 22 others, TractorGirl, lilypanda and 33 others
AnOminous said:
The clerk might have had more important things to do. Like literally anything else.
Click to expand...

Due to the timestamp of the filings, I can't help but wonder if Hardin is seeing these for the first time today along with the rest of us. Presumably he and Greer had behind-the-scenes communications that day which led to the stipulation later being filed, but did he know about these?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: .iota., Broken Cuddles, Not a bee and 1 other person
AnOminous said:
A court can generally do anything sua sponte (that is on its own motion) that it could do in response to a motion by a party. Courts generally do this only rarely, though. In this case, there's absolutely no point to these witnesses who clearly have no pertinent testimony since "plights" isn't a cause of action and they know absolutely nothing of copyright infringement.
Click to expand...
I was thinking not to verify the facts of the case but to see if Greer’s professional allegations have any weight. Subpoenaed witnesses to testify that Greer is witless would amuse.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Broken Cuddles and Clovis
goblin enby said:
View attachment 6790377
Meanwhile in ECF 203 EXHIBIT B filed by Mr Greer...
View attachment 6790382
These two unhinged filings are a Christmas miracle. Most of the "justifications" for his behaviour have already been covered as insufficient, inaccurate and/or lies in Hardin's original motions. It's especially funny how he's relying on claiming there was only one request to meet and confer that he "saw" when, again, Hardin already filed multiple exhibits showing the numerous times he attempted to arrange it without response.
Click to expand...
Because there is nothing a court and Judge enjoy more than reading a Pro Se retard attack the opposing council over and over and over for being a meanie who understands the law. Didn't he call the AGT Lawyer Lady all sorts of nasty things and accuse her of similar unethical behavior ? I ask because Russ's behavior here is not simply Willful and Recalcitrant, but Repeated almost Pathologically from Case to Case.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Pee Cola, The Un-Clit, CEO of Gay and 9 others
RodgerDodger said:
Because there is nothing a court and Judge enjoy more than reading a Pro Se retard attack the opposing council over and over and over for being a meanie who understands the law. Didn't he call the AGT Lawyer Lady all sorts of nasty things and accuse her of similar unethical behavior ? I ask because Russ's behavior here is not simply Willful and Recalcitrant, but Repeated almost Pathologically from Case to Case.
Click to expand...
It's unethical to not give him what he wants.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: YouTube Autist, Pedophobe, Botchy Galoop and 3 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back