Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.6%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 55 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.9%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 153 33.3%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 111 24.2%

  • Total voters
    459
Greer sets groundbreaking new court precedent called the "Kiwi Farms Prosecution" where if you can prove the defendant is Kiwi Farms you will be given every opportunity possible within the law to win the suit.
Artist's rendition
kiwidefense.png
 
Greer is such a loser fuck up that I'm convinced the second the judge orders him to cough up any serious amount of money to pay for Hardin's work hours he'll effectively dismiss the case himself, no pesky appeals when the tard leaves on his own because he's on a 24/7 broke nigga alert.
 
I think it's a lot closer to the Chewbacca Prosecution, because that's all Russ has, trying to confuse the judge and obfuscate all of his recalcitrance. If only Hardship Hardin didn't keep track of all of his bullshit!
I think this is the actual still from South Park with the chewbacca defence.
Call it the Slobbermutt defence.L
I'm6
7
 
He can let it slide insofar as he doesn't impose case ending sanctions, but I don't see how anything Russ has done will help him avoid the sanctions that the judge already telegraphed he would impose, something that would only further drive shitlips to deeper depths of insanity.
The judge will only need to impose one (1) singular hardship upon Russ before the retard crosshairs will fall squarely upon him, and Russ will begin to file motions about the judge and his family and the fact that he's going to tell the 10th circuit on him.
 
This is what bad faith looks like:
Screenshot_2024-12-26-23-38-04-24_64ef5fc2000c1caa954c114bb372e1d5.jpg
What does Rule 26(a) require, Mr Greer?
Screenshot_2024-12-26-19-14-34-35_e2d5b3f32b79de1d45acd1fad96fbb0f (1).jpg
What did you omit, Mr Greer?
Screenshot_2024-12-26-19-15-15-36_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12 (1).jpg
Right, the substance of what the witnesses bring to the case, which you didn't provide and which means you didn't "fully comply with Rule 26(a)." Surely Mr Hardin and the federal judge won't recognize your masterful ruse.
 
The judge will only need to impose one (1) singular hardship upon Russ before the retard crosshairs will fall squarely upon him, and Russ will begin to file motions about the judge and his family and the fact that he's going to tell the 10th circuit on him.
Honestly that would be pure kino. Probably the best bits of Acerthorn's current ongoing batshittery is his whining at the judge which is about to cost him the one slight win he's ever managed, which will likely set him off even further.
 
Right, the substance of what the witnesses bring to the case, which you didn't provide and which means you didn't "fully comply with Rule 26(a)." Surely Mr Hardin and the federal judge won't recognize your masterful ruse.
Ah, you've already fallen into Russ's brilliant trap! The phone number just is the substance and subjects of the information!

He's going to call them to the stand and they will recite their phone numbers, which is all the evidance needed to put Null away for life without parole for felony website.
 
I know you're making a joke, but for the record, this allegation and any other one of similar nature are unequivocally and totally false in so far as it relates to me
I think the issue is you are too polite and even tempered and dont refer to people as fat faggots often enough. You're the foil to the other popular law knowledgable kiwi; his vitriol towards lolcows and their enablers can turn people to slurry but you're just so gosh darn pleasant and approachable that people can't help but admire you and want to include you in their vexatious lawsuits.
 
I think the issue is you are too polite and even tempered and dont refer to people as fat faggots often enough. You're the foil to the other popular law knowledgable kiwi; his vitriol towards lolcows and their enablers can turn people to slurry but you're just so gosh darn pleasant and approachable that people can't help but admire you and want to include you in their vexatious lawsuits.
You clearly haven't seen my posts in Melinda and Pamela threads, lmao.
 
Russell contests the motion to exclude witnesses, showing he still doesn't know he himself signed away any right to call witnesses, including himself!
I believe that's because of clerk time travel shenanigans. 204 was apparently filed 8:00 AM on December 20th, 203 was 8:54 AM that day. 201, the stipulation, was way later that day, only posted here in the evening. So Greer contested it before, then I assume he sat together with Hardin on the 20th and discussed what the fuck, and then they stipulated together those facts in the stipulation. Makes sense to gain new insights when you meet and confer, kinda why you have to do that.
 
Back