Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The judge needs to order Hardin to perform no better at this than a pro se.These facts don’t show that Plaintiff has been non-compliant, rather, the facts show that Mr. Hardin is engaging in very predatory behavior and using his advantage as a lawyer against a pro se litigant.
I think it's a lot closer to the Chewbacca Prosecution, because that's all Russ has, trying to confuse the judge and obfuscate all of his recalcitrance. If only Hardship Hardin didn't keep track of all of his bullshit!
I think this is the actual still from South Park with the chewbacca defence.Artist's rendition
View attachment 6791507
The judge will only need to impose one (1) singular hardship upon Russ before the retard crosshairs will fall squarely upon him, and Russ will begin to file motions about the judge and his family and the fact that he's going to tell the 10th circuit on him.He can let it slide insofar as he doesn't impose case ending sanctions, but I don't see how anything Russ has done will help him avoid the sanctions that the judge already telegraphed he would impose, something that would only further drive shitlips to deeper depths of insanity.
do you have the mp3 you used to make that elevenlabs ai?
Honestly that would be pure kino. Probably the best bits of Acerthorn's current ongoing batshittery is his whining at the judge which is about to cost him the one slight win he's ever managed, which will likely set him off even further.The judge will only need to impose one (1) singular hardship upon Russ before the retard crosshairs will fall squarely upon him, and Russ will begin to file motions about the judge and his family and the fact that he's going to tell the 10th circuit on him.
...or a venereal disease, something that Russ would be far more familiar with.This mess really is the gift that keeps on giving, like mold, or cancer.
Ah, you've already fallen into Russ's brilliant trap! The phone number just is the substance and subjects of the information!Right, the substance of what the witnesses bring to the case, which you didn't provide and which means you didn't "fully comply with Rule 26(a)." Surely Mr Hardin and the federal judge won't recognize your masterful ruse.
I know you're making a joke, but for the record, this allegation and any other one of similar nature are unequivocally and totally false in so far as it relates to meHe did e-mail two Kiwi Farms users. He CC'd himself, Null and Useful_mistake.
I think the issue is you are too polite and even tempered and dont refer to people as fat faggots often enough. You're the foil to the other popular law knowledgable kiwi; his vitriol towards lolcows and their enablers can turn people to slurry but you're just so gosh darn pleasant and approachable that people can't help but admire you and want to include you in their vexatious lawsuits.I know you're making a joke, but for the record, this allegation and any other one of similar nature are unequivocally and totally false in so far as it relates to me
You clearly haven't seen my posts in Melinda and Pamela threads, lmao.I think the issue is you are too polite and even tempered and dont refer to people as fat faggots often enough. You're the foil to the other popular law knowledgable kiwi; his vitriol towards lolcows and their enablers can turn people to slurry but you're just so gosh darn pleasant and approachable that people can't help but admire you and want to include you in their vexatious lawsuits.
Time softens us all, old man.You clearly haven't seen my posts in Melinda and Pamela threads, lmao.
I believe that's because of clerk time travel shenanigans. 204 was apparently filed 8:00 AM on December 20th, 203 was 8:54 AM that day. 201, the stipulation, was way later that day, only posted here in the evening. So Greer contested it before, then I assume he sat together with Hardin on the 20th and discussed what the fuck, and then they stipulated together those facts in the stipulation. Makes sense to gain new insights when you meet and confer, kinda why you have to do that.Russell contests the motion to exclude witnesses, showing he still doesn't know he himself signed away any right to call witnesses, including himself!
As you can see dear reader, this is a person who is really afraid that they'll have to "footsie" with Greer as part of a settlement.I know you're making a joke, but for the record, this allegation and any other one of similar nature are unequivocally and totally false in so far as it relates to me