Culture Why Is Haiti Uniquely Miserable?

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
L | A
By Rod Dreher
2fbdf0a717a4b1f04fe6e061462ae997b215a6c2.jpg

Our cultural guardians do not allow us to consider the role that voodoo plays in shaping how Haitians see the world and their place in it.

Back in 2018, President Donald Trump referred to Haiti as a “s**thole,” and was roundly denounced for being a racist. While watching a clip of a “cannibal gang” member eating a piece of roasted human leg on the streets of Port-au-Prince the other night (it’s revolting; you have been warned), it struck me that Trump’s judgment has held up pretty well.

Why is Haiti the way it is? Everybody has an explanation.

The most popular one is that Haiti was horribly exploited by its former colonial master France, which imposed reparations on it that weren’t paid off until 1947. That’s true, and morally obscene. But the Dominican Republic, with which Haiti shares the island of Hispaniola, was just as poor as Haiti in 1947, and today is six to seven times richer.

Almost one hundred years ago, Haiti was invaded and occupied for a time by the United States. Yes, but so was the Dominican Republic.

Haiti is subject to hurricanes and earthquakes … but, sorry, so is the Dominican Republic. In 1950, half of Haiti was covered by forest, but now, Haitians have deforested their part of the island, leading to economic disaster. In sharp contrast to the green Dominican Republic, today less than 2% of Haiti is forested. This is surely a factor in Haiti’s misery, but it is hardly a complete explanation.

Both Haiti and the Dominican Republic were led by dictators in the 20th century. It has been argued that Haiti’s Duvalier family used its monopoly on power to do nothing but exploit the country, while the D.I.’s Rafael Trujillo, though a strongman, nevertheless modernized his country. This seems plausible—but again, only as a contributing factor.

What about religion? It cannot be denied that religious belief, which infuses culture (after all, you can’t have culture without cult) has tremendous effects on political, social, and economic life.

Max Weber famously credited Protestant values with building capitalism and liberal democracy. Samuel P. Huntington argued that the reason the United States and Canada developed wealthier and more stable countries than other New World nations is because they were settled by Anglo Protestants, not Latin Catholics. His point, of course, was not that Latin Catholics are worse people than Anglo Protestants, but that ideas have consequences.

More recently, Harvard anthropologist Joseph Henrich, in his provocative 2020 book The WEIRDest People In The World, explained how Western culture became a far outlier on global cultures, become educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic while the rest of the world did not—or only did under Western influence.

The key factor, he found, is the way the Latin church organized western European cultures in the wake of the Roman Empire’s 5th century collapse. A secondary factor is the rise of literacy after the Reformation.

The lesson is that religion matters for the prosperity and stability of any society. Not just ‘religion,’ but the content and form of religion, because it provides to its adherents a model of how the world works and gives them a model of how to conduct oneself in it.

In Haiti, there is a famous saying: “Haiti is 90% Catholic, 10% Protestant, and 100% Vodou.” Vodou, or voodoo, is the Creolized form of indigenous West African religion preserved by Haitian slaves. It is a polytheistic religion in which worshipers make sacrifices to various deities, called lwa, to propitiate them, to serve them, and to get the lwa to do their bidding.

Both Haitians and Dominicans practice voodoo. But it is far stronger and more prevalent in Haiti. This, perhaps, makes the difference. It is at least worth investigating, right?

It should be. In the part of the world where the root religion of the Haitians comes from, a government minister once told journalist Robert D. Kaplan that religion had a lot to do with the anarchy there.

In the poor quarters of Arab North Africa … there is much less crime, because Islam provides a social anchor: of education and indoctrination. Here in West Africa we have a lot of superficial Islam and superficial Christianity. Western religion is undermined by animist beliefs not suitable to a moral society, because they are based on irrational spirit power. Here spirits are used to wreak vengeance by one person against another, or one group against another.

Voodoo is a folk religion derived from traditional West African animism. It has no central authority or institutional structure. There is no formal ethical teaching, which is not to say there is no ethic in the religion. Its followers generally devote themselves to a particular lwa, a spirit who has particular characteristics, and judge themselves good or bad by how faithfully they mimic the character of the lwa. Good and evil are contextual.

In voodoo rituals, worshipers seek to become “mounted,” or possessed, by a lwa. This intimate intercourse between spirits and people is a key part of the voodoo faith. The point here is that a vodouist believes his fate is determined by these interactions with capricious spirits; the fate of human communities is bound to the passions of the hundreds of lwa, who are the means of mediation between humans and the distant creator god.

This is what the African minister meant by his country’s people being governed by “irrational spirit power.” If people within a social order believe that they have no real moral agency, and that their fate lies in the hands not of a God of reason and justice, but of an irrational spirit with a mercurial will, then it will be hard to build ordered social structures and ways of life. Whether or not the voodoo creator god and the lwa actually exist, this is a psychological and social fact.

For Haitian Protestants, whose opinions we rarely if ever encounter in the media, this is the central fact explaining their country’s chronic misery. They say the country’s founders brought a curse on Haiti by consecrating it to demons in the slave revolt that sparked the Haitian Revolution.

The rebellion that eventually overturned despotic French colonial rule began on the night of August 14, 1791. A group of voodoo adherents gathered at Bwa Kayiman, a forested area, and carried out a ceremony invoking the lwa to aid them as they rose against their European enslavers. A voodoo priest named Dutty Boukman sacrificed an animal and chanted this prayer:

The god who created the sun which gives us light, who rouses the waves and rules the storm, though hidden in the clouds, he watches us. He sees all that the white man does. The god of the white man inspires us with crime, but our god calls upon us to do good works. Our god who is good to us orders us to revenge our [sic] wrongs. He will direct our arms and aid us. Throw away the symbol of the god of the whites who has caused us to weep, and listen to the voices of liberty, which speaks in the hearts of us all.

Days later, Boukman gave the signal for a slave uprising that slaughtered every white man, woman, and child on the Turpin plantation. The revolution had begun, and eventually ended with Haiti under the control of the Africans who had been enslaved and abused by the French.

Yet according to many Haitian Protestants, the pact with the lwa was the Faustian bargain their ancestors made, a contract more punishing and long-lasting than the cruel reparations imposed by France. U.S. televangelist Pat Robertson drew mockery and criticism in 2010, when he blamed demon-worship for the Haitian earthquake. But Robertson didn’t come up with this thesis. It originated with black Haitian Protestants themselves.

Bertin M. Louis, a University of Kentucky anthropologist, has written that Haitians who embrace Protestantism typically do so to be protected from the lwas, and in search of a form of faith that will build karactè, or character, defined by Louis as “the moral and ethical strength that conversion to Protestant Christianity provides an individual.” Louis wrote in a 2010 paper:

The strict practice of Protestantism, then, becomes the only logical religious choice for any Haitian concerning not only their personal salvation but ensuring a positive future for Haiti. Many Haitian Protestants believe that conversion to Protestant forms of Christianity teaches fellow Haitians to love each other evidenced in passages from the Holy Bible which Protestants memorize in Bible study and Sunday school. Vodou, by contrast, teaches you to hate your neighbor by wishing their downfall by using maji (sorcery) against them. Vodou is, in the imagination of many Haitian Protestants, a religious “Culture of Poverty”; an adaptation to a set of objective conditions that is transmitted from generation to generation that keeps Haiti from developing into a modern, civilized, and liberated nation.

Louis quotes one Haitian Protestant pastor saying:

You are a Christian and you carry with you principles that you will apply in every setting. Those principles are very clear, my friend. It comes down to your character: honesty, integrity, and transparency as a person. These are the things that Christ taught and these are the things that are missing not only in Haitian society but the world over.

If this pastor and his religious community are correct about the contrast between Protestantism and voodoo, then it’s not difficult to see how different societies would emerge from peoples who carried one or the other cosmology and set of ethics in their heads.

After all, in his influential 1994 article, Robert D. Kaplan said that the social order he observed in the slums of Turkey revealed to him the power of Islam to provide its adherents with a worldview that allowed them to live in peace, order, and dignity despite their poverty.

Haitian Protestants certainly believe in the power of spirits—the Holy Spirit and evil spirits—at work among humans. But one doesn’t have to share that belief to recognize the determinative connection between cult and culture.

Alas, this is not something we can’t speak honestly about with regard to Haiti. One is only allowed to comment on Afro-Caribbean religion with respect, even awe. To do otherwise is to be guilty of racism, of colonialism, and all the other Very Bad Things.

It seems that the way Western people see voodoo depends on their politics, cultural and otherwise. Thus, we only see media reports that characterize voodoo as a kind of vibrant nature religion despised and slandered by whites (The Atlantic), or as a fun, pro-LGBT, progressive faith hated by Christians (The Guardian).

Even anthropologist Louis condemns his Protestant subject, calling their view

an interpretation of Haitian history which rejects its African roots and which has as its goals to reintegrate Haiti as a respected nation among nations through a globalized, Christian identity which resonates with American Evangelicalism. It relies on erasing the centrality of white hegemony in the creation of a dehumanizing socioeconomic system based on extraction and violence and blaming blacks in their search for a solution to their bondage. Haitian Protestantism, at times, internalizes a form of anti-Black racism that absolves past and continued white exploitation of Haiti and views Vodou, a syncretic religion that emerges from the violent history of the Atlantic slave trade and chattel slavery, as pathological.

Louis goes on to blame “Eurocentric colonization and globalized capitalist structural inequality” for the suffering of Haitians today.

The anthropologist presents a false choice. Though he would have to explain why the next-door Dominican Republic is thriving, despite having the same factors at work, in principle Louis could be right about Haiti. Yet the Haitian Protestants could also be right about the negative social and political effects of voodoo religion on their country—even though modern Westerners don’t want to hear it.

Nobody seriously disputes that religion—which entails a model of reality espoused by believers—has real-world effects, for better or for worse. India would be a very different place if all its Hindus took up Lutheranism. An Islamic Brazil would be scarcely recognizable, as would a Pentecostal Saudi Arabia.

Yet we are not allowed by our cultural guardians to consider the role the animistic beliefs of voodoo plays in shaping how Haitians see the world and their place in it. We can only regard voodoo as sacrosanct because it is a native African religion, and because it is consecrated by its role in the successful slave rebellion. Black Haitians who refuse this narrative are either ignored or deemed self-hating bigots.

There’s a word for this: paternalism. There’s an even uglier word for it: racism. It’s the kind of racist paternalism that condemns Haitians to more suffering, while outsiders who do not have to live within the chaos of voodoo culture admire from afar its picturesque folk qualities, and how consonant it is with their own political prejudices.

It is of a piece with the recent Church of England report calling on the Anglicans to apologize for “seeking to destroy diverse African traditional religious belief systems”—while African Anglicans chastise the liberal white mother church for abandoning orthodox Christianity.

Whites in the West are only permitted to value what black people say if their words make us feel good about what we already believe. The Anglicans of Africa probably know exactly how the Protestants of Haiti feel.
 
The actual reason is somehow simultaneoulsy much more simple and complex than just "niggers" and I'm tired of people taking actual memes and turning them into serious political rants.
Nothing of what I said is wrong and you haven't provided any proof to the contrary. My delivery was humorous but if you strip the humor the point still stands. The less able of the African tribes got conquered by the more able African tribe and in term sold to the least able of the colonial powers. Do to the nature of both the colonial power in general and the specific management of the island that less able African population got less white and native admixture than equivalent Caribbean nations and also a less cohesive and cooperative culture took hold do to the nation achieving independence via armed revolution that quickly turned into ethnic cleansing. That violent revolution promoted even less cooperation and cohesion with the white colonial powers and the mixed Caribbean locals. It became a cycle of negative reinforcement.

And while yes the average African nation is not as bad as Haiti you have places like Equatorial Guinea, Liberia and Eritrea. That go down the shitter do to an extreme incompetent regime or anarchy. Haiti simply has the misfortune of the negative reinforcement being coupled with a dogshit regime. That doesn't mean the cycle isn't present and doesn't have negative repercussions.
And India is uniquely shit. While other places don't have toilets the custom of mass street shitting is not shared by lower IQ populations. That is a uniquely Indian deviant behavior that has nothing to do with IQ.
 
Last edited:
One thing I haven't seen mentioned:

French colonies and former colonies are uniquely fucked up compared with their neighbors, whereas the Spanish for whatever reason managed to leave behind the apparatus of a functioning state in most places. I might posit that the state's relationship to Catholicism and the different schools of Catholicism were involved.

Blame the Eternal Fr*g.
A lot of antebellum plantations were owned by those with French ancestry and spoke only French. The infamous photo of the nigger’s back scarred from all the whipping was on a French-speaking plantation. Also the really shitty African countries are Francophone countries. There definitely is something odd with French and the niggers, even to this day.
 
Absolutely nothing. No system of government would make the slightest difference in Haiti. Nothing can change a "pigs in mud" society.
If that doesn't change a thing, since they are close by, Cuba would absorb it and turn it into Cuban Hispanola. Which means more US military presence in DR.
 
Absolutely nothing. No system of government would make the slightest difference in Haiti. Nothing can change a "pigs in mud" society.

So not even the CCP would be able to change Haiti, even if Xi were to go all-in on trying to do so?
 
So not even the CCP would be able to change Haiti, even if Xi were to go all-in on trying to do so?

You might want to review the history of the US going "all in" over and over and again to save Haiti. Just about every method and every sort of reform and every sort of "development" idea has been tried in Haiti over the decades from pouring money into the place to ruling it by force with US marines. From anointing enlightened local "savior" politicians to fix the country to appointing dictators to fix things by force.

The dream of generations of US progressives has been that the people of Haiti are misunderstood victims and noble savages who could build Wakanda if they only had the money and could overcome da racism. And no matter how many times their stupid dreams get proven wrong, the next generation goes back there with the fanatical belief that this time they can get it right. No matter how much money you put in there, the people at the top of the Haitian trash-heap will steal it and use it to relocate to rich countries. The more money put into Haiti, the more the people at the lower levels of society will want and the more they will use violence to get it.

Haiti is a theme park where US evangelical christians go to wrestle with the devil and where US progressives go to wrestle with da racism. All of them are equally deluded.
 
A lot of antebellum plantations were owned by those with French ancestry and spoke only French. The infamous photo of the nigger’s back scarred from all the whipping was on a French-speaking plantation. Also the really shitty African countries are Francophone countries. There definitely is something odd with French and the niggers, even to this day.
What's the problem with Haiti?

The French.

What's the problem with the French?

They're French.
 
:story: Haiti is a theme park where US evangelical christians go to wrestle with the devil and where US progressives go to wrestle with da racism. All of them are equally deluded.
A theme park, we should suggest that idea to Conan O'Brien if and when he'll do his next trip to Haiti.
 
If we thought what they were doing to the Uighurs was bad, what they turn Haiti into would be infinitely worse.
Their factories and mines throughout Africa are operated in a fairly harsh way (which the MSM largely ignore for reasons), but that's understandable given a widespread cultural aversion to working in a productive way (by the clock and not wastefully). Haiti would surely defeat them. It defeated the French of St Dominique whose Code Noir gave slaves rights French peasants lacked, next its first ruling class of former slave overseers and freedmen turning small scale planters (like Toussaint Louverture) and later US government and private efforts. Perhaps the killdozer using Kenyan paramilitary police might work out something, but the Haitian presence isn't too popular among Kenyans AFAIK.
 
Jesus I always pictured hati being like 700 feral niggers in a island, turns out they have around 12x the population density of the U.S.A. and it's allllllll the darkest of speer chuckers. That is proof that Jesus has a fun side and likes watching them hold their cia Glocks sideways.
 
One thing I haven't seen mentioned:

French colonies and former colonies are uniquely fucked up compared with their neighbors, whereas the Spanish for whatever reason managed to leave behind the apparatus of a functioning state in most places. I might posit that the state's relationship to Catholicism and the different schools of Catholicism were involved.

Blame the Eternal Fr*g.
I feel that the relative success of Spain’s former colonies comes down to the composition of the founders. Aside from Spain's more integrated colonial structure that often encouraged settlers to convert and marry natives, the main leadership of Spanish America's independence movements were themselves upper-class Spaniards who generally preferred keeping the old system but removing the “subject to the European Motherland” aspect of their laws, not unlike what happened in the United States. Haiti and most of France’s other colonies instead had the rebel forces expelling or killing nearly all Frenchmen from their countries and completely overhauling the government, meaning there was no sense of continuity once the new rulers took over. Compound that with questionable experience governing in the first place and you get a place that can politely be called a burning shitheap.
 
I feel that the relative success of Spain’s former colonies comes down to the composition of the founders. Aside from Spain's more integrated colonial structure that often encouraged settlers to convert and marry natives, the main leadership of Spanish America's independence movements were themselves upper-class Spaniards who generally preferred keeping the old system but removing the “subject to the European Motherland” aspect of their laws, not unlike what happened in the United States. Haiti and most of France’s other colonies instead had the rebel forces expelling or killing nearly all Frenchmen from their countries and completely overhauling the government, meaning there was no sense of continuity once the new rulers took over. Compound that with questionable experience governing in the first place and you get a place that can politely be called a burning shitheap.
The process of assimilation was also different as it wasn't a conquest as much as an alliance between natives and Spaniards (reason why Hispanic historians don't call it colonialism). The many different tribes already had their own hierarchical systems similar to Europe nobility, so they were promised to keep those titles and be treated as nobility by the Crown and Spanish citizens. The difference was that, instead of bowing to the bloody vicious Incas, they'd bow to a King that promised them rights they didn't have. For the rest of the people, there was a gain there too. They kept their local rulers, but also gained rights as citizens (such as right to property), new infrastructure, a religion that banned human sacrifice, the acknowledgement of being a human being, and so on. The marriage between natives and Spaniards came later but with this background in mind. Some Spaniards married the American nobility, others married simple people, all depending on their own positions.
 
Why is Haiti the way it is?
The answer to any question of ‘why is this place like it is?’ Is the same wherever you are: ‘because the inhabitants live there.’
Japan is weird and safe because it’s full of Japanese. Norway is clean and orderly becasue it’s full of Norwegians.
Haiti is like it is because of Haitians.
 
Back