- Joined
- Jul 23, 2019
Both Fuentes' America First and the America First of the 1940s were pretty anti Semitic. Lindbergh railed against Jews every chance he could.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Both Fuentes' America First and the America First of the 1940s were pretty anti Semitic. Lindbergh railed against Jews every chance he could.
WELL, AFC distanced itself from Father Coughlin that was an unambiguous fascist and antisemite. Lindbergh is more ambiguous, he said that joining the war would cause the opinion to turn against Jews and said he sympathized with German jews. That’s a pro-Jewish position if you're charitable. Des Moines speech was....less so.Both Fuentes' America First and the America First of the 1940s were pretty anti Semitic. Lindbergh railed against Jews every chance he could.
To be fair shlomo Goldstein was one of the biggest supporters of our involvement in World War 2 'cause his fellow shlomo goldsteins were being pushed out of power in GermanyBoth Fuentes' America First and the America First of the 1940s were pretty anti Semitic. Lindbergh railed against Jews every chance he could.
According to the liberals I talked to, that attack cant possibly be racism, its just "racial prejudice" because blacks got no advantage over jews on the hierarchy.Meanwhile "we wuz Jesus and sheeiitt" people racked up half a dozen deaths in a single incident.
sorry hitler was the USSR's greatest ally in taking over Poland and fucking over the potatozone countriesTo be fair shlomo Goldstein was one of the biggest supporters of our involvement in World War 2 'cause his fellow shlomo goldsteins were being pushed out of power in Germany
Hitler's only issue is that he didn't gas all of the Jews he let them escape to America sadly he could have prevented everything if he would have just killed all the Jews fleeing his country and all the communists as well
...?According to the liberals I talked to, that attack cant possibly be racism, its just "racial prejudice"
Does being anti-Asian count as being "prejuriced"?Stop Asian Hate
As long you arent white, yes. Really, its literally just "its racism, but we cant call it racism" They say "racism requires power so you can say the exact same thing, but if you got no power over them on society its not real racism"...?
Racism =/= "racial prejudice", got it.
Does being anti-Asian count as being "prejuriced"?
Why would they want to disrupt an election they were handily winning?A schizo leftoid writes an essay REEEing about his political opponents, full of accusatory language, non-sequiturs, and absurd spin. But instead of publishing it on Substack or his blog, he posts it as a Wikipedia article - and apparently that's not considered a problem by the stewards of that "encyclopedia":
I always get irritated now when I see all those accent marks cuz I know its a fucking turk and they never have good opinions.One of the most infamous users of Turkish Wikipedia, Nanahuatl (named after the Aztec god) who is terminally wiki-editing and slapfighting:
View attachment 6755127
He has joined about 16 years ago and has over half a million edits (consider that he uses tools that can make over 10 edits at a time). This is not a bot account, this is an actual human being who is on Wikipedia 25/8. He often gets banned for arguing with other users but comes back a few weeks later, starts another slapfight and gets banned, the cycle repeats after getting unbanned.
He has 7k edits on English Wikipedia and 111k edits on Wikimedia Commons. He just proposed the deletion of a page as I'm writing this post. God help this guy.
Vice-Chair of Affiliations Committee of Wikimedia posts incredibly lazy AI-generated message in mediawiki update (didn't even bother to remove the AI boilerplate) - wikimedia uses mediawiki which is the software used to power wikipedia. Announcing MediaWiki 1.43.0 / https://archive.ph/3pTqs / Wikimedia affiliations committee
Certainly! Here's a human-friendly response:
------------------------------
That's fantastic news! Congratulations on the successful release of
MediaWiki 1.43!
A big thank you to everyone involved—developers, testers, and contributors
alike—for making this possible. It's great to see the collaborative spirit
and effort that went into not only fixing issues but also improving the
overall release process.
The MediaWiki Engineering Group's leadership in this release is a
significant milestone, and it's inspiring to see the commitment to
transparency and open-source values.
I'm excited to check out the release notes and explore what's new in 1.43.
For anyone encountering issues, it's good to know there's a clear path to
file tasks and track progress on Phabricator.
Looking forward to seeing the continued evolution of MediaWiki. Kudos to
the team!
*Best Regards,*
*Suyash Dwivedi *(He/Him/His)
---
Good Evening,
Does the vice chair of AffCom really have so little care and appreciation
for the community that you can't even be arsed to write your own human
friendly response?
Do better.
Thanks,
Samuel
---
My sincere apologies
*Best Regards,*
*Suyash Dwivedi *(He/Him/His) * "Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's what we're doing." - **Jimmy Wales*