- Joined
- Jul 23, 2019
Both Fuentes' America First and the America First of the 1940s were pretty anti Semitic. Lindbergh railed against Jews every chance he could.
Dumb Shit on Wikipedia
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2021
Found this on the article for smoke detectors.
Unfortunately, black people don't read Wikipedia so this information is useless.
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2022
WELL, AFC distanced itself from Father Coughlin that was an unambiguous fascist and antisemite. Lindbergh is more ambiguous, he said that joining the war would cause the opinion to turn against Jews and said he sympathized with German jews. That’s a pro-Jewish position if you're charitable. Des Moines speech was....less so.
But even if you write off AFC as antisemitic wingnuts, the phrase is most popularly known for its use by Trump who is the most philosemitic guy in history. Groypers are really fringe and Literally Who to 99% of Americans.
Sargon's wife's son
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2019
To be fair shlomo Goldstein was one of the biggest supporters of our involvement in World War 2 'cause his fellow shlomo goldsteins were being pushed out of power in Germany
Hitler's only issue is that he didn't gas all of the Jews he let them escape to America sadly he could have prevented everything if he would have just killed all the Jews fleeing his country and all the communists as well
winderson_silva
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2021
According to the liberals I talked to, that attack cant possibly be racism, its just "racial prejudice" because blacks got no advantage over jews on the hierarchy.
Through I doubt jews are as cuck as asians and would stop talking about these types of attack just so to not offend Jamal and his friends. Like remember how Stop Asian Hate ended the moment the cameras showed who was doing the attacks?
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2019
sorry hitler was the USSR's greatest ally in taking over Poland and fucking over the potatozone countries
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2022
Low effort post but I came across this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Phoenix_man/Archive
A Pajeet has created dozens of sockpuppets to write about his turd world town, I have to say, I'm beginning to pity wiki jannies a bit, he cleans up after street shitters for free. I have been lurking Teahouse and there are countless of similar cases, some which I've featured. Pajeets just cannot help their desire to let the world know about their mudhut town.
Hot take: India would actually improve if the commies took it over. Imagine if India got the red firewall like China. It would be like internet renaissance.
A Pajeet has created dozens of sockpuppets to write about his turd world town, I have to say, I'm beginning to pity wiki jannies a bit, he cleans up after street shitters for free. I have been lurking Teahouse and there are countless of similar cases, some which I've featured. Pajeets just cannot help their desire to let the world know about their mudhut town.
Hot take: India would actually improve if the commies took it over. Imagine if India got the red firewall like China. It would be like internet renaissance.
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2022
...?
Racism =/= "racial prejudice", got it.
Does being anti-Asian count as being "prejuriced"?
winderson_silva
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2021
As long you arent white, yes. Really, its literally just "its racism, but we cant call it racism" They say "racism requires power so you can say the exact same thing, but if you got no power over them on society its not real racism"
Sucker punching a 80 year old chinese grandma isnt racism if you are black, because errrrrr, blacks got no power over asians
polyester
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2020
A schizo leftoid writes an essay REEEing about his political opponents, full of accusatory language, non-sequiturs, and absurd spin. But instead of publishing it on Substack or his blog, he posts it as a Wikipedia article - and apparently that's not considered a problem by the stewards of that "encyclopedia":
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Why would they want to disrupt an election they were handily winning?
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2019
One of the most infamous users of Turkish Wikipedia, Nanahuatl (named after the Aztec god) who is terminally wiki-editing and slapfighting:
He has joined about 16 years ago and has over half a million edits (consider that he uses tools that can make over 10 edits at a time). This is not a bot account, this is an actual human being who is on Wikipedia 25/8. He often gets banned for arguing with other users but comes back a few weeks later, starts another slapfight and gets banned, the cycle repeats after getting unbanned.
He has 7k edits on English Wikipedia and 111k edits on Wikimedia Commons. He just proposed the deletion of a page as I'm writing this post. God help this guy.
He has joined about 16 years ago and has over half a million edits (consider that he uses tools that can make over 10 edits at a time). This is not a bot account, this is an actual human being who is on Wikipedia 25/8. He often gets banned for arguing with other users but comes back a few weeks later, starts another slapfight and gets banned, the cycle repeats after getting unbanned.
He has 7k edits on English Wikipedia and 111k edits on Wikimedia Commons. He just proposed the deletion of a page as I'm writing this post. God help this guy.
TitusOvid
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2017
I always get irritated now when I see all those accent marks cuz I know its a fucking turk and they never have good opinions.
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2017
All I know about Turkish Wikipedia is they actually do have a page for the Armenian genocide and I remember once running the talk page through a machine translator and found endless arguments and seething.
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2022
Speaking of very special users, I think I just found a literal glownigger or paid shill.
First off, props to them for being direct and simple. No wall of badges, no retarded manifesto, no attempt at pretending Wikipedia is some sort of social media. Almost respectable tbh.
This person caught my eye once it was mentioned on the article Polyester linked, which is one big substack article about MUH REPUBLIKKKANS!
Going into their page showed that little profile, but it was the talk page where the nature of this creature is shown. The talk page is ENORMOUS. Even other wikipedos with similar views to them are a bit off put by their militant editing.
"Hmmmmm.... Source? The sources all agree. Reality has a liberal bias sweaty!"
In fact this Soibangla is so prolific they even had a shout out given to them by none other than Russian state media! Here is the RT article. Tl;Dr Soibangla was the one who went and quickly deleted mentions of Bill Clinton and Epstein being friends and BIll flying on the Lolita Express.
Looking into their history it's actually pretty interesting. This is very much a oldfag user of Wikipedia. I am not making a hyperbole when I say this might be a paid shill, the user edit history makes a pretty strong case for it. As soon as they joined on the site the first 2 edits were on Median House Income in the United States, and then...
A absolute fucking wall of edits to the page of a minor politician in the 1990s, mostly about her opinions and actions around Obamacare and ACA and what she did for and against it. All of the course of 2 days. Then nothing for months, and then...
Another wall of edits to some dude who was part of the Trump campaign, which apparently led to them being warned off by Wikipedia admins for "edit warring" (unsure of context, clincking the link doesn't really lead to the discussion). At which point they laid low until 2015, when they came back to edit the "Hillary Clinton Email Scandal" for a bit, but not much. They only really took off into massive editing in 2018, when they proceeded to really REALLY spend a long time on it.
SIDENOTE: Did you know that there is a entire project to catalogue all data on wikipedia user edits and present it as readable data? I didn't! Turns out it is called XTools and it's a fucking godsend for looking at autismo. Honestly shocked the wikipedos allow this to exist, as it can really showcase how hard some topics are walled off and maintained by hardcore shills. Someone needs to throw some known names like LizTheGray and GorillaWarfare there to see what milk comes out.
You can plug the name of any wikipedia user and get a nice breakdown of their activities. Let's do that!
Anyway, here is a some info in graph form showing how many edits Sobangla did and what pages they editted the most. Notice anything?
Turns out someone has a very obvious interest! And would you look at the pages they created! Notice a few familiar names here fellas?
Remember: these are the people who will claim wikipedia has no bias and you can just "edit it yourself if you have reliable sources". This is what a Minitrue employee job looks like IRL.
First off, props to them for being direct and simple. No wall of badges, no retarded manifesto, no attempt at pretending Wikipedia is some sort of social media. Almost respectable tbh.
This person caught my eye once it was mentioned on the article Polyester linked, which is one big substack article about MUH REPUBLIKKKANS!
Going into their page showed that little profile, but it was the talk page where the nature of this creature is shown. The talk page is ENORMOUS. Even other wikipedos with similar views to them are a bit off put by their militant editing.
"Hmmmmm.... Source? The sources all agree. Reality has a liberal bias sweaty!"
In fact this Soibangla is so prolific they even had a shout out given to them by none other than Russian state media! Here is the RT article. Tl;Dr Soibangla was the one who went and quickly deleted mentions of Bill Clinton and Epstein being friends and BIll flying on the Lolita Express.
Looking into their history it's actually pretty interesting. This is very much a oldfag user of Wikipedia. I am not making a hyperbole when I say this might be a paid shill, the user edit history makes a pretty strong case for it. As soon as they joined on the site the first 2 edits were on Median House Income in the United States, and then...
A absolute fucking wall of edits to the page of a minor politician in the 1990s, mostly about her opinions and actions around Obamacare and ACA and what she did for and against it. All of the course of 2 days. Then nothing for months, and then...
Another wall of edits to some dude who was part of the Trump campaign, which apparently led to them being warned off by Wikipedia admins for "edit warring" (unsure of context, clincking the link doesn't really lead to the discussion). At which point they laid low until 2015, when they came back to edit the "Hillary Clinton Email Scandal" for a bit, but not much. They only really took off into massive editing in 2018, when they proceeded to really REALLY spend a long time on it.
SIDENOTE: Did you know that there is a entire project to catalogue all data on wikipedia user edits and present it as readable data? I didn't! Turns out it is called XTools and it's a fucking godsend for looking at autismo. Honestly shocked the wikipedos allow this to exist, as it can really showcase how hard some topics are walled off and maintained by hardcore shills. Someone needs to throw some known names like LizTheGray and GorillaWarfare there to see what milk comes out.
You can plug the name of any wikipedia user and get a nice breakdown of their activities. Let's do that!
Anyway, here is a some info in graph form showing how many edits Sobangla did and what pages they editted the most. Notice anything?
Turns out someone has a very obvious interest! And would you look at the pages they created! Notice a few familiar names here fellas?
Remember: these are the people who will claim wikipedia has no bias and you can just "edit it yourself if you have reliable sources". This is what a Minitrue employee job looks like IRL.
ilovecornsyrup
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2024
Prolly gonna get a bunch of late ratings but IDC. The Kiwifarms Wikipedia page summarizes everything wrong with Wikipedia so well it's insane.
The only page that comes close is the "trans woman" page, which had a whole discussion on the first sentence of the article.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Trans_woman/Archive_10
Despite the fact that most of the "proposal 2" people were trannies whose decision was based on the second sentence sucking tranny cock harder than the first, this was an unbiased, intellectual discussion according to Wikipedia. No good arguments were made on either side (what a shocker) so the current page uses sentence 2.
No bias whatsoever guys!
This is the equivalent of turks writing an article on the armenian genocide, while using the turkish government and schoolbooks as a source. I'm not sure if this is hilarious or plain disturbing.
- The major editors for the page are people with a direct personal interest.
- Included information is selectively chosen to push a certain agenda (every major social media site has a 100x bigger "kill count", no one talks about politically motivated mass shooters with tumblr/twitter accounts)
- Cherrypicking the kinds of lolcows on the site
Are pedophiles intentionally not mentioned or are they under the transgender umbrella? - Shitty "sources" that are subjective interviews from questionable people presented as fact
When a BPD illness faker is talking, I sit my neurotypical ass down and listen!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Trans_woman/Archive_10
Despite the fact that most of the "proposal 2" people were trannies whose decision was based on the second sentence sucking tranny cock harder than the first, this was an unbiased, intellectual discussion according to Wikipedia. No good arguments were made on either side (what a shocker) so the current page uses sentence 2.
No bias whatsoever guys!
This is the equivalent of turks writing an article on the armenian genocide, while using the turkish government and schoolbooks as a source. I'm not sure if this is hilarious or plain disturbing.
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2015
WOAH CENSOR THAT FILTH WIKIPEDIA. SHEESH.
Fag Alert Major Fag Alert
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2023
A broken clock is right twice a day
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2021
Crossposting from open software thread - wikimedia committee members for their mediawiki software platform posts AI generated announcement while being too lazy to remove the boilerplate disclaimer lol
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2017
Of course ot was a jeet lmao