Thoughts on the libertarian perspective on children,cp and age of consent

Actual instances of pedophilia advocacy comes from the authoritarian-left and the authoritarian-right. In the left's case, pretty much everything to do with LGBTQIAP+∞&BEYOND, and in the case of the right, it's the groypers.
Nick Fuentes is not really an accurate representation of the authoritarian right, nor are a bunch of faggots who want to cut their dicks off an accurate representation of the authoritarian left.

Most pedo advocates have been socialists or libertarians. The founder of NAMBLA was a Trotskyist. The French who signed that pedophile letter to abolish the age of consent were mostly socialists and socialist libertarians.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Moths
socialist libertarians
This really the best you can come up with? I'm not trying to be adversarial or aggressive or anything. But leftist cannot be libertarian by any stretch of the imagination. They may as well be calling themselves anarcho-stalinists. So if you have an example of a libertarian doing something like that (an actual libertarian, not some authoritarian nun raping leftist prick) then list em. The most famous example of a libertarian being uncouth and retarded was that fat retard who got naked and started dancing around on stage... Who then immediately got boo'd by other libertarians and shoo'd away.
 
This really the best you can come up with? I'm not trying to be adversarial or aggressive or anything.
Nigger you gave Nick Fuentes as your “proof” that authoritarians are pedophiles. In fact many authoritarians, from Stalin and Mao to Mussolini have ruled countries without advocating pedophilia. Instead it’s flourished under the neoliberal order. I can’t name a single libertarian regime which hasn’t advocated for pedophilia.

There are many libertarians pedophiles just read the news. Nathan Larson, Nelson Maatman, Gabriel Matzneff, etc.
 
So you admit libertarians are pedophiles
This isn't just absurd, this isn't just dishonest, it's completely logically bankrupt
If we're going to judge philosophies by their worst adherents, then every political system, religion, or movement should be condemned.
from Stalin and Mao to Mussolini
These authoritarians have committed atrocities on an unimaginable scale, yet no reasonable person would claim that every authoritarian is a genocidal maniac by default
These regimes were not just oppressive, they often created environments rife with abuse, exploitation, and systemic pedophilia
When power (of man over other men) is concentrated in the hands of a few, abuse is what follows
What libertarianism does is decentralize power (of man over man) and emphasize individual responsibility, meaning it's a framework that inherently resists such abuse

Child molestation by its very nature violates the libertarian principles of non-aggression, voluntary exchange, and respect for individual rights. Children are being exploited and harmed, and children are individuals who usually cannot give meaningful informed consent. The vast majority of, if not all, libertarians outright condemn such actions
The idea that libertarianism somehow enables or supports such a behavior is not just false, it's a smear tactic with no basis in reality

As for the individuals you mentioned, I've never heard of them. Regardless, benefit of the doubt and for the sake of argument, those individuals would be anomalies and not representatives of libertarianism. For every alleged libertarian who has allegedly acted reprehensibly, I could point to countless others who have fought tirelessly for freedom, justice, and human dignity against all odds.
By the same line of thinking, you should discredit socialism because of Pol Pot and condemn monarchism because of the crimes of King Leopold II. The fact that you don't do that shows that you know better than to cherrypick bad actors, yet you still do it as a smear tactic when talking about libertarianism

Libertarianism is about respecting others' rights and living peacefully without unjust coercion. Anyone trying to associate it with vile behavior is either misinformed or deliberately trying to mislead
 
Libertarianism is about respecting others' rights and living peacefully without unjust coercion
Libertarianism is about indulging your base desires and shirking responsibility for your actions. It’s the favoured ideology of most pedophiles for obvious reasons. In some cases it has even been known to turn people into pedophiles.
 
Nigger you gave Nick Fuentes as your “proof” that authoritarians are pedophiles.
You're mixing it up. Nick Fuentes is within the authoritarian right. He is not a representation of the authoritarian right. Child rape advocacy comes from authoritarians, not authoritarianism. America First, islam, judaism, marxism, LGBTQIAP+∞&BEYOND, etc are all authoritarian ideologies that advocate for child rape. Basic bitch fascism is not.
 
Libertarianism is about indulging your base desires and shirking responsibility for your actions. It’s the favoured ideology of most pedophiles for obvious reasons. In some cases it has even been known to turn people into pedophiles.
Complete idiocy.
Libertarianism is about personal responsibility and respecting others' rights, not "indulging desires and shirking responsibility" (honestly, you're probably thinking of hedonism, the philosophy practiced by "people" like Nick Rekieta). If anything, libertarianism demands far more responsibility than political ideologies because it rejects the idea of outsourcing personal obligations to a coercive state. Child molestation violates the core libertarian principle of non-aggression, condemning it is not just obvious, but essential. Your claims are absurd and baseless.
 
Maybe so, but I just don't think we need to have the conversation to begin with. Even if there is technically a more nuanced angle to discuss it's just not necessary. The existing age of consent laws are sufficient.
Every law requires the promise of lethal force to enforce, which means every law needs to be reexamined from time to time. If it's important enough to kill people over, then it is important enough to talk about. Shame that said discussion is basically impossible to have in today's climate.
 
No, that's wrong too. Turns out the political outlook most strongly associated with pedophilia, ageplay and 24/7 power dynamics is right Conservatism.


I asked a bunch of people (~19k) what kinks they were into, and as an almost-afterthought asked people what quadrant of the political compass they were on.
So an online poll by a leftard magically got a bunch of replies admitting that they are pedophiles and magically as an afterthought they also happened to report that they are evil right-wing Nazis. I'm sure this is real data 100% fo sho nigga on god
 
So an online poll by a leftard magically got a bunch of replies admitting that they are pedophiles and magically as an afterthought they also happened to report that they are evil right-wing Nazis. I'm sure this is real data 100% fo sho nigga on god
Don’t forget these retards worship Ayn Rand, a welfare queen who literally did nothing except write smut (if you read Atlas Shrugged it’s literally just her ramblings about an imaginary man she wants to fuck) and beg the American taxpayer for gibs. So much for idolising productivity.

Libertarians seriously believe that welfare for the disabled and mentally retarded is bad - but it’s good for Ayn Rand, a libertine who mismanaged her money because she was dumb. Their reasoning? She was subverting the system, man. Taking it down from the inside, dude.

There’s no point trying to explain their data is faulty. Either they can’t admit that they’re just libertarian because they don’t want to be hold accountable for their actions, or they’re a Dick Masterson tier unrepentant sinner who will admit it but won’t change.
 
So an online poll by a leftard magically got a bunch of replies admitting that they are pedophiles and magically as an afterthought they also happened to report that they are evil right-wing Nazis. I'm sure this is real data 100% fo sho nigga on god
I didn't know the auditor was a lolcow.
Don’t forget these retards worship Ayn Rand, a welfare queen who literally did nothing except write smut (if you read Atlas Shrugged it’s literally just her ramblings about an imaginary man she wants to fuck) and beg the American taxpayer for gibs. So much for idolising productivity.
I know you're retarded but Ayn Rand wasn't a Libertarian, she didn't like Libertarians and her personal ideology is called Objectivism.
but it’s good for Ayn Rand, a libertine who mismanaged her money because she was dumb. Their reasoning? She was subverting the system, man. Taking it down from the inside, dude.
I know you're retarded but Ayn Rand went on social security, not welfare, which means she pulled money out of a fund she had already contributed to. She also didn't do this until she started dying of lung cancer.
There’s no point trying to explain their data is faulty. Either they can’t admit that they’re just libertarian because they don’t want to be hold accountable for their actions, or they’re a Dick Masterson tier unrepentant sinner who will admit it but won’t change.
I know you're retarded but Ayn Rand is not a Libertarian leader and even if she were she wouldn't have been the first nor the last.
 
Last edited:
There's about 5% of it that makes sense and should be applied in society but the rest would completely destroy everything.
This is why the best, most stable political systems are those that don't resort to extreme/fringe ideologies. Government is like a ship: rock from side to side and things get uncomfortable, lean too far and the ship goes down.
 
Every law requires the promise of lethal force to enforce, which means every law needs to be reexamined from time to time. If it's important enough to kill people over, then it is important enough to talk about. Shame that said discussion is basically impossible to have in today's climate.
Every law? What about laws against murder (not killing--murder)? No, I'm not equating anything to murder, but I'm asking if you're being logically consistent.

So an online poll by a leftard magically got a bunch of replies admitting that they are pedophiles and magically as an afterthought they also happened to report that they are evil right-wing Nazis. I'm sure this is real data 100% fo sho nigga on god
Trust the science, chud.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Fount of BadSpeak
Nobody cares if some 25 year old guys bangs a 16 or 17 year old girl.
If I were the 16 yr old girls parent id be breaking out the double barrel
Nick Fuentes is not really an accurate representation of the authoritarian right, nor are a bunch of faggots who want to cut their dicks off an accurate representation of the authoritarian left.

Most pedo advocates have been socialists or libertarians. The founder of NAMBLA was a Trotskyist. The French who signed that pedophile letter to abolish the age of consent were mostly socialists and socialist libertarians.
Nick Fuentes really isnt an accurate representation of any reality and is just a retarded grifter and clout chaser.
 
Back