Yes, because the audience of wikipedia and wikipedia editors have a massive overlap. Any article with a
section on, or
superfluous references to, "LGBTQ+" anything, no
matter how circuitous, is a dead giveaway.
WikiJoke. Yes, even among their own "guidelines" it isn't even remotely notable,
and yet it gets aggressively added anyway. One must wonder why. It might be the Free Encyclopedia, but it's not LGBozz-load Free.
I like how it wears its own mental illness with some sort of ironic pride and something worth listing on a CV. I suppose that's where the term comes from, doesn't it?