Diseased Bugchasers / Bugchasing / Extreme Kinks / Curious Chaser / Breeding.zone - The discussion of extreme kinks that any normal person would never consider

View attachment 6799499

The sad conclusion of this post in particular, is that everything in this man's life has indirectly benefited his kink.
No wedding, no singular promotion he's ever gotten, not even the birth of his own son managed to snap him out of this or seek help.
Not once did he have a moment of realisation that life is more than catering to your sexual depravities, and now he's actively sought out a way to get his son raped by a bunch of men he met on the internet. All for his sick enjoyment.
I wish summer star sign upon him or to bleed to death from his anus. Despicable human.
 
I will write up the text from these tweets so no one else has to click each and every single one to see:

1. Now seems a good time to talk about the Vampire of the Carribbean and how a rogue Haitian company was selling HIV tainted blood to American hospitals.

2. This is the tale of Hemo-Caribbean and its creator Luckner Cambronne, right hand man to Papa Doc Duvalier and leader of the notorious paramilitary force, the Tonton Macoute.

3. Luckner Cambronne was born in 1929, the son of a poor Protestant preacher. Starting out as a bank teller, he eventually found a job in the company of Francois Duvalier (Papa Doc). Cambronne quickly rose to become chief extortionist for Papa Doc's regime.

4. Despite stealing huge sums from the ministries he held, and redirecting public infrastructure funds towards his own accounts, Cambronne also bullied, extorted and intimidated local businessmen. They would 'donate' to the regime, those who failed often disappeared.

5. Cambronne eventually headed up Duvalier's personal militia, the Tonton Macoute. Named after a voodoo monster who kidnaps children, the Macoute beat, raped, stoned, burnt, extorted and rampaged across Haiti, silencing all opposition.

6. Cambronne identified a number of business opportunities as leader of the Macoute. Taxi companies, travel and divorce companies and selling dead and murdered bodies to US medical schools. In the early 1970's he started Hemo-Caribbean with Joseph Gorinstein, a Miami businessman.

7. Hemo-Caribbean ran out of Port-au-Prince. Initially a two-story building with capacity for 350 plasma donors, overseen by an Austrian biochemist. By 1972 the company was harvesting 6000 litres of plasma a month.

8. The New York Times ran an investigative report, describing how impoverished Haitians were being farmed for their plasma and paid very little.
1735512285589.png


9. A local doctor commented: ‘The plasma cows are rather tired, but they don’t have a job anyway.’

10. An author estimated that around 6,000 Haitians sold their plasma to Hemo- Caribbean. Gorinstein claimed that in late 1972 Hemo-Caribbean was paying donors an average of $70,000 each month: at $4 per donation, this corresponds to 700 different donors each day.

11. After Papa Doc's death, his son Baby Doc took over rule of Haiti. Cambronne was in a threatening position and was ousted. By the end of 1972 Hemo-Caribbean was forcibly closed down.

12. Disastrously, Hemo-Caribbean opened at exactly the time the new HIV-B strain had entered Haiti. Noone knew to look or screen for it, and since plasma donors were reinfused with their own red blood cells, poor hygeine compounded with rampant infection provided the perfect cover.
1735512425841.png


13. Follow up surveys on HIV patients in Haiti neglected to ask about plasma donation to Hemo-Caribbean, neither did an academic review paper looking at blood banks in Haiti. The company slipped under the radar
1735512459201.png


14. The frozen plasma was exported on Air Haiti, Cambronne’s company, and sold to four American enterprises: Armour Pharmaceutical, Cutter Laboratories, Dade Reagents and Dow Chemical, as well as to clients in Germany and Sweden.

15. Nobody knows how many people became infected with HIV through these sales. Although some may have been used to make albumin and immunoglobulins, which deactives the virus, for haemophiliacs, the factor VIII treatment meant plasma was pooled with up to 25k other donations.

16. Cambronne died quietly in Miami in 2006, a far too pleasant a death for a man who disappeared countless people, tortured and intimidated his way into power and helped spread a deadly virus around the world.

17. I'll leave you with one of his famous and chilling sayings: "A good Duvalierist is prepared to kill his own children for Duvalier, and also expects his children to kill their parents for him"

You do not hate niggers and faggots and nigger faggots enough and etc.
 
This shit is real.
There was a point like 8 or so years ago where I knew about this stuff but was sure it had to be an obscure thing only these people did. That stopped when I found the twitter account of a gay friend of mine I thought was totally normal and found out he was a poz pig (his words) with all kinds of absolutely fucked posts about the “lifestyle” and how much he and his boyfriend loved spreading HIV. Never talked to him again, rest assured this is very real and prevalent in the gay community.

How is this not a poll on the thread yet?
1735514939472.png
 
Last edited:
This shit is real.
There was a point like 8 or so years ago where I knew about this stuff but was sure it had to be an obscure thing only these people did. That stopped when I found the twitter account of a gay friend of mine I thought was totally normal and found out he was a poz pig (his words) with all kinds of absolutely fucked posts about the “lifestyle” and how much he and his boyfriend loved spreading HIV. Never talked to him again, rest assured this is very real and prevalent in the gay community.

How is this not a poll on the thread yet?
View attachment 6800212
Please tell me you can provide more. Did you ever know he was HIV positive? Looking back were there things you can point to and say “that was probably a sign”? Did he ever try anything with you? (I assume you’re straight but were there things that maybe looking back on you think he was PURPOSEFULLY trying to infect?) genuine curiosity here
 
  • Like
Reactions: Charred Dinosaur
How do you jump from "ooga booga monke brain want give baby" to pozzing negholes?

First: "Ooga booga brain want give baby" isn't what happens because reproduction isn't intentional it's accidental. What happens is "ooga booga brain want do feel good thing" and that feel good thing causes impregnation. Animals don't fuck to have babies they fuck because it feels good, babies are just an unintended side effect.

Evolution is the reason a variety of behaviors feel good, because they happen to result in impregnation often enough that natural selection favors them. One is "ram peepee in hole feel good" and that is why guys will stick it in literally anything. It won't always be a vagina, but it will be often enough for it to be successful. Another is "pin down weakling and ram peepee in hole feel good". It can be any of the zillion "weird thing feel good" things people get pleasure from as long as it results in the automatic biological process of impregnation. (This is also why incels are hung up on real vagina and cannot live on a diet of fleshlights. Evolution has driven a desire for the real deal because the men with a desire for real pussy reproduced and the men who were satisfied with goat pussy didn't.)

In fact men will risk fucking women even if the chance of impregnating her horrifies them and they actively try to avoid it. They're obviously not driven by "brain want give baby" they're driven by "do feel good thing (with least amount of consequences)". If reproduction happens in that case it is only because it's an unintended side effect (but is an evolutionary success regardless).

Second: Being gay is a defect that causes a person to find sexual attraction in the same sex rather than the opposite sex, so gay behaviors should be understood as behaviors that increase reproductive chances between heterosexuals being misdirected towards the wrong sex. So to answer why homos do this you have to ask what similar behavior it is that hetero males do that increases reproductive probability.

Heterosexual men enjoy having a sense of ownership over women they desire. And what easy way of "claiming ownership" of a woman has been recognized since the dawn of time? Impregnating her. Or to make the connection more clear you could say "infecting her with your seed".
Once she is "infected" there isn't much she could do to undo it.

To put it in evolutionary perspective: There's already a lot of evolutionary shaping around the ownership of resources (territoriality in many species, cooperation for the collective defense of resources, etc.) for obvious reasons. Men can't be certain of paternity so marriage and "ownership" of women developed to help ensure it.

At some point some men developed a "take ownership of woman feel good" mutation that drove their behavior in various ways that increased their chances of reproduction. These behaviors could be many (Exhibit A), but a very simple one would be knowingly impregnating her. It almost 100% ensures paternity and creates disinterest in other men who wouldn't want to put resources toward offspring that isn't their own. This even shows up in the old testament:

Deuteronomy 22:28-29

28 “If a man finds a young woman who is a virgin, who is not betrothed, and he seizes her and lies with her, and they are found out, 29 then the man who lay with her shall give to the young woman’s father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife because he has humbled her; he shall not be permitted to divorce her all his days.

So you have heterosexual men with an impregnation/breeding kink, in which the pleasure of the act is specifically about the idea of establishing "eternal ownership" of a woman by "infecting" her with his seed, above and beyond the act of sex itself. It would increase odds of reproductive success because the pleasure of this behavior hinges on successful impregnation, whereas the pleasure of mere sex does not.

Now take a man like this and give him the gay defect. Faggots obviously can't impregnate each other but some of them nonetheless have this "take ownership by impregnation" desire that they're desperate to fulfill somehow. The only thing available to fags which is analogous to this experience in any way is sexually transmitted diseases. HIV may be a favorite because it's incurable and therefore the closest analog to pregnancy/offspring in the sense that it "can't be undone". Yes intentionally getting a deadly disease is lunacy but keep in mind the sex drive dampens disgust and even overrides fear of death at its strongest. (See: several spider species and men who knowingly stick their dick in crazy.)

That's the theory anyway.
 
That's the theory anyway.
Most animals do not have sex for pleasure. They do so in response to specific hormonal and seasonal timing and their act of procreation is very abrupt. After mating season they do not breed at all. For many animals it IS explicitly for procreating, procreating is not a side effect. I'm not saying you're entirely on the wrong tract but you always run into problems when comparing humans to animals generally speaking because there are so many species with many different behaviors. Not least of all the level of intelligence and abstract thinking that complicates humans' relationship to our instincts and the natural world.

I think most fags just hate themselves and hate other fags. That's why so many of them treat each other like dog shit. And this is largely just another aspect of that. They just go deeper and deeper into further perversions and aspects of self-harm. A lot of people self-harm through sex than you would think. Your theory also would rely on fags being born gay as a erotic target miss: but most of them are abused and perverted into it. (Not that I also don't believe some are born that way just that I think their number is smaller, probably similar to the number of T&H lesbians.)

I was mainly contemplating how you would consider pozzing negholes a subset of a conscious breeding kink.
 
They do so in response to specific hormonal and seasonal timing and their act of procreation is very abrupt. After mating season they do not breed at all.
This doesn't disprove what I wrote at all. Humans are not always in the mood for sex either. All this means is some species have been shaped to find sex pleasurable only during a specific window of time regulated by environmental factors. There is no reason that can't be the case.

For many animals it IS explicitly for procreating
A human can think to themselves "I want kids (even if I'm not interested in sex)" and consciously choose to bring that about because we have the capacity to imagine what doesn't exist yet and understand how to make it happen. That is intentional procreation for the sake of procreation and nothing else.
While some animals have shown some ability to imagine I highly doubt any animal has the intellectual capacity to do that. No cicada can imagine having offspring and think to itself "I want to lay eggs", so whatever animals are doing can't possibly be with the intention of procreating.
ETA: Young children can't comprehend procreation either until their brains have matured to a certain point of intellectual capacity. This is a large reason why children can't consent to sexual activity. (Very low IQ adults can be legally restricted from sexual activity for the same reason.) If a young child can't grasp what it means to procreate I doubt any animal could.

Unless you mean evolution "intends" it which is anthropomorphizing a natural process. Evolution is not a conscious thinking entity that can "intend" anything, no more than a volcano can "intend" to erupt, it's a blind automatic process. Intention is not applicable to evolution, only animals with the capacity for intention. That was my point.

Your theory also would rely on fags being born gay as a erotic target miss: but most of them are abused and perverted into it.
It doesn't rely on being born that way. Maybe my choice of the word "defect" wasn't the best, but how they end up that way is irrelevant. There is evidence to support sexuality being shaped by early life experiences.
 
Last edited:
Unless you mean evolution "intends" it which is anthropomorphizing a natural process.
Thinking that animals find it "pleasurable" for the same reasons and physical sensations that humans do is equally as anthropomorphizing. Animals psychology is completely a wild west. We'll just agree to disagree on this point. You can't at one point say that how animals interact and behave is applicable to humans even as a metaphor but also think anthropomorphizing is bad because that is explicitly what relating their behavior to our own is and vice versa, it flattens and simplifies human experience and imagines there are aspects to animal experience that we realistically can't know beyond basic observations. My basic observation is that most animals do not "have sex" simply because it's pleasurable, both from how simplistic and short their coupling is, and because it's only in play for most of them during a season. My point is that animals do not have sexualities the way humans do.
 
People deny this exists? They had to change the laws in California to keep faggots from getting in trouble for this. Intentional HIV infections in CA are no longer a felony. https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc...enalty-knowingly-exposing-someone-hiv-n809416

IDK if this has been brought up I didn't read the whole thread.

"The law also reduces the penalty for knowingly donating blood infected with HIV from a felony to a misdemeanor."

The above is absolutely done intentionally as a malicious fetish.

"LGBTQ advocates called the legislation “landmark.” Melissa Goodman, the LGBTQ, Gender and Reproductive Justice Project Director with the ACLU of Southern California, praised the fairness of the new legislation, and emphasized that HIV-specific criminal law has “disproportionately harmed people of color and transgender women.”"

LMAO
 
Please tell me you can provide more. Did you ever know he was HIV positive? Looking back were there things you can point to and say “that was probably a sign”? Did he ever try anything with you? (I assume you’re straight but were there things that maybe looking back on you think he was PURPOSEFULLY trying to infect?) genuine curiosity here
No, at the time I was dating my now wife so he didn’t ever flirt with me. Honestly if you met him and his boyfriend you’d probably like them and think nothing of them, you’d probably think that he’s one of the good ones or something, that’s how normal he seemed. I only found out from his very easily findable twitter which was full on just AIDS worship wild shit. These dudes are hiding in plain sight and in his case there’s just no way you’d have known from talking to him

BONUS POZ:
You guys know that “Oh shit I’m sorry” gay porn meme that was huge a while back? The bald guy from that now is into the bug chaser culture too.
 
Last edited:
All of this could be avoided if gays didn't like anal so much. Anal is dirty and nasty anyway, so they kind of deserve it.
There was a health campaign telling the gays to stop bumming strangers and maybe try a bit of frotting instead and the usual suspects acted like it was a call for genocide.
 
why did you dislike the video
He's a douche. I also stumbled on him as a group of anarchist Satanist and Luciferian faggots and trannies in Germany love the guy. These particular faggots include a 67 year old tranny I've been following who purchased a Chinese bride shortly before he trooned out. So, they want women to be slaves and baby making machines for faggots and trannies, including HIV infested faggots. These people, as I said, ARE openly practicing Satanists... so why are they promoting an "ex-occultist" who criticizes "Satan"? Oh, that's right, they believe the traditional God is Satan, and Satan is God... but you won't get that point right away, either, by looking at his content. He's two faced.
These German anarchist fans of his re-post his content, translated in German, all over telegram.
He also seems tied to some IT company in Philadelphia that has his last name, which is ironic considering he seems to whip up paranoia over "digital ID". Not that I'm a digital ID fan, but I am suspicious of anyone who demonizes such technology when they are tied to a company that CREATES such technology.... and wouldn't "collapsing the government" naturally lead up to tech surveillance being implemented? I don't want to go off on a tangent too much.
Also, he had a slightly older girlfriend who was a nurse who died under mysterious circumstances in 2022.
I found one website online where a person insinuated this was some kind of "sacrifice for Satan". His girlfriend's obituary has some pictures of people who also feature on some internet spaces tied to Passio Tech website... so I am fairly certain he has ties to this company which creates digital ID passes for transportation services, is focused on digital ID, etc..
He seems suspect to me... pretending to be a guru for men and "traditional values" while a bunch of faggots are following him.
The Church of Satan also claims he was never a member. I don't think he's "anti-occult", either, as he's literally TEACHING occult concepts in his videos.
For a guy with so many videos, he hardly has any critics online, either, which I find very odd for someone who believes "HIV is a hoax" and who has other controversial opinions that would normally lead to censorship.
Why haven't left wingers cancelled him yet? Why aren't there many threads criticizing this "guru" who's been around for ten years? Potential GLOWIE? Something stinks.
 
There used to be a “medical journal” which was dedicated show to how AIDS wasn’t real. It had to cease publishing as everyone involved with it got incredibly sick and died. I’m sure you can guess what disease killed them all?
Michel Foucault was one of those assholes and spread AIDS to a bunch of people including his students and presumably some underage kids as well as he was also a pedophile. Not sure if he had anything to do with that specific journal but he was definitely of that set of beliefs, or at least pretended to be to excuse his repugnant behavior.
 
Michel Foucault was one of those assholes and spread AIDS to a bunch of people including his students and presumably some underage kids as well as he was also a pedophile. Not sure if he had anything to do with that specific journal but he was definitely of that set of beliefs, or at least pretended to be to excuse his repugnant behavior.
really not helping the “faggots are pedophiles” allegations
 
Back