Careercow Elon Reeve Musk - Tesla, SpaceX and Twitter owner + ex-paypal CEO. Manchild, sexual deviant, spergy autist with access to space travel

[metroid_fetish_ii]

Teslas are the shitbulls of vehicles. No matter how much the users baby them, they can and will snap, killing or maiming their owners in the process.

 

[Drip Torch]

The right isn't buying cybertrucks either, they're buying F-150s and Tacomas. The only cybertrucks I saw were driven by jeets and people resembling redditors. In other words it's for immigrants and corporate bootlick consoomers.

True, Ive seen only one (wrapped in bright fucking pink) while driving around my state, interacting with deeply MAGA landowners and good ol' boy deer hunters. NEVER have seen a cyber truck pulled off into a hunting spot. There are no Tesla rechargers in MAGA country. So maybe a lib, then again I didnt see any libs destroying their own luxury clothing items, Keurig coffee makers and cases of light beer to make a political statement.

 

[Lucas Silva #4903141]

I asked Grok about this ordeal with Musk and H-1B visas.

Elon Musk has been vocal about his support for reforming the H-1B visa program in the United States, particularly in the context of skilled labor needed for technology and innovation sectors. Here's what he has said:

Musk has advocated for changes to the H-1B visa system, describing it as "broken" and in need of "major reform." His proposal includes making it "more expensive to hire from overseas than domestically" by suggesting to "raise the minimum salary significantly and adding a yearly cost for maintaining the H1B." This approach aims to ensure that companies hire foreign workers only when they truly cannot find suitable American talent, rather than using the visa as a means to cut labor costs.
His comments have sparked a debate within political and social circles, especially among supporters of the MAGA movement, who have traditionally been skeptical or outright opposed to increasing H-1B visas or any form of immigration that they perceive might undermine American jobs. Musk's stance has led to friction with some of these supporters, who see his advocacy as conflicting with "America First" policies.
Despite the controversy, Musk's argument is that the U.S. needs to attract "super talented engineers" to maintain its competitive edge in technology, similar to how sports teams recruit international athletes. He has emphasized that there's a "dire shortage of extremely talented engineers" in America, suggesting the necessity of the H-1B program for the country's economic and technological advancement.


Musk's position on H-1B visas has been nuanced, focusing on reform rather than a straightforward increase in numbers, aiming to make the visa program more selective and beneficial for both the U.S. economy and the workers it brings in. However, his advocacy for changes to the H-1B program has led to significant discussion and division, especially given his role in the upcoming Trump administration and his influence in tech policy discussions.

And now the amusing part, I asked about the criticism of his take

The criticism Elon Musk has received on X (formerly Twitter) regarding his stance on H-1B visas can be broken down into several key points:

Perception of Exploitation for Cheaper Labor:
Criticism: Many argue that Musk's call for H-1B reform is less about attracting "super talented engineers" and more about securing a workforce that companies can pay less compared to local American talent. There's a sentiment that the H-1B visa program, as it currently stands, allows companies to hire foreign workers at lower wages than they would need to pay American workers, thus undercutting domestic wages and exploiting immigrant labor. Critics see this not as a search for talent but as a cost-cutting measure.

Undermining American Engineers:
Criticism: Some individuals feel that the U.S. already has a pool of "super talented engineers" who are either underemployed or not given opportunities because companies prefer to hire through the H-1B program. There's a belief that if companies like those Musk leads are genuinely looking for top talent, they should be able to find it within the U.S. borders. This perspective sees the push for H-1B visas as an admission that American education and talent development are inadequate, which many find offensive or misguided.

Need for Educational Reform:
Criticism: The argument here is that if there's a perceived gap between the skills of American engineers and those from abroad, the solution should be to improve the U.S. education system rather than relying on foreign talent. Critics argue that the U.S. should invest in STEM education, making its engineers as competitive or more so than those from other countries. This would not only help in retaining jobs for Americans but also elevate the overall quality of engineering education in the U.S.

Political and Ideological Clash:
Criticism: Musk's support for H-1B visa reform clashes with certain political ideologies, particularly among those who advocate for stricter immigration controls or an "America First" policy. These critics see his stance as contradicting the very principles of prioritizing American workers and reducing reliance on foreign labor, especially in a time when domestic job security is a hot-button issue.

Selective Hiring and Wage Suppression:
Criticism: There's skepticism about whether the proposed reforms would genuinely address issues like wage suppression or if they would still allow companies to selectively hire from abroad in a way that keeps wages down. Critics question if raising the minimum salary and adding costs would really change the dynamics of the H-1B visa or if it would just formalize an existing system of labor arbitrage.

These criticisms reflect broader debates about immigration, labor, education, and economic policy in the U.S., showcasing the complex interplay between business needs, national policy, and social equity concerns.

It's like asking someone's son why his father is so stupid, and then he just tells you exactly why, with detail

 

[General Emílio Médici]

This is literally Mandate of Heaven mystic fuckery. "Chief official slanders the Emperor and his carriage is struck by lightning as it passed by the Imperial Outpost" type of bullshit.

 

[Travis Touchdown (REAL)]

Say you were forced to pick a side. Whose side are you on?

View attachment 6810425

Meanwhile, in reality:



I'll take the white side, thanks.

 

[Badungus Kabungus]

This is literally Mandate of Heaven mystic fuckery. "Chief official slanders the Emperor and his carriage is struck by lightning as it passed by the Imperial Outpost" type of bullshit.

The only thing more obvious than this would be a penis-shaped cloud that follows Elon wherever he goes.

 

[LilypaCastsUpper]

The only thing more obvious than this would be a penis-shaped cloud that follows Elon wherever he goes.

It that his son's penis that was murdered and it went to heaven?

 

[W@rui]

Surveilance footage of when the Cybertruck blew up

 

[CircuSphere]

Maybe a car sperg can clarify but I’m pretty sure the base design of cars being pretty universal across brands and cultures is that over a century of engineering and millions of lives lost to previous designs has resulted in essentially what is currently the safest model while still being able to maneuver easily and effectively. Then Musk comes along, sees the worm of those that came before and pulls a Homer.

Ehhhhhhhh.... It really depends. Like American Motor Company (AMC) in the day (owned by Mitt Romney's Father) would build cars out of a mix of domestic (mainly Dodge IIRC) parts.... but everything about those cars was run of the mill/par for the course, pre gas crisis, pre Ralph Nader (regulations, regulations and more regulations) and the company didn't last.

On the flip side, all these car companies have patents out the wazzo for everything from door systems to power plants to suspension tech, so if you want Variable Valve Timing for your engine aka: Honda V-Tech, well then you have better invent a slightly different way of altering the shape of the cam lobes/timing at high RPM (like Mistubishi MI-VEC or Golf VVTI). If you look into All Wheel Drive systems it is a similar story, Subaru calls it 'Symettrical AWD' and Merc calls it '4-Matic', they are both AWD systems but when you look into them the Subaru's differentials and mechanical layout and the 4-Matic will be totally different because both are patent pending systems.

Also injection molding is insanely expensive until your reach a certain volume, which is why every Corvette has the same door handles, blinker stalks, radio knobs, etc. as a fucking Chevy Cavalier.

Similarly Tesla always struggled with 'automotive basics' from what I understand. They are an industry leader in terms of electric power plants but electric vehicles are heavy and you need to understand suspensions and handling to build a complete car worthy of the asking price. Randy Pobst (famous boomer race car man) took a Tesla up Pike's Peak (it should do really good at altitude) and there is an interview somewhere where he explains that the Tesla people didn't know the first thing about making a car that handles but have gotten better and then he crashes a stripped out Model 3.... Also the way you acquire this type of knowledge is racing, hiring race teams, engineers, doing race testing, iterating season over season.... modern car companies don't bother anymore (performance offerings destroy your EPA fleet score) but they have decades of institutional knowledge on the subject.

Finally profit margins are super thin to the point where every car manufacturer has an R&D partnership these days (Chevy + Honda, Mazda + Ford, BMW + Toyota...) and you see collaboration cars like the BRZ/86 and the BMW 'Supra'

Example:



I'm not sure this is the full thing, I am recalling but I have to poop:

https://www.motortrend.com/features/tesla-model-3-pikes-peak-crash-randy-pobst/

 

[ToEnsureVerification]

Surveilance footage of when the Cybertruck blew up

I know the Cybertrucks are deathtrap pieces of crap, but just wondering, couldn't it have been torched on purpose by someone who really hates Musk? It was just in front of the Trump tower, so perhaps a frustrated huwhite just wanted to send a message.

Edit: Just saw, it was a deliberate explosion. Elon you done goofed.

 

[metroid_fetish_ii]

Burning to death in one of his wheeled shitboxes would be optimal.

I willed this into happening. Pray that I do not will it into happening again, Elon.

 

[Fcret]

There are no Tesla rechargers in MAGA country

I live in MAGA country and there's two places where you can charge within 5 miles of me - Walmart and a truck stop. Although most people aren't charging Teslas at them but Rivians or Bolts or some other electric car. They've become popular because electricity is dirt-cheap out here compared to gasoline.

MAGA country isn't some magical place that's 20 years in the past. There's definitely electric cars and keurigs here. White women, even conservative ones, love that retarded coffee pod shit.

IIRC it's never been profitable. and was even worse before Musk.

Musk's basic ideas were good - slash headcount and get people onto premium. Unfortunately he's a midwit. He got rid of the most competent people who wouldn't do his humiliation rituals in favor of jeets, and turned premium into a P2W setup wrt the algorithm which alienated users. Paying people for engagement is also just a bad idea as we've seen because third-worlders can trade time for money at rates that any white man would find truly incomprehensible.

 

[mawrieposter]

 

[Alabama Gamer]

Idk, this feels too perfect, especially to happen immediately after a major debacle involving Elon. Before we learn anything else I'm going to assume stolen truck + sabotaged battery.

 

[GamerGateSurvivor]

Surveilance footage of when the Cybertruck blew up

View attachment 6810762

You can clearly see fireworks go off. Maybe it's intentional.

 

[Faggitory]

On topic: Accident, or political statement?

I hope the explosion was an accident so it can feel like a direct message from God. If its a political statement, it'll be some faggot who can't say anything more complex than "fuck Trumpler! Fuck Elon!" while expecting us to clap.

 

[Badungus Kabungus]

You can clearly see fireworks go off. Maybe it's intentional.

Yeah, seems like fireworks. Red and green flashes definitely stand out. Not sure if intentional or not, people are pretty fucking stupid.

 

[W@rui]

You can clearly see fireworks go off. Maybe it's intentional.

It's not that far-fetched to think that there would be fireworks in the car since, it's New Year, and people buy fireworks around then too.

 

[ToEnsureVerification]

Surveilance footage of when the Cybertruck blew up

@Null I think this is good for a feature? Blowing up a Cybertruck in front of the Trump tower after the Pajeetgate, seems like a 95% chance this is a deliberate message. I'd find it very hard to believe this is just a Cyber enthusiast that just parked a car there with too many fireworks.

 

[CircuSphere]

@Null I think this is good for a feature? Blowing up a Cybertruck in front of the Trump tower after the Pajeetgate, seems like a 95% chance this is a deliberate message. I'd find it very hard to believe this is just a Cyber enthusiast that just parked a car there with too many fireworks.

You guys are fucking with me right? That looks CGI as fuck. I doubt it exploded at all, they just catch fire and then can't be put out (without insane effort).