Artcow SamanthaPrater / EruzaArto / DefyingGravityAgain / Emily Nicole Cassidy / Willowtheway / Uniloax - Special Ed Art Thief and "Big Bonned" Attention Whore; Perpetual Liar; Cucumber Princess; Negligent Animal Abuser; Twice Investigated for Murder

Catgirls are Love said:
SecretAgentSquirrel would like it to be known that Emily is the Grasshopper.
Click to expand...
"You were right and I was wrong" is a string of words that Emily is simply physically incapable of uttering in any way, shape, or form. She also has less than nothing to offer, whereas the Grasshopper knew an instrument and was an artist in his own right, as shortsighted as he was. Emily isn't even a twig in the snow or the snow on the ground or even the ground itself, as all those things benefit the world in one way or another. By merely existing she is a net negative on the universe, a dynamo of entropy, furthering progression towards the heat death of the universe
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: LobsterBoy669, Not a bee, Sparkletor 2.0 and 5 others
Of course she is a Wicked fan. The funny thing is. That the Wicked Fandom just like with any old dead fandom is brought back to life after some rando reignites the dead fandom and many start to hop on it. The same happened to Morel Orel and the same happened to Wild Kratts and WordGirl. Question Emily. Are you friends with Orion Doherty he'll be up your alley as degenerate as you are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Not a bee
toskarinion said:
She also has less than nothing to offer, whereas the Grasshopper knew an instrument and was an artist in his own right, as shortsighted as he was.
Click to expand...
Strange how the powers that be can decide she can live "independently" but cannot give her some semblance of employment. It would give her some sense of priority or at least, you would hope that was the case.
For comparison, even the extremely autistic and hooked-nose Graeme Kelly worked a very basic job in an office building as a cleaner. He eventually talked shit about them on Facebook and got fired for it but the point is, even the most braindead can do straightforward tasks.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: manic dainty gorl
Man In A Dress said:
but the point is, even the most braindead can do straightforward tasks
Click to expand...
Yes, but here's the thing: She can barely count past 3 without stopping to double-check. And she's so vindictive that she will find a way to throw her hypothetical employers under the bus. Can you imagine her sending her supervisor an weekly showering video as soon as she gets written up for her already poor hygiene?
 
  • Horrifying
  • Like
Reactions: Not a bee, Catgirls are Love, Sparkletor 2.0 and 4 others
NerdShamer said:
Yes, but here's the thing: She can barely count past 3 without stopping to double-check. And she's so vindictive that she will find a way to throw her hypothetical employers under the bus. Can you imagine her sending her supervisor an weekly showering video as soon as she gets written up for her already poor hygiene?
Click to expand...
One of the ways to test for cognitive issues is the 'draw a clock test', with different results meaning different things. It's also used a lot with schizophrenia. I wonder what hers what look like, considering she can barely comprehend a paragraph and has trouble remembering things past an hour ago.
 
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Not a bee and Cheesy Beavy
God's Favorite Princess said:
One of the ways to test for cognitive issues is the 'draw a clock test', with different results meaning different things. It's also used a lot with schizophrenia. I wonder what hers what look like, considering she can barely comprehend a paragraph and has trouble remembering things past an hour ago.
Click to expand...
She'd probably just trace a clock anyway so we wouldn't find anything new out.
 
  • Agree
  • DRINK!
  • Winner
Reactions: Pedophobe, biggacracka, Not a bee and 3 others
Tumblr Anon W has so much to say, they take two posts to say it.
1.jpg2.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Pedophobe and Cheesy Beavy
God's Favorite Princess said:
One of the ways to test for cognitive issues is the 'draw a clock test', with different results meaning different things. It's also used a lot with schizophrenia. I wonder what hers what look like, considering she can barely comprehend a paragraph and has trouble remembering things past an hour ago.
Click to expand...
It would probably be just her crudely drawing the current time while reeing about the how forcing her to draw an clock instead of an centaur is making the drama worse
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cryptosporidium 136, Pedophobe, biggacracka and 2 others
Two questions for the thread; I've finished going through the other two threads of Emily's and retrieved every centaur I could find. As I'm now working my way through the early pages of this thread, I've encountered what is likely to be the first instance of a time where I'm rather certain Emily most likely reposted the 2020 centaur but can't explicitly confirm it (or plagiarized Lamby again, but I feel that's less likely in this particular case) but no actual image of the centaur survives to this day for me to verify exactly what happened (back then we weren't as careful about archiving links/screenshots as we are now, plus the blogger settings tended to fuck with archival tools, also completely ignoring Emily's habit of FUCKING DELETING EVERYTHING that we were only just starting to grasp). The questions are as follows:

If a centaur was reposted a significant amount of time after its initial post but I'm not completely certain which one it was, do I include a placeholder for it in the collage?
Should the signs point to a completely unknown centaur was posted but all traces of it are erased from the internet, does it get a placeholder in the collage?

Vote now on your phones, including such choices as "Cat, what did you ever do to yourself that makes you despise yourself so".
 
Catgirls are Love said:
Two questions for the thread; I've finished going through the other two threads of Emily's and retrieved every centaur I could find. As I'm now working my way through the early pages of this thread, I've encountered what is likely to be the first instance of a time where I'm rather certain Emily most likely reposted the 2020 centaur but can't explicitly confirm it (or plagiarized Lamby again, but I feel that's less likely in this particular case) but no actual image of the centaur survives to this day for me to verify exactly what happened (back then we weren't as careful about archiving links/screenshots as we are now, plus the blogger settings tended to fuck with archival tools, also completely ignoring Emily's habit of FUCKING DELETING EVERYTHING that we were only just starting to grasp). The questions are as follows:

If a centaur was reposted a significant amount of time after its initial post but I'm not completely certain which one it was, do I include a placeholder for it in the collage?
Should the signs point to a completely unknown centaur was posted but all traces of it are erased from the internet, does it get a placeholder in the collage?

Vote now on your phones, including such choices as "Cat, what did you ever do to yourself that makes you despise yourself so".
Click to expand...
I'd say placehold it with a cutsey 404 in that chibi style for things you can't retrieve. Then it satisfies the cute chibi wants some people have but also tell the viewer it's missing.
 
Flaming_Barghast said:
I'd say placehold it with a cutsey 404 in that chibi style for things you can't retrieve. Then it satisfies the cute chibi wants some people have but also tell the viewer it's missing.
Click to expand...
I'm rather surprised that in this scenario you're the one suggesting going cutesy whereas my initial thoughts were a tad more grim.
00038-2621313647.jpg
 
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: RadioactiveMonkeyMan, LobsterBoy669, Alex Hogendorp and 2 others
Catgirls are Love said:
If a centaur was reposted a significant amount of time after its initial post but I'm not completely certain which one it was, do I include a placeholder for it in the collage?
Should the signs point to a completely unknown centaur was posted but all traces of it are erased from the internet, does it get a placeholder in the collage?
Click to expand...
I say yes and yes. I think it'll be funny just to have them all like they are different (even if not) in order to just fuck with em more.

Edit: The bigger the list looks the better it'll be for the list but I'm also tired so maybe I don't understand the best.

Edit 2 : I also came from a community happenings post and just love shit talking Emily, so I’m also maybe not the best judge of character. If you care about accuracy just go off what you can prove beyond a doubt.
 
Last edited:
  • Dumb
Reactions: Cryptosporidium 136, Kiwifarms Luker, biggacracka and 7 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back