Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Useful_Mistake]

No, see, he was just getting ready to talk to the police. He'll do it at an undetermined date sometime in the future since he's busy working part time.

That is one interpretation, but it is weird that he offered to give Mr. Hardin a report that didn't exist in that case.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

View attachment 6813945
View attachment 6813954
Yes, pretty much.
Also not active since 2018.
View attachment 6813965

This smells of jeetscams.

 

[Bogliacci]

That is one interpretation, but it is weird that he offered to give Mr. Hardin a report that didn't exist in that case.

Old lyin Russ at it again

 

[filthypenguin]

He's asking to add them as defendants, not witnesses. He says they individually committed copyright infringement and civil conspiracy against him.

Oh, I'm retarded.

If the judge approves the joinder then the retarded litigant can subpoena the Internet service in question for the identity of the users. The Internet service can then either further fight the subpoena or hand over any data they have about the usernames in question.

Assuming this goes the way Russ wants it to, how likely are the ISPs able to identify two users based on username alone? I assume Josh doesn't keep any records of IP addresses (for reasons like this, specifically). I can't imagine the ISP keeps records of usernames on websites, does it?

 

[JustSomeDong]

This smells of jeetscams.

She's decently attractive, so I assumed ole Russ did the usual, stalk, harass, pester, annoy, and implied sucking of him his penis.

 

[Plague Flea]

This smells of jeetscams.

There was a link to fiverr in one of her posts, but it was flagged as a scammer and is dead now.


(Ignore the yellow - fat-fingered a highlight by accident)

 

[BoomerPrime]

Yeah, well that's not exactly my jurisdiction

I know you're just the Law Kiwi, thankfully you have those of us with Computer Science III under our belts who can help with the Cyber Police. First step is to backtrace the report....

 

[DavidS877]

Oh, I'm retarded.

Assuming this goes the way Russ wants it to, how likely are the ISPs able to identify two users based on username alone? I assume Josh doesn't keep any records of IP addresses (for reasons like this, specifically). I can't imagine the ISP keeps records of usernames on websites, does it?

An ISP should not be able to tell the username of a user on a website if it's using https. I'm not going to speculate further lest I give any litigious parties any ideas how to figure this stuff out.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

Oh, I'm retarded.

Assuming this goes the way Russ wants it to, how likely are the ISPs able to identify two users based on username alone? I assume Josh doesn't keep any records of IP addresses (for reasons like this, specifically). I can't imagine the ISP keeps records of usernames on websites, does it?

If I remember correctly Null has stated that he is required by law to keep the IP addresses of accounts that login for 30 days, then they are purged on a rolling basis.

 

[FamicomGorby]

If I remember correctly Null has stated that he is required by law to keep the IP addresses of accounts that login for 30 days, then they are purged on a rolling basis.

So since @Russtard hasn't logged in for years at this point, there's basically zero chance of identifying them. Though for both of em, what's the statute of limitations on the claims Russel is putting forward? He would have definitely been aware of the users when he filed his original complaint four years ago.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

The IP address was 69.69.69.69; yes, the sex number.

 

[BoomerPrime]

So since @Russtard hasn't logged in for years at this point, there's basically zero chance of identifying them. Though for both of em, what's the statute of limitations on the claims Russel is putting forward? He would have definitely been aware of the users when he filed his original complaint four years ago.

Some quick googling tells me there is some kind of 3 year statute of limitations on copyright infringement, but I am too retarded to parse it properly so someone else will need to look at that. To your earlier point though, statute of limitations or not, if there is no way to identify who the two users Shitlips wants to add, how is he going to serve them?

The IP address was 69.69.69.69; yes, the sex number.

They connected on port 420 from that address.

 

[ScooterL]

He wants to win them over with plights, music and dance, doesn't he?

Is it/should it be too late to ask for this, under the rules?

Apparently moebius syndrome affects three out of a million. Means there’s at least 900 of them in the USA alone, so we should have 900+ threads on them.

But we don’t. Hmmm.

In fact, if you look at the main Russell thread, there's a few posts about other people with the condition (and other disabilities) who are mentioned because posters think they're OK, and show that Russell's problem is his personality, not his face.

What is he trying to say about Mr. Moon?

Russell thinks the litigation fund is Null's personal stash of cheese.

We had never once spoken about Russell Greer (YET) so how are we responsible for something that happened in February 2017?

And he only came to the attention of the Farms after he was laughed at on Reddit. His story that the Farms made him famous is false, he was the butt of the joke before anyone here heard of him.

how is he going to serve them?

This never stopped him in at least two cases that we know of.

 

[FamicomGorby]

Some quick googling tells me there is some kind of 3 year statute of limitations on copyright infringement, but I am too retarded to parse it properly so someone else will need to look at that. To your earlier point though, statute of limitations or not, if there is no way to identify who the two users Shitlips wants to add, how is he going to serve them?


They connected on port 420 from that address.

Well I guess Null could say otherwise but @moseph.jartelli could potentially be identified. Probably won't be, but could be. Though even if Greer gets an IP address he's not gonna know what to do with it.

Regardless of all that though, it's just fucking ridiculous that Greer wants to add defendants to a case that's four years old at this point that already has a fucking schedule. I'm 99% sure it's just because the name @Russtard infuriates him and since he thinks the case is a slam dunk for him that it's a chance to get revenge against them.

 

[Seymour Duncan]

If I remember correctly Null has stated that he is required by law to keep the IP addresses of accounts that login for 30 days, then they are purged on a rolling basis.

And even if you do have an IP address in hand, you also need the owner of that IP address block to actually retain logs that far back (and that is if the guy went in raw from his home ISP or some dogshit logmaxxing VPN instead of bouncing off a credible VPN or Tor). You have a good chance at catching someone a few months after the fact, but once you go past the one year mark you're in for an increasingly bad time and 40 months is where you'll get the ISP saying that they do own that block but they don't keep subscriber info that far back so tough luck bud.

 

[Sneedfully and Peacefully]

Reading through all his exhibits I think the quaint but funniest part of it is not only the whacked out aspect ratio modifications that make this shit seem shopped, but that whenever he tries to expunge information he uses a black marker/highlighter tool instead of any actual redaction tool in a PDF editor.

I recall at least one other which was a pooner that was mad about her dog being mocked or something and she did the same thing, it seems cows have an inability to actually obfuscate information.

 

[Hunter Hearst Helmsley]

Greer already can't hit his deadlines and is losing his shit at how many emails Hardin is sending him and motions he's filing...and now he wants to add two more lawyers on the other side?

 

[Google.com]

The IP address was 69.69.69.69; yes, the sex number.

You guys are going to be mad that I'm helping Russ but their IP is actually 127.0.0.1:1

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

Greer already can't hit his deadlines and is losing his shit at how many emails Hardin is sending him and motions he's filing...and now he wants to add two more lawyers on the other side?

On disinformation and Belize, I think @Russtard is QUASI. He should be subpoenaed immediately, nothing could go wrong.

 

[Dyn]

if there is no way to identify who the two users Shitlips wants to add, how is he going to serve them?

When I got lolsuited they tried to serve me through my animalfetishporn.us email, and the judge ruled that my reply saying 'lmao that account you're trying to sue isn't me and has no connection to this email address you fat retard', to be an official and valid receipt of service, but that was in a stupid made-up country's court and not an American one, so I guess we'll have to wait see if this servile cucked-out joke of a judge can manage to outdo that.