Lo, I bring you science (but keep in mind it's a joke, ya Fat fvcks -- and I believe you'll see why):

(
link |
archive)
Fantastic -- so GG and
@Ask My D0minatriX both use "a mix of short, declarative sentences and longer, more complex sentences" and have "a tendency towards conspiracy theories."
The former is not instructive, as all writers of any given language tend to use "a mix of short, declarative sentences and longer, more complex sentences"... generally. The latter is more interesting. I wonder what the AI's basis for determining whether some topic/observation follows from a conspiracy theory.
(There are two, and
only two people in the related threads, who consistently try to open the sheeple's eyes -- and when you are ready to discuss the artwork in Jamie Lee Curtis's breakfast room or the real reason Joni Mitchell caught a nasty case of Morgellon's, we'll be here.)
I also wonder how many writing samples for each person -- you hear about AI projects to, say, discriminate dialects within a given language, which involves millions of utterances. Thank God the AI noticed that 2 people who are discussing online drama... are discussing online drama.
I also love that the AI seems to start with the supposition that these
are the same individual, then discusses its analysis in those terms.
I don't know why AK didn't have AI start with whether both authors are British or American. It would take a rare soul to write consistently against his/her native conventions for years. GG's not up to the task, what with his "repetitive... short, declarative sentences."
(I know it's just for fun, but I hope some of GG's writing samples are non-tweets.... Otherwise, his sentence style might be attributable to Twitter's character limit.)
What's important, though, is the peer review process:
Wyked Crafter: "women and children... like we are here for his amusement!" (
Does GG pick on Wyked Crafter? Why does this woman keep shoehorning herself in?)
Ivana Hafsechs: Clearly not invested in the topic (never a good sign from a review panel).
Christina is here: confirmation bias satisfied!
Samantha: Delighted -- the dancer's become the dance. Visual representation below:
ETA: Feedback for 2 Wyked:

Arguably, GG is NOT "besties with all the farmers." Some of us don't care for his wish for information presented in short, declarative sentences.