UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk
https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs

7
10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019

See spread happiness's other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton
https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary


42
10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019

See pg often's other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.

 

[FedPostalService]

He does. He tried to change his name as he was worried about his head falling off his shoulders due to an incident with a guillotine.

I know he’d hinted in the past at takin new name as king and I’m pretty surprised he never. Obviously his mum wasn't a big fan of history.

 

[Whoopsie Daisy]

I know he’d hinted in the past at takin new name as king and I’m pretty surprised he never. Obviously his mum wasn't a big fan of history.

I should be able to rate my own post as autistic.
I'm holding out hope that Charles just goes fucking mental, proper old-school-monarch levels of mental where he raises an army and attacks france for no reason other than "fuck frogs".

 

[isalaide]

As for "people didn't know", and I see this a lot, the Jay Report was released ten years ago into the scale and details of the horrors in Rotherham.

Nothing, genuinely nothing, that is 'emerging' now isn't covered in the Jay Report. Yes, it is a great fucking big report to read. It is comprehensive.

The issue is not "how didn't people know". The issue is how during the last entire fucking decade have the publicly available facts not been considered important enough to do ANYTHING about rrrrright up until major party seats at council and national level started to be lost to 'Muslim' 'independent' candidates.

Never forget your elected representatives have only one behavioural directive: protect their own seats.

The Jay Report is here and anyone in the UK who hasn't read it by now needs to read it now. You need to understand what the fuck has been going wrong in our country for a long fucking time before you can understand what the problems are and how our sitting politicians will not fix them.

https://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/download/31/independent-inquiry-into-child-sexual-exploitation-in-rotherham-1997---2013

 

[A-Logato]

I wouldn't want to be ruled by Charles either. He's already shown that's he's drank plenty of globalist cool aid and is in full support of all of this.

Now what we do need is our very own Napoleon. Consequences be damned.

 

[6MillionCoofs]

View attachment 6817075

See. I can buy that. You look into it anyway though as it is the right thing to do. Tell the EDL tards to fuck off and they are not helping and get to work.

But you won’t because pussies. So all we havr is Tommy and his gang being retards.

People will use the louts if it is the only available tool

 

[A-Logato]

As for "people didn't know", and I see this a lot, the Jay Report was released ten years ago into the scale and details of the horrors in Rotherham.

Nothing, genuinely nothing, that is 'emerging' now isn't covered in the Jay Report. Yes, it is a great fucking big report to read. It is comprehensive.

The issue is not "how didn't people know". The issue is how during the last entire fucking decade have the publicly available facts not been considered important enough to do ANYTHING about rrrrright up until major party seats at council and national level started to be lost to 'Muslim' 'independent' candidates.

Never forget your elected representatives have only one behavioural directive: protect their own seats.

The Jay Report is here and anyone in the UK who hasn't read it by now needs to read it now. You need to understand what the fuck has been going wrong in our country for a long fucking time before you can understand what the problems are and how our sitting politicians will not fix them.

https://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/download/31/independent-inquiry-into-child-sexual-exploitation-in-rotherham-1997---2013

Sadly a lot of this was well known within these community's for a long time but no one was allowed to do anything about it. Common theme every time is fear of arrest or actual lynch mob from a horde of angry Tusken's and his 6 layers of extended family.

A lot of these areas with the biggest issues with these gangs are the ones with the Muslim independent candidates and your not voting these fuckers out as the ethnic vote is simply too strong. As an example and one you've probably heard of Iqbal Mohamed (that man who wanted cousin fucking to remain legal in front of parliament among other things), won his election with a margin of 6,934 votes, never mind the other parties who ran against him and didn't even come close to that.

I really doubt a man called Iqbal Mohamed or any other limp wristed labour MP who won their seat by the thinnest of thin margins (you know who) will want to rock the boat and the vote and in Mr Iqbal's case get half his family arrested.

 

[SirCliveSinclairdabbing]

The issue is not "how didn't people know". The issue is how during the last entire fucking decade have the publicly available facts not been considered important enough to do ANYTHING about rrrrright up until major party seats at council and national level started to be lost to 'Muslim' 'independent' candidates.

Because nationalism was seen as the main threat by socialists during (a European union was proposed pre ww2) and after ww2. The simplest solution was replaced nationalist communities.
For a reason I can't remember Bradford was first and more recently stoke due to it's BNP support (I think they had an MP)
The outcome is the replacement never stopped and here we are near the end of the socialist purity spiral with leaders pushing the limits on degeneracy (. That foxford comic with the decapitated cop shouting out you're not saying anything racist are you at the 2 butchered white blokes springs to mind. I'm also available for motivational speeches.

 

[Morethanabitfoolish]

Me literally spitting my tea out at the dumb nature of it:

Be fair, we had this on the Farms too. In this thread or the Happenings one or possibly both people have said "duh, the King can just say fuck you and dissolve Parliament." Some were trolling but much like on Twitter there people who genuinely think the King has some massive power he chooses not to wield rather than being a figurehead.

 

[General Emílio Médici]

Me literally spitting my tea out at the dumb nature of it:

A Civil War would improve the UK by getting rid of that massive wall of faggotry called "Stiff Upper Lip" that keeps you cunts from rebelling against the establishment.

I seriously do not see a issue with Charles dissolving parliament. They have such garbage approval ratings the man would have vast approval from the population itself. "Oh there would be massive consequences and the government and civil service would revolt" who gives a shit? They failed at their jobs and continue to fail. They are the ones who brought it on themselves and who made their bed.

The UK is a dying country anyway, it needs chemotherapy bad for the terminal cancer that has spread over it's entire structure. You will have to suffer one way or the other. Bigger Army Diplomacy is a certified European classic and Charles wins by default because he has the only people with actual guns on the island under his thumb. Who does Parliment have? Bobbies from London? Security guards full of diversity quotas? 83-IQ police officers operating out of Tony Blair's idea of a new police who follow rules like complete automatons and who need to outnumber a criminal 6-to-1 to arrest them?

Charles isn't a based nationalist, we know that. But again: at this point the UK Government is a fucking joke. If he wants to do his part for Agenda 2030 he is unironically better off getting his regalia on and executing his royal prerogatives than he is allowing the midwits of Westminster to keep bumbling along.

 

[AnOminous]

Sainsbury's are selling 5 force-grown strawberries (the tasteless ones that are just blocks of cold water) for £2.50 and 1kg of tomatoes is £8

Bongland is insane.

(To be fair American grocery store tomatoes are absolute fucking garbage too and not worth normal prices much less what they charge for them.)

 

[Chunky Salsa]

A Civil War would improve the UK by getting rid of that massive wall of faggotry called "Stiff Upper Lip" that keeps you cunts from rebelling against the establishment.

I seriously do not see a issue with Charles dissolving parliament. They have such garbage approval ratings the man would have vast approval from the population itself. "Oh there would be massive consequences and the government and civil service would revolt" who gives a shit? They failed at their jobs and continue to fail. They are the ones who brought it on themselves and who made their bed.

The UK is a dying country anyway, it needs chemotherapy bad for the terminal cancer that has spread over it's entire structure. You will have to suffer one way or the other. Bigger Army Diplomacy is a certified European classic and Charles wins by default because he has the only people with actual guns on the island under his thumb. Who does Parliment have? Bobbies from London? Security guards full of diversity quotas? 83-IQ police officers operating out of Tony Blair's idea of a new police who follow rules like complete automatons and who need to outnumber a criminal 6-to-1 to arrest them?

Charles isn't a based nationalist, we know that. But again: at this point the UK Government is a fucking joke. If he wants to do his part for Agenda 2030 he is unironically better off getting his regalia on and executing his royal prerogatives than he is allowing the midwits of Westminster to keep bumbling along.

Yeah, it'd be nice for Charles to pull the plug, and have everyone shot that does this, but it won't happen; and Charles is just as big of a lover of it as the rest of them. I don't think there's a political solution to things as they are. The only thing that would actually heal the things done by our government over the last fifty years is for all of them, and the civil service, to be publicly dragged through trials, and then hanged without ceremony. I'd also want their families killed as well to be honest.

EDIT: To be more realistic, you would literally need to - as a magically elected nationalist government with control over the apparatus of state - create a new government from scratch. Because the actual managers of the current government powers; The civil service, would paralyse any action you took without making a new one. It's not just kicking out the browns, and punishing the traitors, our entire system is infested, and needs burning down and rebuilding.

You would have to create parallel civil services, then fire everyone in the current civil service, and then restaff the new one with nationalist members. Then do the same for the police, the armed forces, the health sector, etc, etc, etc. It is a monumental task that requires real dedication and I don't see any politician, or nationalist leader being willing to do that. Hence, no political solution.

 

[Cherry Eyed Hamster]

Not ‘news’ specifically, but I was recommended this video on YouTube that was uploaded just 2 days ago and it’s already got 200k+ views. Lots of people are fed up.

 

[FedPostalService]

EDIT: To be more realistic, you would literally need to - as a magically elected nationalist government with control over the apparatus of state - create a new government from scratch. Because the actual managers of the current government powers; The civil service, would paralyse any action you took without making a new one. It's not just kicking out the browns, and punishing the traitors, our entire system is infested, and needs burning down and rebuilding.

There would be an argument about the primacy of parliament. It would drag until someone tried to arrest the king or prime minister. That’s when the army would have to choose a side. If it doesn’t all choose the same side, DEI officers vs old school officers, a bloody civil war starts.


Anyone wishing for that is a Tim Pool enjoyer or a retard. Hang on, they’re both the same thing.

 

[Chunky Salsa]

There would be an argument about the primacy of parliament. It would drag until someone tried to arrest the king or prime minister. That’s when the army would have to choose a side. If it doesn’t all choose the same side, DEI officers vs old school officers, a bloody civil war starts.


Anyone wishing for that is a Tim Pool enjoyer or a retard. Hang on, they’re both the same thing.

Which sort of makes the options 'Do nothing and die' and 'Assume there will be a civil war, prepare accordingly', which for most people is also option the first. Because without disinfecting the civil service, nothing at all will change. The 'Secret Hitler' plan demonstrably does not work, none of the 'right wing' parties are remotely right wing. Everyone in power seems pretty much fine with how things have gone and will carry on going.

Bit depressing, innit.

 

[FedPostalService]

Q predicted this. Trust the plan.

 

[Chunky Salsa]

Q predicted this. Trust the plan.

I think we should get our own letter. America has Q, we can have D.

 

[bort420]

Also couldn't find any carrots near me, and the potatoes all have at least one nasty mushy one in them. I hate to cry 'food problems' but it seems like all our food has not only gotten pricier, but also shitter very fast.

lmfao broken Britain guess importing cheap labor and suppressing wages really paid off! native girls getting gangraped was just the icing on the cake

As for "people didn't know", and I see this a lot, the Jay Report was released ten years ago into the scale and details of the horrors in Rotherham.

Nothing, genuinely nothing, that is 'emerging' now isn't covered in the Jay Report. Yes, it is a great fucking big report to read. It is comprehensive.

The issue is not "how didn't people know". The issue is how during the last entire fucking decade have the publicly available facts not been considered important enough to do ANYTHING about rrrrright up until major party seats at council and national level started to be lost to 'Muslim' 'independent' candidates.

Never forget your elected representatives have only one behavioural directive: protect their own seats.

The Jay Report is here and anyone in the UK who hasn't read it by now needs to read it now. You need to understand what the fuck has been going wrong in our country for a long fucking time before you can understand what the problems are and how our sitting politicians will not fix them.

https://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/download/31/independent-inquiry-into-child-sexual-exploitation-in-rotherham-1997---2013

the rotherham rape gangs were briefly in the zeitgeist a decade ago but quickly squelched by the government and media -- who, since the UK does not have free speech, are in bed with each other.

labour didn't want to have to answer for their retarded bleeding-heart immigration policies. the con-dems didn't want to answer for their retarded economic immigration policies. both count on imported ex-colonial asians (thanks Maggie for the Uganda thing) for huge voting bases.

only thing that happened was that it fucked over native, actual Brits

 

[lion of panjshir]

lmfao broken Britain guess importing cheap labor and suppressing wages really paid off! native girls getting gangraped was just the icing on the cake

Well they can't suppress wages when they don't work. They're not even productive.

 

[bort420]

Well they can't suppress wages when they don't work. They're not even productive.

they increase demand on services, which is justification to import more of the ones who have to work for a few years until they too can live the good life on the dole

 

[Bloom Worm Cross Field]

I want to make a reminder to everyone, and apologies that this is quite preachy.

It is a sad but understandable fact that people who understand what I will simply call "the situation" in this country, do not want to put their name on the line organising or trying to directly affect political change, as the deck is so completely stacked against us by the state.

What I believe is not acceptable is not even trying to change a few minds and communicate with trusted people about the state we're in. The situation seems so immovable because despite it being current year, the state still rests on a gigantic bedrock of normies who will grumble about this and that, but still fundamentally believe that the state has their interests in mind, that tolerance and acceptance is an unquestioned virtue, and that the British-on-paper of this country really are British in their hearts and minds, with the same goals and incentives as the natives. Those normies almost certainly include close friends and family members of people here.

If you possess even the slightest modicum of conversational skills, it has literally never been more easy to bring up the rape gang situation without seeming like a weirdo with an axe to grind. It costs no social capital to talk to a close friend about things like:

• The "grooming" gangs were/are systematic child rape and torture gangs
• The gangs were almost all Pakistani men
• Basically all the victims were white British girls, and they were targeted on racist grounds, and racially abused with terms like "white slag" and "kaffir" while being raped
• The girls were drugged, raped 4 at a time, beaten and raped with baseball bats, burnt, cut, pissed on, branded with their abusers' initials next to their anus, and a seemingly never-ending list of other atrocities
• Girls were taken to different towns to be raped by dozens of men a night, many nights a week
• The only people who have been prosecuted have largely been the gang members who had control of these girls, and doesn't include the uncountable number of nameless men who were the customers of these gangs, whom the girls were pimped out to
• A kebab shop in Blackpool killed at least one girl and mixed her body into the kebab meat
• Police arrested girls at the scene for being "drunk and disorderly"
• Despite the massive underreporting and coverup, 1 in 73 Muslim men in Rotherham were prosecuted for being in the rape gangs.
• 1400 underage girls in Rotherham alone were raped and abused. This is described as "a conservative estimate" by the report that produced it (Jay report)
• It is estimated that 5-10% of all white British underaged girls in Rotherham were abused
• Grooming gangs have operated in dozens of towns all over the country, with Rotherham being only the most well-known
• The Rotherham rape gang did what it did despite Pakistanis only consisting (at the time) of 2% of the town's population
• South Yorkshire police deliberately did not record the ethnicity of the rape gang members
• Pakistani council members repeatedly used their powers to deny enquiries and investigations
• Muslim MP Naz Shah liked and retweeted a post saying "those abused girls in Rotherham and elsewhere just need to shut their mouths. For the good of #diversity". She received almost zero attention for this and is still MP for Bradford West years on from this.
• The Conservative party created a Home Office panel to advise on the gangs, and put Imran Ahmad Khan, MP for Wakefield and Pakistani Muslim child molester, on the panel as an expert on child sexual abuse (is now convicted, was under police caution at the time of being added).
• While the Mirror "broke" this story in 2013, members of the BNP were put on trial for race hate in 2006 for saying the same thing. The Guardian even reported Nick Griffin in saying "I was speaking the truth to an audience of decent working people in West Yorkshire who in some cases are facing terrible problems, including the grooming of their children by paedophiles." and yet no notice was taken.
• In 2011 a man was interviewed at an EDL march and spoke about "Muslamic [sic] rape gangs" and "15 year olds are getting raped, that's why we're here". He became a gigantic meme and the subject of intense derision by the left for years, with remixes making fun of his poor speech getting millions of views, and comedy hosts (like Russell Howard) broadcasting abuse of him on national TV. The anonymous man was completely factually correct.

All of these are easily fact checked, and every one of them is a gigantic, eye-opening truth that cannot be swallowed by a member of the "normie" contingent without seriously reconsidering their beliefs about ethnicity and integration in this country. The average person's exposure to "grooming gangs" news was, until now, successfully limited by the state to one "Horrific abuse of 1400 girls" headline 12 years ago, and the odd drip drop of "14 convicted of grooming offences" on the BBC local news section.

As someone reading this, you belong to the top tier of professional noticer. You hold more sway from the knowledge you have than you may realise. Most of the doomer points about the British state were also true of the USSR during the disaster and coverup of Chernobyl. It was all watertight until everybody knew the lies were lies, and everybody knew that everybody knew.