Though I would be much better served by simply ignoring this thread (admittedly, though it is obvious by my recent postings, I am in fact one of those concerned by the subject of this thread) I find the inexorable desire to clarify certain things (which I am sure will not fall upon deaf ears and will
definitely not be negrated whatsoever). I would like to appear unbothered by the vitriol displayed in this thread (and in many places on this site) but, sadly, what occasionally comes to mind whenever I chance upon it is my own family and how they have been treated in the past. Thus, I must "valiantly" and rather stupidly attempt to form a rebuttal. Woe upon me of my own making, I suppose. Oh well.
He describes how all words in Hindu for “honor”, “charity” or “integrity” are either Persian or English in origin, and how your average jeet have little understanding and even less regard for those concepts.
Indians are from birth to death preoccupied with fucking over other Indians. A plumber will leave a mess when he comes to fix your bathroom just to fuck your over, and the person hiring the plumber will try to fuck him over on for example payment, irregardless of how well the job was done, just because he can.
Officials take bribes just for the principle and because they can, and are seen as morons and weak if they don’t try to exploit their position.
TLDR: India is a shithole of low IQ jeets who act like they’re Jews 24/7 and constantly try to fuck over anyone they can.
The Persians have been concerned with this country for about a thousand years now, seeing as Islam reached the subcontinent
going through Persia, and Persian was the court language of one of the few empires to span nearly the entire country (like the English), not to mention the cultural ties between Persia and the northwestern reaches of the subcontinent throughout the ages. The author is simply using rhetoric to make his point.
I went ahead and read the article itself, and though I found it truthful in many aspects, I also found it needlessly self-effacing. It is curious to see that only one user in the A&N thread pointed out that the very subservient nature described in the article may apply to the author themselves in how they practically grovel to (what I would label as) racist sentiments. As you would probably predict, my foremost claim in response to such a screed would be "not all Indians", but I will admit that "many Indians" or even perhaps "most Indians" behave in morally and materially corrupt ways, but this is to be expected from a nation beaten black and blue in terms of sovereignty for centuries.
With regards to the general statement that "Indians are preoccupied with fucking over other Indians", I would instead say that the culture has beaten most people into apathy instead. At least from my personal experience, most people don't necessarily try to screw each other over. The author of that article grew up in Bhopal (another well-known shithole, though at least a quarter to maybe half the country lives in the shittiest states) so perhaps the culture there is different. The culture is parochial and rather oppresive, demanding near-constant deference to elders, which explains many aspects of Indian subservience. Not that it makes things any better, I admit.
As far as IQ goes, seeing as malnutrition is still a major issue in the country (most of the poor subsist on a diet of rice, wheat, and vegetables with all the vitamins boiled, cooked and fried out of them - with very little meat or protein) as well as in most purportedly low-IQ countries, one wonders if that figure is actually representative of the country's potential.
I must clarify that I do not seek to defend current immigration practices, however, especially Canadian ones, where they have decided to import the lower half of Indian society without even attempting to force them to integrate and learn local cultural norms. Such practices are patently retarded and I oppose them just as I oppose the mistreatment of my compatriots. WITCH companies (Wipro, Infosys, Tata Consultancy Services, Cognizant and HCL) have a bad reputation in India itself for producing low-quality work and scraping the bottom of the barrel for employees (due to consistent mistreatment and terrible wages), so it is rather disturbing even to me that they are the main pipeline being used to funnel Indians into the US.
As a final remark, note that the author of that article - that man (or "jeet", as you would call him) - lives in Canada. Would you exclude him from your mass "jeet" purge?
(Additionally, funnily enough, "jeet" means "victory" in most North Indian languages, which is why it appears in so many Indian names.)
Now, I will clarify a few misconceptions (pointless as it may be):
- videos you see of various disgusting habits of Indians are generally uncommon and are made into videos due to the fact. If such behaviours were so commonplace, why would any native (indeed, it is other Indians behind the camera, most of the time) bother to record them?
- This goes for the practice of eating cow shit especially. Nowadays, only the most fanatical Hindus believe that eating cow shit is holy. Most people are sensible enough to understand that cow shit is, in fact, shit.
- open defecation usually occurs in rural areas only, where people tend to defecate in fields. Not that this is particularly better than "street shitting", of course. Sentiments against toilets inside homes are again common only in rural areas and match similar sentiments of people from developed nations several decades ago. Otherwise, the government has implemented various programs to increase toilet usage in rural areas to varying levels of success.
- the massive increase in Indian Internet exposure occurred because the entrance of a new competitor into the phone plan market made prices for cellular data plummet, giving every last retard in the country a consistent Internet connection.
- the cockiness of most Indians on the Internet can probably be attributed to the government and the ruling party's efforts to domestically create an image of progress and prosperity. Idiots naturally fall for these ploys hook, line, and sinker, and so feel emboldened to behave in such ways despite the pitiful state of their surroundings.
- the Hindu hate for Muslims generally arises from historical grievances against Muslims, as well as general Muslim intolerance for other religions, idolatry and polytheism. Every war Pakistan has fought against India was started by Pakistan. Otherwise, Hindus, Buddhists and Sikhs generally live in peace (aside from regions with caste-based volatility) as Sikhism and Buddhism have Hindu roots (and are hence labelled dharmic religions - "dharma" being the Sanskrit term for religion).
- India itself is highly variegated, with certain areas (generally those in which stereotypical problems such as open defecation are most pronounced) treated with the same disdain by other Indians as the disdain for Indians in general by you. Some parts of the country even have developed-nation-level HDIs. The most well-known places are shitholes though.
The evidence is pretty definitive that the precursor language to sanskrit did not originate in India because it contains words for things like apple, oak, and pine (things which conspicuously do not exist on the subcontinent). This is not even a subject of contention in linguistics like, "Was Middle English a French creole" or "Are the Japonic languages actually isolates." It's basically incontrovertible unless you believe Indian civilization is actually 20 million years old like the Hindu fundamentalists do.
Most Hindu fundamentalists (again, as far as I'm aware) understand Sanskrit's exo-subcontinental origins. In fact, Avestan - the old language of the Persians - shares many similarities with Sanskrit. However, Hindu fundamentalists take pride in how Sanskrit was written down in the subcontinent, and most Indic languages take heavily after Sanskrit, especially in vocabulary.
A question for the thread... does anyone have knowledge/experience of jeets in the creative arts? particularly in music performance or composition?
Indians abroad, particularly Indian Americans, would rather their offspring learn the musical arts of their own culture than Western cultures, so most of them tend to pick up traditional Indian music - Hindustani or Carnatic. Traditional music is a key part of most religious events (in the same way as church hymns), so exposure to it is far greater than the exposure to other cultures of their own traditional music. As far as I'm aware, the Chinese do not have a particularly rich and varied musical history and culture or at least one in reach of the common man, which may explain why they tend towards Western classical music instead.
monkeys are better than the average jeet. admittedly, the chinese are equally as bad
The Chinese are at least controlled by their government, which has prevented the world from being exposed to the average Chinese person (not that Chinese tourists didn't already have a rather bad reputation - but at least an authoritarian government such as China has the tools to remedy such misbehaviour). Fortunately or unfortunately, India is at least nominally a free country and so cannot explicitly prevent Indians from simply leaving or accessing the wider Internet (as China does with their Great Firewall). The Chinese have always been far more organised than us simply because the government has had a much tighter grip on the country. China also has the benefit of being ethnically homogeneous (for the most part), unlike India, which is effectively a mottled patchwork of up to hundreds of different ethnic groups, each with more people than the average Central/Eastern European country.
I made a small attempt to try and find any evidence of jeets actually doing this, but I came up empty. It wouldn't surprise me if they did though.
Could've been a false flag (literally, heh). Could've been some random village retard. Could've been some obscure tribal culture. But most people don't use dragonflies to pop pimples. As far as I'm aware.
