The British Summer of Discontent - The growing civil unrest of the native British population, sparked by the murder of 3 young girls in Southport

[Miriam Margoyles]

As a response to the currently ongoing grooming gangs scandal, Keir Starmer decides to punish the few remaining white British people with this:

View attachment 6817507

https://x.com/RadioGenoa/status/1875258928256442717

https://archive.ph/3hXra

I just can't get over how much he hates you, British bros.

Paki teachers won't go on strike.
This is all a ploy to undermine the unions.

We're now in a situation where a Labour government is trying to undermine the unions more than the fucking Tories ever did.

 

[Geoff Capes Vapes Apes]

As much as think he’s a tool there’s one thing about Robinson: he doesn’t glow that much.

I’ve no doubt that he’s surrounded by Special Branch informers but Robinson has the autistic stubbornness of the Dear Leader, but sadly without a First Amendment to protect him.

He’s in and out of prison and the establishment is hell bent on destroying him.

I do believe he was amplified at first as the establishment though “look at that disgusting working class guy, surely that will put people off talking about this stuff” until they realised a lot of fucking people agree with him.

Compare and contrast to Mark Colett, an actual neo-nazi who seems to plod along just fine and glows so strongly you can see him from orbit.

Tommy's not particularly bright, but his heart's in the right place and I don't think he's compromised.

I think Mark Collett has a look about him, like his biggest objection to the grooming gangs is he doesn't get to join in. Real "ephebophile, actually" physiognomy. Probably how, if he was sincere in his fashing originally, the security services got to him.

 

[teriyakiburns]

Is something new happening around this? The foreign rape gangs have been an international meme for what seems like a decade. Everybody knows the police and local governments protect them and have for some time, but im seeing it talked about more recently than usual.

Background that you probably know: Starmer was head of the crown prosecution service during a significant period of the worst of the rapes and allegedly went out of his way to block prosecutions of paedophiles and child rapists during his tenure. It was held as a criticism against him when he was leader of the opposition, but now that he's the PM it has become a huge issue - alongside his unsavoury associations with weird gay muslim property magnates - that he's consistently refused to address. The demands for some sort of answer to all these questions have brought a lot of previously forgotten issues back into the public mind.

Recently, Oldham Council asked the government to carry out an inquiry into the rape gangs in their town and elsewhere, with a wider remit than the previous Rotherham inquiry. Jess Phillips, the "Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls", refused and said the council should run the inquiry itself; she didn't want to risk stoking ethnic tensions and is more than willing to throw working class women and girls - the very people it is her literal job to advocate for -in order to appease rapists and child molesters. The fact that she is willing to destroy her reputation over this has got people asking serious questions.

There's also been publication of the full transcripts of the trials of several of the rapists, which went into excruciating detail about how they abused their victims. Information has also emerged about how people who tried to stop the rapists were treated, while previously released stories, which were mostly suppressed by a compliant media, of how the authorities protected "ethnic communities" by arresting young girls even while they were in the process of being raped, and arrested fathers trying to rescue their children, are now making the rounds again. The whole scandal has been bubbling just under the surface for a long time, held in abeyance by a general disbelief that it could be nearly as bad as it turned out to be, fear of incarceration, and the worry of each person that they might actually be the only one that understood. People have been paralysed by that, but now there's information getting out that is so far beyond the pale that I think it might actually be galvanising people into action.

So that's why people are talking about it more.

 

[wtfNeedSignUp]

As much as think he’s a tool there’s one thing about Robinson: he doesn’t glow that much.

I’ve no doubt that he’s surrounded by Special Branch informers but Robinson has the autistic stubbornness of the Dear Leader, but sadly without a First Amendment to protect him.

He’s in and out of prison and the establishment is hell bent on destroying him.

I do believe he was amplified at first as the establishment though “look at that disgusting working class guy, surely that will put people off talking about this stuff” until they realised a lot of fucking people agree with him.

Compare and contrast to Mark Colett, an actual neo-nazi who seems to plod along just fine and glows so strongly you can see him from orbit.

I could have understood disliking Robinson if he was standard fare "bad optics strawman that seemingly never get jailed" like that neo nazi that got punched years back. But the worst I heard about him is schitzo ties to Jews in the Mossad, usually told by NEETs who will never go against the system despite having the least to lose.

 

[They were once men]

I could have understood disliking Robinson if he was standard fare "bad optics strawman that seemingly never get jailed" like that neo nazi that got punched years back. But the worst I heard about him is schitzo ties to Jews in the Mossad, usually told by NEETs who will never go against the system despite having the least to lose.

he might be pro israel because he's known to be anti-muslim/anti-terrorists so it would make sense to support the country which is turning them into sludge.

 

[Golden Apple]

she didn't want to risk stoking ethnic tensions and is more than willing to throw working class women and girls - the very people it is her literal job to advocate for -in order to appease rapists and child molesters.

how the authorities protected "ethnic communities" by arresting young girls even while they were in the process of being raped, and arrested fathers trying to rescue their children, are now making the rounds again

I know that misogyny is everywhere, but this is just the most foul shit I have ever seen.
"Oh don't rile up the shitskin muslims, shut your mouth because diversity"

They're literally placating the shitskin hoards with the bodies of their women.

I hope the UK falls into the sea.

 

[Lord of the Large Pants]

I have a question for my rightpondian cousins.

Is referring to Arabs and Indians as "Asians" something with a legitimate history? Just a cultural quirk? Or is it a recent development use to deliberately conflate properly civilized chinks and nips with swarthoid rapefugees?

 

[ForTheHoard]

I have a question for my rightpondian cousins.

Is referring to Arabs and Indians as "Asians" something with a legitimate history? Just a cultural quirk? Or is it a recent development use to deliberately conflate properly civilized chinks and nips with swarthoid rapefugees?

I think they're called "Saracens." Calling them Asian is meant to implant an inaccurate image in your mind when reading the description of criminals. Possibly another reason why we aren't allowed to call people Orientals anymore.

 

[libRT]

I have a question for my rightpondian cousins.

Is referring to Arabs and Indians as "Asians" something with a legitimate history? Just a cultural quirk? Or is it a recent development use to deliberately conflate properly civilized chinks and nips with swarthoid rapefugees?

Media started it a while back in response to attacks/murders, but yeah thats exactly the reason, to draw the ire away.

 

[YourFriendlyLurker 2.0]

I said it about Britain and I say it again. If you fill your society with 3rd world garbage and banana republic scum oligarchs, this is the society you get.

 

[Drihten]

I said it about Britain and I say it again. If you fill your society with 3rd world garbage and banana republic scum oligarchs, this is the society you get.

Time and time again did the British folk vote against this, by the way. So not only did the state flood the land with these vermin, they did it to the opposition of the nation.

 

[Rusty Metal Skull Gun]

Is referring to Arabs and Indians as "Asians" something with a legitimate history? Just a cultural quirk? Or is it a recent development use to deliberately conflate properly civilized chinks and nips with swarthoid rapefugees?

As far as I can tell this has always been the case in British English. The Chinese and Japanese have always been Orientals rather than Asians.

 

[Londo]

I have a question for my rightpondian cousins.

Is referring to Arabs and Indians as "Asians" something with a legitimate history? Just a cultural quirk? Or is it a recent development use to deliberately conflate properly civilized chinks and nips with swarthoid rapefugees?

Pakistan and India are in Asia.

That's all there is to it. Most brown foreigners in the country when these terms were being made common were from the Imperial territories and therefore from Asia mostly.

 

[FedPostalService]

I have a question for my rightpondian cousins.

Is referring to Arabs and Indians as "Asians" something with a legitimate history? Just a cultural quirk? Or is it a recent development use to deliberately conflate properly civilized chinks and nips with swarthoid rapefugees?

Take a look at a map of the world. Take a pen and draw a line around the continent of Asia. Take a look at the countries you’ve drawn a line around. The results may shock you,

 

[isalaide]

The reason btw that it matters whether the councils hold an inquiry, like Jess Philips has told them to do, or the government holds a statutory inquiry, like the councils want, is that a government inquiry has legal powers to compel production of documents and other evidence, including powers to compel individuals to give evidence to the inquiry. The council's powers of inquiry are limited to looking through their own files and the police might, might, help them if they feel like it. The council can't even see anonymised medical evidence.

It's not just about hand washing. It's about the ability of any inquiry to accurately form a view of what happened, why it happened, and most crucially what is being done to prevent it continuing to happen. (Spoiler: extremely fucking little.) The "what happened" has mostly been settled by the Jay inquiry: Alexis Jay was very thorough and made if anything a conservative estimate of the scale of the disaster. The Casey report was issued in 2015 as a follow up of sorts to the Jay report to outline why the Rotherham response was so fucking terrible. The council was put under special measures for a couple of years but this was as much for the look of it as anything. The idea that the structural and cultural problems identified by Louise Casey were exclusive to Rotherham or meaningfully changed by special measures nearly a decade ago is risible.

The Casey report is here for happy reading: https://assets.publishing.service.g...966_Report_of_Inspection_of_Rotherham_WEB.pdf

An inquiry that isn't a government inquiry, isn't statutory or judicial, simply does not have the power to uncover and reflect in full on these events and what needs to be done to stop this shit happening. Talking about "moving on" etc is just turning yet another blind eye to the problem of CSE.

 

[FedPostalService]

The reason btw that it matters whether the councils hold an inquiry, like Jess Philips has told them to do, or the government holds a statutory inquiry, like the councils want, is that a government inquiry has legal powers to compel production of documents and other evidence, including powers to compel individuals to give evidence to the inquiry. The council's powers of inquiry are limited to looking through their own files and the police might, might, help them if they feel like it. The council can't even see anonymised medical evidence.

It's not just about hand washing. It's about the ability of any inquiry to accurately form a view of what happened, why it happened, and most crucially what is being done to prevent it continuing to happen. (Spoiler: extremely fucking little.) The "what happened" has mostly been settled by the Jay inquiry: Alexis Jay was very thorough and made if anything a conservative estimate of the scale of the disaster. The Casey report was issued in 2015 as a follow up of sorts to the Jay report to outline why the Rotherham response was so fucking terrible. The council was put under special measures for a couple of years but this was as much for the look of it as anything. The idea that the structural and cultural problems identified by Louise Casey were exclusive to Rotherham or meaningfully changed by special measures nearly a decade ago is risible.

The Casey report is here for happy reading: https://assets.publishing.service.g...966_Report_of_Inspection_of_Rotherham_WEB.pdf

An inquiry that isn't a government inquiry, isn't statutory or judicial, simply does not have the power to uncover and reflect in full on these events and what needs to be done to stop this shit happening. Talking about "moving on" etc is just turning yet another blind eye to the problem of CSE.

Plus Labour are a dab hand of trying to sabotage or ignore having enquiries when it’s not to their benefit.

They tried to sink the Glenfell enquiry with nonsense like “the judge leading it has never stepped foot in a black of flats” and flooding it with people whose only qualifications were being professionally ethnic. Who even remembers that now and what did it change?

Hillsborough disaster? Well, those Scouse monkeys are no better than niggers who will vote for us anyway and we’ll fallout with The Sun if we have one so fuck them whilst we’re in power. Andy Burnham takes credit for it but it was David Cameron and a Tory fucking government of all people who powered through with it.

Labour are not your friend. They think you’re a peasant and expect you to vote for them because you‘re no better than an animal. They fucking despise you.

 

[Free the Pedos]

They're literally placating the shitskin hoards with the bodies of their women.

I hope the UK falls into the sea

In the Middle East, Central Asia, and Pakistan, sexually abusing a girl outside of your immediately family is cause for a decades long blood feud. (Boys of course are fair game.). Muslims in the west think western women are fair game because abusing them doesn’t get the same immediate, violent response.

It makes me sick to my ass that they take advantage of us in so many ways. This is why vigilante justice used to exist: the authorities ignored problems so people took care of perpetrators quickly and violently to make an example of them.

 

[Jimmy Dean Bowl]

I don't understand at what point Muslims became more important than the native population.
It's been an insidious creep, an entire country of slow boiling frogs.

Tolerance turns to hatred when a country's hospitality and people are abused in such an egregious manner.

 

[FedPostalService]

I don't understand at what point Muslims became more important than the native population.

When the left realised they could rely on their votes and the right realised they could be called racist.

 

[YourFriendlyLurker 2.0]

Time and time again did the British folk vote against this, by the way. So not only did the state flood the land with these vermin, they did it to the opposition of the nation.

I guess both parties are just the same faggotry over and over?