US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: ThisIsGonnaBeGood, The Shredder, ActualCracker and 120 others
Click to expand...
Escar said:
If you bring up John Money to trannies, they just say Reimer killing himself proves that transgenderism is correct because he felt what he really was, despite how they tried to raise him. Because Le Hecking Self-ID.
Click to expand...
Both brothers killed themselves so this excuse is nonsense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smar Mijou, Banana Nut Muffin, spiritofamermaid and 4 others
StarkRavingMad said:
The only reason why we didn't see any rioting today is because of the snowstorm.

Starting on January 20th, they have four years to act out ... Just like they did during the last Trump Administration.

Commie faggots.
Click to expand...

I'm sure there will be protests. Maybe a bit of rioting. I expect a CVS or two in a black neighborhood will get ransacked by poor, innocent dindus.

I would be surprised if they actually make any move on the state though. I've long thought that progressives fuming over J6 are absolutely disingenuous. They'll often cry "traitor", "treason", etc. But progressives are the first in line to shit on the concept of patriotism or nationalism. Loyalty to and love of country is anathema to the leftists. "Why should I love a country I was born in by accident?"

They don't believe in any of the rhetoric about treason and they aren't most upset that the right wingers marched on the capital. They're seething because they know that they are too cowardly to do as much themselves.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, The Foxtrot, John.Doe and 11 others
Escar said:
Progressives so accustomed to losing that they take pride in how well they surrender.
Click to expand...
In fairness, 'losing with dignity and respectability' is typically the Republicans' shtick. The only reason they progs are quiet today is because on some level they realize everyone is sick of them, and they HAVE to shut the fuck up and sit down, at least for a minute.

Personally I'm just sick of this corny high-school-civics "ReSpEcTaBiLiTy" ass bullshit. I almost wish Trump and the J6 supporters were even 10% as based as libshits have led me to believe.

"Yeah you can barely afford eggs thank to us but we're nice on twitter so ACKSHUALLY we're the good people here" Mmm how about hell no bitch. I don't even like Trump that much, but man oh man am I hyped for 4 years of telling these cunts that Trump's president so cry about it.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Smar Mijou, HIVidaBoheme, AmateurComedicTaxidermist and 13 others
UnidentifiedFlyingOrchid said:
I made a post about this a month ago, which includes a map I made of possible added House seats:
If Canada had US House Seats.png
My post has an explaination of my logic (and possible merging of Provences).
Click to expand...
There's absolutely no reason why America has to take all of Canada at once.

Alberta has the rocky mountains to the west and Manitoba has the Canadian Shield mountains to the right, which both act as rough terrain that limits movement through them except for easily controlled access points. Moving through the territories is difficult which also acts as a natural border. Those three provinces are landlocked and low population, meaning that it would be very easy to control what goes through them. They would be conservative states and so are an attractive addition.

BC would be cut off from the rest of Canada and would have difficulty functioning as part of it. It may be coerced into joining the US, or it might try to go independent or be bought out by China or something.

What's left would be Ontario, Quebec, and the Maritimes which would likely split into those three groups. The Maritimes might be somewhat easy to absorb, but Quebec and Ontario would be a very tough nut to crack and may be too populated to easily absorb. Might as well let them be independent countries for a while and absorb them when they collapse.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: HIVidaBoheme, spiritofamermaid, Pocket_Sand! and 2 others
Betonhaus said:
There's absolutely no reason why America has to take all of Canada at once.

Alberta has the rocky mountains to the west and Manitoba has the Canadian Shield mountains to the right, which both act as rough terrain that limits movement through them except for easily controlled access points. Moving through the territories is difficult which also acts as a natural border. Those three provinces are landlocked and low population, meaning that it would be very easy to control what goes through them. They would be conservative states and so are an attractive addition.

BC would be cut off from the rest of Canada and would have difficulty functioning as part of it. It may be coerced into joining the US, or it might try to go independent or be bought out by China or something.

What's left would be Ontario, Quebec, and the Maritimes which would likely split into those three groups. The Maritimes might be somewhat easy to absorb, but Quebec and Ontario would be a very tough nut to crack and may be too populated to easily absorb. Might as well let them be independent countries for a while and absorb them when they collapse.
Click to expand...
The US should take:

Yukon
NWT
Nunavut
Alberta
Manitoba
Saskatchewan
Nova Scotia
Prince Edward Island
Newfoundland and Labrador

Quebec can become the Republic of Quebec

Ontario and British Columbia can die in a fuckin fire
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Autistic Gunspergings, Smar Mijou, Kier Starmer and 14 others
UnidentifiedFlyingOrchid said:
Greenland is a frozen rock. The tiny population that lives there lives on islands off the southwest coast in little villages. These villages have annual weather colder than Anchorage, Alaska. Grass barely grows on the hard rocky surface.
Click to expand...
Thousands of medieval Norse people lived there, growing hay and raising cattle and sheep before they were mass-murdered by Eskimos in a few genocidal wars around 1350-1400. The Danish government helped fund academics to make up studies saying it was "unsustainable" to cover for the Eskimos (who are mostly alcoholics with insane rates of suicide) and today it's used to bolster the "woah, we gotta watch out for da climate change!" even though the real cause was the most successful genocide of white people in history.
 
  • Informative
  • Horrifying
  • Like
Reactions: Sneed Halation, Smar Mijou, HIVidaBoheme and 11 others
draggs said:
The US should take:

Yukon
NWT
Nunavut
Alberta
Manitoba
Saskatchewan
Nova Scotia
Prince Edward Island
Newfoundland and Labrador

Quebec can become the Republic of Quebec

Ontario and British Columbia can die in a fuckin fire
Click to expand...
Realistically the next time Democrats get in power they will try to absorb Ontario and BC to get more EVs, but that won't be until 2036 or something
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL
Chuck McGill said:
In fairness, 'losing with dignity and respectability' is typically the Republicans' shtick. The only reason they progs are quiet today is because on some level they realize everyone is sick of them, and they HAVE to shut the fuck up and sit down, at least for a minute.

Personally I'm just sick of this corny high-school-civics "ReSpEcTaBiLiTy" ass bullshit. I almost wish Trump and the J6 supporters were even 10% as based as libshits have led me to believe.

"Yeah you can barely afford eggs thank to us but we're nice on twitter so ACKSHUALLY we're the good people here" Mmm how about hell no bitch. I don't even like Trump that much, but man oh man am I hyped for 4 years of telling these cunts that Trump's president so cry about it.
Click to expand...
Plus, "respectability" only applies to Republicans. The left can have women twerking and a menagerie of freaks in charge of things like energy, transportation, and medicine. Whenever Trump comes up it's "ZOMG THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IS CHAOS AND INCOMPETENCE *jak*" The political equivalent to "I have nothing for contempt for your standards of behavior and morality, but maybe if I say the magic words you'll do what I want." This recent election made the Dems do some soul searching, and I think that, pushing all hypocrisy aside, they realize trying to force an actual riot on J6 wouldn't work for them. They fell into the trap they'd set on Republicans for decades.

Sam Brinton and Richard Levine faced no scrutiny when they were selected. None. Only Trump's nominees get shit not because of the nominees themselves, but who's nominated them.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Smar Mijou, Sexy Peach Emoji, spiritofamermaid and 18 others
Escar said:
I'm sure there will be protests. Maybe a bit of rioting. I expect a CVS or two in a black neighborhood will get ransacked by poor, innocent dindus.

I would be surprised if they actually make any move on the state though. I've long thought that progressives fuming over J6 are absolutely disingenuous. They'll often cry "traitor", "treason", etc. But progressives are the first in line to shit on the concept of patriotism or nationalism. Loyalty to and love of country is anathema to the leftists. "Why should I love a country I was born in by accident?"

They don't believe in any of the rhetoric about treason and they aren't most upset that the right wingers marched on the capital. They're seething because they know that they are too cowardly to do as much themselves.
Click to expand...

Trump is very likely to get another SCOTUS appointment or two.

Anticipate organized violent meltdowns. Sure, they don't care about country or unity ... But they certainly do like to destroy and dismantle, especially when they don't get their way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marchesa of the Vast, Smar Mijou, Sexy Peach Emoji and 11 others
Potatoherder said:
So this is weird. I expected a few token ones at least.
View attachment 6828142
Click to expand...
That’s because the objection rules changed in 2022. You used to need only one senator and one representative to object to a states count for any reason. Now you need 1/5 of each house (20 senators and 87 reps).

Any objection made by senators or representatives during the counting of the electoral votes must be made in writing and signed by at least one-fifth of the senators and one-fifth of the members of the House of Representatives. Previously, an objection required the signatures of only one member of each chamber.

The law also limits the grounds for an objection to one of the following:
  1. The electors of a state were not lawfully certified
  2. An elector's vote was not "regularly given”
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, GunCar Gary, ( ◠‿◠ ) and 8 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back