Live updates: Brush fire burns in Pacific Palisades as Santa Ana winds blast Southern California - Live video at link

It's okay they have insurance
They don't. One of the biggest horrors of the current crisis is wealthy elites revealing that the insurance companies voided their fire insurance/refused to insure new property over the last year on the download...

The Oscars ceremony this year is going to be the most insufferable one in history yet.
Unless the Hollywood elite come to think Trump and Musk caused the fire as payback for the years they've spent shitting on him and his supporters, at which point expect Hollywood's elite to suddenly get VERY VERY VERY quiet at the Oscars and other awards shows now that daddy is back and for there not to be another race to the bottom to shit on Trump.
 
Reading through the thread and here's a reminder for people who said this is what Californians voted for
View attachment 6837590View attachment 6837591
Same thing as in a lot of Blue States where certain parts dominate the rest so no not all of them did vote for it.

You are correct that not all of California voted for it, but your maps clearly demonstrate that Los Angeles county did vote for it with enthusiasm.

I do not cheer the destruction of people's homes and communities, but if it has to happen (and with the policies that have been implemented, it was always going to happen), then I would much rather it happens to the people who explicitly voted for it as opposed to those who did not.
 
No matter how much you Ghouls want it, Los Angeles nor California is going to be leveled to the ground by fire. Sorry to disappoint you. We know that if you were in charge, that there would never be any fires, and if there were any fires, why they'd be out in just a few minutes.

So cope, your dreams of California burning to the ground will remain science fiction.
 
The voters aren't retarded, they voted for the people who ran on fire prevention and "safety", but they did not follow through with the promises.
That is the whole point of the post you just quoted and then you pretended as if "people voting is the problem!!!!!".

The actual fire departments are not controlled by the voters, they are controlled by the local governments, county/city governments and are thereby indirectly impacted by elections, since who controls the government gets to influence the fire department, police department, etc.

Which is as it should be in a representative democracy.
The problem is that politicians lied and misrepresented their agenda, then prioritized diversity programs over keeping fire department effective, well funded and capable of dealing with what was to come.

Contrary to what people are saying, this kind of fire is absolutely not unexpected. Experts have been warning of this scenario for decades, especially with climate change the arid periods and draughts were predicted to increase massively, so it was only a matter of time. Yet, fire departments had funding cut, no new reservoirs were built, water infrastructure stayed trash. WHO THE FUCK STILL USES WATER TOWERS?

It is very clearly a systemic failure and that is 100% the responsibility of the governments and elected officials.
Every single diversity project that was funded was money that could have been used to improve infrastructure, upgrade equipment, hire more personnel. It is absolutely 100% warranted that citizens are upset about the failures of the government to predict and prevent this from happening, because EVERYONE knew it was going to eventually.

[EDIT] Cheering for the status quo burning down is absolutely warranted. Decades of mismanagement lead up to this. I do not think anyone is actually cheering for the death of humans, more for the death of the "Idea of California".
I am saying it's dumb to tie fire safety to elections because the general public is too dumb and too uninformed to vote on such important issues.
What do you think voters should vote for, the quantity of gay flags on local school? Politics _is_ about matters of life and death, if the voters are retarded, less of them is good.
The voters are retarded, I just don't think people should die for that. And I don't like to see Kiwis gloat at people dying horrific deaths.
 
Fire insurance has been pulling out of California for a while so it's likely that not even Hollywood had it.
Insurers have been pulling out of California as fast as possible.

I'm going to try to get this as succinct as possible while covering exactly how fucked this is.

PG&E is the California state energy monopoly. Minus a few areas that opted out when it was formed, they run power & gas for the whole west coast with a monopoly enshrined by law. This breeds the exact levels of incompentence you would expect. PG&E is a publically traded company so they do everything they can to siphon tax dollars to investors pockets instead of doing any sort of reinvestment. They are pretty close to a Captain Planet villain.

PG&E was paid tens of millions in grants to bury powerlines. They did not do this and instead paid that out as a dividend to investors/the board.

PG&E has been neglecting maintenance for decades but its gotten much worse in the past 10. They had a powerline that,due to lack of maintenance, fell to the ground and the sparks started a forest fire that burned out over a dozen towns - due to powerlines they got money to bury but didn't. The fire was absolutely massive. PG&E was brought to court, found guilty of felony murder, and set to have pay out something like half a billion in insurance payouts because they were responsible.

Newsom effectively pardoned PG&E for the fire, making it impossible for insurance companies to recoup the payouts from the responsible party.

Due to the California state govenrment willing to immunize guilty parties against paying damages (and other California crazy laws and regulations about sucking off troons and niggers) every insurance company possible has been evacuating the state. State Farm has straight up said they are not issuing new policies and any ammendment to existing ones they use as an excuse to cancel.
This has caused insurance rates to skyrocket, we're talking at least triple and that's IF you can find coverage.
And beause of the lack of nation-wide insurers, most of regional or state-only, there is a very real chance if hit with a lot of claims they will just say "we bankrupt" go out of business and MAYBE if you're lucky you'll get paid out 50% of what you were insured for.


What’s the scale of the eucalyptus issue? Could there be a program over say five years of uprooting them and destroying regrowth behind? Can goats be used to clear brush, even if it’s just in firebreaks?
Utterly massive. They are all through out the fire zone because that's what they + grow fast so they recolonize fast when there is a burn. Many of them are very hard to get to.

But the real issue is that Californians are fucking retards. They refused to allow hunting of invasive feral hogs that are destroying the forests iwth Typical Hog Behavior. They refuse to allow animal control to remove feral cats that are killing near-endangered wildlife. So when you mention "we are going to remove invasive eucalyptus trees" all the retarded Cali brain is "We are cutting down trees" and immediately screech and protest because the earth is sentient and alive and will take care of any issues or some hippy dippy bullshit.

This would also be very expensive and would take money away from the various grifting projects, especially laundering money to campain backers via programs for nogs and spics, so its a complete nonstarter.

Goats wouldn't be able to eat back the brush. The way the brush is supposed to be cleared back is fire, that's what the ecosystem is designed for. But Commifornians are too retarded and you have faggots in the mountains complaining about "muh views" or "too close to muh house" being too dumb to realize the fire is coming for their house, the only choice they get is when and how hot it'll be.

California is a paradise ruined by a mix of evil and stupidity. The fault needs to sheer about 12 miles and put LA & SF into the ocean.

Let me give
should we execute them and laugh about it?
1736422334079.gif
 
I am saying it's dumb to tie fire safety to elections because the general public is too dumb and too uninformed to vote on such important issues.
If the topic is important to voters, it is completely legit for a politician to run an election using it.
That they went back on the promises is the problem, not that voters decide who they vote for based on a topic that is important to them.

Accountability is the issue, not what people base their voting behavior on.
If those scumbag liars could be held accountable for what is happening right now, due to failing to uphold their election promises, then they would be less likely to run based on lies and deception.

Those locations with the current wind look suspiciously perfect to torch the city. Did they release any info on what caused the fires yet?
 
You are correct that not all of California voted for it, but your maps clearly demonstrate that Los Angeles county did vote for it with enthusiasm.

I do not cheer the destruction of people's homes and communities, but if it has to happen (and with the policies that have been implemented, it was always going to happen), then I would much rather it happens to the people who explicitly voted for it as opposed to those who did not.
I mean yeah but it's not like the fire is going to ask who you voted for before it burns your house down.
 
No matter how much you Ghouls want it, Los Angeles nor California is going to be leveled to the ground by fire. Sorry to disappoint you. We know that if you were in charge, that there would never be any fires, and if there were any fires, why they'd be out in just a few minutes.

So cope, your dreams of California burning to the ground will remain science fiction.
Jonah 4:11
Should I not have compassion on Nineveh, the great city in which there are more than 120,000 [innocent] persons, who do not know the difference between their right and left hand [and are not yet accountable for sin], as well as many [blameless] animals?
 
[EDIT] Cheering for the status quo burning down is absolutely warranted. Decades of mismanagement lead up to this. I do not think anyone is actually cheering for the death of humans, more for the death of the "Idea of California".
The status quo is enforced and supported by people. There are plenty of people cheering for Hollywood and everyone associated with it being burnt alive. Burning the idea of California changes nothing when all of those people move to Texas and continue to tell you to mutilate your children and worship niggers. One of the major reasons we're in the mess we are now is because the USSR collapsed without killing the ring leaders. They took their wealth and moved else where to continue to ruin people's lives. If they all burnt alive the world would be a better place.

Being an adult means you accept some solutions require death to resolve. The child traffickers in Hollywood aren't going to lose anything if their homes burn down. They will move to a new city, find new children to prostitute and still have billions in their bank accounts and stock profiles. Until they are dead they will continue to be a threat to children and nothing else can stop that.
 
Those locations with the current wind look suspiciously perfect to torch the city

I see we've entered the "How can we attribute this to direct malice?" portion of the disaster movie. Anyone who's paid any attention is aware that SoCal burns every couple of years in dramatic fashion because of forestry mismanagement and population creep. Nothing about this is unusual except for the severity of the Santa Ana's coupled with the La Nina dry winter causing this year's burning to spiral out of control in more populated areas. Normally, air drops and working Hydrants are enough to keep the hill fires at bay while only losing a handful of structures. I can't say much about the management of city infrastructure, but the actual firefighters are highly skilled at fighting the hill fires at this point. Without the winds and infrastructure failures, this would have been a non-incident.
 
Last edited:
Back