Horrorcow Tommy Tooter / Thomas Wasserberg - Dog-Abusing, Trash-Eating Pedo, Neo-Nazi, Fake Tranny, "1st-Wave Incel", Hounded YouTuber to Suicide

[Ultrapenguin]

what's hilarious is the idiotic conclusions you fetishistic fascist fucktards leap to. keep pounding those keyboards, fools. dig yourselves in good and deep. YT is already in negotiation with me and the complaint will be amended, properly citing the jurisdictions for the RICO-based criminal complaint against the allied web sites and their abusers starting with 18 U.S.C. § 249.

Translation:
"I got an automated response to my impotent whining, this multi-billion dollar company is on the ropes now!"

Tom you old retard we've genuinely been through the lolsuit arc now a bunch of times. It's incredible, you're somehow actually stupider and have worse pattern recognition than the dogs you rape.
Much like Tom can't accept he's a man, he also can't accept that the people making fun of him are in the right, both legally AND morally.

PS: An old white person trying to use the court systems (via his family's money) to intimidate or suppress people's freedom of speech? Sounds a lot like a fascist to me.

 

[Tragi-Chan]

It’s easy to just slough off the blathering of this mentally defective faggot as, well… the blathering of a mentally defective faggot. But when you really ponder it, he’s literally proposing that by not allowing him to bully and browbeat people into accepting his delusions as reality that they’re “inciting violence” against him. Of course he is an impotent blowhard, but he’s just one of a small but violent minority filled with people who would gladly visit violence against people who they can’t force to accept POZzed vileness.

Yeah, but when Tom does it, it’s funny. Most troons are at least a little subtle. Tom not only says the quiet part out loud, he does so through a megaphone.

 

[Sparkletor 2.0]

Tom, does your future husband who lives in a tent in your driveway know you are a woman? Cuz that dude looks gay as fuck. Petty sure he isn't into women. May want to let him know you are a chick before the wedding.

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

Bearable Thomas has been fighting legal battles against a vexatious hobo but tomorrow it goes away. And to celebrate, he will have a gift for you. Tune in around 11 am eastern time for a nice present

 

[Fred Herbert]

Is it possible for the courts to declare Thomas “dogfucking pedophile” Wasserberg a vexatious litigant in advance?

Not that the cowardly hobo will ever file, it would just be another amusing failure in his lifetime of miserable setbacks.

 

[The I Scream Man]

Is it possible for the courts to declare Thomas “dogfucking pedophile” Wasserberg a vexatious litigant in advance?

Not that the cowardly hobo will ever file, it would just be another amusing failure in his lifetime of miserable setbacks.

I mean he did file something already

 

[Tragi-Chan]

I mean he did file something already

When Tom files something, it is officially a pedo file.

 

[repentance]

Is it possible for the courts to declare Thomas “dogfucking pedophile” Wasserberg a vexatious litigant in advance?

Nah. He won't even get declared a vexatious litigant until he establishes a pattern of filing nuisance lawsuits. What the court can do, though, is dismiss his action with prejudice which means he can't refile it against the same parties on the same grounds.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

you bet your ass i can. i will also have evidence proving that i'm not SMI.

you've never seen me nude. i have always had gynecomastia and very smooth skin. i have medical documents to support the claim.

oh? what's this then?
A. Discrimination in places of public accommodation against any person because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin or ancestry is contrary to the policy of this state and shall be deemed unlawful.

HB2802 - 552R - I Ver - Arizona Legislature​

Accommodation isn't hate speech dumbass. Great use of that "150IQ".
Visit this site

https://www.lgbtmap.org/equality_maps/profile_state/AZ

head on down to the part that says "Criminal Justice Laws and Policies"
First part "Hate Crime Law Covering LGBTQ People"
Tell me what you you see under both Sexual orientation and gender identity. Then promptly kys for being a child molesting dogfucker.

That site even keeps track of things like HIV Criminalization laws and States that may require you to be on the sex offenders list if you got it.

 

[Pokemanifsmokeweed]

I'm not a "him" for starters. She or they please and my name isn't Tom or Thomas. Failure to respect that just adds fuel to the federal charge of gender-based hate speech.

Fun Fact: Mark Zuckerberg is lifting "hate speech" restrictions when it comes to the alphabet army. In more simple terms, that means that "John Doe the 3rd" can't get banned anymore for calling crazy cosplaying goblins like you "sir". Your thoughts?

what's hilarious is the idiotic conclusions you fetishistic fascist fucktards leap to. keep pounding those keyboards, fools. dig yourselves in good and deep. YT is already in negotiation with me and the complaint will be amended, properly citing the jurisdictions for the RICO-based criminal complaint against the allied web sites and their abusers starting with 18 U.S.C. § 249.

tl;dr your lolsuit will fail, keep going full stampy feet impotently, you catastrophically creepy crazy cartoon character villian from an 80s saturday morning cartoon

 

[Sparkletor 2.0]

I can imagine the judge listening to Tom try and say his reputation was ruined. Then the judge looks down at the pages and pages of Tom's multiple arrests and involuntary mental hospital visits.

 

[repentance]

tl;dr your lolsuit will fail, keep going full stampy feet impotently, you catastrophically creepy crazy cartoon character villian from an 80s saturday morning cartoon

He'll claim that it failed because of a psyop which has been in operation for the last 22 years.

 

[Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg]

Fun Fact: Mark Zuckerberg is lifting "hate speech" restrictions when it comes to the alphabet army. In more simple terms, that means that "John Doe the 3rd" can't get banned anymore for calling crazy cosplaying goblins like you "sir". Your thoughts?

I posted my thoughts on that earlier in response to the whining i was seeing from the queer community. You're free to spew whatever misinformed, bigoted nonsense your infantile broken brain compels you to express, fool. KF is a fringe cult of fetishistic fascist incels and old, stupid drunkards with very little reach and most of that is negative.
In order for speech to remain free, we must not restrict the expression of words that are offensive to underserved and marginalized minorities. One of the main reasons First Amendment speech protections are so broad is that the framers were confident that reasoning of the majority would squash extremist viewpoints. Minorities, particularly delusional sanctimonious hypocrites on the extreme left of the wedge issues, need to grow thicker skins and oil their backs better, while polishing their arguments.

The right is clinging to questionable scripture interpretation, obsolete biology, debunked pseudoscience and paranoid delusions on most issues involving the rights of body autonomy, same sex pairing and abortion. Fact based arguments put these people in their place neatly
.

Don't even engage the willfully stupid. Just block them. I feel like running off to the new hug box at Bluesky is just chickenshit. Do like my friends in the #FreePalestine movement have been doing for years. Set your profile to friends only and make your groups private. If you feel the need to confront haters do it in the comment sections of the influencers' posts.

tl;dr your lolsuit will fail, keep going full stampy feet impotently, you catastrophically creepy crazy cartoon character villian from an 80s saturday morning cartoon

that remains to be seen. it's getting amended tomorrow to clearly define that all i seek from you tube is to disable the channels.

He'll claim that it failed because of a psyop which has been in operation for the last 22 years.

25, but no I won't and i don't think it's going to fail. it's getting amended tomorrow or withdrawn and replaced with the amended claim.

 

[RollingRock2]

One day later and you realize you bungled your retarded lolsuit out of the gate. Guess you should've tried sobering up before writing a lawsuit. What a dumb old MAN! @Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg

 

[innocent jogger]

And we have a filed lolsuit vs YouTube

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/56439276/Wasserberg_v_Legal_Support_YouTube,_Google_LLC

View attachment 6837908

Has anyone told Russ Greer that A CHALLENGER APPROACHES?

 

[BlueArmedDevil]

define that all i seek from you tube is to disable the channels.

And when youtube tells you it's all fair use and charges you for the privilege of dismissing your case what will you do?

 

[Sparkletor 2.0]

And when youtube tells you it's all fair use and charges you for the privilege of dismissing your case what will you do?

Same thing we do every night,TRY AND TAKE OVER THE WORLD shit his pants and do nothing.

 

[Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg]

And when youtube tells you it's all fair use and charges you for the privilege of dismissing your case what will you do?

false light defamation is not first amendment protected. neither is gender-based hate speech, conspiracy, stalking, harassment or invasion of privacy. you tube isn't bloody likely to call that fan fiction fair use.

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

that remains to be seen. it's getting amended tomorrow to clearly define that all i seek from you tube is to disable the channels.

Yeah Tom, extort that billion dollar company through the courts. that won't blow up in your face

25, but no I won't and i don't think it's going to fail. it's getting amended tomorrow or withdrawn and replaced with the amended claim.

When have you ever been right about anything in your life?

false light defamation is not first amendment protected. neither is gender-based hate speech, conspiracy, stalking, harassment or invasion of privacy. you tube isn't bloody likely to call that fan fiction fair use.

Using the words you say in videos to point out what you are isn't false light or defamation. You have zero case

 

[repentance]

What a hill to die on.