Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

In typical Pat fashion, when presented with an opportunity to defend his convictions, he cowers like a beaten dog because his greatest retort of "Enjoy prison, stalker" is all the proof you'll ever need that Pat is a real-life tough guy and pundit totally not driven by his fragile, base emotions.

I would love to see Pat have an articulate debate about his beliefs without the name-calling and low blows, but he's incapable of civil discourse. I also think this is a mask for his hatred of people because he is universally rejected for being a terrible human being. His face reads of a fat, lonely pig. Now he's no more than a rabid hog rolling in his own filth, and that's all he'll ever be.
He has multiple reasons to avoid any discussion where he can't hide behind a block.
First, he is a narcissist and deathly afraid of public humiliation.
Secondly, he is a coward that roached out at every single instance when one of the stalkerchildren were even in the same building.
Thirdly, deep in his massive gut he knows that he is not nearly as smart and educated as he likes to believe and bluster about.

Honestly, most cows on this site could beat Patrick in a debate, including Chris-Chan, his superior in academic achievement, Tommy Tooter, DSP and Ethan Ralph.
 
You would think that Pat, being the political firebrand he is, would jump on the opportunity to get on a radio show and have a new audience hear him out. It means potential new followers, new fans, and more exposure.

The reason he waved that away, but did the podcasts, is because the podcast hosts offered him sympathy and (by his estimation) a safe place he could push his well-rehearsed narrative uncontested.

The radio show, on the other hand, would actually be asking him hard questions, be adversarial, but worst of all, it would be about something other than Pat's rehearsed personal history. How can he talk about his own brave stand against terrorists if he's brought onto the show to debate the host about Trump's eligibility?

So no child, Pat has no desire to go on your radio show.
 
and more exposure.
He's already exposed himself plenty, matter of fact I want him to expose himself less. I know they're Milwaukee police but even they don't deserve to be flashed while doing their jobs. Keep that robe closed!
GGZi0RlX0AAn6fp.jpg
 
Is there consensus as to why Titty Two Chins consistently denies easily verifiable facts? Of all his off-putting quirks, I find that one the most grating.
Because he can't let the Idiots win, obviously. But to answer your question, no, there isn't a consensus. There's two schools of thought:

1. He's just a liar who lies
2. Technicality Tomlinson (this school of thought attempts to recreate a lens through which all of his lies are truths, actually)
 
I used to think that technicality Tomlinson is what made all of his denials works but now anymore I'm convinced that when he can't find an out he just spouts wholesale lies. He's not above denying undeniable facts when it's a stalker child because they're idiots who cannot win. I don't think Leslie has ever stated any facts but I could be forgetting given how much she twists his tail. Although even if she referenced his police report he has a technicality out of choice (Rona doesn't exist. I apologized about wanting to kill my wife and kid therefore it's not real. Etc.)

I wonder if she pokes him about the cheese steak incident if he would give her the full denial or a "Your delusional beliefs are warped by the false persona your criminal allies have fed you. You are mentally ill Leslie. Seek. Help." The problem being there is no persona here. The report was taken by an officer from Pat's fish mouth.
 
The radio show, on the other hand, would actually be asking him hard questions, be adversarial, but worst of all, it would be about something other than Pat's rehearsed personal history. How can he talk about his own brave stand against terrorists if he's brought onto the show to debate the host about Trump's eligibility?
As soon as he's pressed he'll automatically turn into the lisping sassy Pat and make a spectacle of himself, it's a real pity he won't go on because the amount of Patposters born when they hear that voice coming through their radio would be immense.







 
He's not above denying undeniable facts when it's a stalker child because they're idiots who cannot win. I don't think Leslie has ever stated any facts but I could be forgetting given how much she twists his tail.
She makes him oink daily with facts.

'They do gang up on him! They highlight his many misogynistic and homophobic tweets. They call him fat and remind him he has no parental rights to his daughter. They pick on his simplistic political takes' - Queen Leslie (L) (A)
 
Does he have three tits like Ethan Ralph was revealed to have?
No, but he does have 3 sets of articulated appendages and a low blood sugar problem.
89393caa68f74b14a2081cc97ba388d7.png


In another news:
CallingAllHeroes-Ruth2-650-3332485634.png
Screenshot_20250110_120406_Brave.jpg


Edit to avoid double posting:

Gentlemen, did everybody remember to bring your own Oik Counter? Good we'll need them.

Pat will deflect this as a win because Trump takes office as a felon, but be assured, in reality he's fuming. To him, that label just makes every Trump supporter that much more evil. So I expect MANY prisonings today.
Screenshot_20250110_122249_Brave.jpg
:woo:
 
Last edited:
Is there consensus as to why Titty Two Chins consistently denies easily verifiable facts? Of all his off-putting quirks, I find that one the most grating.
I used to follow a modified Technicality Tomlinson view, where niggling over details allows him to get a "victory" even when he's losing. So, for example, if he was at Chubby's to pick up a to-go order for his wife's gas suppliers, then he can get a "win" by saying he's never eaten there.

But more and more I'm starting to think that attributes too much intelligence to the fat retard.

Has he received his cope programming update on the universal discharge? I'm waiting here, people, I ain't got time for this shit I need that rickyviews direct in the vein!
 
I used to follow a modified Technicality Tomlinson view, where niggling over details allows him to get a "victory" even when he's losing. So, for example, if he was at Chubby's to pick up a to-go order for his wife's gas suppliers, then he can get a "win" by saying he's never eaten there.

But more and more I'm starting to think that attributes too much intelligence to the fat retard.
Sure, the obvious answer is that he's a big fat liar who will say anything at all to prevent the idiots from winning. But I choose to believe that Patrick is chugging around the city in Lazy Susan, his V6 Rustang, picking up DoorDash orders into the wee hour of the morning. He tweets at the funsters while he waits for the orders, then eventually trundles home and sleeps on the couch until 2pm. And in the afternoon he puts on his maid uniform, grabs his plunger, and heads next door to clean up Niki's AirBnB.
 
Back