- Joined
- Mar 6, 2023
Can't wait to read the next Diary entry. You just know that shits gonna be spicy.
Dammit nick, we keep losing literally everything! Again!
Dammit nick, we keep losing literally everything! Again!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seems to be a matter of preference. I've known people who literally never practiced law but maintain a license for whatever reason. It's probably a better practice to deliberately go on inactive status but since most people neither know nor care what your status is, it really doesn't matter much.yes, i found that surprising too. is it possible some of these are recently retired and their continuing education credits lapse on purpose? not sure about the process when lawyers retire.
I'm pretty sure he isn't able to hold himself out as authorized to practice law and that it would constitute UPL if he did in fact do so and someone took him up on the offer.Technically he is still a licensed lawyer, and is still required to make payments. He just can't practice until he becomes in compliance with the rules
Coping, seething, DENIED, FORECLOSED, UNAUTHORISED.Technically he is still a licensed lawyer, and is still required to make payments. He just can't practice until he becomes in compliance with the rules
View attachment 6842305
I thought the Riley case was dismissed? Take for grain of salt cause some of the writing in the document sounds weird, but I saw this posted from Hack the movies the other day and they are someone close to that friend group of vito and masterson.Well, I wouldn't call a person who has been disqualified from practicing law for failing his legal education to testify on anything law related, but that might just be me.
He also does the same with children as the subject.He sure talks a lot about sex with other dudes
It is still pending, and no dismissal was grantedI thought the Riley case was dismissed? Take for grain of salt cause some of the writing in the document sounds weird, but I saw this posted from Hack the movies the other day and they are someone close to that friend group of vito and masterson.
View attachment 6842324
So how does this affect his ability to testify as an expert witness in the Riley vs Eric July case? I don’t think cocaine or balldos were involved so other than a lawyer I’m not sure what sort of expertise he can provide
If I recall correctly, he actually has that house he hasn't lived in for years declared as his homestead, and has never declared the house he currently lives in (and is being foreclosed upon) as a homestead.
(a) Exclusion
Gross income shall not include gain from the sale or exchange of property if, during the 5-year period ending on the date of the sale or exchange, such property has been owned and used by the taxpayer as the taxpayer’s principal residence for periods aggregating 2 years or more.
26 U.S.C. § 121
The legislative history demonstrates that Congress intended the term “principal residence” to mean the primary dwelling or house that a taxpayer occupied as his principal residence. Nothing in the legislative history indicates that Congress intended section 121 to exclude gain on the sale of property that does not include a house or other structure used by the taxpayer as his principal place of abode. Although a principal residence may include land surrounding the dwelling, the legislative history supports a conclusion that Congress intended the section 121 exclusion to apply only if the dwelling the taxpayer sells was actually used as his principal residence for the period required by section 121(a).
...
The section 1034 regulations reinforce our conclusion that to obtain the benefits of former section 1034, a taxpayer who sells a dwelling must have actually used it as his principal residence.
...
Our conclusion regarding the meaning that Congress attaches to the terms “property” and “principal residence” in section 121(a) is also consistent with caselaw interpreting former section 1034, as in effect before its repeal. This Court held that in order to qualify under former section 1034, a taxpayer had to sell a dwelling that he used as his principal residence.
In Hughes v. Commissioner, 54 T.C. 1049, 1050, 1970 WL 2241 (1970), affd. per curiam 450 F.2d 980 (4th Cir. 1971)... [t]his Court disagreed with the taxpayers and held that they were not entitled to the exclusion because the dwelling that was used as their principal residence was never sold or disposed of as required by former section 1034. Id.
In O'Barr v. Commissioner, 44 T.C. 501, 1965 WL 1178 (1965)... this Court stated that “The only logical interpretation of section 1034 is that it will only apply in situations where a taxpayer has disposed of his old dwelling.” Id. at 503. Because the taxpayers did not dispose of their dwelling, the Court concluded that former section 1034 was inapplicable. Id. Other cases have followed Hughes and O'Barr. See, e.g., Boesel v. Commissioner, 65 T.C. 378, 390, 1975 WL 3198 (1975) (essential element of a residence is the dwelling, not the land on which it is situated); Hale v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.1982–527 (“The sale of a taxpayer's residence requires the sale of a structure which is used as a principal place of abode, and we have held that the sale of land without the structure does not constitute a sale of a residence within the meaning of section 1034.”).
Gates v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 135 T.C. 1, 10-13 (U.S.T.C. 2010)
I think they had to re-file or something. It's still on!I thought the Riley case was dismissed? Take for grain of salt cause some of the writing in the document sounds weird, but I saw this posted from Hack the movies the other day and they are someone close to that friend group of vito and masterson.
View attachment 6842324
God damn, how deep does this government conspiracy go? They even own the bar association.
I had a joke about the McCoys in my first draft, lol. I deleted it because I wasn't sure that the non-Americans here (a surprisingly high number, seemingly) would understand the Civil War reference.What's with Hatfields starting shit with everyone? First Hatfields & McCoys .... Now Hatfields & Rekietas.
Looks like the squad of bottom feeding scum are up to their usual gayops.I thought the Riley case was dismissed? Take for grain of salt cause some of the writing in the document sounds weird, but I saw this posted from Hack the movies the other day and they are someone close to that friend group of vito and masterson.
View attachment 6842324
Meigh logged off, changed her kid's name, escaped the ragepig, and seems to be trying to de-cow herself. So kinda, yeah. Which is bonkers. If Meigh is better than you at anything, pull up, PULL UP!>meigh is a better mother than kayla rekieta
Imagine if he put the same level of logistics planning into cleaning his shower as he did into being a cuckold.Thank you this goes with my theory that nick wanted the renter gone because they were too plugged into his social life/community and would get in the way of being a degenerate
If you have a favorite porn star, it's time to pull up.talking about his favorite porn star
Nick is the kind of "straight" misogynist that loves anal because women hate anal. I can't get over how much this dickhead hates his wife.he mentioned that she doesn't do enough anal for his tastes
Yes, I agree. He's an absolute and utter retard. The only reason he did something this dumb was he is completely incompetent at life.Its also stupid on his part because he gets the tax benefits of the homestead on the property taxes of the house of lesser value (and a lesser amount of property taxes to pay). They wouldn't go after him because he is only hurting himself by doing it.
So nick years ago in like 2018 gave a lecture on the topic of MAP.If you have a favorite porn star, it's time to pull up.
Oh, but not trains? You need to turn in your autist card immediately.I'm the "I like planes and cars and guns" autism, not the "I count everything" autism.
And for some reason, his favorite porn stars (why does anyone even talk about their favorite porn stars in public that is weird) resemble underage boys.He also does the same with children as the subject.
This is misleading, as people who have been reading the relevant thread will be aware, since a dismissal has been requested by the state. This case is over.It is still pending, and no dismissal was granted
Eric July was a witness, not a party, so he wasn't wasting any of his money. Eric appears to have been very in favor of Riley facing consequences for as long as Eric didn't have to do anything publicly at all.Looks like the squad of bottom feeding scum are up to their usual gayops.
Even if it's dismissed, it's not a W. It only means Eric July would rather not waste time and money on pursuing this fat midget. Just slap them with a mutual no-contact and get this gay shit over with. That's the ideal outcome for both. In my opinion.
I assume to tell the jury how much of Nick's cum Aaron felched.I am curious what exactly they plan to say though.
I don't think it's very misleading considering that is what the post I quoted showed. I just provided context that it wasn't granted yet.This is misleading, as people who have been reading the relevant thread will be aware, since a dismissal has been requested by the state
More into tanks than trains. But I didn't feel like editing and putting another "and" with it.Oh, but not trains? You need to turn in your autist card immediately.
And for some reason, his favorite porn stars (why does anyone even talk about their favorite porn stars in public that is weird) resemble underage boys.
Do you really think he was going to get on the stand and lie and claim to be actually afraid of a piss smelling midget retard? Was he supposed to commit perjury? Because there is no way he was remotely afraid of that midget.Like Aaron with Melton, Eric July hasn't played this well at all, as he's appeared to place his self-conception of being a tough guy online first.
And it's obviously not true, and even more weirdly and funnily, is intensely to his disadvantage. I don't think he even thought about county property taxes, because he's literally retarded, because whatever advantage that might have had, homestead status actually has some importance in the foreclosure situation.He did continue that false classification for county property tax purposes, but that wouldn't affect the outcome for income tax purposes, where the test would be a totality of circumstances showing that the sold property was in fact occupied and used by the taxpayer as the primary place of abode:
Fun fact, the Hatfields and McCoys are now on pretty good terms, and hold an annual reunion.I had a joke about the McCoys in my first draft, lol. I deleted it because I wasn't sure that the non-Americans here (a surprisingly high number, seemingly) would understand the Civil War reference.