Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The fuck does McDonalds have DEI programs for??
"Can you work a deep fat fryer?"
"What? Sir, I'm a huge nigger."
"You're hired!"
Interesting. Justin Trudeau also isn’t going, but Alberta premier Danielle Smith is.
You don't think the Romans are desensitized and need help with killing? The Roman propaganda machine does nothing but promote military service and make their enemies subhuman.This has no relation to guns at all. If Ancient Rome had violent video games and a government propaganda apparatus like we do, then violent first person sword games where you stab Persians and Germanic tribals would be just as effective at desensitizing people to killing as Call of Duty is.
No because you're not the one in control.So could watching news recaps of shootings in urban areas. So could watching horror movies. Your point?
The irony is that the second line used to hate and mock the first line for those takes back in 2006.First it was the Evangelicals and geriatric activists and politicians hating on video games for them being violent, satanic, pornographic, and causing school shootings and delinquency.
Then it came the feminists and journos hating on video games for them promoting misogyny, the male gaze, troonsphobia, homophobia, and racism.
I hate to hit you with reality but, yes, he is wrong. Even if it is making us desensitized (it's not. Society is just emasculating you) it's not the same as nor is it training you to kill people "mentally". 100 years ago you would have had to butcher your own food for meat desensitizing you to blood and taking a life. Are you saying butchering your food is training you "to kill people mentally".He's not wrong.
Violent videos games desensitizes people.
That why I was suprised when the internet including streamers that should know better (like Kino Casino who have been following politics for years) started celebrating and pissing on his grave. Justin will be looking for ways to hold on and make a political comeback. The only good outcome imo would have been if somehow the election was called.Sadly, he “intends to resign”, the fucking weasel.
Part of it is just video games being the newest form of media - before it was vidya, it was comics, and before comics (or contemporary), it was rock and roll, and before that it was talkies... and so on. It just so happens that video games have more or less settled down as the oldest "new" type of media, since VR is hilariously janky.There is something about video games as a form of media and entertainment that always makes certain demographics of different generations cope and dilate over their existence and popularity, and I'm not really sure why, they will just constantly come up with new excuses to justify why they hate vidya.
I went to a rodeo in Texas a few years ago and to my surprise there were quite a few Canadians in the show. All of them were from Alberta.Makes sense since she's going to be the governer of the US territory of Alberta
I don’t really know why this is a bad word, honestly. I thought this was just about putting robot parts in people, I kinda like that idea. I would like a sweet robot arm.transhumanist
"making something look cool" is not an elaborate psyop, it means to sell product. fun fact, an army recruiter is gonna say enlisting is the fucking greatest thing ever, just as the hot-dog stand at the corner talking about his wieners.If soy infused modern media puts Redditors in a worldview that makes them think Trump is Hitler, it isn't far fetched to think ZOG uses similar tools to manipulate less than genius young men to go die for Israel.
yeah, no. fiction isn't reality and never will. some retards will be retarded, because that's just human nature, they don't need any fiction for that. it's also the reason vegans can eat meat in videogames.He's not wrong.
Violent videos games desensitizes people.
Tulsi Gabbard changes tone on surveillance powers she once sought to dismantle
President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to serve as director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, is voicing support for a key government surveillance authority she once sought to dismantle.
The shift comes amid lingering uncertainty about Gabbard’s path to confirmation despite her having spent the last several weeks meeting with senators on both sides of the aisle in an effort to win their support.
In a new statement to CNN on Friday, Gabbard said she will support FISA Section 702 — an intelligence gathering tool passed by Congress after September 11, 2001 — if confirmed as Trump’s spy chief, marking a dramatic shift from her previous attempts to repeal the same authority and comments raising deep concerns about domestic surveillance.
“Section 702, unlike other FISA authorities, is crucial for gathering foreign intelligence on non-U.S. persons abroad. This unique capability cannot be replicated and must be safeguarded to protect our nation while ensuring the civil liberties of Americans,” Gabbard said in the statement to CNN.
“My prior concerns about FISA were based on insufficient protections for civil liberties, particularly regarding the FBI’s misuse of warrantless search powers on American citizens. Significant FISA reforms have been enacted since my time in Congress to address these issues. If confirmed as DNI, I will uphold Americans’ Fourth Amendment rights while maintaining vital national security tools like Section 702 to ensure the safety and freedom of the American people,” she added.
Gabbard also met Friday with the current director of national intelligence, Avril Haines, according to a source familiar with the matter, who declined to provide additional details about what was discussed.
The meeting comes as Senate Republicans have been pushing to hold a confirmation hearing for Gabbard before Trump’s inauguration, but Democrats are resisting setting a date for next week as the Intelligence Committee has not yet received key paperwork on the nomination, including an FBI background check, two sources familiar with the matter previously told CNN.
Trump’s selection of Gabbard to run the Office of the Director of National Intelligence quickly drew scrutiny because of her relative inexperience in the intelligence community and her public adoption of positions on Syria and the war in Ukraine that many national security officials see as Russian propaganda.
But where she is perhaps most at odds with the agencies she may soon be tasked with leading is her distrust of broad government surveillance authorities and her support for those willing to expose some of the intelligence community’s most sensitive secrets.
Gabbard’s confirmation would make her the most markedly anti-surveillance official to lead the intelligence community in the post-9/11 era. Her previous animus toward what she has described as the “national security state and its warmongering friends,” hell-bent on using the Espionage Act and other tools to punish its enemies, has raised questions about whether she might seek to reshape the rules by which American intelligence agencies have been collecting, searching and using intelligence for decades.
In December 2020, shortly before she left Congress, Gabbard introduced legislation that would repeal the Patriot Act and Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Like her other legislative attempts on spying issues, it went nowhere.
But Gabbard’s disdain for government surveillance powers — and her aggrieved sense that Americans have been lied to about those authorities — are among her most coherent and consistent national security positions, even as Gabbard has transformed from a Democratic congresswoman and presidential candidate to a potential Cabinet member in the new Trump administration.
In 2017, when Trump was challenging the credibility of the FBI’s investigation into his campaign’s ties to Russia, Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer warned him: “You take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.”
Gabbard, then a Democrat, heard a “chilling message,” she wrote in her memoir: “The intelligence community and national security state are so supremely powerful and accountable to no one that even the president of the United States better not dare criticize them.”
Punchbowl was first to report Gabbard’s statement regarding FISA Section 702.
Call of Duty Endowment (C.O.D.E.) Bowl V, Presented by USAAName me an example where Call of Duty tried to recruit its fanbase for the military.
Let me see here....Bioshock Infinite is the most "Stereotypical Dumb Liberal" game ever made.
I remember it started the “pseudo-narrative dissonance” crap because “the story is deep but you spend so much time killing” which was annoying as fuck.Bioshock infinite was seen as a deep intellectual game upon release. i only played it a year after it came out.
Of all provincial territories, Alberta would be your best bet but it’s just not feasible.I went to a rodeo in Texas a few years ago and to my surprise there were quite a few Canadians in the show. All of them were from Alberta.
I think Alberta joining the Union would be good for the people living there. The U.S. government isn't as gay as Canada but it is still really gay. The big difference is that as a U.S. state Albert would have far more local control.
Honestly, of course they'd do this. They cause problems, then profit from them. Never let a crisis go to waste.View attachment 6847851
There are some things you do where you just go to hell and this is one of them.
Okay i want to see how many people signed up for the meat grinder because of this event.The Army won the biggest military esports tournament in the world, a hope for the service’s recruiting efforts as they try to meet more of Gen Z where they’re at: online gaming.