Mike Peinovich / Mike Enoch & The Right Stuff (therightstuff.biz) - Lazy Podcasting Clique, Pepe the Frog Fetishists, Doxed by /pol/, Fed Honeypot for Gullible Neo-Nazi Conspiracy Theorists.

[GameratePTSD]

(The argument being colonization is morally justified because the indians weren't particularly numerous or civilized)

European colonialists went into savage demon-worshiper lands and built schools, hospitals, museums. Jews are going into evacuated Palestinian homes and rifling through drawers so they can sniff Arab women's underwear. It's not comparable.

(The right argument is colonization is good when White people do it and Jews doing it is bad, because they’re Jews).

That's a valid and coherent position to take. Other races and white leftists deep down believe "it's ok when we do it". They're not going to be swayed by having a consistent principle that colonialism is always okay. Your opinion can just be, "yeah when we settled these countries it was good and what Israel is doing is bad." You don't need to justify your own interests by justifying the interests of your enemies.
If you're just trying to make the point that we shouldn't lose sight of Might Makes Right, I get that.

 

[American Castration]

(The right argument is colonization is good when White people do it and Jews doing it is bad, because they’re Jews).

>"The right argument is circular nonsense that I think makes whites sound tough and cool."

You're not tough and cool. You don't live by "the law of the jungle" (which is actually, "Eat and sleep", not "Subvert and torture neighbors") and, if mankind did live by "the law of the jungle" as you mean it, a dozen Tyrones would be feasting on your fatty liver right now, as their children barbequed your blubbery flesh for sustenance.

 

[Hungry Wes Borland]

you have no idea what moral legitimacy you give to people who want to exterminate Whites if you argue the Jews are in the wrong.

As if spending paragraphs psychoanalyzing interracial cuckolding wasn't enough, we are routinely treated to kneeslappers like this one. This is a thread for gossip and watching lolcows, not pathetically incessantly trying and failing to convince WNs Israel's cause is our own.


We got the message, bro. You're a Jew AND a sperg. You can leave us alone now.

 

[Ishtar]

European colonialists went into savage demon-worshiper lands and built schools, hospitals, museums. Jews are going into evacuated Palestinian homes and rifling through drawers so they can sniff Arab women's underwear. It's not comparable.

Any leftist or brown will bring up any number of real, exxagerated or false tales of White people doing atrocities to the indigenes. The argument "we brought civilization" is explicitly identified in anti-colonial sources as "this is how the colonizers justify their crimes, which are never justifiable".

That's a valid and coherent position to take. Other races and white leftists deep down believe "it's ok when we do it". They're not going to be swayed by having a consistent principle that colonialism is always okay. Your opinion can just be, "yeah when we settled these countries it was good and what Israel is doing is bad." You don't need to justify your own interests by justifying the interests of your enemies.

My beef with TRS is they seem to have internalized the same position as people posting about "Turtle Island" on twitter. That is-colonialism itself is an intolerable injustice and can only be remedied by righteous violence against an oppressing race/class.

I realize this may seem remote or abstract-but when White people are a minority, in twenty years-what is to stop the Hispanic/black/brown effluvia from adopting the "oppressed indigenous" identity and arguing White people have no place on the continent?

If that happens, TRS will have done the White race a great blow.

 

[Elm Sinclair]

If that happens,

Nothing ever happens.

TRS will have done the White race a great blow.

Nothing TRS does makes any difference one way or the other.

 

[Ishtar]

Nothing ever happens, but the great replacement, which now is unfortunately a done deal.

I suppose that’s why all we can do is laugh at TRS retards.

 

[Burned Legate]

Nothing ever happens, but the great replacement, which now is unfortunately a done deal.

I suppose that’s why all we can do is laugh at TRS retards.

I wouldn't say done deal quite yet. Pretty much everywhere you look the youth is getting more right-wing.

Does this mean the DR will get what it wants? Not necessarily, but as the liberals die and are replaced by a right-wing youth the opposition they face from the powers that be will push them further right. Nothing is better at creating extremists than liberals.

The question at hand is whether they can be replaced by their governments fast enough, or further more, whether they'll fight if that influx of shitskins gets too excessive.

There is literally no benefit to being blackpilled, just a loser ideology. Are we going to unite with Arabs and nuke Israel off the map to rule the world together? No. But are we out of the game yet? I wouldn't say so.

Nobody is going to get exactly what they want, but what matters at the end of the day is survival.

 

[I'm a Silly]

The natural baseline of repulsion a White baby has at seeing a black face tells me that every contact made between "indigenous people" or African slaves and Whites was sponsored/forced/coerced economically on us. That's why I reject anticolonial arguments. It's like the weird proposition that eebul not-sees allegedly made personal bathing soap out of people they hated so much.
The fact that there are "people" in any given White country within shooting or stabbing distance of any White target is evidence that White countries are colonized by jews just as much as Palestine. It isn't the colonization. It's just the jews.

 

[Konstantinopel Retaker]

Nothing ever happens, but the great replacement, which now is unfortunately a done deal.

I suppose that’s why all we can do is laugh at TRS retards.

Nope. Things were worse in the past. Back then, White countries were actually conquered and not "soft" conquered like some countries are today.
On the other hand, today Moike exists; so it might actually be over for the huwhite race.

Also, TASOWN sucks without Hans. It's just this strange amalgamation of shitposting now. The best episode they did was the first one on HT. There was actual structure there.

 

[Rick Nekieta]

The natural baseline of repulsion a White baby has at seeing a black face tells me that every contact made between "indigenous people" or African slaves and Whites was sponsored/forced/coerced economically on us. That's why I reject anticolonial arguments. It's like the weird proposition that eebul not-sees allegedly made personal bathing soap out of people they hated so much.
The fact that there are "people" in any given White country within shooting or stabbing distance of any White target is evidence that White countries are colonized by jews just as much as Palestine. It isn't the colonization. It's just the jews.
View attachment 6852630

Yes it does. The actual stats regarding numbers of slaves and Jews doesn't add up to 78% of slave owners being Jewish. Even the "40% of Jews owned slaves" could not have been true after the 1840s when the bulk of Jews were Ashkenazis, many of modest means, living in the North. I can believe the 40% of Jews owned slaves only when the average Jew was a Sephardic merchant in Charleston or Richmond or Memphis and there were only a few thousand of them in the whole US. But Jewish numbers rapidly increased during the 1840s and slavery was illegal in states these Jews settled.

There were 394,000 slaveowners in the US in 1860 and 150,000 Jews. That alone disproves the assertion 78% of slaveowners were Jews. South Carolina for instance had only a few thousand Jews but over 26,000 slave owners. So you're pretty clearly factually wrong on many levels.

I don't have a dog in this fight and I don't ascribe to the levels of anti-semitism often found on these boards, but perhaps it is a poorly cited claim where the claimant meant to imply that 78% of slaves had a Jewish master, insofar as there was no limit on how many slaves one man could have. I am not making this assertion, merely thinking that the 78% statistic might have applied to a different metric and measurement.

Even if my guess is correct, the initial claim is extremely poorly thought out for the reasons you mentioned.

The meme is not correct. There are many apt criticisms of the tribe, but that stat is very wrong.

 

[The Hardest R]

The meme is not correct. There are many apt criticisms of the tribe, but that stat is very wrong.

Post the correct one then.

 

[Rick Nekieta]

Well, there were about 150K Jews in the U.S., 25K of which were in the Confederacy. I do not know how many Jews were in Delaware, Kentucky, Maryland, and Missouri, where slavery was still legal.

The confederacy’s 11 states had 316,632 slave owners out of a free population of 5,582,222. The same census puts them at about 3 million slaves.

The union had just shy of 640K slaves in the four aforementioned states in 1860. I do not know the sum Jewish population of these four states in 1860 but it was about 85K in 1899. It is POSSIBLE that 78% of UNION slaveowners were Jewish IF the average slave to slaveowner ratio were around 10 to 1, as per the phenomenon one sees in the south with the average slave owner having nearly 10 slaves AND god damned near every Jew in that state were a slaveowner, as there were clearly less than 85K Jews in those four states at that time. This falls apart because even someone with 30 slaves and a family of six, means the average member of that family would still be at 5* slaves per person, well under the average of 10 per slaveowner. Even if a family was a heavy owner of slaves, they are all considered the property of the patriarch and even if entire families share in the ownership of slaves, the records only ascribe them to one party, so even if every Jew had access to slaves, only a fraction of them would be categorized as "slave owners", again making it mathematically impossible.

The 1860 census data is available for anyone who wants to find the right data.

I do not doubt that Jews were overrepresented by a large margin in 1840-1860, when compared on a per capita basis, but the ridiculous stat being presented is not even within the realm of possibility. Even the steelmanned assessment that possibly 78% of Union slaveowners were Jewish does not pass muster. It is POSSIBLE that 78% of Union slaves were owned by a Jewish master, but I am not asserting that and you'll have to comb the records yourself. I am merely noting that I do not doubt overrepresentation, but the levels being asserted are just categorically impossible.

 

[I'm a Silly]

This might not help, but I was looking for the '78' and got here so far:
https://archive.ph/qMA7o = but with comments: https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/article-721645

https://web.archive.org/web/20160402043817/http://radioislam.org/islam/english/toread/who_brought_slaves_to_america.htm

which came from https://www.reveddit.com/v/Discussion/comments/w88f0e/at_the_height_of_american_slavery_78_of_slave/ | archive

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

Here's the thing since me and Mike no longer have a mutual friend because our mutual friend doesn't associate with him because he considers him now a scumbag I'll just say it Mike pinevich is completely and utterly disgusting in fact and the last time I was hanging out with him he literally ate an entire bowl of tortilla chips in front of me and then passed out the lawn chair.

Also he tried to keep getting me to join the NJP and I told him to get bent.

No he's not Jewish Mike is 100% a filthy gory you sound disgusting now and I would not have sex with him.

If you're gonna ask for proof I don't take pictures and I don't record people and I don't do any of those things other people know I do 'cause that's scummy and underhanded.

To be completely honest spend is actually the more intelligent one who is more fun to hang out with and talk about music and metal.

I feel bad for anybody who paid for the inner circle treatment I got it for free I generally be just being a nice guy and having a good mutual friend with him I'm still friends with our mutual friend Mike I was never particularly friendly with I mean I knew the guy and the guy knows of me.

But we are really not friends.

And strikers 100% of coke addict from what everyone told me

 

[FightenGnome]

No he's not Jewish Mike is 100% a filthy gory you sound disgusting now and I would not have sex with him.

> Would not have sex with him

Do you have something you'd like to share with the class?

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

> Would not have sex with him

Do you have something you'd like to share with the class?

No just a common Internet joke you're fat and ugly and I would not have sex with you

 

[Burned Legate]

Shit. Reports in the news of a ceasefire in Gaza; I put all my chips on Palestine killing literally every Jew and saving America.

 

[Ash Gassem]

I wouldn't say done deal quite yet. Pretty much everywhere you look the youth is getting more right-wing.

Does this mean the DR will get what it wants? Not necessarily, but as the liberals die and are replaced by a right-wing youth the opposition they face from the powers that be will push them further right. Nothing is better at creating extremists than liberals.

The question at hand is whether they can be replaced by their governments fast enough, or further more, whether they'll fight if that influx of shitskins gets too excessive.

There is literally no benefit to being blackpilled, just a loser ideology. Are we going to unite with Arabs and nuke Israel off the map to rule the world together? No. But are we out of the game yet? I wouldn't say so.

Nobody is going to get exactly what they want, but what matters at the end of the day is survival.

"The great replacement" is but a smaller effect of a larger problem. Namely, that all this great tech and "civilization" seems to kill reproductive rates dead (and the planet besides). Even India is below replacement now. No one has an even remotely plausible solution to this problem that doesn't involve growing babies in artificial wombs and/or merging with machines, either of which would fundamentally transform what it means to be human beyond its already bloated boundaries.

Changing the trajectory we're on would involve reducing the human population to probably less than 1/5th its current level, which is obviously politically impossible, and in any case would involve suffering almost beyond comprehension for those who lived to carry on the species. So there's that.

 

[Grog]

"The great replacement" is but a smaller effect of a larger problem. Namely, that all this great tech and "civilization" seems to kill reproductive rates dead (and the planet besides). Even India is below replacement now. No one has an even remotely plausible solution to this problem that doesn't involve growing babies in artificial wombs and/or merging with machines, either of which would fundamentally transform what it means to be human beyond its already bloated boundaries.

Changing the trajectory we're on would involve reducing the human population to probably less than 1/5th its current level, which is obviously politically impossible, and in any case would involve suffering almost beyond comprehension for those who lived to carry on the species. So there's that.

There doesn't need to be a solution to something that, really, isn't a problem. Reproductive rates aren't going to go down continually until human extinction. As less people populate a country, more resources are available such as housing and jobs, and more families will begin to be formed naturally.
The real problem is wanting to interrupt this natural process that takes place over generations by importing infinite browns that are supposed to keep the line going up forever.

 

[The Hardest R]

The Judeo-capitalist system requires big line to go up in perpetuity or else the whole system falls apart because we can never realistically service the insane amounts of debt we’ve accumulated. The lower worldwide birth rates is a threat to that because importing Muhammad and Ubungu means they can be issued hundreds of thousands of dollars of gibs and debt. However this is totally at odds with the Neomalthusians who want zero or negative growth and want to target their political enemies first but it’s generally accepted that the future is living in pods and eating bug paste except for a small elite who can continue to do whatever they want to do.

Neither path is sustainable and the end game for either path is mutually exclusive. I’m not one of those zero hedge dorks that think collapse will happen tomorrow but unless we have some kind of insane energy or food production breakthrough, the current system will fall apart at some point. Right now the powers that be are doing what they can to pull the ladder up. If the system will collapse, they still want to be the ones to play leading roles in the next phase of this dead and gay earth, not unlike former Eastern bloc communists who are now leading center-right parties.